Dr. Israr Ahmed Preached That The Quran Is Not The Real

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 3
At a glance
Powered by AI
The passage discusses Dr. Israr Ahmad's controversial views that the Quran we possess is not the original and contains errors, and the criticism this attracted.

Dr. Israr Ahmad believed the real Quran is on Loh-e-Mehfooz and is error-free, while the version we have contains mistakes. He said some Quranic verses refer to the original on Loh-e-Mehfooz, not our version.

Zarb-e-Haq criticizes Dr. Israr Ahmad for expressing these controversial views publicly instead of in academic circles. It says he would have been excommunicated for these statements.

Moujoda Quran Asli Nahin: Dr.

Israr Ahmad

Dr. Israr Ahmed Preached That the Quran Is Not the Real

Compiled by: Rana Ammar Mazhar


kalaam
08-10-2010, 03:36 AM
Karachi (representative of Zarb-e-Haq): Internationally famed, renowned scholar Dr. Israr Ahmed; the
founder of organizations like Khudam al Quran, Tanzeem-e-Islami and Tehreek-e-Khilafat has preached to
the public in public gatherings, writings and video cassettes that the Quran we have in our possession is not
the real one rather it is a copy. The real Quran is written on Loh-e-Mehfooz which is free from all mistakes
whilst the Quran possessed by the Ummah has mistakes in it. Whilst providing a commentary of the verses
dealing with the protection of the Quran Dr. Israr asserted that the promise is not about the Quran possessed
by the Ummah, rather it is about the Quran of Loh-e-Mehfooz. “Surely We have revealed the Reminder and
We will most surely be its guardian” do not refer to the copy of Allah’s book that is in our hands rather these
verses were revealed for the verses written on Loh-e-Mehfooz. Allah also says "None touches save the
purified ones" this verse likewise does not refer to the copy of the Quran we possess, that is the Usmani
scripture that is unprotected and can be touched by impure and pure people.

Zarb-e-Haq’s Commentary: …. the intellectual commentaries of the Ulema exist in their academic and non
academic books. Whilst one can also deem such commentaries as incorrect, it remains an unequivocal fact
that none of these scholars of commentary ever had doubts over the authenticity of the Quran. This Quranic
verses are deemed sufficient enough about the protection of the present Quran. Qazi Abdul Kareem Kalachi
kept strking his head on account of the statement of Maulana Anwar Shah Kashmiri about Tahreef of words
in the Quran in his ‘Faiz al Baari’. Had Maulana Anwar Shah Kashmiri like Dr. Israr spoken these words in
public gatherings or common gatherings of scholars then he would have been excommunicated from Islam
and would have been forced for repent…”

Monthly Zarb-e-Haq, for the month of May 2005 (Madressa Mehmoodia, Jain Road, Gazdarabad, Ranchod
Line Karachi) (http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/tahreef/zarbehaq.jpg)

We would like to ask the mullhas why they are merely targeting Dr. Israr Ahmed? It is not like he woke up
in the morning and inexplicably uttered those words. His theory is based on the various Sunni traditions that
imply that mistakes are present in the present Quran. If Deobandi logic suggests that Dr. Israr should be
deemed an infidel then what about those scholars that he relied upon to shape his theory?

When Zarbe Haq doesn't know the reality about what Anwar Shah kashmiri really said, how can you trust it
in case of Israr Ahmad? So it is to be rejected too. Find some other evidence

http://haqforum.com/vb/archive/index.php/t-12190.html

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy