Title: Impacts of Communication To Employee Performance In: Trade Project
Title: Impacts of Communication To Employee Performance In: Trade Project
Title: Impacts of Communication To Employee Performance In: Trade Project
PAPER NO :
INDEX NO. :
CENTER CODE :
INSTITUTE.
i
DECLARATION
Declaration by the Candidate
This research project is my original work and has not been presented to any other examination
body. No part of this research should be reproduced without my consent or that of OL’LESSOS
TECHNICAL.
SIGN………………DATE…………………………..
Supervisor.
NAME: MR KOECH
SIGN ………………………DATE……………………
ii
DEDICATION
I dedicate this research project to my beloved parents and my beloved friends for their financial
and moral support throughout my study.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to acknowledge the efforts made by my research supervisor Mr. Koech for his
guidance. I also acknowledge my classmates.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION..............................................................................................................................i
DEDICATION................................................................................................................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT..............................................................................................................iii
ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................viii
CHAPTER ONE..............................................................................................................................1
1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Statement of the Problem...........................................................................................................2
1.3 Objectives of the Study..............................................................................................................2
1.4 Research Questions....................................................................................................................3
1.5 Significance of the Study...........................................................................................................3
1.6 Scope of the Study.....................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER TWO.............................................................................................................................5
LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................................................................5
2.1 Internal Communication............................................................................................................5
2.2External communication: Client-centered communication........................................................7
2.3 Positivism, Modernization & Behavior Change Communication.............................................8
2.4Towards a New Paradigm.........................................................................................................10
2.5Constructivism, Sustainability and Empowerment Communication........................................11
2.5 Communication for Social Change..........................................................................................15
2.7Criticisms of Participation and Emerging Approaches............................................................16
2.7Capacity Development..............................................................................................................17
2.8The Nature of Organizations....................................................................................................18
2.9Individual Learning..................................................................................................................18
2.10Power, Knowledge and Mental Models..................................................................................20
CHAPTER THREE.......................................................................................................................22
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY.........................................................................22
3.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................22
3.2 Research Design......................................................................................................................22
3.3 Target Population.....................................................................................................................22
Table 3.1: The Target Population..............................................................................................22
v
3.4 Sample Size and Sample Design.............................................................................................23
3.5 Data collection Instruments.....................................................................................................23
3.5.1 Questionnaires......................................................................................................................23
3.5.2 Interview Schedules..............................................................................................................23
3.6 Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments....................................................................23
3.7 Administration of Research Instrument...................................................................................24
3.8 Data Analysis...........................................................................................................................24
CHAPTER FOUR.........................................................................................................................25
DATA ANALYSIS PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION............................................25
4.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................25
4.2 Return Rate..............................................................................................................................25
4.3.0 Demographic Information....................................................................................................25
4.3.1 Gender of Respondents.........................................................................................................25
Table 4.1 Gender of the Respondents........................................................................................26
4.3.2 Age Bracket of the Respondents...........................................................................................26
Customers......................................................................................................................................27
4.3.3 Respondents Level of Education..........................................................................................27
4.3.4 Employee Job Designation in the Company.........................................................................28
4.3.5 Working Experience of the Respondents and Period of being Employees..........................29
4.4 Specific Information................................................................................................................31
4.4.2 Employees Attitude Variable................................................................................................32
4.4.3 Implementation Frequency of New Communication..........................................................32
4.4.4 Response on how Employees Attitude has influenced or Affected Communication..........33
vi
4.4.5 Effects of Employee’s Attitudes towards implementation of Communication Performance
.......................................................................................................................................................34
4.4.6 Challenges Facing the Organization in Managing Employees Attitude towards
implementation of effective Communication...............................................................................35
Table 4.11 Challenges Facing the Organization in Managing Employees Attitude towards
Communication..........................................................................................................................36
4.4.8 Analysis of the Interview Schedules.....................................................................................38
CHAPTER FIVE...........................................................................................................................40
5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................40
5.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................40
5.2 Summary of the Findings.........................................................................................................40
5.2.2 Bio-data of the Respondents.................................................................................................40
5.2.2 Elements of Employees Attitude..........................................................................................41
5.2.3 Features or Factors Associated With Employees Attitude on implementation of
communication..............................................................................................................................42
5.2.4 Implementation Frequency of New Communication..........................................................42
5.2.5 Response on how Employees Attitude has influenced or Affected New Communication. .42
5.2.6 Effects of Employees Attitudes on Communication Performance.......................................42
5.2.7 Challenges Facing the Organization in Managing Employees Attitude towards
Communication..............................................................................................................................42
5.2.8 Strategies of Marketing Communication in areas with Employees Attitude towards
Communication..............................................................................................................................43
5.2.9 Employees Response............................................................................................................43
5.3 Conclusions..............................................................................................................................43
5.4 Recommendations....................................................................................................................44
5.5 Suggestions for Further Study.................................................................................................44
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................45
APPENDIX I.................................................................................................................................47
QUESTIONNAIRE.......................................................................................................................47
APPENDIX III...............................................................................................................................50
BUDGETING................................................................................................................................50
vii
viii
ABSTRACT
Communication has crucial impacts within or among workgroups in that organization
communication can be a channel to flow information, resources, and even policies. Given the
importance of organization communication and its managerial impacts, further research is
needed to explore this topic as it relates to the public administration field. The study focused on
the effects of non monetary incentives on Employees performance in Imenti North. The
objectives of the study were, to identify the types on effective communication used at Imenti
North West District Headquarters, to establish the contribution of communication on employee
motivation in Imenti North , to determine the effects of effective communication on Employees
performance at Imenti District and to explore the challenges faced by Imenti North District in
using non monetary incentives. The study adopted a case study in collecting data. The study
target 60 a total population of 60 employees. The researcher used simple and stratified sampling
techniques. Data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed through descriptive
statistics. Data was presented in frequency tables and percentages. The study established that the
major types of communication used in the Kenya power company. The benefits of effective
communication is motivating employees, provide immediate recognition to the employees, it
recognizes employee contributions and it develop one’s full potential. The major effects include
it enhances improved organization performance by employees since employees tend to like their
jobs, it increases employee trust and thus enabling the public receive services without bribing, it
leads to organizational unity and corporate responsibility towards customer service and it
enhances employee job satisfaction hence reducing cases of favourism. The major challenges
faced by Kenya power management on effective communication are some employees do not
have positive attitudes towards effective communication. It is difficult to establishing
performance standards thus applying effective communication is difficult and it may be
expensive for the organization to apply it. Based on the findings the researcher recommended
that there is need to adopt effective communication in order to effectively improve employees
performance hence increase their productivity. Further study should be carried out to determine
the effects of effects of effective communication on employee performance.
ix
x
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
Communication has crucial impacts within or among work groups in that organizational
communication is a channel to flow information, resources, and even policies. Organizational
communication can be broadly defined as communication with one another in the context of an
organization (Eisenberg & Goodall, 1997; Shockley-Zalabak, 2006).
This type of communication, in turn, includes activities of sending and receiving messages
through various layers of authority, using various message systems, and discussing various topics
of interest to the group we belong to or the company we work for. Organizational
communication research has mainly been conducted both in the business management field and
in the communication field; however, researchers in the public administration field have
provided little knowledge about organizational communication and its roles and effects. Several
studies emphasize that effective communication can enhance organizational outcomes (Garnett,
Marlowe, & Pandey, 2008; Pandey & Garnett, 2006).
Communication can influence on the perceptions and opinions about persons, communities,
organizations, governments, and even society. One of the outcomes of administrative
communication is related to the flow of information, regulations, policies, and procedures. As a
managerial tool, communication is frequently expected to share information with members, to
coordinate activities, to reduce unnecessary managerial burdens and rules, and ultimately to
improve organizational performance. While the literature is contributing to establishing an
understanding of how the context of the organization influences communication processes and
how the nature of communication differentiates it from other forms of organizational behavior,
theoretical and empirical work still remains to be done to answer how organizational
communication operates in public and nonprofit organizations and how it influences managerial
issues and outcomes. The goal of this study is to develop and test an exploratory model of
communication and its impact on red tape, one of managerial issues, in public and nonprofit
1
sector. The next section explores organizational communication in more detail and summarizes
the current state of knowledge about it.
d) To identify out the challenges faced by Royal Prince Hotels Limited in implementation of
2
effective communication.
a) What are the types of communication used at Royal Prince Hotels Limited ?
d) What are the challenges faced by Royal Prince Hotels Limited in using non monetary
incentives?
On the other hand, there is a growing interest and attention on the use of communication.
Especially in private sector organizations, it starts to be pronounced louder and there is a wide
literature on their incredible influence in obtaining highly motivated employees. Despite the
overwhelming research on the effects of communication in private organizations, few researchers
have investigated the case for public organizations. Particularly in Royal Prince Hotels Limited,
the literature on the motivation of public employees as well as the effects of communication is
quite inadequate.
3
There is hardly any research on these topics. Thus, the significance of this study is that it sheds
light on what kinds of communication the public employees in Royal Prince Hotels Limited
value most and it tries to explore the attitudes of employees towards communication incentives.
The findings of this study will also be of great importance to other scholars who wish to extend
their study in the topic of effective communication in the organization it will provide a very
useful source of literature review
4
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
First, downward communication means the flow of information from superiors to subordinates
and it is a dominant channel in accordance with formal communication networks.
Garnett (1992) identified four roles of downward communication: conveying a vision,
communicating to motivate subordinates, providing feedback on subordinates’ performance, and
assigning tasks and conveying task-related information. Likewise, Katz and Kahn (1966)
indicate five types of downward communication, including job instruction, job rationale,
procedures and practices, feedback, and indoctrination of goals. In most cases, task-related
messages, such as goals, disciplines, orders, policies, and directions, are dominant. Goldhaber
(1993) indicates two intriguing points of downward communication: message overload and
filtering.
He mentioned “in one organization most of the employees, after eight months of receiving
countless messages every day, began to throw every message into the wastebasket before reading
it” (p.156). Thus, downward communication can cause message overload to individuals,
especially subordinates who usually receive messages, and it leads them to avoid receiving
messages from supervisors, senders. O’Reilly (1980) has empirically proved the relationship
between information overload and organizational satisfaction and performance. He found that
perceived information overload is associated with lower performance but higher job satisfaction.
On the other hand, filtering means that messages have chances to be changed or distorted during
5
their travel from top to down within an organization due to “number of links in a network,
perceptual differences among employees, and lack of trust in a supervisor” (p.157). Managerial
over control results in internal rules and red tape, as Bozeman (2000) mentioned: “Managers’
responsibilities for obtaining organizationally sanctioned objectives necessitate developing tasks
and rules ensuring that subordinates will take coordinated action to achieve the objectives”
(Bozeman, 2000, p. 95).
Finally, horizontal communication indicates the lateral exchange of information, which flows in
accordance with the functional principle among people on the same level within an organization.
Upward and horizontal communication is emphasized for employee satisfaction (Miller, 1999).
However, upward communication could be another instrument to control and regulate
subordinates, as Shermerhorn, Hunt, and Osborn (2005, p. 298) mentioned: “upward
communication keeps higher levels informed about what lower level workers are doing, what
their problems are, what suggestions they have for improvements, and how they feel about the
organization and their jobs.” When the upward communication channel is formalized and
becomes a mandatory burden that employees should do, upward communication can cause
administrative delay of the subordinate’s job duties and make them perceive more red tape.
With this in mind, Internal communication usually occurs in the context of internal processes
where most rules, regulations, procedures, and constraints emerge, develop, and exist. In this
context, downward and upward communication within the organization could make employees
feel so many burdens on the job that they may want to throw emails into a wastebasket. Thus, I
hypothesize that internal communication is likely to be positively associated with the red tape
perception.
6
2.2 External communication: Client-centered communication
External communication processes link multiple organizations and connect the organization to its
environment. Organizations exist amidst a complex web of relationships among multiple
audiences, which Grunig and Hunts (1984) described as components enabling the environmental
sector that controls the allocation of authority (governments, regulatory agencies); the functional
sector (suppliers, employees, employees); the normative sector (trade association, professional
organizations); and the diffused sector (local community, media). Thus, at the inter
organizational level of research, communication is understood in the network relationship.
The network property of strength refers to the frequency and length of interactions among linked
individuals. Strong links communicate more frequently than weak links and usually have longer
periods of interaction. External communication can also be divided into several types in
accordance with the target groups. There are, for instance, external communication types with
clients, with private companies, with political parties, with nonprofits, with government
agencies, and so on. Among them, this paper focuses on client-centered communication in terms
of increased emphasis on improving citizen-centered public service delivery. In light of the
interest in the public and nonprofit sectors, a starting point pertains to the concept of client. For
the public organization, client means its publics, particularly the clients who are recipients or
targets of policy programs and other stakeholder citizens. Nonprofits in the United States,
defined under the federal tax code, serve a broad public purpose. Charitable and religious 501(c)
(3) organizations and the social welfare 501(c)(4) organizations make up the majority of the
nonprofit sector. Other types of tax exempt organizations such as business leagues 501(c)(6), and
social and recreational clubs 501(c)(7) primarily serve their members. Thus, client for the
nonprofit sector means mainly the general public, particularly their members of the organization.
Farace, Monge, and Russell (1977),
All kinds of external communication can actualize through individual organizational members’
activity. In general, the boundary spanners who serve to link an organization with its
environment and transfer information across organizational boundaries , play meaningful roles
for both their own organization and external organizations, (Miller, 1999; Tushman
& Katz, 1980).
7
Boundary spanners can be both filters and facilitators by selecting, transmitting, and interpreting
information. Thus, peripheral public or nonprofit managers frequently contact clients, answer
their requests, exchange representative information with them, collect their feedback, and
transmit it to the core, Aldrich and Herker (1977).
Miller (1999, p. 258) also attempts to provide three major functions of external communication:
coordinating inter organizational relationships; creating and maintaining organizational images;
and providing employees services.
8
Dominant in academic circles between 1945 and 1965, the modernization theory of development,
which has grown out of positivist thinking, is based on the idea that employees cultures, often
characterized by authoritarianism, in-fighting, low levels of individualism, resistance to
innovation, limited control over their environment, and a lack of formal institutions, are at the
root of underdevelopment (Rogers 1969).
The answer then, is the application of Western neoclassical economic development models to
help post-colonial states to “catch up” with Western progress in their economic growth, political
systems, education levels, and life expectancy (Rostow 1960; Huntington 1971). Because of this
context, communication for development interventions have their roots in post-World War II
international aid programs as a way to get the necessary modern information to developing
country populations in order to change their attitudes, ideas and values and therefore their
behavior (Melkote 2003). Information was seen as the basis for development and crucial to
creating the necessary social environment for development to succeed. At this time it was
thought that a country’s level of development could be measured not only through gross national
product (GNP) but also in part through the depth of mass media penetration (Waisbord 2001).
This view of development has, in turn, informed several communication theories: diffusion of
innovation (Rogers 1969, 1995), social marketing (Kotler & Roberto 1989, Walsh et al. 1993)
and “edutainment” (Bandura 1977). In their early forms and in many cases into the present, these
strategies are delivered as a mass one-way transfer of information from those who have it to
those who do not. They are often delivered as organized communication campaigns directed at a
selected audience for a period of time in order to reach a specific set goal (Snyder 2001). This
“transmission” model assumes that unless there is something wrong with the channel (poor radio
reception, bad printing, noise, etc) that the person receiving the message will get the exact
information that the communicator intended them to have (Leeuwis 2004).
9
2.4 Towards a New Paradigm
As dominant development theories began to receive widespread criticism for their Western
biases and top-down approaches (Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation 1975; Frank 1966; Haq 1976),
in the mid-1970s several of the main thinkers from the modernization school of communication,
such as Rogers (1976), began to publicly recognize the cultural biases that had shaped early
thinking in diffusion of innovations, social marketing and edutainment theories (Huesca 2003).
This shift in thinking was in large part due to the poor results and lack of change that both
development in general and behavior change campaigns in particular were bringing about
(Waisbord 2001). In particular, communication practitioners began to notice that even in cases
where the message appeared to be received by the target populations without any problems, often
the intended meanings were not conveyed and the expected changes in conduct did not occur
(Leeuwis 2004).
Because of this, some of the basic guiding premises of the modernization theory began to be re-
examined (Dube 1988; Spybey 1992). One idea that faced reexamination was that societies are
fair in their distribution of resources to all individuals and groups and that all people, with just a
little help and their own effort, can share in these resources. This assumption led to the idea that
people who do not possess the resources or the proper attitudes to participate fully in society
need to be helped and taught news skills. This “victims blame hypothesis” fell apart as large
sections of the world continued to experience a state of underdevelopment in spite of receiving
much aid (Melkote 2003). Similarly, critics in Latin America noted that the outcomes of
development projects often coincide with interests of the elites, indicating that development
cannot be attained through simply helping the individual without addressing societal power
structures (Huesca 2003).
Power imbalances were also linked to ownership of the communication channels. As mass media
become more prevalent in most countries around the world, the impact of communication
messages should be increasing. However, as Gumucio Dagrón points out, in Latin America, “the
higher concentration of media houses in fewer hands has resulted in a loss of diversity and
quality programming…local programming on social issues has disappeared from private
10
television, leaving room for all kinds of low level and bad taste entertainment that sells well”
(2003; 2). This results in a dearth of socially positive messages and an abundance of simplistic
content that often contains violence, stereotyping, racism and sexually promiscuous behavior
(Waisbord 2001).
Researchers such as Buchanan et al. (1994) and Röling (1988) began to advocate for a renewed
focus on the process of communication and for using the specific local socio cultural context as
the basis for designing intervention strategies. Because of these shifts in thought, modernization
theory-based communication models are slowly being adapted to become more compatible with
communication theories that focus on participation, social change, learning and empowerment.
In this view communication serves to actively construct meaning rather than merely convey it.
Since there are multiple versions of reality depending on who is asking, observing and
interpreting, people often have conflicting goals, attitudes, values, aspirations and standards, the
negotiation of which can be observed in the interactions between people in any community,
organization or household. Human contact and communication are therefore continuous
opportunities for any combination of struggle, negotiation, accommodation or agreement (Röling
1994). Because of this, new theories of development and communication hold that there are no
universal approaches to creating change that can work in all situations (Huesca 2003).
While both development and communication theories were undergoing changes before the
constructivist paradigm became wide-spread, this paradigm has contributed to the shift in the
11
goals of development that has occurred over the past thirty years. Dependency theories that
emerged from Latin America in the mid 1960s, argued by authors such as Baran (1957), Frank
(1966) and Escobar (1995), posit that the source of the problems lies in the very concept of
development that uses the West as its de facto model, the history of global and local politics,
colonial relationships, and the manner in which colonized countries were integrated into the
world economy. Dependency theorists do not believe that lack of information is at the root of
development problems, but rather that underdevelopment is a direct consequence of the level of
development in the Western world (Hornik 1988).
In development theories in general, there is growing recognition that the focus must shift to
meeting human needs and fostering environmental sustainability rather than securing rapid
economic growth or blindly following a Western model of development. According to Engel
(1997), this type of development can only be achieved where people have worked out ways to
live with each other; in fact, adequate social organization maybe a prerequisite for sustainable
development. Many new road maps for development including the United Nations’ Millennium
Development Goals call for a restructuring of political and economic systems for a more
equitable distribution of benefits, personal and communal freedom from oppression, and
empowerment (Melkote 2003).
The new focus on learning and social and structural change began to evolve into a branch of
development theory in the 1970s that called for participation of the people in defining, analyzing
and coming up with tactics for addressing their problems. Development planning processes
underwent a transition from a reliance on blue-prints designed in a central office or implemented
in another part of the world to more process orientated situation-specific approaches (Korten
1980). Some development workers began to claim that participation in decision-making is a
basic human right and one that can only be carried out through on-going communication
(Melkote 2003).
Participation theorists such as Beltrán (1976), Díaz Bordenave (1977), and White et al. (1994)
also criticized modernization approaches for confining local people to the role of passive
receivers of messages telling them what to do rather than active participants capable
12
of shaping their destinies using their own knowledge. This lack of participation is seen as the
principal reason behind the failure of many communication interventions, which has led to some
measure to the abandonment of communication for persuasion models.
The emphasis on media penetration as an indicator of development ignored questions about who
owned the channels of information and controlled access to what could be said on them. These
critiques imply that what is necessary in development is not more information but rather social
and structural changes in order to redistribute access to power and resources (Waisbord 2001).
Paulo Freire (1921-1997), an educator who worked on literacy projects in slum areas of Brazil
during the 1960s and 1970s, has been one of the most influential thinkers in the areas of popular,
informal empowerment communication, with what he calls conscientization: the development of
a critical consciousness that has the power to transform reality. Freire viewed most development
projects as superficial, authoritarian and in opposition to the interpersonal communication
processes that can help people to develop a critical perspective on their situation, resulting in a
sense of ownership over their lives and collective responsibility for their own liberation from
oppression. He believed that the distance between teacher and student, expert and community
member, researcher and researched should be narrowed so that all parties can begin to reflect on
their roles and co-learn (Huesca 2003).
According to Freire (1970), communication should be used to provide a space for dialogue;
exchanging views, identifying common problems, exploring solutions, reflecting on community
issues and mobilizing resources. The concept of dialogue is based on repeated and reciprocal
information exchange between people; it involves not only the physical acts of speaking and
13
listening but also is embodied in the relationship between the participants. And, unlike mass-
mediated dissemination messages, dialogue is generally oral, live, immediate and bound to a
physical context (Peters 1999).
Several studies have shown that members of marginal groups in society actually prefer faceto-
face or small group dialogue rather than mass or one-way communication (Waisbord,2001).
These ideas have led to a surge in small community-based projects using theater, music,
storytelling, video, photography, and radio to share ideas among local people without the need
for external experts (Gumucio Dagrón 2001a).
While communication proponents have become aware of the importance of planning and
implementing well-designed communication interventions to support development goals, often
there has not been a corresponding increase in support from funders, project planners and other
development workers. So in an effort to garner support, as well as to reflect the shifts in thinking
from behavior change to empowerment theories of communication, a plethora of names for
communication efforts have appeared, from media advocacy, to strategic communication,
development support communication, communication for human development, participatory
communication, and communication for sustainable agriculture (Bessette 2004; Waisbord 2005).
While the field is broadly known as communication for development now, there is a new
movement towards communication that fosters social change (Riaño 1994; Servaes et al. 1996;
Wilkins 2000).
Communication for Social (and Environmental) Change, while clearly based on participatory and
empowerment communication theories, is a “distinct way of doing communications- and one of
the few that can be sustained…largely due to the fact that ownership of both the message and the
medium- the content and the process- resides with the individuals or communities affected”
(Deane & Gray-Felder 1999; 4). This model prioritizes local content and media ownership so
that the voices of those previously unheard can be amplified and channeled into existing public
14
and political debates, thereby allowing them to set their own agendas and make them known in
regard to political, economic and social development.
The “social network” model on the other hand, tries to capture the myriad of prior and
simultaneous communication that is occurring for both the sender and the receiver. Meaning,
therefore, is not just constructed between the sender and the receiver but also in dialogue with
15
the broader social context. The social network model also takes power into account by
acknowledging how political interests, personal aspirations, social status and interpersonal
relationships influence the construction of meaning. In practice all three models (one-way flow,
subjective and social network) are implicitly or explicitly still in use to some extent in
communication for development interventions (Leeuwis 2004).
Several authors (Calvelo Ríos 2003; Díaz Bordenave 1977; Leeuwis 2004; Ramírez & Quarry
2004; Rosengren 2000) have explored the “function” or intention that underlie communication
action. This reason for communicating is different from the actual content of any single message
Communication functions that seek to persuade, control or simply transmit information may
have their roots in the behavior change paradigm. On the other hand, efforts to explore views,
facilitate social bonds or raise consciousness may be based on empowerment communication
models. Often one or two functions tend to dominate the thinking or overall motive behind a
communication effort.
However, critics of participatory models such as Cooke & Kothari (2001) contend that there is
no universal definition for participation, nor do the expected outcomes of empowerment, equity
and social change have operational definitions (Morris 2003). Additionally, opportunities for
participation can be co-opted by local elites thereby maintaining or even deepening power
inequities.
16
Additionally, there are different ways in which people can participate in a project for an example
of different levels of community participation in water management) and some are more
participatory than others (Arnstein 1969; Pretty 1994).
2.7Capacity Development
Despite the concept of capacity development holding a central place in many development
projects, “people everywhere struggle to explain exactly what capacity is or what it comprises.
Virtually all discussions about the subject begin with an effort to agree on a definition” (Morgan
et al. 2005: 8).
However, as Gumucio Dagrón points out, “it is better to use wide definitions that enable [us] to
add experiences, rather than tricky straight and narrow concepts that only contribute to
mexcluding many interesting… processes”. In that spirit, the common features among several
definitions of capacity development that have been identified by Horton et al. (2003) will be
used as a guide for this discussion; that it is an on-going process; that its goal is to increase an
organization’s ability to perform its functions and achieve its objectives; that it increases the
ability of an organization to learn and solve problems; and that it aims to create the ability to
manage current challenges and perform well into the future. Since capacity development
involves changes in roles, power, access to resources and shifts in relationships at all levels from
the individual to the societal, it is not surprising that politics often feature prominently.
Capacity development can be viewed as a means, a process and an end in itself. As a means it
serves to strengthen the ability of an organization to carry out specific activities related to its
mission. As a process it enables the organization to continually reflect and adapt its purpose in
17
response to change and learning. And finally as an end it strengthens an organization’s ability to
become self-sustaining, survive and fulfill its purpose (Gubbels & Koss 2000;
Morgan et al. 2005).
Horton et al. (2003), identify four main areas that determine an organization’s overall capacity:
organizational performance, internal capacity, internal operating environment and the external
operating environment. Organizational performance is related to how effective and efficient the
organization is at delivering programming, how relevant the activities they choose to do are to
the mission and stated goals, and the degree of financial stability experienced by the
organization. Organizational capacity is made up of the resources, knowledge, and processes
used by the organization. The internal operating environment is composed of communicationand
rewards, organizational culture, history and traditions, leadership and management styles,
acceptance of organizational mission by all stakeholders, and the organizational structure. And
finally, the external environment is made up of the administrative and legal system, national and
local policies and political systems, economic trends, and the overall social and cultural milieu.
Many authors have broken down the idea of capacity into different areas, (Morgan et al. 2005;
Horton et al. 2003).
2.9Individual Learning
Since organizations are made up of individuals, the manner in which people learn to create and
adapt to change in an organizational context is important. For most managers throughout the
nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the key to effective organizations lay in bureaucracy,
hierarchy and a strict division of labor (Weber 1958). At this time, employers focused only on
18
training workers what they needed to know in order to accomplish the specific tasks set out for
them and only a relatively small number of people in skilled positions were given more training
(Jarvis et al. 1998).
In the 1960s the idea of what an organization should look like began to break down as it became
more and more difficult to control external conditions and to foresee what skills would be needed
to react appropriately to them. The clear dividing line between managers who have all the
answers and give orders, and workers who do as they are told also started to blur as training for
workers shifted to ‘human resource development.’ This change reflected the amount of
knowledge and autonomy employees need in order to make quick decisions in the best interest of
the organization (Jarvis et al. 1998).
Merriam and Caffarella (1991) outline four main orientations to adult learning theories
behaviorist, cognitive, humanist and social learning. Behaviorists (e.g. Thorndike 1913; Pavlov
1927; Watson 1998; Guthrie 1956; Hull 1943; Skinner 1974) view learning as producing more or
less permanent behavior change in a desired direction. Cognitivists (e.g. Köhler,1959; Lewin
1948; Kohlberg 1986; Gagne 1985; Mezirow 1991) view learning as an internal mental process
that relies on individual memory and perception to create meaning and insight. Humanists (e.g.
Maslow 1954; Rogers 1961; Knowles 1978) regard learning as an individual act to fulfill
personal potentials for growth. Social learning theorists (e.g. Bandura 2001; Rotter 1973; Jarvis
1987) believe that learning occurs through interaction with, observation of and feedback from
others in a social context. Workplace learning is now seen more holistically as many of these
theories have been integrated. Kim defines learning as “increasing one’s capacity to take
effective action”(1993; 38).
This definition encompasses two meanings: the acquisition of skills and knowhow which include
the physical ability to take certain actions, and the acquisition of know why which includes the
mental ability to conceptualize an experience and know how and when to apply lessons from it.
Both of these processes are affected by personal and collective memory, which determines what
will be retained and remain available for recall in new situations.
19
A new way of looking at adult learning that is now a common perspective in work place learning
is situated learning theory. Lave & Wenger explain, “It concerns the process by which
newcomers become part of a community of practice. A person’s intentions to learn are engaged
and the meaning of learning is configured through the process of becoming a full participant in a
socio-cultural practice. This social process includes, indeed it subsumes, the learning of
knowledgeable skills” (1991; 29).
Because of this, situated learning theory blurs the line between individual and collective learning
(Sun 2003). Situated learning theory holds that learning is located within everyday work
practices that coincide with processes of identity formation, both of which are embedded in
individual and group power dynamics. These power relations are what constrain and enable
access to positions of potential mastery of the knowledge and skills necessary within each
context (Contu & Willmott 2003). Since information and knowledge are acquired, maintained,
and transformed through social interaction, within this framework, the acquisition of skills is not
what is most valued, but rather it is the ability to read the context and act in a way that is
recognized and valued by other organizational members that is crucial.
O’Dell et al. describe knowledge as “information in action” (1998; 5), and distinguish it from
data as raw sensory input; information which is interpreted data; and knowledge which according
to Leewis is, “the body of mental inferences and conclusions that people build from different
elements of information, which allows them to take action in a given context” (2004; 95).
20
Access to relevant and timely information and knowledge influences the ability of each person to
make informed choices about how to exercise their personal agency. So, in this sense, access to
information is empowering while inadequate information is disempowering.
- Channels - Expansion
- Training employee
2
4
Organizational factors
- organisational policy
- financial capacity
- availability of communication
devices management style
21
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 Introduction
This chapter describes the research design, and the research methodology employed in this study,
this is set out in this sections under sub-headings containing research design study site, target
population, sampling for study, data collection instruments and data procedures, and finally the
data analysis and presentation methods used in this study.
Category Frequency
General manager 1
Section heads 3
Employees 36
Total 40
22
3.4 Sample Size and Sample Design
Given the nature of the population that is small and manageable, all the population was included
in the sample. Census was used to select general manager, section heads and employees.
Convenient sampling was employed in selecting employees.
3.5.1 Questionnaires
In pursuit of this study and achieve its objectives, the research instrument used was
questionnaires. The questionnaire was pre-tested with ten employees from the sample size in
order to check and ensure that no irrelevant question was present in the questionnaire and hence
assesses the content validity. Their suggestions were incorporated. The use of questionnaire was
considered most appropriate so that consistency can be maintained in all the respondents. The
research instrument was divided into two sections. Part I comprised of demographic information,
Part II, comprised of specific objectives.
Mugenda (1999) defines validity as the accuracy and meaningfulness of inferences, which are
based on research results. Validity was assured by peers and supervisor cross check the
questionnaire to ensure it was according to the objective.
23
3.7 Data Analysis
The data obtained from the questionnaires was analyzed using descriptive analysis. The analyzed
data was presented and interpreted in through simple frequency tables. These methods ensure
easy understanding of presented data and information.
24
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the findings from the study. Data from the field was coded and edited for
completeness. It was then analyzed in form of percentages and presented in form of frequency
distribution tables.
In analyzing the data, the responses to the items in the questionnaire, the researcher assigned
each response a number. The data collected were then analyzed by use of descriptive statistics
where frequency distributions and percentages were calculated and displayed in tabular form.
25
employees frequently use the company’s communication. The results for these findings are
indicated on table 4.1 below.
Male 12 54 58 58
Female 10 46 42 42
The results shown in table 4.1 indicate that 12 or 54 % of the respondents among employees are
males and only 10 or 46% were female. Among employees, 58 representing 58% are male and
the remaining 42 or 42% are female. These findings show that there is gender imbalance in the
company and that majority of the employees of the company are male.
26
Age brackets (in Employees
Customers
years)
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
18-25 4 40 4 40
26-35 3 30 12 30
36-45 2 20 16 10
Over 45 1 10 8 20
From the findings in table 4.2, 2 employees representing 40% are aged between 18-25 years, 3 or
30% of the employees are in the age brackets of between 26-35 years, 2 employees or 20% are
aged between 36-45 years and the remaining 1 or 10% are in aged over 45 years . This is an
indication that majority of the employees are in their prime age of between 18 and 25 thus are
more productive and that they can work for long hours tirelessly. Also majority of the employees
are well educated to understand the role of communication as opposed to their employees
attitudes.
27
Branch manager 1 10
Section heads 3 30
Employees 36 60
Total 40 100
The findings indicate that majority of the employees are employees as indicated by 36 or 60%,
some 3 employees representing 30% are section heads and the remaining 1 or 10% is a manager.
This is an indication that the establishment is young thus has a few employees.
Table 4.5 Working Experience of the Respondents and Period of being Employees
Employees Customers
28
Working Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
experience
1-5 years 3 30 12 30
6-10 years 4 40 20 50
11-15 years 3 30 8 20
Over 16 years 0 0 0 0
From the data in table 4.5, majority of the employees as indicated by 4 or 40% have been
employees in the Catering Establishment for a period ranging from 6-10 years, 3 or 30% have
served in the Catering industry for a period of 1-5 years and some 3 employees representing 30%
have a working experience ranging from 11-15 years. Majority of the employees have been
served or sought the services of the Catering industry for a period of 6-10 years as depicted by 20
or 50%, 12 or 30% have been employees of the catering industry for a period ranging from 1-5
years, and the remaining 8 or 20% of the employees have been served by the industry for a
period of 11-15 years. This implies that most of the employees are quite experienced and thus are
able to indicate or relate how employees attitudes have affected marketing or performance of
communication in the Hotel industry.
29
4.4.1 Elements of Employees Attitude
Attitude comprises of various elements. The researcher sought to determine from the respondents
the components or elements that constitute of employees attitudes. The results of this concern
were tabulated as indicated below.
Beliefs 3 30
Values 3 30
Perception 2 20
Assumptions 2 20
Total 10 100
The results above indicate that 3 or 30% of the respondents cited beliefs as one of the elements
that constitute employees attitudes, 3 respondents representing 30% cited values, some 2 or 20%
of the respondents indicated perception as another element of employees attitude affecting
marketing of communication in a catering industry while the remaining 2 or 20% felt assumption
is an element of employees attitude. The findings clearly indicate that employees attitude
comprises of four elements.
30
Features/factors Frequency Percentage
Colour 4 40
Packaging 3 30
Price 3 30
Total 10 100
Majority of the respondents as depicted by 4 or 40% cited colour as a main factor in employees
attitude towards communication, 3 respondents representing 30% cited packaging and the
remaining 3 respondents or 30% indicated price as another factor when it comes to employees
attitude.
Never 5 50
Rarely 3 30
31
Sometimes 2 20
Often 0 0
Always 0 0
Total 10 100
The findings above indicate that 5 employees representing 50% cited that when communications
launched or offered, employees never buy it, 3 or 30% of the employees indicated that
employees rarely implementation communication and the remaining 2 employees or 20% of
them indicated that employees sometimes implement new communication. None of the
respondents who cited often or always options. The findings indicate that there is low rate of
employees’ adoption or implementation of effective communication.
Table 4.9 Response on how Employees Attitude has influenced or Affected Communication
Increased implementation 0 0
No effect 0 0
32
Total 10 100
The entire group of the respondents indicated that employees attitude reduce or decrease
employees implementation of communication.
Poor communication 2 20
Difficulties in implementation 2 20
33
Total 10 100
The findings in the above table show that majority of the respondents as depicted by 4 or 40%
felt that employees attitude towards communication in most cases leads to poor communication,
2 or 20% of the respondents indicated that the attitude of employees on implementation of
effective communication is usually low due to employees attitude, 2 employees representing
20% cited employees attitude leads difficulties in implementation of the communication as an
incentive to an organisation, the remaining 2 respondents or 20% indicated that employees
attitude leads to temporary withdrawal of the strategies put in place.
Table 4.11 Challenges Facing the Organization in Managing Employees Attitude towards
Communication
Employees illiteracy 3 30
Employees preferences 3 30
Total 10 100
34
Figure 4.11: Bar graph
The results above indicate that 3 employees representing 30% felt that employees illiteracy is
challenge that hinder the organization in handling employees attitude towards effective
communication, another 3 respondents or 30% cited employees preferences and the remaining 4
or 40% of the respondents indicated that some employees are used to certain media or
communication and their perception is that there is no other better media than this.
Creates unity 10 10 5 2 1
35
Increase in 10 5 5 2 1
productivity
Creates awareness 5 5 - - 1
Total 40 30 20 5 5
36
4.4.8 Analysis of the Interview Schedules
This section deals with the analysis of interview schedules that were distributed to employees.
Here linker scale was used which included SA=Strongly Agree, A=Agree, SD=Strongly
disagree, D=Disagree and UD=Undecided
Statement SA A SD D UD Total
Majority of the employees as depicted by 60% agreed with the statement that I prefer the
communication am used to rather than new ones and 40% of them strongly agreed with this
statement. The table further indicates that 30% of the respondents strongly disagreed with the
statement that I think communication are of higher quality than the ones am used to and the
remaining 70% disagreed with the statement. Half of the respondents as depicted by 50%
strongly agreed with the statement that I think communication are more expensive than the ones
am used to while the other 50% agreed with this statement. Some 30% of the respondents
strongly agreed with the statement which read that I do not like the idea about having
communication because they are bound to fail and the majority lot as depicted by 70% agreed
with the statement.
37
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the summary of the findings, conclusions, recommendations and
suggestion for further studies. The chapter is guided by the findings of the preceding chapter
objectives of the study and the questions that were to be answered by the study.
The results indicated that 54 % of the respondents among employees are males and only 46%
were female. Among employees, 58% of them are male and the remaining 42% are female.
These findings show that there is gender imbalance in the catering industry and that majority of
the employees of the company are male.
38
(b) Age Bracket of the Respondents
From the findings 40% of the employees are aged between 18-25 years, 30% of the employees
are in the age brackets of between 26-35 years, 20% are aged between 36-45 years and th,
remaining 10% are in aged over 45 years.This is an indication that majority of the employees are
in the age of between 18 and 25 thus are more productive and that they work tirelessly for long
hours.Also majority of the employees are well educated to understand the role of communication
as opposed to their employees’ attitudes.
The findings indicated that majority of the employees are as indicated by 70%, some 20% are
section heads and the remaining 10% is a general manager. This is an indication that the
organization is young thus has a few employees.
The results indicated that majority of the employees as indicated by 40% have been employees in
the catering industry for a period ranging from 6-10 years, 30% have served in the industry for a
period of 1-5 years and some 20% have a working experience ranging from 11-15 years.
Majority of the employees have been served or sought the services of the industry for a period of
6-10 years as depicted by 50%, some 30% have been employees of the industry for a period
ranging from 1-5 years, and the remaining 20% of the employees have been served by the
industry for a period of 11-15 years. This implies that most of the employees are quite
experienced and thus are able to indicate or relate how employees attitudes have affect
performance of communication in the catering industry.
39
industry while the remaining 20% felt assumption is an element of employees attitude. The
findings clearly indicate that employee’s attitude comprises of four elements.
40
5.2.7 Challenges Facing the Organization in Managing Employees Attitude towards
Communication
The results indicated that 30% of the employees felt that employees illiteracy is a challenge that
hamper the industry in handling employees attitude towards effective communication, another
30% cited employees preferences and the remaining 40% of the respondents indicated that some
employees are used to certain media or communication and their perception is that there is no
other better media than this.
5.3 Conclusions
Based on the findings of the study, the researcher made the following conclusions.
41
The researcher concludes that the major elements of employees attitude are beliefs values,
perception as assumption is an element of employees attitude.
The researcher concluded that strategies of marketing communication in areas with employees
attitude towards communication are carrying out free samples demonstration on the use and
performance of the communication and the communication to be sold at discounts to encourage
the employees to implement communication.
5.4 Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study and the conclusions made, the researcher made the following
recommendations to improve the performance of communication in catering industry. Much
emphasis should be put on employee’s education to enable them change their employees attitude
and adopt new communication. A health communication between the organization and the
employees should be fostered to facilitate quick adoption by the employees.
Further study should be carried out to ascertain factors that lead to communication failure in an
organisation. Further research should be carried out to determine the effects of employees
perception on effective communication implementation in an organization.
42
REFERENCES
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy
of Management Review, 217-230.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private
organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290.
Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Red Tape in English Local Government Authorities:
Variation at the Corporate Level and among Core Services.
DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule
dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,
15(1), 133-148.
Eisenberg, E., & Goodall, H. (1997). Organizational Commnication: Balancing Creativity and
Constraint. New York: St.Martin's Press.
Farace, R. W., Monge, P. R., & Russell, H. M. (1977). Communicating and Organizing.
Reading,MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gardner, J., Paulsen, N., Gallois, C., Callan, V., & Monaghan, P. (2001). An intergroup
perspective on communication in organizations. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.),
The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 561-584). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
43
Garnett, J. L. (1992). Communicating for Results in Government: A strategic approaches for
public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Garnett, J. L., Marlowe, J., & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Penetrating the performance predicament:
communication as a mediator or moderator of organizational culture's impact on public
organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 266-281.
Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, &
Winston.
Jones, A., Watson, B., Garner, J., & Gallois, C. (2004). Organizational communication:
challenges for the new century. . Journal of Communication, 19, 722-750.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
44
APPENDIX I
QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A
20-40 ( )
40-60 ( )
Above 60 ( )
Female ( )
Secondary ( )
45
College ( )
Loans ( )
Marketing ( )
Personnel ( )
Enquiries ( )
5-10 Years ( )
10-15 Years ( )
Over 15 Years ( )
SECTION B
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
46
Better public relation
Creates unity
Increase in
productivity
Creates awareness
Total
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
9. What are the strategies adopted by the organization to mitigate the challenges
experienced?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
47
APPENDIX III
BUDGETING
The research include the following experiences during the development and the preparation
periodic
Details Amount
Printing 1000
Photocopy 500
Transport 500
Lunch 200
Total 3,000
48