Effect of Yarn Wetting On Some Physical Properties of Polyamide 6 False-Twist Textured Yarn
Effect of Yarn Wetting On Some Physical Properties of Polyamide 6 False-Twist Textured Yarn
Effect of Yarn Wetting On Some Physical Properties of Polyamide 6 False-Twist Textured Yarn
net/publication/299575452
CITATIONS READS
0 451
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
I am working on semi-aromatic polyamides in fiber type to get better thermal and mechanical resistance. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Rouhollah Semnani Rahbar on 18 April 2016.
ABSTRACT
In the present work, the effect of water on some physical properties of false-twist textured
polyamide 6 yarn was studied. A laboratory false-twist texturing machine was modified by a
water bath in order to wet the feed yarn before entering the texturing zone. Polyamide 6
yarn was textured at the texturing speeds of 51, 85 and 119 m/min and twist levels of 2165,
2559 and 2954 turns per meter, with and without water bath. The properties of textured yarn
in the aspects of crimp characteristic and tensile behavior were determined. The properties
of wet textured yarn were also compared with normal (dry) textured yarn. The results show
that the tensile and crimp property values of wet textured yarn are lower than those of
normal (dry) textured yarn. Wetting of feed yarn changes the stability of twisting–untwisting
process in false-twist texturing, and it seems that some fraction of twist is maintained in the
final textured yarn. This residual twist results in non-bulky appearance of wet textured yarn.
There had been many developments in false-twist Despite the fact that false-twist texturing creates
texturing during the last decade when the demand crimps to impart natural feel and stretch to
for synthetic filament yarn significantly increased. synthetic filament yarn, it lacks natural appearance
The most recent developments in false-twist due to monotonous geometry. In order to break up
texturing have shown that there is still the monotonous look, certain effects are imparted
considerable potential in the false-twist texturing to the false-twist textured yarn during the process
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 0098 (021) 64542600; Fax: 0098 (0021) 66400245
E-mail address: semnanirahbar@aut.ac.ir (R.S. Rahbar)
75
RJTA Vol. 14 No. 1 2010
Feed yarn was textured on a Scragg Shirley CS a clamp, the other end was laid over on another
12600 laboratory pin spindle false-twist texturing movable clamp, which was situated 1 meter away
machine. The texturing machine was modified by from the first clamp. A weight of 12 g was hanged
a water bath between feed roller and first heater. onto the yarn at the middle point. The movable
Two sets of experiments were carried out with and clamp was then slowly and steadily slid towards
without a water bath. Textured yarn samples were the stationary clamp until about 10 mm distance
obtained by using twist values of 2165, 2559 and was left between the two clamps. As the yarn gets
2954 turns per meter and texturing speeds of 51, slack, the yarn will snarl up to balance the internal
85 and 119 m/min. The heater temperature of 170 torque. Since the weight was hanged, the snarling
o
C and the winding overfeed of 3% were will oscillate and finally settle down. The twist of
maintained constant for all samples. snarl was then counted and expressed as twist per
meter. Ten measurements were made for each
2.2 Characterization Techniques sample and the average was then calculated
(Masoudian, 2004).
Yarn linear density (expressed in tex) was
determined in accordance with ASTM D 1577-96. 3. Results and Discussion
Mean values are the average of five
measurements. The changes in some physical properties of dry
and wet textured yarn including tensile and crimp
Stress-strain curves were obtained using an Instron properties are discussed in following sections. Wet
tensile tester model 5566 H1730. A gauge length textured yarn shows an interesting appearance
of 200 mm and cross-head speed of 500 mm/min which is completely different from normal (dry)
were employed. From stress-strain plots, the textured yarn. In the false-twist texturing, nearly
modulus, tenacity and breaking elongation were all twists are opened after the false-twist spindle
obtained. Ten specimens were tested for each and therefore the resultant textured yarn has no
sample. real twist. However, in the case of wet textured
yarn, some fraction of twist is not opened.
The crimp properties of textured yarn including Therefore, the appearance of wet textured yarn is
crimp contraction, crimp modulus and crimp like textured yarn, which is twisted after texturing.
stability were determined under the conditions of This effect may be due to the cohesion of moisted
DIN 53840 Part 1 standard method, 1983. Mean filaments in the texturing zone or tension
values are the average of five measurements. instability because of water.
In order to measure the twist liveliness of textured 3.1 Tensile Properties and Linear Density
yarn, approximately 1 meter of yarn was taken
from a package and while one end was fixed with Tensile properties of textured yarn as a function of
76
RJTA Vol. 14 No. 1 2010
yarn twist level and texturing speed are shown in Table 3. Crimp properties of dry and wet textured
Table 2 and Figures 1, 2 and 3. The tensile yarn at various twists and texturing
property values of both dry and wet textured yarn speeds
generally decreased as compared to those of feed
Texturing speed
contraction (%)
Crimp modulus
Crimp stability
yarn. This reduction is a well-known phenomenon
(m/min)
Crimp
(%)
(%)
in the case of false-twist texturing of fully-drawn Sample specification
feed yarn. This can be related to the increase in
low molecular weight fraction, formation of
51 55.14 37.00 91.50
hidden micro defects and disorientation of
†
structural elements (Demir & Behery, 1997; Dry,2165TPM 85 56.21 40.60 99.36
Vaidya, 1988). 119 54.06 38.65 94.83
Initial modulus
Linear density
Elongation at
break (%)
(cN/tex)
(m/min)
Wet,2165TPM 85 8.22 32.84 27.22 83.43 In the case of wet texturing, the highest contact
time (the lowest texturing speed) demonstrates the
119 8.27 28.07 26.33 88.40
largest negative effect on the tensile properties
51 8.24 36.96 33.33 99.63 (see Figures 1, 2 and 3). The longer contact time
Dry,2559TPM 85 8.32 37.85 31.67 115.16
may provide enough time for water to change the
tensile properties. From this result, it can be
119 8.22 37.35 33.89 105.73 predicted that wet high speed false-twist texturing
51 8.38 29.37 26.67 81.12 will cause a small decrease in values of tensile
properties. It should be noted that as the tensile
Wet,2559TPM 85 8.39 28.85 30.00 96.36
property loss is not too large, the wet textured yarn
119 8.25 33.45 32.22 98.44 is successfully knitted.
51 8.05 36.69 30.56 121.00
As seen from Table 2, the linear density of
Dry,2954TPM 85 8.25 36.78 29.01 110.91 textured samples in both wet and dry conditions is
119 8.19 36.88 28.89 80.65 fluctuated and it seems that water presence in yarn
does not show a distinctive effect on this property.
51 8.13 28.95 21.67 97.91
This can be attributed to errors in linear density
Wet,2954TPM 85 8.80 34.94 28.89 84.23 measuring due to high twist liveliness in textured
119 8.12 35.12 27.78 76.67 yarn.
†
Turns per meter
77
RJTA Vol. 14 No. 1 2010
41
39
37
Tenacity (cN/tex) Dry,51m/min
35 Wet,51m/min
Dry,85m/min
33
Wet,85m/min
Dry,119m/min
31
Wet,119m/min
29
27
25
2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100
T wist level (T PM)
Fig. 1. Tenacity of Dry and Wet Textured Yarn Versus Twist and Texturing Speed
36
34
32
Elongation at break (%)
Dry,51m/min
30 Wet,51m/min
Dry,85m/min
28 Wet,85m/min
Dry,119m/min
26
Wet,119m/min
24
22
20
2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100
T wist level (T PM)
Fig. 2. Elongation at Break of Dry and Wet Textured Yarn Versus Twist and Texturing Speed
125
115
Initial modulus (cN/tex)
Dry,51m/min
105 Wet,51m/min
Dry,85m/min
Wet,85m/min
95 Dry,119m/min
Wet,119m/min
85
75
2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100
T wist level (T PM)
Fig. 3. Initial Modulus of Dry and Wet Textured Yarn Versus Twist and Texturing Speed
78
RJTA Vol. 14 No. 1 2010
70
60
Dry,51m/min
Crimp contraction (%)
Wet,51m/min
50 Dry,85m/min
Wet,85m/min
Dry,119m/min
40 Wet,119m/min
30
20
2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100
T wist level (T PM)
Fig. 4. Crimp Contraction of Dry and Wet Textured Yarns Versus Twist and Texturing Speed
55
45
Dry,51m/min
Crimp modulus (%)
Wet,51m/min
35 Dry,85m/min
Wet,85m/min
Dry,119m/min
25 Wet,119m/min
15
5
2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100
T wist level (T PM)
Fig. 5. Crimp Modulus of Dry and Wet Textured Yarn Versus Twist and Texturing Speed
Figures 4 and 5 illustrate that the higher applied limit applied in this work has no significant effect
twist results in higher crimps and therefore higher on the crimp properties. However, the larger
crimp contraction and modulus values. This change in the contact time (texturing speed) is an
increase is more apparent in the case of dry important variable influencing the crimp
texturing. As expected, changing the applied twist properties.
does not influence crimp stability (see Figure 6).
Variables affecting the heat setting (like heater 3.3 Twist Liveliness
temperature) are factors which can alter crimp
stability. Changing the texturing speed within the Twist liveliness of dry and wet textured yarn at
79
RJTA Vol. 14 No. 1 2010
different applied twists and texturing speeds is textured yarn. If all of the applied twists are
demonstrated in Figure 7. Twist liveliness values opened, the yarn will tend to return to its twisting
of wet textured yarn are in a lower level compared condition. Increasing the applied twist decreases
to the normal (dry) textured yarn. This may be due the twist liveliness, but the texturing speed does
to the presence of some unopened twist in wet not create any specific trend in twist liveliness.
100
90 Dry,51m/min
Crimp stability (%)
Wet,51m/min
Dry,85m/min
Wet,85m/min
80
Dry,119m/min
Wet,119m/min
70
60
2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100
T wist level (T PM)
Fig. 6. Crimp Stability of Dry and Wet Textured Yarn Versus Twist and Texturing Speed
140
130
120
Dry,51m/min
Twist livliness (TPM)
110 Wet,51m/min
Dry,85m/min
100 Wet,85m/min
Dry,119m/min
90
Wet,119m/min
80
70
60
2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100
T wist level (T PM)
Fig. 7. Twist Liveliness of Dry and Wet Textured Yarn Versus Twist and Texturing Speed
texturing zone is not adequate due to the presence [5] Li, J., Artunc, H. & Weinsdorfer, H. 1998,
of water. This can be explained by lower crimp ‘Optimizing the yarn path profile in high
properties of wet textured yarn. speed polyester yarn texturing’, Chemical
Fibers International, vol. 48, no. 6, pp.
REFERENCES 522-526.
[6] Masoudian, Z. 2004, 'Effect of Yarn Wetting
[1] Canbaz karakas, H. & Dayioglu, H. 2004, on Some Physical Properties of Polyamide 6
‘Influence of major false-twist texturing False-Twist Textured Yarn', B.Sc. thesis,
parameters on the structural properties of Amirkabir University of Technology, Textile
polyamide 66 yarn’, Fibers & Textiles in Engineering Department.
Eastern Europe, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 23-28. [7] Schmenk, B. et al. 2002, ‘New developments
[2] Demir, A. 2004, ‘Recent developments in the for online quality control in high speed
field of texturing technologies’, High false-twist texturing’, Chemical Fibers
Performance Textiles and Apparels (HPTEX), International, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 352-353.
KTC Coimbatore, India. [8] Vaidya, A.A. 1988, ‘Production of Synthetic
[3] Demir, A. & Behery, M. 1997, ‘Synthetic Fibers’, Prentice-Hall, New Delhi, India.
filament yarn, texturing technology’, [9] Weinsdorfer, H. 2001, ‘Measures for
Prentice-Hall, New Jersy, USA. increasing output in texturing’, Chemical
[4] Hearle, J.W.S., Hollick, L. & Wilson, D.K. Fibers International, vol. 51, no. 5, pp.
2001, ‘Yarn Texturing Technology’, The 370-372.
Textile Institute, UK,.
81