Gambella 2013 AWPB Final Draft
Gambella 2013 AWPB Final Draft
Gambella 2013 AWPB Final Draft
September, 2020
Gambella
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTENTS Page
Lowlands Livelihood Resilience Project Gambella Coordination Unit 2013 Budget Summary.................1
1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................2
2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................................
3. 2013 EFY WORKPLAN AND BUDGET BY COMPONENTS AND SUB COMPONENTS...............3
COMPONENT THREE.................................................................................................................14
3.3 Improving Basic Service and Capacity Building Component..............................................................14
3.3.1 Provision of Basic Social Service and Infrastructure sub component............................................15
3.3.2 Institutional Capacity Building......................................................................................................16
3.3.3 Knowledge Management, Research and Policy Support sub component.......................................17
COMPONENT FOUR..............................................................................................................................18
3.4. Project management, Monitoring and Evaluation Component............................................................18
3.4.1 Physical Capacity Building............................................................................................................18
3.4.2 Monitoring and Evaluation............................................................................................................19
3.4.3 Internal Audit and Compliance......................................................................................................21
4
5
6
8
20
2013 EFY LLRP national level allocated Budget to accomplish the planned activities Birr
3,858,399,168.61 (USD 113,482,328.49). Which is showmen in the tables below in regional
and component wide.
LLRP in the Gambella regional coordination unit level Total Budget allocated for 2013 EFY to
accomplish the planned activities is Birr 321,984,234.29 (USD 9,470,124.53). Which is
showmen in the tables below in component wide.
319,908,434.29 9,409,071.59
Total
1
1. INTRODUCTION
The Lowlands livelihood Resilience Project (LLRP) is a SIX year program that will be implemented
from 2019 to 2025. LLRP will be funded by International Development Association (IDA),
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and beneficiary community contribution. The
total project cost is USD 451 million, of which USD 350 million mixed grant (USD 70 million) and
credit (USD 280 million) from IDA, USD 90 million from IFAD, and the remaining USD 11 million
from beneficiary communities. The program was approved by IFAD’s and Bank’s Executive Board in
September 12, 2019 and May 29, 2019, respectively and became effective as of November 21, 2019. It
will be implemented in 100 pastoral and agro pastoral woredas of the six regions (36 in Somali, 20
in Afar, 18 in Oromiya, 9 in SNNPR, 9 in Benishangule Gumuz and 8 in Gambella).
The project seeks to increase resilience including: (i) absorptive capacity, through rangeland and
natural resource management interventions, strategic investments and improved basic social service
delivery, which will help communities and pastoral and agro-pastoral system to absorb drought
shocks and reduce asset losses, (ii) adaptive capacity, through livelihood improvement and by
helping beneficiaries adopt climate smart agriculture and investing in research systems that will
contribute towards better adapting to changing climate; and (iii) transformative capacity, through
market linkages, small scale irrigation, and livelihood diversification, that provide a basis for more
fundamental socioeconomic changes and help beneficiary reduce their dependence on rain fed
agricultural system.
To achieve this, the project will combine three complementary layers of investments. Component
one focuses on improving the natural resource endowment and financing strategic investment;
component two improves public service delivery and supports market access to optimize the
utilization of investments made in the first component and diversification to reduce pressure off
natural resources; and component three builds the capacity of institutional environment and supports
social services delivery to ensure long term livelihoods sustainability.
This project will build on the long-standing experience of the Pastoral Community Development
Project (PCDP) for inclusive development through CDD-oriented service delivery, the Regional
Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience Project (RPLRP) and other related projects under the IGAD’s
2
Drought Disaster Resilience Sustainable Initiatives (IDDRSI) livelihoods resilience framework.
Further emphasis will be put on rangeland and natural resource management, livelihood improvement
and diversification and market access aspects to enhance the livelihoods resilience dimensions of the
interventions.
2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The Project Development Objective is to Improve Livelihood Resilience of Pastoral and Agro-
Pastoral Communities in Ethiopia.
3
3. 2013 EFY WORKPLAN AND BUDGET BY COMPONENTS AND SUB COMPONENTS
Table 3: Summary of Budget Allocated for Integrated Rangeland Development and Management Component
sub Major Activities Budget in Birr
components
1.1 Integrated Rangeland Management Planning 5,077,200.00
1.2 Supporting Strategic Investments 80,937,016.14
1.3 Conflict Management and Secure Access to Key Resources 1,367,500.00
Total 87,381,716.14
From the above Table, IRDM is consisting of three Major Sub-Components where by the Fiscal Year
budget is allocated based on Proportions.
Strategic interventions in rangeland development and management cycle basically rely on strictly
participatory approaches of developing natural resources and capacities of primary stakeholders. It is
due to such a realistic precondition that RMIPs are supposed to be formulated through different and
logically interdependent planning stages and operational steps. Under sub-component 1.1 of IRDM,
every activity cannot be treated independent of the other. Rather, the outputs of the preceding activity
are inputs of the succeeding management action. In general, integrated rangeland planning will
involve the step-by-step implementation of various activities; all together will end up with minimum
2 formulated RMIPs for subsequent detail studies and/or investment. Major activities constituted in
the planning phase, however, include the following five action points, and the details are summarized
below.
4
Table 4: Major Activities of Integrated Rangeland Management Planning
N0 Core Activities Specific Activities
Budget Remar
ks
1 Screening and Verification of Shelf Verification of Sub-projects 200,000.00
Sub-Projects Including ESIA Issues
2 Formulation of New Participatory Formulation of Regional RMIPs
4,271,200.0
Rangeland Management and
0
Investment Plans (RMIPs)
Training for Taskforce members 150,000.00
and Regional Stakeholders
Training for Zonal, Cluster and 345,000.00
Woreda Stakeholders
Formulation of Rangeland
Management and Investment 3,256,200.00
Plans
Regional Level Validation of 520,000.00
RMIPs
3 Familiarization of RMIPs to 210,000.00
Federal and Regional Stakeholders
4 Conducting Basic Trainings on Federal, Regional, Cluster/Zonal 396,000.00
GPS, GIS and Remote Sensing Level
Applications
Grand Total budget 5,077,200
Following the participatory formulation of the RMIPs, two basic and mutually interdependent
categories of management actions of rangeland resources are supposed to be implemented in an
interrelated link that activities under each initiative positively feed to each other. Rangeland
Management and pasture improvement initiatives and strategic investments focusing on development
of basic public infrastructures such as: (i) water resources, (b) small-scale irrigation schemes and (iii)
spot improvements (like roads, bridges and other cross-structures). Likewise, other public economic
investments include primary and secondary livestock markets, veterinary clinics, etc.) Constitute the
two complementary intervention areas.
5
A) Rangeland Management and Pasture Improvement
Major intervention areas under this initiative include management actions related to sets of activities
such as rangeland rehabilitation, soil and water conservation (SWC), gully control and stabilization,
soil moisture retention, forage and pasture development, and rangelands afforestation measures.
Investments that are believed to support such initiatives such as; establishment and/or
rehabilitation/upgrading of nurseries with objectives of producing tree and forage seedlings, and
supplies of agro-forestry inputs will be considered as part of the overall intervention.
In the Table below, a number of activities are to be done in order to manage the Rangelands and
improve Pasture for the Health of our Environment so as to boost its Productivity which in turn
results in our Livelihood improvements. The core activities mentioned in the table are to be done, that
is to rehabilitate the Rangelands for its well beings and hence its productivity can be enhanced and
the other activities like establishment of Nurseries and forage seed multiplication centers are to be
done in order to have access to the Forage seeds and Agro-forestry seedlings for the betterment of
PAP Community.
6
Table 6: pasture development, management and improvement
No Core Activities Unit Target Budget
Establishment of Forage Seed N0 1 1,500,000.00
Types of Multiplication Centers
Interventions
1 Establishment and 6,400,000.00
Upgrading of No
Establishment of New Nurseries 8
Nurseries
In the project documents, the concept strategic investment has displayed to show the spatial
orientation of basic public economic investments to serve the most underserved communities through
7
creating conducive environments to access to key resources. The new concept, “rangeland as an entry
point of project intervention” has also been underlined to rehabilitate, conserve and develop key
resources of PAP areas (wet lands, dry season grazing reserves, and potential areas of water
reservoirs) along livestock mobility routes and across the traditional rangeland units. To come across
with such target areas, project districts/woredas have been selected in response to the primary criteria
of creating geographically interconnected rangeland units and form the so called rangeland clusters.
In the table, three Road Construction Projects were selected in Gambella, i.e. Achagna-Udek,
Mengeshi-Dope and Itang-Pool Roads.
Table 8: three Road Construction Projects Screened in the Region and Estimated Costs
No Region Access Roads
Sub-Projects Estimated Engineering 50% of the budget allocated for
Cost the fiscal year
1 Gambella 3 69,249,632.28 34,624,816.14
Table 9: List of Sub-projects Specified in the Region, Number and Estimated Costs
N0. List of Sub-Projects No Budget
1 Construction of Livestock Market Centers 2 20,000,000.00
2 Construction of Veterinary Clinics 1 4,000,000.00
3 Maintenance of existing Water Points 60 8,428,800.00
Total 32,428,800.00
8
Conflict analysis and mapping
Identification of institutional setups of customary institutions, and accordingly, conduct
appropriate training sessions in response to identified capacity gaps
Facilitating socially and spatially cross-boundary platforms
Supporting and facilitating policy dialogues
Supporting capacity building and research initiatives
Respective to each and every sub-project of strategic investments (particularly those of water
resource development, small-scale irrigation schemes development, and roads and bridges including
other cross-structures), environmental and social safeguard elements have been considered as one of
the shelf project screening criteria. In the development processes of annual work plan and budget
(AWPB) documents too, certain aspects of risk mitigation are considered.
Table 11: Activities, target and associated budgets of Environmental and Safeguard Considerations
No Major Activities Unit Targe Budget allocated in Remark
t Birr
ETB USD
1 Screening of Shelf projects, strategic No of 51 15,000.00 441.18 Q_I
projects, Projects related to Projects
community investment funds (CIF)
and Screening of Livelihood business
plan
2 Preparation of Safeguard tools woredas 8 40,000 1,176.46 Q_
including ESMPs, RAPs/ ARAPs/
PMPs
3 Monitoring, supervision and No of 200 90,000.00 2,647.06 Q1-Q4
evaluation of safeguard activities at Sup
9
Regions days
4 Training to woreda Coordinators and No of 16 96,000.00 2,823.53 Q1-Q2
woreda focal persons on social and participa
environmental screening of nts
subprojects for 3 days
Total ---- -- 241, 000 7,088.23
10
1.5 Training of DAs No 360 2,160,000.00 BANRD& WOANRD
1.6 Training of No WOLFRD& WOANRD
Community 400 160,000.00
Sub Total 8,400,000.00
2 Scaling up 2,650,000.00 BANRD& WOANRD
technology
Sub Total 2,650,000.00
Grand total 11,050,000
The Sub-component focused on strengthen Animal health service delivery system, through
Rehabilitation, Equipping 16 animal health post and provision of technical and practical training for
animal health experts, animal health technicians in 8 targeted project woreda of the region, Equipping
one regional animal diagnostic laboratory and provision of training for lab technicians, the detail
planned activities and budget breakdown of the sub-component shown in table 13 blow.
11
sub Total 103 170,000 3,453,800.00
Budget for supervision and technical
4 support
4.1 Budget for agencies 60,000.00
4.2 Budget for Woredas 360,000.00
sub Total 420,000.00
Grand Total Comp 2.1 Sub Total 0
The Sub-component focused on strengthen Animal health service delivery system, through
Rehabilitation, Equipping 16 animal health post and provision of technical and practical training for
48 animal health experts, 240 pastoral and agro-pastorals communities in 8 targeted project woreda of
the region, Equipping one regional animal diagnostic laboratory and provision of training for lab
technicians, the detail planned activities and budget breakdown of the sub-component shown in table
15 below
12
Provision and supply of office equipment
to newly established RuSACCOs (Table,
2.2.4 Chair, safe box, calculator. Shelf) No SACCOs 24 600,000.00 RCPA
Training for Woreda Cooperative experts
24
2.2.5 and Auditors at regional level No SACCOs 240,000.00 RCPA
Training for new RuSSACOs Committee on
2.2.6 financial management No 160 960,000.00 RCPA
Sub Total
256 2,160,000.00
Grand Total
13
COMPONENT THREE
Under this component, in 2013 EFY, the major activities planned include; implementation of
community subprojects, preparation of three years Keble development plan in 8 project woredas,
human capacity building activities related to CIF, component specific comprehensive training for
project staffs, capacity building for government staff, competitive grants for universities and
institutions, knowledge management and communication, evidence based policy and research.
Thus, a total budget of Birr 142,366,100.00 is allocated to implement activities planned under
Improving Basic Services and Capacity Building Component. From the total component budget; Birr
122,400,000.00 is allocated from the project, Birr 13,600,000.00 or 8.69% is expected to be
contributed by beneficiary communities in the form of cash and in kind/labor.
Out of the total budget allocated for the component, Birr 136,000,000.00 or 96 % is allocated for
Provision of Basic Social Services and Infrastructure subcomponent, Birr 3,786,300.00 or 2.6 % is
allocated for activities related to institutional capacity building subcomponent, and the remaining Birr
2,057,800 .00 or 1.4 % for Knowledge Management, Research and Policy Support sub component.
14
It was planned to undertake preparation of Keble Development Plan and Community Action Plan in
2012 EFY. However, due to COVID-19, these activities are not implemented as planned. It was then
carried over to 2013 EFY and undertaken in 48 Keeble’s of the 8 project woredas.
Table 18: Budget allocated for implementation of Community Subprojects in 2013 EFY by
sector
KM of
Road
No of Budget(million Birr) No. of beneficiaries
sub
Sector projec
ts Total project
cost in USD
Community contribution
Total project Female
cash In kind/ LLRP share cost Male Total
labor
Human
Health Post 08 566,667 1,700,000 20,400,000 22,666,667 4,240 4,124 8,364 666,666.67
Animal
Health Post 04
283,333 850,000 10,200,000 11,333,333 18,995 2,324 21,319 333,333.33
Community
Road 21
1,487,500 4,462,500 53,550,000 59,500,000 15,534 13,271 28,805 163 1,750,000.00
KM
Total 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
15
During 2013 EFY, a total of Birr 3,786,300.00 is allocated for training and awareness creation. The
detail human capacity building activities planned and budget allocated for the planning period is
presented as follows.
In order to document best practices and other project activities and facilitate trainings and workshops,
it is planned to procure one photo cameras with unit cost of 40,000.
16
3.3.3 Knowledge Management, Research and Policy Support sub component
This sub component supports continuous learning, adaptable knowledge management, and
communication on innovative tools and approaches. This subcomponent will also identify the
indigenous knowledge and customary institutions that are expected to play pivotal roles in
strengthening various development activities among PAP communities. It will also support research
and capacity building in thematic priority areas of PAP systems. In addition, it will introduce digital
technologies and pilot other innovations to solve critical bottlenecks in PAP value chains and finance
technical assistance for evidence based policy making and community engagement in policy
dialogue.
Table 20: Budget Allocated for Knowledge Management, Research and Policy Support
No List of activities Unit Plan Budget Rema
. rk
1 Documentation of indigenous knowledge and technologies Document 02 170,000
at regional/RCST level.
3 Conduct one day community level monthly learning fora participant 14 & 40 172,800
at Keble center (the participants are KDC member, woreda
project coordinator , Keble facilitator , 30 peoples from
each Keble community)
4 Printing of Bi -annual brochure Numbers 1000 15,000
Total 1,857,800
COMPONENT FOUR
17
No Major Activities Budget allocated in Birr Remark
3.4.1 Project Mgmt.- Investment 24,825,975.72
3.4.2 Project Mgmt.-Recurrent 1,186,000.00
3.4.3 Monitoring & Evaluation 24,566,842.54
Sub component grand budget 50,578,818.26
Major activities under this component include physical capacity building, and allocation of
operational Expenses at regional and woreda levels. The total budget allocated for the component for
the planning period is Birr 50,578,818.15 (USD 1,487,612.29). Detailed activities are described
below...
In order to speed up the implementation of project activities at all levels Birr (15,058,515.68 USD
442897.52 ) allocated to buy 4 vehicles for regional, 8 for project woredas and 16 motor cycles
again for project woredas was planned by federal LLRP planned to be procured in the planning
period. Budget allocated for the office equipment and furniture are in the planning period is Birr
2,360,053.33 (USD 69,413.33). Summary of the procurement items with detail costs are presented
below and the details by woredas on the Table below.
Major activities under this component include physical capacity building, and allocation of
operational Expenses at regional and woreda levels. The total budget allocated for the component for
the planning period is Birr 50,578,818.15 (USD 1,487,612.29). Detailed activities are described
below...
18
A participatory monitoring, evaluation and learning system has been developed for regular
monitoring of implementation and evaluating of project achievements. In order to follow up the
progress of the project properly and make timely corrective actions accordingly, simple and user
friendly reporting and monitoring formats will be developed to be used at federal, regional and
woreda levels. Project progress reports are expected to be produced and delivered every quarter and
on annual basis for different project stakeholders. Besides, comparison of actual project performances
with that of the planned activities indicated on the annual plan will be made. In addition, depending
on the nature of the indicators, project achievements against the targets indicated on the result
framework will be reported on quarterly and annual basis.
More specifically, providing M&E manual training for project staff (region, and woreda level), and
regional level performance review workshop to evaluate project activities and establishment of
Grievance Redress Mechanism are the key activities planned under this section in the planning
period. The total allocated budget to accomplished the planning activities is Birr 1,186,000.00 (USD
34,882.35)
19
Table 22: Major activities planned under M&E section in the planning period
20
3.4.3. Internal Audit and Compliance
The annual audit plan comprises a detail audit program for each auditees that will be covered
during the 2013 budget year. Since it is the new project, on the basis of general risk assessment
on the adequacy of the internal control system and control environment, the IAC Unit’s annual
plan is prepared and allocated the required resource by considering the existed qualified staffs
and to be undertaken in comply with the IAC manual, the MoFEC’s I.A. professional standard
on Internal auditing and guidelines.so regionally planned to be 100% audit coverage in the 1 st
quarter planned to cover 2 ,in the 2 nd quarter planned to cover 4, in the third quarter planned 3
and lastly in the 4th quarter is planned to prepare 4 audit documents.
The End!
21