K. O'Halloran: Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVES. Continuum, 2004

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

REVIEWS 335

Washbrook, D. A. 1999. ‘Orients and occidents: Colonial discourse theory and the historiography of the
British Empire’, in R. Winks (ed.): The Oxford History of the British Empire, Volume V: Historiography. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 596–611.
Wertsch, J. and K. O’Connor. 1994. ‘Multivoicedness in historical representation: American college
students’ accounts of the origins of the United States’, in J. Wertsch (ed.) Special Issue on Historical
Representation, Journal of Narrative and Life History 4: 295–309.

K. O’Halloran: MULTIMODAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: SYSTEMIC

Downloaded from http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/ at The Univesity of Calgary on May 4, 2012


FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVES. Continuum, 2004.

As the title of this book promises, it offers an in-depth exploration of a


variety of texts and discourses from a multimodal systemic functional
perspective. Each chapter offers a grounded approach to a particular aspect of
multimodal discourse analysis. The chapters socially situate the text(s) being
discussed to make connections across the design (social organization) of a
text, a culture’s knowledge of itself and the world. The book focuses on the
multimodal research of colleagues at the National University of Singapore,
much of which is influenced by the theoretical work of Michael O’Toole.
This makes a good contribution to understanding how multimodality is being
developed differently within different contexts.
The book is organized into three sections, each of which attends to the
question of how to research the configuration of modes in a particular
medium: the first section is concerned with ‘three dimensional material
objects in space’, the second with ‘electronic media and film’. Leaving the
more traditional medium to the last, the third section is focused on ‘print
media’. Each of these sections consists of three research-based chapters
that offer a detailed multimodal analysis of a ‘text’. Each section also
develops and extends systemic functional theory by its application beyond
the linguistic.
Chapter 1 by O’Toole opens the first section on three-dimensional material
objects in space. He stretches the three Hallidayan semantic meta-functions
(Experiential, Interpersonal and Textual) over the Sydney Opera House in
search of a grammar of architecture which will help him better understand
architectural practices as they are located socially. In Chapter 2, Pang offers
a multimodal analysis of an exhibition titled ‘From Colony to Nation’ at
the National History Museum of Singapore. The author uses a systemic
functional approach to explore the construction of historical discourses.
Safeyaton Alias presents a semiotic study of Singapore’s Orchard Road and
the Marriott Hotel in Chapter 3 in order to examine the physical instantia-
tion of economic and political discourses.
Section two deals with electronic media. This section opens with Baldry’s
discussion of an online computer-based system, the Multimodal Corpus
Authoring system. Baldry examines the organization of phases and
336 REVIEWS

transitions within car advertisements—as a type of film text—with a view to


identifying typical (gendered) patterns and functions in the multimodal
realization of meaning. In part this focus relates to the reconstruction
of the generic structure of film genres with a stress on multimodal
components (incl. the rhythm of a film, its use of visual components, the
sound track, etc.), all of which interplay to realize the meaning of a text).
In Chapter 5, O’Halloran explores the potential of video-editing software for
multimodal analysis, with an example analysis of two short extracts from
Polanski’s film Chinatown. Bringing systemic functional theory together with
film theory, she proposes the use of computer technology for the semiotic

Downloaded from http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/ at The Univesity of Calgary on May 4, 2012


analysis of dynamic visual imagery in visual meaning making. In Chapter 6,
Kok offers a theoretical model of hypertext constructions of reality and
meaning. The model is demonstrated by applying it to the analysis of the
website of Singapore’s Ministry of Education.
The third and final section concerned with print media opens with
Chapter 7 by Cheong Yin Yuen. This chapter concentrates on the construal
of ideational meaning in print advertisements and aims to contribute to
the development of a theoretical framework for looking at adverts that
incorporate visual and linguistic elements. Guo Libo examines aspects of
multimodality in a biology textbook in Chapter 8 with a focus on schematic
drawings and graphs and how meanings are instantiated in linguistic and
visual semiotic resources. In the book’s final chapter, Lim Fei sets out to
develop an integrated multi-semiotic model for understanding how meanings
are realized in the interaction of linguistic and visual semiotic resources.
This edited volume shows the great potential of linguistic tools and
practices when taken and reshaped for use in a multimodal context. At the
same time, it highlights some of the potential constraints of doing so. One of
these is the utter intensity of the research process when research efforts are
expanded across more than one mode. I also think that the scale and level
of analysis, when one moves from linguistic text to the (literally enormous)
Sydney Opera house, might demand some further thinking. In any case, one
of the ways in which the book extends systemic functional analysis is by
questioning and challenging what is a text. A narrow linguistic definition
of text is imploded from the outset by O’Toole’s analysis of the Sydney Opera
House in Chapter 1 (p. 11).
As in language, the Collocational potential of architectural elements—
their Conjunction in rooms and floors and buildings, their Reference to each
other and to their environment—is what makes them into coherent and
usable ‘texts’.
The book expands the notion of text in an exciting way to include specific
buildings, urban landscapes, film, hypertext, alongside the more prosaic
inclusion of print adverts and textbooks. The volume thus highlights the
potential of new ways of looking at the world as well as the usefulness
of tools that have been around for some time in helping us to do this.
In this way, this edited volume serves to extend the theoretical tools of
REVIEWS 337

systemic functional linguistics as well as the scope of linguistic research


objects.
The book’s connection with linguistics is clear and as such it might be
more immediately appealing to some linguists than some other books on
multimodality. In this way the book offers a specific way into multimodality.
It builds on the tools of systemic functional linguists and is therefore useful
to those linguists with knowledge of systemic functional grammar who
want to broaden their scope to the multimodal without feeling that they
need to learn a completely new analytical process and language. The book is
also ‘gentler’ on linguistics than some other publications in the domain of

Downloaded from http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/ at The Univesity of Calgary on May 4, 2012


multimodal inquiry, in that it continues to accord a central place to language
and maintains the analytical language of linguistics. The assumption of some
knowledge of a systemic functional approach may pose a problem for
some readers (especially those less familiar with a Hallidayan framework).
However, I think it is a bold (and ‘right’) editorial move to make
multimodality the starting point and to downplay the need to sketch the
whole history of systemic functional linguistics prior to the multimodal turn.
The overall structure of the book works well and the introduction is useful
in mapping why this publication is needed now. The book does, however,
sweep across a large and varied terrain and I think it could have been
structured a little more to help the reader navigate the ideas it collects up.
For example, short introductions to each of the sections would have been
welcome, as I thought there was much to be said about the ideas that ran
across each section and nowhere to say it. Similarly, a conclusion would
also have been useful to tie some of the threads woven across the chapters
together into bundles of ideas—especially a conclusion that establishes
connections rather than one that bangs the nail in the discursive coffin.

Final version received March 2006


Reviewed by Carey Jewitt
Institute of Education, London, UK
doi:10.1093/applin/aml002

J. Gibbons and E. Ramı́rez: MAINTAINING A MINORITY


LANGUAGE. A CASE STUDY OF HISPANIC TEENAGERS.
Multilingual Matters, 2004.

Maintaining a Minority Language by J. Gibbons and E. Ramı́rez explores


Spanish language maintenance among second-generation Hispanic teenagers
in Sydney, Australia. The book brings together five semi-independent studies
that measure proficiency and examine societal, interpersonal, and attitudinal

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy