Results:: A) Experimental Shear Centre

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

RESULTS :

A) Experimental shear Centre

All values are multiplied by 0.01 mm

Total load = 20N

Deflection (mm) = without load (mm) – with load (mm)

Left-Hand (LH) gauge Right-Hand (RH) gauge


Hole
Without With Deflection Without With Deflection
load load (mm) load load (mm)
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 0 0.07 -0.07 0 -0.12 0.12

1
2 0 0.05 -0.05 0 -0.1 0.1
3 0 0.04 -0.04 0 -0.08 0.08
4 0 0.035 -0.035 0 -0.05 0.05
5 0 0.02 -0.02 0 -0.03 0.03
6 0 0.01 -0.01 0 -0.01 0.01
7 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 -0.01 0.01 0 0.03 -0.03
9 0 -0.02 0.02 0 0.06 -0.06
10 0 -0.025 0.025 0 0.07 -0.07
11 0 -0.035 0.035 0 0.09 -0.09

Figure 1. Graph of deflection against load position for C-Channel Section

Figure 1 demonstrates the chart of rejection against stack position for C-Channel phase that is
planned in lightweight of the wildcat outcome. In lightweight of the chart, the convergence

2
purpose between the 2 lines shows the trial shear focus of C-Channel space.
Test Shear Center (e) = 20 mm to the proper aspect of the realm.
B) Theoretical shear Centre:

Moment of inertia: =

= +[
= 323466mm⁴

Shear Centre for C-Channel section can be found using this equation:

e=

e=
= 19.32mm

3
• Comparison of theoretical and experimental results

Method Experimental (mm) Theoretical (mm)

Shear Centre 20 19.32

Looking at both of the qualities we got, the trial and hypothetical shear Center, the rate mistake
is computed by utilizing the accompanying recipe:

Percentage error= × 100

= = 3.52 %

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy