Running Head: CASE STUDY 1
Running Head: CASE STUDY 1
Running Head: CASE STUDY 1
Irena Pawlak
Keiser University
Psychopathology
Introduction
elevated and expansive moods (American Psychology Association [APA], 2000). These changes
in polarity are generally experienced as episodes of varying severity and duration. During these
episodes an individual will experience several different behaviors which, despite the mood, result
in impaired social, occupational, and/or academic functioning. In addition, individuals with BPD
have a higher rate of suicide than the general public with one in three versus one in thirty,
respectively (Leahy, 2007). Because of the variability of the course of the disease, most
individuals are not diagnosed at the onset of the disorder where the symptoms are more
manageable and the chances of deterioration are less likely (Alloy et al., 2012; Perlis, 2005). As
a result, BPD is one of the sixth leading causes of disability in the world (Miller, 2006; Price &
Marzani-Nissen, 2012).
In the United States, approximately 4.4 % of the population will experience some form of
BPD in their lifetime (Urosević, Abramson, Harmon-Jones, & Alloy, 2008). Furthermore, it is
estimated that BPD imposes a $45 billion cost to society in the United States due to subsidized
health care, economic losses due to loss of work productivity, and disability payments (Miller,
2006). Accordingly, research focusing on developing more effective treatment to ease the
individual disease burden as well as that of society is currently underway. To date, there have
been some promising studies including medication and psychosocial therapy which have proven
to reduce the severity of the disorder and improve overall functioning (Bowden et al., 2012;
Diagnosis
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 3
Eric is a 32-year old Caucasian male seeking treatment for concentration problems
arising from chronic worry and anxiety (Brown & Barlow, 2011). After a clinical assessment
focusing on symptoms, family history, longitudinal course, and treatment history and response
(Miller, 2006), I made the following 5-Axis diagnosis based on the Diagnostic and Statistical
interepisode recovery
text rev.; DSM–IV–TR; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2000), Eric suffered from
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 4
bipolar disorder (BPD) I and anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS). Specifically,
Eric’s symptoms were consist with a mixed episode, a subtype of BPD I, which requires at least
one manic or mixed episode, where the criteria for a major depressive episode and a manic
episode are met for at least one week and cause marked impairment in functioning. In addition,
like both major depressive or manic episodes, these symptoms were not the product of substance
A major depressive episode requires meeting at least five of nine criteria throughout the
day, nearly every day for at least two weeks including: depressed mood, marked loss of interest
episode, an individual must experience an excessively elevated, irritated, or uninhibited mood for
at least one week and display three or four (depending on whether the predominant mood is
irritation) of seven symptoms: grandiosity, sleeps less without feeling tired, subjective feeling of
Although the duration of Eric’s symptoms could not be established definitely at the time
of his initial presentation, his depressed mood and simultaneous manic behaviors generally
indicative of a mixed episode, which is rare given that depressive and manic episodes are
typically clearly demarcated by one dominant mood (Hatchett, 2010). For example, Eric’s
feelings of failure, inability to concentrate, and agitated pacing are all symptoms of a depressed
mood and depressive episode. Likewise, the repetitive nature of Eric’s worries seemed
symptomatic of depression-oriented rumination about things gone wrong in his life (Auerbach,
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 5
Webb, Gardiner, & Pechtel, 2013). Conversely, Eric’s irritability, muscle tension, increased
goal-directed behavior towards getting a new job, restlessness, and racing thoughts/worries were
all symptomatic of mania. Eric’s fluctuating between both depression and mania without any
clear demarcation between dominant moods is a reliable indicator of a mixed episode (Price &
Marzani-Nissen, 2012). Furthermore, the fact that Eric was seeking treatment was a sure sign
that these symptoms were clinically significant and interfering with his ability to function.
In addition to Eric’s current state, based on his history, he had been suffering from BPD I
since his first manic episode during college. Thereafter, Eric reported additional episodes of
depression and elevated moods. Eric even reported experiencing delusions and auditory
hallucinations during certain depressive and manic episodes. However, he reported that when he
was taking his antipsychotic medications or in between episodes, he no longer experienced these
psychotic features. Likewise, Eric also stated that he no longer worried or had any failure-driven
thoughts. Based on this information, I determined that Eric suffered from recurrent BPD I
In addition to BPD I, Eric also displayed symptoms of anxiety. Specifically, Eric met the
DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000) criteria for anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified (NOS). For
example, Eric indicated that when he was in remission, he only worried about the onset of a new
episode and whether his BPD medications would cause any long-term damage (Brown &
Barlow, 2011). Anxiety disorder NOS was used because I did not feel that Eric’s worries
outside of his mood episodes were racing or intrusive. Consequently, because Eric’s anxiety did
appear to meet the criteria for any specific disorder and because BPD I usually generally presents
with some form of anxiety (Bowden et al., 2012; Leahy, 2007; Perlis, 2005; Price & Marzani-
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 6
Nissen, 2012; Williams, Ruekert, & Lum, 2011), anxiety NOS was the only available option in
With respect to Axis II, I did not find Eric to be suffering from any personality disorders.
Similarly, no diagnosis was made on Axis III because I did not find any evidence of a general
medical condition. On the other hand, Eric demonstrated serious psychosocial and environmental
issues relevant to his Axis I disorder. Accordingly, Axis IV includes problems related to his
employment, support group, and health care access. Based on Eric’s assessment, he had serious
issues related to his employment situation. For instance, despite graduating from college as well
as being trained as a paralegal, Eric was currently employed as a night security guard. Due to his
constant feelings of failure, the majority of which was focused on his employment status, and his
goal-oriented mania generally focused on looking for other jobs, Eric’s underemployment
definitely seemed clinically relevant. Eric’s support system was also a source of serious
problems affecting his mental health. Despite living with his parents who seemed genuinely
supported and concerned with Eric’s well-being, their behaviors were actually harmful in context
of Eric’s BPD I. For example, Eric’s father displayed characteristic expressed emotion by being
overly involved in monitoring Eric’s behavior and treatment. Research has demonstrated that
parental expressed emotion was highly correlated with the onset of a new episode as well as
longer time to remission (Miklowitz, 2008). In addition, Eric’s parents’ disagreements over his
treatment were a source of conflict and a potential stressor (Leahy, 2007; Miklowitz, 2008).
Finally, Eric’s parents’ health insurance had reached its maximum following Eric’s last
hospitalization. As a result, both he and his parents were concerned about the cost of treatment
and were often reluctant to commit Eric or take him in for treatment. Compounded by the fact
that despite all of the treatment and medications Eric had been taking over the past 13 years, his
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 7
parents were often set on keeping him at home to prevent him from deteriorating which played a
The last Axis represents Eric’s current global assessment functioning (GAF) score. This
was calculated according to the instructions in the DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000). Accordingly, based
on Eric’s current presentation, taking into account his clinical history which was significant for
four suicide attempts, three hospitalizations, and mood-congruent psychoses, I believe that Eric
merited a score of 41. A score of 41 connotes the presence of serious symptoms and
impairments in work and social functioning. Eric’s problems with social functioning reflect the
lack of a steady relationship over the past eight years although he currently worried about not
having a girlfriend.
Differential Diagnosis
Because of the numerous symptoms Eric described during his assessment and the high
rate of comorbidity in bipolar disorder (Leahy, 2007), several differential diagnoses were
considered and subsequently rejected based on the criteria found in the DSM-IV-TR (APA,
2000). Generalized anxiety disorder was considered based on Eric’s description of pacing and
worries but subsequently discarded due to his anxiety outside of his mood disorder lacking
otherwise specified (NOS), and delusional disorder but ruled out because Eric’s delusions and
hallucinations were only present during mood episodes (APA, 2000). Obsessive-compulsive
disorder (OCD) was considered due to Eric’s characterization of his thoughts being persistent
and his trouble discarding old newspapers. This diagnosis was rejected, however, because the
obsessions were related to real-life worries and they both failed to cause significant impairment.
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 8
of concentration difficulties but ruled out because these periods were better explained by his
BPD I. Major depressive disorder was considered based on Eric’s suicide attempts and the
episode he experienced after quitting his job as a stockbroker. Although major depressive
disorder is commonly misdiagnosed with bipolar disorder, Eric’s experience of more than one
manic/hypomanic episode ruled out the diagnosis (Perlis, 2005). Adjustment disorder was
considered based on Eric’s serious depressive symptoms emerging after his quit his job, but
ruled out because his distress was better explained by his BPD I.
Eric’s symptoms of BPD began while he was still in high school when he started
experiencing concentration difficulties, anxiety about getting into college, depressed mood, and
first suicide attempt. While not meeting the threshold for any of the bipolar disorders, these
symptoms are common for adolescents at risk for developing BPD (Moreno et al., 2007; Price &
Marzani-Nissen, 2012). Although Eric continued to be symptomatic he did not experience his
first full-blown manic episode until his freshman year of college. Because Eric’s episode was a
manic episode instead of a hypomanic episode, he met the criteria for BPD I, which requires a
manic episode, from the outset (APA, 2000). This episode can be differentiated from a
hypomanic episode, which would result in a diagnosis of BPD II, a less severe form of BPD, for
several reasons (APA, 2000). These include Eric’s engaging in dangerous and impulsive
behavior including taking several recreational drugs, several fist-fights, and ending with a high
speed car accident and four-day hospitalization. However, most importantly, the key difference
in manic versus hypomanic is the marked impairment in academic functioning (Alloy et al.,
2012; Hatchett, 2010; Leahy, 2007; Nusslock et al., 2012). This was because Eric’s increased
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 9
energy was spent painting his dorm room over and over causing him to miss several classes. As
a result, this behavior is more consistent with functional impairment (academic) rather than goal-
directed behavior. Having a manic episode around the age of 18 is considered an early onset and
predictive of a severe course of BPD in general (Alloy et al., 2012; Miller, 2006). Furthermore,
Eric’s comorbid anxiety, demonstrated by his text anxiety and whether he would get into college
also increased his chances of developing BPD I (Bowden et al., 2012). Because the course of
BPD I if variable, an indication of severity is the span of time in which four signs are manifested
during an individual’s lifetime (Miller, 2006). These include: a) manic moods and behaviors; b)
dysphoric and negative affect; c) cognitive impairment (apart from distraction [Williams et al.,
2011]); and d) psychotic episodes (Miller, 2006). Aside from the episode freshman year, Eric
continued to get into fist-fights, get into car accidents because of driving recklessly, and went on
shopping sprees where he spent thousands of his parents’ dollars on books, vitamins, and gifts
for his family. In addition, Eric was also hospitalized three times during certain manic episodes.
Deteriorations in Eric’s behavior were also recognized over the course of his illness marked by
three suicide attempts during the past three years. Eric’s suicide attempts were had a clear intent
of death and considered violent confirming the darkness of his depression (Soloff, Lynch, Kelly,
Malone, & Mann, 2000). Eric reported marked cognitive impairment during episodes which left
him so disorganized that he could no longer read books or even watch television. Finally, Eric
experienced an early onset of psychotic episodes only one year after college after he quit his first
job as a stockbroker. After resigning due to fear of failing due to stress, Eric experienced a
prolonged depression episode during which time he began having paranoid delusions. These
delusions were based on the belief that he was being tracked by the CIA and being set up to fail.
Despite being placed on antipsychotics, when Eric did not take them due to adverse side effects,
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 10
his delusions began including auditory hallucinations where he believed the CIA was telling him
to take his medications. In addition to the side effects, these psychotic episodes only added to
psychosocial environment (Leahy, 2007; Miklowitz, 2008). In Eric’s case, although his parents
allowed Eric to move in with them, paid for his health insurance, and financially supported him,
their behavior probably added to his disease burden. For example, because of Eric’s spending,
his father took away his credit cards and put him on an allowance which left Eric feeling like a
child and became a source of contention between them. In order to avoid further conflict, Eric’s
father stopped telling him he could not use the family car but instead began disconnecting wires
so that the car would not start. This probably added to Eric’s delusions that the CIA’s
interference that he was being set up to fail because without a car he would not be able to get to
work or go on job interviews. While these delusions were clearly psychotic, one of the worries
he expressed during the assessment was his fear the car would break down, a fear that his
father’s behavior was likely contributing to his psychosis. Another factor was his parents
fighting about his treatment which often resulted in a tense and hostile environment, which is
believed to be stressor that can either trigger or exacerbate BPD episodes (Bowden et al., 2012).
In summary, over the past 15 years Eric’s BPD had severely impacted his life by interfering with
his autonomy by leaving him unable to become financially independent, without a girlfriend,
cognitively impaired, and suicidal. Without a new treatment plan, if Eric’s course continued in
this vein, his chance of eventually completing suicide was very high. Bipolar disorder is
associated with the highest rate of suicide with one out of three individuals committing suicide
(Leahy, 2007).
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 11
believe the best theory advanced to date is the behavioral approach system (BAS) dysregulation
theory. The BAS dysregulation theory is based on the belief that individuals with BPD have
polarity specific triggers and the onset of episodes (Urosević et al., 2008). The BAS is
responsible for creating motivation incentives for an individual to act in the presence of reward
or punishment cues (Nusslock, Abramson, Harmon-Jones, Alloy, & Hogan, 2007). Individuals
who cannot effectively regulate their BAS are prone to hypersensitivity to triggers of BAS-
relevant events or cues (Urosević et al., 2008). BAS hypersensitivity is a trait that is believed to
be hereditary. Presence of the trait is necessary but not sufficient for development of BPD.
Instead, the psychosocial environment triggers the onset of symptoms and course of the disease
(Urosević et al., 2008). Factors that influence BAS hypersensitivity and dysfunction are
cognitive styles related to high levels of perfectionism, goal-striving, and autonomy (Urosević et
al., 2008). Autonomy in the BAS is considered the value placed on achievement, social
The mechanisms through which the BAS dysregulation theory causes manic or
depressive episodes depend on two major factors including whether a situation is considered
BAS-relevant and the perceived efficacy with which the individual perceives their ability is to
affect the outcome (Urosević et al., 2008). Situations that are relevant generally involve some
the opportunity to satisfy some biological or social need to improve an individual’s life, such as a
job or girl/boyfriend. For example, in relation to this theory Eric’s stress about getting into
achieve a goal or reward (Alloy et al., 2009; Nusslock et al., 2007; Urosević et al., 2008). Eric’s
belief that his school work was integral in his chance of achieving this goal resulted in extreme
activation of the BAS because of his innate hypersensitivity and the onset of his first manic
Conversely, BAS deactivation occurs when an event that is BAS relevant occurs in the
context of an individual’s inability to affect the outcome or after the loss of a BAS relevant
event/cue (Urosević et al., 2008). For Eric his cognitive style of perfectionism may have left him
feeling as if he would not be able to succeed in this field. As a result, he resigned and lost out on
a previously earned reward. Because this represented a BAS relevant event with low efficacy the
result was an extreme deactivation of the BAS which triggered the onset of a depressive episode
The BAS theory also proposes the individual’s value places on the event will also predict
the magnitude and duration of the ensuing episode (Urosević et al., 2008). During the
assessment, Eric reported that he was hired one year after college. An inference of his getting a
job after searching for an entire year probably added to the value Eric placed on achieving this
particular goal. The loss of something so valued due to his belief that he was a failure and would
be unable to handle the stress ran opposite of his cognitive-style and is probably why this
particular episode was significant for its duration and severity in so far that it marks the onset of
his psychosis. However, the BAS also proposes that treatment targeting these response-styles
may be able to reduce the hypersensitivity to the event and thereby reduce the activation or
deactivation of the BAS. In other words, if Eric’s cognitive styles were restructured to reduce
the value placed on BAS-related events, he may be able to influence the severity of the episode
Standard treatment of BPD involves pharmacotherapy and continued care, which consists
2011). Unfortunately, medications generally have a ceiling effect (Miklowitz, 2008). This has
two indications. The first is that medications should be evaluated over time and switched as
needed according to the individual’s episodes and symptoms (Williams et al., 2011). In addition,
the identification of psychosocial triggers and their association with mood episodes suggested the
development of therapy to diminish these effects to improve the course of BPD episodes
(Bowden et al., 2012; Urosević et al., 2008). Accordingly, several studies were conducted and
management was significantly more effective than standard care (Miklowitz, 2008).
behavioral therapy, have been identified as beneficial to individuals with BPD by resulting in
shorter duration of episodes, longer remissions, and better mood even during an acute episode
(Bowden et al., 2012; Miklowitz, 2008). In addition, these therapies were associated with
increased overall functioning, reduction in cognitive impairments, and higher recovery rates
(Miklowitz, 2008). This type of therapy, however, was found to be more successful at
preventing and managing manic episodes versus depressive episodes (Miklowitz, 2008).
Miklowitz believed the therapy’s focus on treatment compliance, early identification of triggers
and manic symptoms, and coping skills such as getting more sleep and decreasing goal-related
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 14
activity were the mechanisms responsible for the successful outcomes. Family focused therapy
communication with family/caregivers to prevent or work through conflict and learning to ask
for help (Miklowitz, 2008). Conversely, this therapy was shown to be more effective at
preventing and managing depressive episodes (Miklowitz, 2008). Miklowitz thought these
effects were due to individuals assigned to this treatment generally being from high expressed
emotion and family conflict environments and the therapy’s focus on problem-solving and
involves cognitive restructuring and increasing treatment adherence. Miklowitz found that
research was mixed on the efficacy of this therapy, which he believed was probably due to
inconsistent elements included during trials. Overall, the consensus appears to be that treatment
should be based on the current state of the individual, their last/current episode, symptom
recognition, relapse prevention, and strict treatment adherence (Miklowitz, 2008; Miller, 2006).
Based on this evidence, I would recommend Eric undergo an intensive course of psychosocial
about dysfunctional attitudes about his feelings of failure, relapse prevention, communication
strategies, and symptoms management. Furthermore, I would require his parents, especially his
father undergo a few sessions of psychoeducation focusing on learning about the disease, its
course, and the importance of treatment compliance. Moreover, I would have the therapist stress
treatment noncompliance has been shown to result in a loss of 14 years of life in terms of
functional impairment and 9 years based on suicide attempts and completed suicide (Miller,
2006). Furthermore, I would have Eric’s medication re-evaluated to eliminate as many adverse
One of the major changes to the DSM-5 for bipolar disorder includes the use of increased
energy as an additional criterion for diagnosing mania or hypomanic (APA, 2012). While at first
glance this seems like a useless addition, considering the difficulty in distinguishing hypomanic
from mania, when considered in terms of distinguishing BPD from major depressive disorder,
this change makes much more sense (Perlis, 2005). For example, one of the major reasons for
misdiagnosis is because an individual usually seeks treatment when feeling depressed and
without any evidence of mania of any degree there is no reliable method to distinguish bipolar
depression from unipolar depression (APA, 2012; Hatchett, 2010; Perlis, 2005). This is a serious
problem because medications used to treat unipolar depression are generally unsuccessful for
individuals with BPD (APA, 2012; Perlis, 2005). Because the misdiagnosis between depression
disorders has more potential for harm than the hypomanic versus manic episode problem, I
believe that the current plans for the DSM-5 revisions are warranted.
CASE STUDY: ERIC AND BIPOLAR 16
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
American Psychiatric Association. (11 May, 2012). Bipolar and related disorder. In Proposed
http://web.archive.org/web/20121015074940/http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/Pag
es/BipolarandRelatedDisorders.aspx
Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Walshaw, P. D., Gerstein, R. K., Keyser, J. D., Whitehouse, W.
styles and bipolar spectrum disorders: Concurrent and prospective associations. Journal
Alloy, L. B., Urošević, S., Abramson, L. Y., Jager-Hyman, S., Nusslock, R., Whitehouse, W. G.,
& Hogan, M. (2012). Progression along the bipolar spectrum: A longitudinal study of
10.1037/a0023973.supp (Supplemental)
Auerbach, R. P., Webb, C. A., Gardiner, C. K., & Pechtel, P. (2013). Behavioral and Neural
Bowden, C. L., Perlis, R. H., Thase, M. E., Ketter, T. A., Ostacher, M. M., Calabrese, J. R., . . .
Sachs, G. S. (2012). Aims and results of the NIMH systematic treatment enhancement
program for bipolar disorder (STEP-BD). CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 18(3), 243-
Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2011). Diagnosis not provided: Case #2. In 4 (Ed.), Casebook in
Leahy, R. L. (2007). Bipolar disorder: Causes, contexts, and treatments. J Clin Psychol, 63(5),
Miklowitz, D.J. (2008). Adjunctive psychotherapy for bipolar disorder: state of the evidence.
Miller, K. (2006). Bipolar disorder: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Journal of the
7599.2006.00148.x
Moreno, C., Laje, G., Blanco, C., Jiang, H., Schmidt, A. B., & Olfson, M. (2007). National
trends in the outpatient diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in youth. Arch Gen
Nusslock, R., Abramson, L. Y., Harmon-Jones, E., Alloy, L. B., & Hogan, M. E. (2007). A goal-
striving life event and the onset of hypomanic and depressive episodes and symptoms:
perspective from the behavioral approach system (BAS) dysregulation theory. Journal of
Nusslock, R., Harmon-Jones, E., Alloy, L. B., Urosevic, S., Goldstein, K., & Abramson, L. Y.
Perlis, R. H. (2005). Misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder. The American Journal Of Managed Care,
Price, A. L., & Marzani-Nissen, G. R. (2012). Bipolar disorders: a review. American Family
Soloff, P. H., Lynch, K. G., Kelly, T. M., Malone, K. M., & Mann, J. J. (2000). Characteristics of
suicide attempts of patients with major depressive episode and borderline personality
Urosević, S., Abramson, L. Y., Harmon-Jones, E., & Alloy, L. B. (2008). Dysregulation of the
behavioral approach system (BAS) in bipolar spectrum disorders: review of theory and
Williams, K. L., Ruekert, L., & Lum, C. (2011). Treatment of bipolar disorder: A focus on