SUG614-Chapter 2 - Sounding PDF
SUG614-Chapter 2 - Sounding PDF
SUG614-Chapter 2 - Sounding PDF
Sea bed
Bathymetric data produced by Single Beam Echosounder System (SBES) Bathymetric data produced by Multibeam Echosounder System (MBES)
Water Surface
Transducer
COVERAGE 100%
Interferometry
The angle as function of travel time (Excluding the
possibility of different angles corresponding to a single
travel time)
Basic Beam Forming
What is a “Beam”?
•y = r sin θ
•d = r cos θ = -z
• r : range
• θ : beam angle
MULTIBEAM SYSTEM
• Multibeam system is manufactured
consisting of the following parts:-
•Acoustic data processor
•Control Display
•Multibeam transducer array
•Sound velocity probe (depending on type of multibeam)
• Acoustic Data Processors
– The heart of multibeam system
– The processor has to process a huge amounts of data
• Control Display
– Used to change the settings of the multibeam.
– The reading from the multibeam will be displayed as well as the status
of the multibeam
• Transducer
– Multibeam transducer arrays can be subdivided using a number of
parameters such as frequency, number of beams, beam angle and
maximum depth rating.
– All these parameters influence the size of the transducer.
– Apart from size, multibeam transducers can be divided into flat arrays
and round arrays.
– Main advantage of the round array is that there is a direct relationship
between the position of the receive element of the transducer and the
beam number.
FLAT ARRAY
VS
ROUND ARRAY
Contd…
– When using flat arrays, phase detection is used to electronically detect
the beam number based on the returned signal.
– The wavelength of the signal depends on the frequency and speed of
sound, sound velocity probe is used to correct for the differences in
sound velocity at the receive head.
– Depending on the type of multibeam, the transmit and receive array
can either be separated or combined.
• Peripherals System
– In order to operate a multibeam system, a number of other systems
are required as listed below:-
• Motion sensor for measuring heave, roll and pitch
• Gyro compass for measuring yaw angles
• Positioning system
• Acquisition software
• Sound velocity probe for measuring the speed of sound at different depths
Typical MBES
Receiver
Acoustic Data/Sonar Processor
Installation
• Swath sounder are generally used to create DTM with a very
high accuracy.
• Therefore a number of requirements have to be met.
• Amongst others is the installation of the swath sounder.
• In general the installation requirements for a swath sounder
are the following:-
– Sounder should be aligned as accurately as possible with the horizontal
and vertical axis of the measurement platform.
– Sounder should be installed as far away from equipment that generates
noise e.g. single beam e/s operating at the same frequency, engine etc.
– Multibeam is mounted deep enough below the water level so that will
not come above the water level during operation in normal wave
conditions.(between 0.5 to 1m below the water level when operating
inshore and > 1m below the keel when operating offshore.
Contd..
– Sounder should have a free field of vision over the entire swath range
and not be obstructed by the hull of the measurement platform.
– The position of the swath sounder in relation to the other survey
systems should be determined as accurately as possible. (offset)
– Although the mounting of the transducer is generally dictated by the
type of survey, consideration should be given to the fact that the
mulitbeam constructions does not hinder safe operation of the vessel.
Installation
Sonar mounting
• Side mounting
• Bow mounting
• Moon Pool mounting
• Hull mounting
Side mounting
http://www.chustzsurveying.com/
Side mounting
Advantages
• Easier to install
• Head can be brought up when not in use.
• Portability
Disadvantages
• Very susceptible to vibration and noise.
• Possible damage from other vessels and shoal
areas
• Harder to maintain multibeam calibration
Bow mounting
http://www.maine.gov/
Bow mounting
Advantages
• Far from noise.
• On center line of vessel, lever arms may work
better.
Disadvantages
• In rough seas, pitch motion can cause problems
• Being on the bow, less protection for the sonar
head.
• Can be harder to install.
Moon pool mounting
Moon pool mounting
Advantages
• Combines a hull mounted with recoverable mount.
• Very little of pole is required to extend below the hull,
so usually very strong and free from pole vibration.
• Can be installed on the centre line of the vessel.
Disadvantages
• Require a vessel that can be modified for a moon pool.
• Usually more costly to install.
Hull mounting
Hull mounting
Advantages
• Attached to the hull so usually very strong and
free from pole vibration.
• Can be installed on the centre line of the
vessel.
Disadvantages
• Require a vessel that can be modified for a
moon pool.
• Very costly to install.
• Vessel need to go for dry dock for mantainace
Calibration – using the Patch Test
• This slide will explain the calibration of swath sounders using
a technique called Patch Test.
• It is a method of using a specific patch of bottom for
determining the alignment of the swath sounder.
• This technique which is described below is commonly used
with multibeam software.
• Before doing a multibeam calibration, all other additional
system should be calibrated in advance.
• Speed of sound profile also should be measured in the area
where the patch test will take place.
3. MOUNTING ANGLE ERROR
• Altitude sensor were installed and offsets were measured
whilst the vessel was alongside at quayside. The calibration
ideal be done during the calm weather or less movement
at the quayside.
• Motion Lever Arm Offsets were set into the altitude sensor
unit or into the acquisition software.
Example summary of result mounting angle error
MBES Calibration
(Patch Test)
PURPOSE
• Patch test is a method of using a specific patch of bottom for
determining the alignment of swath
* Latency (time) errors should be solved by the TTL device (or PPS device)
Figure of sailing
pattern for Patch
Test
Results of wrong mounting offsets
• Roll
- Both tilted but under opposite
angle
• Pitch
- Both with slope in different
place
• Yaw (Heading)
- Results looks the same as the
pitch error
• The following parameters can be determined using the patch
test:
– Latency between positioning system and swath sounder
– Roll offset of sounder
– Pitch offset of sounder
– Yaw offset of sounder
• An area with a slope and reasonably flat area should be used
in order to execute a patch test.
• The slope should be 1:2 and 1:5, while the flat area should be
as deep as possible.
• In order to determine all four parameters, a minimum of four
lines should be sailed over the slope/flat bottom combination
A slope and flat area
• The following combinations of lines are used to determine the
parameters:
– 1+2: Pitch determination on the slope. Roll determination on the flat
parts. An error in the pitch offset will display a shift of the measured
slope between the two sailed lines. An error in the roll offset will show
as an angle between the two measured bottoms.
– 1+3: Latency determination on the slope. Latency will show as a shift
in the measured profile between the slow and the fast line.
– 2+4: Yaw determination on the slope. An error in the yaw offset will
show as an angle in the top view of the measured slopes.
Coverage
• The achieved coverage when using swath sounder depends
on the used sensor. The following sensor parameters
influence the achieved coverage:
– Swath sector
• The larger the swath sector, the wider the area cover
with one sailed line.
– Beam angle
– Maximum update rate
Singlebeam vs Multibeam
DATA COMPARISON
SBES VS MBES
DESO25 FS20
File Size 20KB 1.8MB
Soundings 399 49,000
Swath width Single line 95m
MBES
SBES SOUNDING LINE LAYOUT
5
10
15
20
20
Advantages
Shipping Channel
Advantages
Shipping Channel
Compare to the single beam lines which run across the channel, the
traffic in the channel will disturb the survey. However, with
multibeam survey the traffic are not a problem.
MULTIBEAM SURVEY
Advantages
SBES DATA
MBES DATA
Water Surface
Transducer
COVERAGE 100%
▪ It must provide for the delineation of the topography of the seabed in the
most economical and expedient manner.
▪ When it has been completed it must ensure that there is very little
possibility that dangers to navigation will have been overlooked.
SCALE OF SURVEY
In general the scale on which the survey is conducted is dictated by a
combination of the nature of the bottom, the general depth, and the
complexity of the area.
LINE SPACING
The direction of sounding lines should aim to satisfy the following criteria.
Lines should be run:
▪ at right angles to contours, and
▪ at right angles to coastlines.
However these may conflict with:
▪ the best direction for Side Scan Sonar,
▪ other sounding requirements, and
▪ navigational safety.
The above are guidelines, not rigid rules. It may be necessary to compromise
over conflicting requirements, for example, running lines parallel to contours
for boat's safety.
FIXING INTERVAL
Generally the fixing interval should be as short as possible and the boat's
speed as fast as possible, so long as it does not exceed the limits of
carefulness.
Manually plotted fixes should be spaced between 10-25mm apart on the fix
plot.
CROSSLINES
Crosslines are lines of soundings run at an angle (generally about 90°) to the
normal lines in a sounding plan at intervals of 20 times the line spacing of the
main line soundings.
Crosslines are run for the following reasons:
▪ to provide a check against work which has already been carried out,
▪ to define a contour line accurately, where for some reason the normal lines
fail to do this, and
▪ to define a shoal more fully than can be done by interlining normal lines of
sounding.