Examiner Report Nov 2020 PDF
Examiner Report Nov 2020 PDF
Examiner Report Nov 2020 PDF
PAGE
(ii)
Foreword & Acknowledgement …………………………………….
CHAPTER VI The NBAA Special Awards Programme for Candidates with 134
Meritorious Examination Achievements …………………………….
FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The current examination scheme has been tested for the first time in this November 2020 examination
session. It has basically be designed to test competencies rather than understanding of knowledge.
In order to realize this goal, there is a need to streamline the whole process from teaching of the
students, setting of examination questions as well as marking of the examinations. Here it means
that the trainers, learners, examiners as well as examination markers need to speak the same
language. If there is any mismatch between these key stakeholders the aim of competence based
examination scheme cannot be realized. Trainers are required to change their teaching orientation
to match with competence approach. They are required to guide learners to acquire competencies
rather than knowledge. Learners are supposed to change their learning styles from rote learning to
active learning that will enable them to learn the required competencies. Those who are setting
examination questions should also consider the fact that they are testing understanding of skills and
competencies rather than understanding of information. How to orient all these stakeholders to have
the same orientation has remained a challenge in implementing the competence based examination
scheme. But as we move forward the situation is changing into better through trainings and
acquisition of experiences.
The current examination scheme has eight subjects in the Accounting Technician Levels I and II
as shown below:
Code Name
Accounting Technician Level I
T01 Book keeping and Accounts
T02 Elements of Business Mathematics and Statistics
T03 Introduction to Information and Communication Technology
T.04 Business Communication Skills
ii
The Professional Examination Scheme has three level structures as
follows:
(i) Foundation (Knowledge and Skills) level, having six subjects,
(ii) Intermediate (Skills and Analysis in Context) level, having six subjects, and
(iii) Final (Professional Analysis, Application and Evaluation) level, having four subjects.
A1 Quantitative Techniques
A2 Business and Management
A3 Financial Accounting
A4 Cost Accounting
A5 Business Law
A6 Business Economics
iii
ACCOUNTING MANPOWER
Since the inception of the Accounting Technician examinations, the Board has been able to produce
14,289 Accounting T e c h n i c i a n s . This category of Accounting Technicians covers 4,035
Accounting Technicians Certificate (ATEC) graduates, 2,971 Basic Book-keeping Certificate
(BBC) graduates, 5,746 National Book-keeping Certificate (NABOCE) graduates and 1,537
National Accountancy Diploma (NAD) graduates.
The Board has also been able to produce 10,498 CPA (T) graduates since it started conducting these
examinations in May, 1975, 210 CPA (T) Equivalent since it started conducting these examinations
in November 2014. In total, the Board has been able to produce 24,812 accounting personnel
(manpower) of different levels and categories serving both in public and private sectors inside and
outside Tanzania.
EXAMINATION CENTRES
During the 92nd examination session, examinations were held in 16 examination centres, where Dar
es Salaam had 06 centers and the other 10 centers located in Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar. These
centres accommodated 6,179 candidates sitting at different levels of the Board’s examinations. The
examination centres were as follows:
Dar es Salaam Centres were all located at APC Hotel and Conference Centre (Bunju).
Other centres
1. Arusha – Institute of Accountancy Arusha (IAA)
2. Dodoma – Institute of Rural Development Planning (IRDP)
3. Iringa – Iringa RVTSC
4. Kilimanjaro – Moshi Cooperative University (MoCU)
5. Mbeya – Mzumbe University – Mbeya
campus
6. Morogoro – Muslim University of Morogoro (MUM)
7. Mwanza –St. Dominic Pastoral Centre
8. Tabora – Tabora RVTSC
9. Tanga – St. Joseph’s Commercial School (SJCS)
10. Zanzibar - State University of Zanzibar (SUZA)
iv
OBJECTIVES OF THE REPORT
The Report is intended to avail to trainers and candidates, the examinations’ overall general
performance, specific areas of weaknesses and suggestions for improvement. It is an important
guide to candidates as well as trainers, setters, markers and moderators of the Board’s future
examinations.
Analysis of the examination performance is presented in Table 3 of this report while a detailed
analysis indicating the performance of candidates registered by the recognized Tuition Providers is
shown in Tables 10 to 11 of the report. Analysis of performance in each subject is presented in
Tables 5.1 to 9.1.8. Comments and observations in the Examiners' and Performance Report are
supported by relevant statistical analysis of the candidates' performance in each examination level.
The last chapter of the Report comprises a list of prizes offered by NBAA and other prize donors.
These prizes will be awarded to candidates who have excelled in their examinations during the
graduation ceremony expected to be held on October 2021.
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
On behalf of the Board and on my own behalf, I wish to convey my very sincere appreciation to all
persons who willingly supported the Board in this demanding professional task. I am indeed
particularly thankful to all Tuition Providers who devoted their energy and time to guide the
candidates and preparing them for the examinations. I am also delighted to acknowledge the
contribution of Board’s Examiners, Markers, Invigilators, and the Board’s Secretariat, the Education
and Publications Committee and the Governing Board for their much appreciated co- operation
during the whole process of the NBAA’s 92nd examination session. Last but not least, I congratulate
all examination candidates who studied hard and sat for the 92nd examinations of the Board.
Once again, I would like to reiterate that the Examiners' Report is prepared to help trainers and the
Board’s candidates to improve on their future performance by learning from previous experiences.
I, therefore, call upon readers of this Report to come up with constructive suggestions on how to
improve further the examination process and reports arising therein.
Yours sincerely,
vi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO THE 92ND EXAMINATION SESSION – NOVEMBER 2020
1.0 PREAMBLE:
The Board conducts its normal session examinations twice in a year during the months of
May and November. This session is the 92nd examination session in which the
examinations were conducted from Tuesday 3rd to Friday 6th November 2020.
4,492 candidates applied for the examinations, out of whom 349 (7.8%) were absent, 4,143
(92.2%) sat for the examinations at different levels. The candidature distribution this
session is as shown in the Table below:
vii
2.0 TREND OF THE EXAMINATION CANDIDATURE
Table 1 and Graph 1 shows candidature trend (candidates who sat for the
examinations) for the eight examination sessions: November 2016 to November 2020.
Table 1
EXAMINATION CANDIDATURE TREND FOR THE PRECEDING NINE
EXAMINATION SESSIONS NOVEMBER 2016 TO NOVEMBE 2020
85th Session May 2017 103 185 557 3,477 2,292 6,614
86th Session November 2017 100 172 572 3,235 1,977 6,056
viii
Graph 1
8,000
Column1 6,934
7,000 6,614
6,282 6,183 6,235 6,179
6,056
6,000
5,000
No. of Candidates
4,492
4,000 3,591
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Nov-16 May-17 Nov-17 May-18 Nov-18 May-19 Nov-19 May-20 Nov-20
Examination Sessions
ix
2.2 Candidature Distribution – November 2020
Candidature distribution for the November 2020 examination session shows that majority
of the candidates who sat for these examinations were in the Intermediate level
examinations.
The Chart below shows the candidature distribution
Chart 1
93
431
1559
2361
Candidature in Intermediate level is highest as most of the candidates who enroll at this
level are those who have completed a three years’ bachelor degree programme or its
equivalent in accounting and enjoy exemptions to sit for the Intermediate Level
examinations. A tertiary institution which offers bachelor degree courses related to
accountancy courses has to apply to NBAA for its graduands to be given exemption in the
Board’s examinations.
x
3.0 EXAMINATION PERFORMANCE
3.1 Pass rates for examination levels tested in November 2020
NOTE:
Among the candidates who passed Intermediate and Final Levels there were twenty (20)
candidates with foreign qualifications.
These candidates are eligible for the award of letters of success and certificates to enable
them register as members.
xi
3.2 Examination Performance by Gender:
Table 3: Examination performance by gender in the five examination levels
PASSED
10 22% 8 17% 18 39% 10 11% 4 4% 14 15% 54 14% 49 12% 103 26% 151 7% 128 6% 279 13% 133 9% 116 8% 249 17% 663 16%
PARTLY PASS
6 13% 7 15% 13 28% 24 26% 20 22% 44 48% 95 24% 82 21% 177 45% 469 22% 468 22% 937 44% 331 22% 293 20% 624 42% 1795 43%
FAILED
6 13% 9 20% 15 33% 18 20% 16 17% 34 37% 62 16% 54 14% 116 29% 489 23% 427 20% 916 43% 328 22% 276 19% 604 41% 1685 41%
TOTAL
22 48% 24 52% 46 100% 52 57% 40 43% 92 100% 211 53% 185 47% 396 100% 1109 52% 1023 48% 2132 100% 792 54% 685 46% 1477 100% 4143 100%
xii
CHAPTER I
FOUNDATION LEVEL
The Foundation Level examinations consist of six subjects. These subjects were tested for the
first time this session following the review of the examination structure and syllabi.
In this examination, 431 candidates registered themselves for the examination out of whom
35 (8.1%) candidates were absent. Of the 396 candidates who wrote the examination, 103 (26.0%)
candidates passed hence becoming eligible for a STATEMENT OF SUCCESS at this level.
177(44.7%) candidates have part passed while 166 (29.3%) candidates failed the examination. (See
Table 4 on page 3).
1
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
The Intermediate Level examinations consist of six subjects. As with the Foundation Level
examinations, these subjects were tested for the first time this session following the review of the
examination structure.
In this examination, 2,361 candidates registered themselves out of whom 229 (9.7%) candidates were
absent. Of the 2,132 candidates who wrote the examination, 279 (13.1%) candidates passed hence
becoming eligible for a STATEMENT OF SUCCESS at this level. 937 (43.9 %) candidates have part
passed while 916 (43.0%) candidates failed the examination. (See Table 4 on page3).
FINAL LEVEL
The Final Level examinations consist of four subjects. These examinations were tested for the
first time following review of the examination structure.
In this examination, 1,559 candidates registered themselves for Final Level examinations, out of
whom 82 (5.3%) candidates were absent. Of the 1,477 candidates who wrote the examination,
663 (22.0%) candidates passed, hence becoming eligible for a STATEMENT OF SUCCESS at this
Level. 2,676 (43.3%) candidates have part passed while 604 (40.9%) candidates failed the examination.
(See Table 4 on page 3).
In this examination session, 14 candidates qualify for the certificate of completion of the ATEC
programme, comprising 4 (28.6%) female candidates and 10 (71.4%) male candidates.
All 14 candidates who qualified for the Accounting Technician Certificate passed ATEC II
subjects
On the other hand, 243 candidates qualify for the certificate of completion of the CPA programme,
comprising 114 (46.9) female candidates and 129 (53.1%) male candidates.
2
TABLE 4
ENTRIES 48 100 93 100 431 100 2,361 100 1,559 100 4,492 100
CANDIDATES 46 95.8 92 98.9 396 91.9 2,132 90.3 1,477 94.7 4,143 92.2
WHOSAT
PART 13 28.3 44 47.8 177 44.7 937 43.9 624 42.2 1,795 41.4
PASSED
PASSED 18 39.1 14 15.2 103 26.0 279 13.1 249 16.7 663 22.0
FAILED 15 32.6 34 37.0 166 29.3 916 43.0 604 40.9 1,685 36.5
TOTAL 46 100 92 100 396 100 2,132 100 1,477 100 4,143 100
3
CHAPTER II
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUBJECT-WISE
INTRODUCTION
This chapter provides a detailed analysis of performance of candidates in each subject at
each level of the Board’s examinations. General evaluation and assessment of candidates’
performance at each level and specific assessment of candidates in each topic examined is
analysed. The Board hopes that this report will provide necessary guidance to trainers and
students for the better results in the Board’s future examinations.
The November 2020 examination is the first examination session under the revised
examination scheme and syllabi. The scheme has a two tier system of five different levels:
two at the Accounting Technician level and three at the Professional level.
A total of 24 examination papers were attempted this session as detailed hereunder:
(a) Accounting Technician Level I with four papers;
(b) Accounting Technician Level II with four papers;
(c) The Foundation Level with six papers;
(d) The Intermediate Level with six papers;
(e) The Final Level with four papers.
4
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL I
GENERAL PERFORMANCE
46 candidates sat for the ATEC I examinations. The performance indicates that 18
(39.1%) candidates passed and therefore become eligible for the STATEMENT OF
SUCCESS for ATEC. 13 (28.3%) candidates have passed some of the subjects in this level
while 15 (32.6%) candidates failed the examinations.
The general performance subject-wise is as shown in Table 5.1
TABLE 5.1
ATEC I SUBJECT-WISE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS: NOVEMBER 2019
AND NOVEMBER 2020
Performance
Paper Subject November November
Code 2019 2020
2018
Entries Pass % Entries Pass %
5
GENERAL COMMENTS
6
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of
23 candidates who answered the question only 03 (13.0%) candidates
passed while the remaining 21 (91.3%) candidates failed. Out of those
who passed 01 (4.3%), 01 (4.3%) and 01 (4.3%) candidates scored pass,
credit and distinction marks respectively.
QUESTION 4: P R E P A R A T I O N O F F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Candidates were required to:
(a) Mention and briefly explain set of financial statements as per
IAS 1.
(b) Prepare the Statement of Financial Position as at the given period.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 23
candidates who answered the question, 21 (91.3%), candidates passed
while the remaining 02 (8.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed
08 (34.8%), 06 26.1) and 07 (30.4%) candidates scored pass, credit and
credit and distinction marks respectively.
7
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the paper
The panel of examiners observed that the questions were clear and fair. Also
they commented that the questions were set within the prescribed syllabus
and could be answered within the allocated time.
TABLE 5.1.1
T.01 – CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Classification of Marks 0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL
TABLE 5.1.2
T.01 – COMPARISON OF PASS RATES WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
8
T.02 - ELEMENTS OF BUSINESS MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
The principal learning outcome of this paper is to build basic skills in the collection,
processing, presentation and interpretation of simple numerical and statistical
knowledge and skills as a tool of learning and understanding related subjects at
higher levels.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper comprised of four questions whereby candidates were required to answer
all questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 40% of the total
marks.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
Candidates were tested on the following topics:
9
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 28
candidates who answered the question, only 01 (03.57%), candidates passed
while the remaining 27 (96.43%) candidates failed. A candidate who passed
scored pass marks. No candidate scored credit and distinction marks in this
question.
Majority of the candidates failed to compute numbers of four-letter words
with repetition allowed. They also demonstrated weakness in applying
compound interest formulae
QUESTION 3: A. PERCENTAGES
B. ANNUITY, SINKING FUND, PRESENT VALUES OF ANNUITY AND
AMORTIZATION
10
passed 01 (3.6%) and 01 (3.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and
distinction marks respectively.
Majority of the candidates failed to provide a clear distinction between
probability and non-probability.
TABLE 5.1.4
T.02. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019 EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
21 out of 56 37.5 10 out of 28 35.7
11
T.03 – INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
TECHNOLOGY
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
The principal learning outcome of the paper i s to enable candidates apply
knowledge and skills in information technology to solve problems in the business
environment.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper comprised of four questions whereby candidates were required to answer
all questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 40% of the
total marks.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS
Candidates were required to:
(a) Choose the most correct answer among the four given
alternatives.
(b) State whether the given statement is true or false.
(c) Match item from LIST A with the statements from LIST
B appropriately.
12
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 28
candidates who answered the question only 03 (10.7%) candidates scored
pass marks while the remaining 25 (89.3%) candidates failed.
Majority of the candidates failed to explain the design and function of CPU.
Furthermore, candidates revealed failure in explaining the challenges of e-
commerce.
13
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the paper
The panel of examiners in assessing the paper were of the opinion that the
paper was fair and the questions tested covered a wide range of the syllabus.
The mixture of the questions was adequate and the distribution of marks was
fair in relation to the time allocated.
(b) Candidates overall performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out
of 18 candidates who answered the examination, 12 (42.9%), candidates
passed while the remaining 16 (57.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who
passed 11 (39.3%) and 01 (3.6%) candidates scored pass marks. There were
no candidates who scored credit and distinction marks in this examination
paper.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table
5.1.5
TABLE 5.1.5
T.03 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Classification of
Marks 0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL
No. of Candidates
(Frequency) 16 11 01 00 28
Percentage
57.1 39.3 3.6 00 100
TABLE 5.1.6
14
T.04 – BUSINESS COMMUNICATION SKILLS
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to enable candidates to master basic
English language skills and be able to use them for communicating effectively in
business environment.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
This paper consisted of six compulsory questions.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
Candidates were tested on the following topics:
15
QUESTION 3: A. DEMONSTRATE LISTENING SKILLS
(a) Carefully read the passage and then answer the questions that followed.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 16
candidates who answered the question only 05 (31.3%) candidates scored
pass marks while the remaining 11 (68.8%) candidates failed.
Majority of candidates demonstrated poor reading skills as they failed to
read and comprehend hence chose wrong answers from the given
alternatives.
TABLE 5.1.7
T.04 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Classification of Marks 0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL
No. of Candidates
(Frequency) 06 10 00 00 16
Percentage
37.5 62.5 00 00 100
TABLE 5.1.8
17
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN EXAMINATION LEVEL II
GENERAL PERFORMANCE
In this level, 92 candidates sat for the examinations, out of whom 14 (15.2%) passed, 44
(47.8%) candidates passed various subjects in this level while 34 (37.0%) failed the
examination. The 14 candidates who passed are eligible for the Board's award of the
STATEMENT OF SUCCESS FOR ATEC II. The general performance subject-wise is
as shown on table 6.1
TABLE 6.1
18
T.05 - PRINCIPLES OF ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates on application of basic
concepts and principles of accounting in preparing and interpreting statements and
reports on a practical context as per IAS 1 and apply audit knowledge in appraising
data and assisting audit staff during audit undertakings.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper consisted of four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective
question which carried 40% of the total marks.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
In this paper, candidates were tested on the following topics:
QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS
Candidates were required to:
(a) Choose the most correct answer among the given alternatives.
(b) Write whether True or False for each of the given statements.
(c) Write the letter from list B against the corresponding roman number
in list A.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 53
candidates who answered the question, 29 (54.7%) candidates passed while
the remaining 24 (45.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 28
(52.8%) and 1 (1.9%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively.
No candidate scored distinction marks in this question.
Candidates demonstrated lack of knowledge on theoretical accounting
relevant to this subject.
QUESTION 2: PREPARATIONS OF MANUFACTURING ACCOUNTS
From the given information, candidates were required to prepare:
(a) Manufacturing Statement.
(b) Income Statement.
(c) Statement of Financial Position.
19
QUESTION 3: NON-PROFIT-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS
Candidates were required to:
20
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners was of the opinion that the examination was fair,
clearly worded and appropriately spread within the syllabus.
(b) Candidates’ overall performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 53
candidates who answered the examination only 16 (30.2%) candidates scored pass
marks while the remaining 37 (69.8%) candidates failed. There were neither credit
nor distinction marks in this examination paper.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table
6.1.2
TABLE 6.1.2
TABLE 6.1.3
T.05 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019 EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
33 out of 110 30.0 16 out of 53 30.2
21
T.06 - PRINCIPLES OF COST ACCOUNTING AND PROCUREMENT
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates on application of
terminologies, methods, techniques and principles of Cost Accounting and Procurement
for providing management with information for decision making, planning and controlling
business operations.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 60 candidates who
answered the question only, 01 (1.7%), candidates passed scored pass marks, while 59 (98.3%)
candidates failed. No score credit and distinction marks.
Most of the candidates were confusing among the various methods of overheads absorption.
22
QUESTION 3: ACCOUNTING FOR MATERIALS, LABOUR AND OVERHEADS AND
COST STATEMENTS AND SIMPLE BUDGET
Candidates were required to:
(a) Explain applicability of why absorption costing.
(b) Briefly explain in favour of any five (5) arguments marginal cost.
(c) Use information given to:
(i) Compute the total budgeted sales quantity (unit) for the forthcoming
year.
(ii) Compute the budgeted sales quantity for each of the months
identified.
(iii) Prepare the production quantity (unit) budgeted for each of the first
three months of the forthcoming year.
(iv) Prepare the direct materials purchase budget (kg and value) for the
first three months of the forthcoming year.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 60
candidates who answered the question, all of them failed.
Not only candidates failed to prepare the required budgets and failure to
workout sales from the information given but also, demonstrated lack of
preparation for these topics.
23
Most candidates demonstrated weakness on buy or make analysis and
on differentiating fixed price from cost reimbursable procurement
contracts and the importance of negotiation.
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair, clearly worded
and within the prescribed syllabus. The examination questions were well
mixed, containing computational as well theoretical questions and could
have easily been answered by an average prepared candidate within the
allocated time of three hours.
(b) Candidates Overall Performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 60
candidates who answered the examination only 11 (18.3%) candidates scored pass
marks while the remaining 49 (81.7%) candidates failed. There were neither credit
nor distinction marks in this examination paper.
TABLE 6.1.4
CLASSIFICATION
OF MARKS 0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL
NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) 49 11 00 00 60
TABLE 6.1.5
T.06. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019 EXAMINATIONS
24
T.07 - ELEMENTS OF COMMERCIAL KNOWLEDGE,
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TAXATION
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome for this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply
knowledge of commerce, commercial law, management and taxation in managing
business functions.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper comprised of four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective
type which carried 40% of the total marks.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
In this paper, candidates were tested on the following topics:
25
Not only candidates failed to distinguish duties of agency and principal,
but also failed to identify elements of the agreement which binds the
contract between principal and agent.
26
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair in relation to the
level of candidate examined, with mixture of easy and difficult questions
and could be answered within the allocated time of three hours by an
average prepared candidate.
(b) Candidates’ Overall Performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 51
candidates who answered the examination, 43 (84.3%) candidates passed while
the remaining 08 (15.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 35 (68.6%),
05 (9.8%) and 03 (5.9%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks
respectively
T TABLE 6.1.6
A
T.07 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS
0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL
NO. OF CANDIDATES 08 35 05 03 51
(FREQUENCY)
PERCENTAGE 15.7 68.6 9.8 5.9 100
TABLE 6.1.7
T.07 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
58 out 0f 91 63.7 43 out of 51 84.3
27
T.08 ACCOUNTING FOR PUBLIC SECTOR AND COOPERATIVES I:
PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply public sector
and cooperative accounting knowledge and skills to manage government and cooperative
funds economically, efficiently and effectively in accordance with the constitution, laws,
rules and regulations in one or more specialized fields.
28
QUESTION 3: THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FINANCIAL
ACCOUNTING REPORTING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR AND ANNUAL
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOUNTS UNDER IPSAS AND THE
PUBLIC FINANCE ACT
(a) List any five (5) roles of the Treasurer in Local Government Authorities.
(b) Use the information given to prepare Statement of Financial Performance
and Statement of Financial Position as per IPSAS 1 for the year ended.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 40 candidates
who answered the question, 25 (62.5%) candidates passed while the remaining
15 (37.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 20 (50.0%), 03 (7.5%)
and 02 (5.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively
No major weakness was noted in this question.
QUESTION 4: A C C O U N T I N G F O R C O O P E R A T I V E S A N D
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATIONS
Candidates were required to: -
(a) (i) Explain the meaning of farming cooperative society.
(ii) Mention and explain three (3) types of farming cooperatives.
(b) Explain in detail the terms economy, efficiency, and effectiveness as used
for achieving value for money.
(c) Mention six (6) code of ethics for public servants in Tanzania.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 40
candidates who answered the question 15 (37.5%) candidates passed while the
remaining 25 (62.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 09 (22.5%), 04
(10.0%) and 02 (5.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks
respectively.
Majority of Candidates failed to explain in detail the terms economy,
efficiency, and effectiveness as used for achieving value for money.
29
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners found the paper to be fairly set, well balanced
containing a mixture of computational as well as theoretical questions. It was
further found to be within the syllabus and that it could have been done within the
time allocated of three hours.
(b) Candidates’ Overall Performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 40
candidates who answered the examination, 28 (70.0%) candidates passed while the
remaining 12 (30.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 22 (55.0%) and
06 (15.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate
scored distinction marks in this examination paper.
CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS
0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL
NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) 12 22 06 00 40
PERCENTAGE 30.0 55.0 15.0 0.0 100
TABLE 6.1.9
T.08. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019 EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
30
PROFESSIONAL LEVEL EXAMINATIONS FOUNDATION LEVEL EXAMINATIONS
This is the first level of the Board’s three tier professional examination scheme which leads
to the Certified Public Accountant [CPA (T)] award.
The Foundation level examinations comprise of six subjects as indicated hereunder:
A1 Quantitative Techniques
A2 Business and Management
A3 Accounting
A4 Cost Accounting
A5 Business Law
A6 Business Economics
The examinations draw candidates from two main sources, namely: -
(a) Those candidates w h o have successfully completed the Board’s Accounting
Technician Level examinations.
(b) Those candidates who have acquired non-accounting first degree (or its equivalent)
qualifications awarded by institutions of higher learning in the country recognized by
the Board.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
In this examination session, 396 candidates sat for the examination out of whom 103
(26.0%) passed and therefore become eligible for the STATEMENT OF SUCCESS for
the Foundation Level. 177 (44.7%) have passed some of the subjects while 116 (29.3%)
candidates failed the examination.
The general performance subject-wise is as shown on Table 7.1
TABLE 7.1
31
A1 – QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to examine candidates’ ability to apply
knowledge and skills of mathematical and quantitative techniques, concepts and tools
in the day to day accounting, business functions and decision making.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTION PAPER
The paper consisted of three compulsory questions. Question one was an objective
question which carried 40% of the total marks.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
In this examination session, candidates were tested on the following topics:
QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS:
Candidates were required to: -
(a) Use the given four alternatives to choose the most correct answer.
(b) Match the given items in list A with those in list B to produce complete
and meaningful sentences.
(c) State whether the statement is true or false.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 136
candidates who answered the question, 100 (73.5%), candidates passed while
the remaining 36 (26.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 74
(54.4%), 24 (17.6%) and 02 (1.5%) candidates scored pass, credit and
Distinction marks respectively.
Some candidates failed to choose the most correct answers, and to state whether
the given statements are true or false.
32
QUESTION 3: LINEAR PROGRAMMING AND SHADOW VALUE,
TRANPORTATION AND ASSIGNMENT MODELS
Candidates were required to:
(a) Formulate the problem as a linear programming model and determine
the optimal mix of the two products.
(b) Formulate and solve the problem using Hungarian method.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 136
candidates who answered the question only, 32 (23.5%) candidates passed
while the remaining 104 (76.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed
16 (11.9%), 08 (5.8%) and 08 (5.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and
distinction marks respectively.
(a) Calculate the probability that they will not be able to deal
with all the people requiring treatment in an hour.
(b) Calculate the is the probability that all the passengers
showing can be accommodated if first class seats can be
used for economy class passengers?
(c) Calculate the average time customers spend in the system,
average number of customers in the system and
probability that the system is idle.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 136
candidates who answered the question only 01 (0.7%), candidate scored
pass mark while the remaining 135 (99.3%) candidates failed.
Most of candidates were not able to use poison distribution to calculate
probabilities, using binomial distribution and normal distribution to
calculate binomial probabilities.
33
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
TABLE 7.1.2
A1 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019 EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
131 49.4 59 43.4
34
A2 – BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this subject is to test candidates’ ability to apply concepts
and principles of business and management in business environment.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper consisted of three questions which were compulsory. Question one was
An objective question which comprised of 40% of the total marks.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
In this examination session, candidates were tested on the following topics:
QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS:
(a) Choose the most correct answer among the given alternatives.
(b) Pair each item from list A with the item from list B appropriately.
(c) State whether the given statement is true or false.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 101
candidates who answered the question, 99 (98.1%) candidates passed
while the remaining 02 (1.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed
34 (33.7%), 53(52.5%) and 12 (11.9%) candidates scored pass, credit and
distinction marks respectively.
No common weakness was noted in this
question.
QUESTION 2: BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND ENVIRONMENT;
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Candidates were required to use the given information to: -
(a) Explain any four (4) benefits that an organization can gain by
providing quality products and services.
(b) Identify any four (4) main areas in which B2B transactions are
prevalent.
(c) Describe the relationship among strategic, business, and
operational plans of an organization
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 101
candidates who answered the question, 92 (91.1%), candidates passed
while the remaining 09 (8.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed
39 (38.6%), 39 (38.6%) and 14 (13.9%) candidates scored pass, credit and
distinction marks respectively.
No major common weakness was noted in this question.
35
QUESTION 3: BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND ENVIRONMENT
(a) Explain the reasons for the failure of the organizations to achieve
their desired objectives.
(b) Give the legal differences between “sole trader” and a “limited
liability company.
(c) Write short notes on: Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 101
candidates who answered the question, 97 (96%) candidates passed while
the remaining 04 (4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 30
(29.7%), 50 (49.5%) and 17 (16.8 %) candidates scored pass, credit and
distinction marks respectively.
Candidates who failed did not understand the requirements of the
question.
36
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
TABLE 7.1.3
TABLE 7.1.4
A2 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2018
EXAMINATIONS
37
A3 – ACCOUNTING
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to examine candidates’ ability to apply
knowledge and skills in recording financial transactions and preparing financial
statements for an entity including not for profit entities in accordance with the
IFRSs and IPSASs.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper comprised four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective
question which carried 40% of the total marks.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
The A3-Accounting subject this session tested candidates on the following topics:
QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS: MULTIPLE CHOICE
Candidates were required to: -
(a) Choose the most correct answer among the given alternatives.
(b) Pair each item from list A with the item from list B appropriately.
(c) State whether the statement is true or false.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 229
candidates who answered the question, 147 (64.1%), candidates passed
while the remaining 82 (35.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who
passed 132 (57.6%), 13 (5.6%) and 2 (0.9%) candidates scored pass, credit
and distinction marks respectively.
No major weakness noted but those who failed were not able to choose
the most correct answer among the given alternatives.
(a) Write up the rent receivable account and the interest payable account
for the year
(b) Prepare income statement
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of
229 candidates who answered the question only 75 (32.8%), candidates
passed while the remaining 154 (67.2%) candidates failed. Out of those
who passed 57 (25%), 16 (6.9%) and 02 (0.9%) candidates scored pass,
credit and distinction marks respectively.
38
QUESTION 3: ACCOUNTING TREATMENT FOR INVENTORIES;
CORRECTING ACCOUNTING ERRORS
Candidates were required to use the given information to: -
(a) Calculate the value of inventory
(b) Correct the accounting errors and ascertain the amount of gross profit
and net profit
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 229
candidates who answered the question only 28(12.2%), candidates passed
while the remaining 201 (87.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who
passed 23 (10%) and 05(2.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks
respectively. No candidate scored Distinction marks in this question.
(b) Identify and explain any five (5) errors which do not affect the
agreement of the trial balance
39
The candidates’ overall performance in the subject is as shown in Table
7.1.5
TABLE 7.1.5
TABLE 7.1.6
A3 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
267 74.0 121 52.8
40
A4 – COST ACCOUNTING
(a) Candidates were required to choose the most correct answer among the given
alternatives.
(b) Candidates were required to state whether the given statements were true or
false.
(c) Candidates were required to pair each item from list A with the item from list
B appropriately.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 184 candidates
who answered the question,103 (55.9%), candidates passed while the remaining 81
(44.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 93 (50.5%) and 10 (5.4)
candidates scored pass, and credit marks. No distinction marks.
No major weakness noted in this question.
QUESTION 2: COSTING
(a) Prepare a trading statement to identify the manufacturing profit using the
existing absorption costing method.
(b) Determine the manufacturing profit that would be reported if marginal costing
was used.
(c) Explain, with supporting calculations
(i) the reasons for the change in manufacturing profit where absorption costing
is used in each year.
(ii) why the manufacturing profit in (a) and (b) differs.
42
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the paper
The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair, well balanced
containing both easy and moderate questions which were relevant to the
candidates’ level and was well within the prescribed syllabus. It was examiners’
view that the paper could have been well attempted within the allocated time of
three hours by an average candidate.
(b) Overall Candidates performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of
184 candidates who answered the examination, 64 (34.8%), candidates passed
while the remaining 120 (65.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 53
(28.8%), 08(4.3) and 03 (1.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction
marks respectively.
TABLE 7.1.8
A4 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
347 out of 482 72.0 64 out of 184 34.8
43
A5 – BUSINESS LAW
44
QUESTION 3: EMPLOYMENT LAW
Candidates were required to:
(a) State the legal position by using a given scenario.
(b) Describe the notions of “causation” and “remoteness of damage” as far as the
breach of a duty of care and assessment of damages is concerned in a tortuous
liability.
Candidates who answered this question failed to understand the needy of the
question i.e. mixed up ground for dismissal and procedures for fair and unfair
dismissal from employment.
45
QUESTION 5: COMPANY LAW
Candidates were required to read a given scenario and advise accordingly.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 60 candidates who
answered the question only 03 (5.0%), candidates scored pass marks while the remaining
57 (95%) candidates failed.
Candidates demonstrated poor knowledge on the procedures for liquidation of a
corporate body in line with the respective legal provisions of Companies Act.
46
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATION
(a) Assessment of the paper
The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair, well balanced
containing both easy and moderate questions which were relevant to the
candidates’ level and was well within the prescribed syllabus. It was
examiners view that the paper could have been well attempted within the
allocated time of three hours by an average candidate.
TABLE 7.1.9
TABLE 7.1.10
A5. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
181 out of 296 61.1 81 out of 146 55.5
47
A6 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to examine candidates’ ability to apply
economics theories and methodologies as alternatives in managerial decisions.
48
Most of the candidates failed to answer part of the question which required
them to determine price required to produce positive output.
49
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATION
(a) Assessment of the paper
The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair, well balanced
containing both easy and moderate questions which were relevant to the
candidates’ level and was well within the prescribed syllabus. It was
examiners view that the paper could have been well attempted within the
allocated time of three hours by an average candidate.
(b) Overall Candidates performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 91
candidates who answered the examination, 82 (90.1%), candidates passed while
the remaining 09 (9.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 51 (56.0%),
28 (30.8) and 03 (3.3%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No
candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper.
TABLE 7.1.10
COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
51 56.7 82 90.1
50
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL EXAMINATIONS
The Intermediate level examinations are the second level of the Board’s professional
examinations under the current examination scheme and syllabus. This examination level
consists of six subjects as shown hereunder: -
B1 Financial Management
B2 Financial Reporting
B3 Auditing Principles and Practices
B4 Public Finance and Taxation
B5 Performance Management
B6 Management, Governance and Ethics
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
The examination draws candidates from the following sources:
(a) Candidates who have been referred previously in the respective corresponding subjects.
(b) Candidates who have majored in accounting in their bachelor degree programmes from
recognized institutions.
51
GENERALPERFORMANCE
In this session 2,132 candidates sat for the Intermediate Level Examinations out of whom 279 (13.1%)
have passed this level and therefore become eligible for the STATEMENT OF SUCCESS, 937 (43.9
%) have passed some of the subjects while 916 (43.0%) candidates have failed the examination.
TABLE8.1
Paper Performance
Code No. Subject November 2019 November 2020
Entries Pass % Entries Pass %
B1 Financial Management 1,644 649 39.5 798 210 26.3
B2 Financial Reporting 1,145 456 39.8 629 324 51.5
B3 Auditing Principles and 1,225 342 27.9 793 243 30.6
Practices
B4 Public Finance and 1,295 609 47.0 697 505 72.4
Taxation
B5 Performance Management 1,986 448 22.6 953 233 24.4
B6 Management, Governance 1,069 1,003 93.9 476 402 84.5
& Ethics
52
B1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
53
QUESTION 2: FINANCING DECISIONS: COST OF CAPITAL AND CAPITAL
STRUCTURE
(a) Explain the meaning of “right issue”. Briefly discuss the pros and
cons of making a right issue.
(b) Use the given information to evaluate whether the proposed changes
in credit policy will increase the profitability of a given company.
(c) Briefly explain the meaning and usefulness of the security market
line.
(a) Briefly explain the meaning of and basis for financial forecasting.
(b) Use the given information to: -
(i) Use formula to compute external financing required for the
company during the coming given year.
(ii) Explain the need for external financing be, if the net profit
margin went up to a given percent and the dividend payout ratio
was increased to certain percent.
(c) Assess the role of financial intermediaries in providing finance and
facilitating investment in business organizations.
55
QUESTION 6: FINANCING DECISIONS: COST OF CAPITAL AND
GEARING
56
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Paper
The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the
questions examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers
also found the paper to be well balanced, covering almost eighty percent of the
topics in the syllabus. The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and
computational questions.
TABLE8.1.1
CLASSIFICATION
OF MARKS 00-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 TOTAL
TABLE8.1.2
B1 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
57
B2 FINANCIAL REPORTING
(i) The Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for
a given company for the given year ended.
(ii) The Statement of Financial Position for a given company as at a given
year.
58
QUESTION 3: ELEMENTS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
59
QUESTION 5: ELEMENTS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Candidates were required to-
(a) Use the given information to:
(i) State any three types of inventories which are within the scope of
IAS 2.
(ii) State two types of inventories which are excluded from the scope
of IAS.
(iii) State four disclosure requirements as per IAS 2.
(b) Use the given information to:
(i) Differentiate between “permanent differences” and “temporary
differences”.
(ii) With reference to IAS 12, explain how temporary differences are
accounted for.
(c) Use the given information to compute:
(i) The amount of liability to be included in the Statement of
Financial Position as at a given year.
(ii) Finance charge to be included in the Statement of Profit or Loss
and Other Comprehensive Income.
(d) Use the given information to show how the impairment loss is allocated.
Most of the candidates failed to interpret the ratios given in the question. They
failed to compute basic and diluted earnings per share.
60
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Paper
The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions
examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers also found the
paper to be well balanced, covering over eighty percent of the topics in the syllabus.
The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and computational questions.
TABLE8.1.3
TABLE8.1.4
B2 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
456 out of 1145 39.8 324 out of 629 51.5
61
B3 AUDITING PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to
apply auditing principles and standards in executing audit assignments (carrying out
Audit procedures) and coming up with appropriate reports, as well as implementing
entity’s internal control policies in carrying out internal audits.
(a) Use the given case to evaluate the circumstances and advise which
controls, between “manual controls” and “automated controls”, are
suitable for a given company.
(b) Use information given to explain the reliability of the audit evidence
provided by the directors in the given written representation letter.
Determine whether you should rely wholly on the representation of
the directors or whether you should obtain other evidence.
(c) Explain the differences between “rules based” and “principle-based”
approaches to professional ethics.
(d) Explain any five elements of an “assurance engagement”
62
QUESTION 2: OBJECTIVES, PROCESS AND NEED FOR EXTERNAL AUDIT
AND ASSURANCE SERVICES
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 513 candidates
who answered the question only 13 (2.5%), candidates passed while the remaining
500 (97.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 11 (2.1%) and 02 (0.4%)
candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored
distinction marks in this question.
63
QUESTION 4: A. INTERNAL AUDIT OF ENTITIES
B. THE NATURE AND USE OF INTERNAL CONTROLS
Candidates were required to use the information given to:
Candidates failed to describe the procedures that will enable internal audit function
to achieve corporate governance compliance.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 774 candidates
who answered the question only 148 (19.1%), candidates passed while the remaining
626 (80.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 130 (16.8%), 17 (2.2%)
and 01 (0.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively.
65
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 793
candidates who answered the examination only 243 (30.6%), candidates passed while the
remaining 550 (69.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 235 (29.6%) and 08
(1.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored
distinction marks in this question.
TABLE8.1.5
CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS
00-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 TOTAL
NO. OF CANDIDATES 550 235 08 00 793
(FREQUENCY)
PERCENTAGE 69.4 29.6 1.0 0.0 100
TABLE8.1.6
B3 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
66
B4 PUBLIC FINANCE AND TAXATION
Most candidates who failed were not able to use the Laffer curve to
briefly explain the relationship between tax rate and revenue
collection.
67
QUESTION 2: CUSTOMS
Candidates were required to use given information to:
(a) Advise on what exactly is needed to be done as the qualifications to be
given a license for the internal container (depot) business.
(i) Smuggling
(ii) Restricted goods
(iii) Transshipment
(c) Candidates were required to use the given information as tax expert to
determine:-
68
QUESTION 3: I N C O M E T A X A N D COMPUTATIONAL OF TAXABLE
INCOME
Candidates were required to use the given information to compute the
total taxable income from the business.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 597
candidates who answered the question, 448 (75.0%) candidates passed
while the remaining 149 (25.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who
passed 233 (39.0%), 185 (31.0%) and 30 (5.0%) candidates scored pass,
credit and distinction marks respectively.
Most candidates were incompetent to use the given information to compute
the total taxable income.
Those who failed were not able to calculate total net amount of VAT and
were not able to clearly apportion the input tax.
(a) Explain at least three returns other than VAT returns a businessman is
needed to submit in the year of income and when they are supposed to
be submitted.
(c) Calculate the chargeable investment capital gain arising from asset
disposals during the tax year.
70
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Paper
The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the
questions examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of
markers also found the paper to be well balanced with excellent spread of
the topics in the syllabus. The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and
computational questions.
(b) Candidates’ overall performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of
697 candidates who answered the examination, 505 (72.4%) candidates
passed while the remaining 192 (27.6%) candidates failed. Out of those
who passed 456 (65.4%) and 49 (7.0%) candidates scored pass and credit
marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this
examination paper.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on Table
8.1.7
TABLE 8.1.7
CLASSIFICATION OF
MARKS 00-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 TOTAL
NO. OF CANDIDATES 192 456 49 00 697
(FREQUENCY)
PERCENTAGE 27.6 65.4 7.0 00 100
TABLE 8.1.8
B4 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
71
B5 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply
knowledge and skills of financial and non-financial data analysis in providing information
and decision support to management for decision-making, performance evaluation, and
control.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper had two sections A and B, with six questions carrying 20 marks each.
Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of
five questions in Section B
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
The following topics were tested in this paper:
QUESTION 1: DECISIONS-MAKING TECHNIQUES, COST CLASSIFICATION
AND ESTIMATION
Candidates were required to use the given information to:
(a) Decompose the manufacturing overhead cost into fixed and variable costs.
(b) Compute the total cost to manufacture the additional units.
(c) Compute the unit cost to manufacture the additional units.
(d) Write a brief report, supported by relevant figures, recommending whether the
project should be accepted or rejected.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 953
candidates who answered the question only 93 (9.8%) candidates passed while the
remaining 860 (90.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 50 (5.2%), 31
(3.3%) and 12 (1.3%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks
respectively
Most candidates were unfit to compute the costs that were required to be decomposed.
QUESTION 2: COSTING ACCOUNTING TECHNIQUES AND DECISION MAKING
TECHNIQUES
(a) Candidates were required to use the given information to:
(i) Prepare the flexed budget, using the actual volume.
(ii) Prepare an operating statement reconciling the actual profit with the loss
figure from the flexed budget.
(iii) Suggest reasons for any variances arose.
(b) Candidates were required to use the given information to explain with
reasons, for each of the remaining stages of the product’s life cycle, the
changes that would be expected in the:
(i) Average unit production cost
(ii) Unit selling price
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 483
candidates who answered the question only 31 (6.4%) candidates passed while
72
the remaining 452 (93.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 27 (5.6%)
and 04 (0.8%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate
scored distinction marks in this question.
Candidates were not capable to prepare operating statement for reconciling the
actual profit with the loss from the flexed budget. Majority prepared income
statement instead.
(c) Candidates were required to identify and explain steps in the preparation of
Zero-Based Budget.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 828
candidates who answered the question only 166 (20.0%) candidates passed while
the remaining 662 (80.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 139
(16.8%), 25 (3.0) and 02 (0.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction
marks respectively.
Most candidates were not able to identify and explain steps in the preparation of
Zero-Based Budget instead they explained steps in formulating activity-based
budget. Also, they explained factors to consider when introducing the new
product rather than sources of information.
QUESTION 4: COST CLASSIFICATION AND ESTIMATION
Candidates were required to:
(a) Briefly explain two-stage allocation process of transitional or conventional
costing system.
(b) Discuss any factors prompting the development and application of Activity-
Based Costing system as an alternative to traditional costing system.
(c) Use the given information to:
(i) Compute overhead cost per unit.
(ii) Calculate the overhead cost per unit.
(iii) Comment of the results in (i) and (ii) above.
73
Most of Candidates could not demonstrate understanding on the application of
activity-based costing as they failed to ascertain cost per unit as per ABC and as
per current absorption system.
QUESTION 5: DECISIONS MAKING TECHNIQUES
Candidates were required to:
(a) Explain assumptions of CVP analysis.
(b) Discuss major factors to be considered when setting transfer prices for an
international group.
(c) Use the given information to:
(i) Calculate the transfer price
(ii) Comment on the circumstances in which the proposed transfer price
may result in a sub optimal decision for the company as a whole.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 857
candidates who answered the question only 222 (25.9%) candidates passed
while the remaining 635 (74.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed
186 (21.7%) and 36 (4.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks
respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question.
Most candidates were not able to understand the requirements of the question.
74
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Paper
The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions
examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers also found the
paper to be well balanced. The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and
computational questions.
(b) Candidates’ overall performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of
953 candidates who answered the examination only 233 (24.4%), candidates passed
while the remaining 720 (75.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 227
(23.8%) and 06 (0.6%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No
candidate scored distinction marks in this question.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 8.1.9.
TABLE 8.1.9
B5 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
TABLE 8.1.10
B5 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates %
448 22.6 passed 233 24.4
75
B6 MANAGEMENT, GOVERNANCE AND ETHICS
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply
principles of strategic management, good governance and business ethics management and
administrative functions of an organization.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER
The paper had two sections A and B, with six questions carrying 20 marks each.
Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of
five questions in Section B
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
The following topics were tested in this paper:-
QUESTION 1: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, RISK MANAGEMENT
AND ETHICS
Candidates were required to:
(a) Explain critically how the 4P’s model can be applied as a decision-
making model to analyze how to penetrate into the existing market.
(a) Give clear explanation on each of the three strategic levels and show
how they are important in any successful organization.
76
(b) Discuss different strategic capabilities available in an organization.
78
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Paper
The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of
the questions examined and time allocated for each question, with a wider
spread of topics within the syllabus.
(b) Candidates’ overall performance
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out
of 476 candidates who answered the examination, 402 (84.4%) candidates
passed while the remaining 74 (15.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who
passed 321 (67.4%), 80 (16.8%) and 01 (0.2%) candidates scored pass,
credit and distinction marks respectively.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table
8.1.11
TABLE 8.1.11
B6 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
TABLE 8.1.12
B6 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates %
1,003 93.8 passed
402 84.4
79
FINAL LEVEL EXAMINATIONS
The Final Level examinations are the last level of the three-tier professional examination system of
the Board.
The final level examinations consist of four subjects as mentioned hereunder: -
C1 Corporate Reporting
C2 Auditing and Assurance
C3 Business and Corporate Finance
C4 Public Finance and Taxation II
These examination papers have been tested in this examination session.
The examination draws candidates from: -
(a) Candidates who were referring P15 Financial Reporting II and P20 Contemporary
Issues in Accounting in the phased out syllabus where these candidates sat for C1
Corporate Reporting in the current syllabus
(b) Candidates who were referring P18 Auditing and Assurance Services in the phased out syllabus
where these candidates sat for C2 Auditing and Assurance Services
(c) Candidates who were referring P16 International Finance in the phased out syllabus where these
candidates sat for C3 Business and Corporate Finance in the current syllabus and
(d) Candidates who were referring P17 Public Finance and Taxation in the phased out syllabus
where these candidates sat for C4 Advanced Taxation in the current syllabus
The performance of the candidates who attempted both modules is shown at the end of the
level’s report.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
During the November 2020 examination session, 1,477 candidates sat for Final Level
examinations out of whom 244 (16.9%) have passed this level and therefore eligible for
the award of STATEMENT OF SUCCESS, 624 (42.2%) have passed some of the subjects
while 604 (40.9%) have failed the examinations.
The general performance subject-wise for the final level examination in this session is as
shown on Table 9.1
TABLE 9.1
FINAL LEVEL SUBJECT -WISE PERFORMANCE
ANALYSIS: NOVEMBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2020
Code Subject Performance
80
C1 CORPORATE REPORTING
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to financial
reporting standards and corporate law in preparing, analyzing and evaluating corporate
reports by entities, both in the private and public sectors.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTION PAPER
This examination paper comprised two sections with six questions. Candidates
were required to answer four questions. Question one which carried 40 % of the total
marks was compulsory
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
In this paper, topics examined and candidates’ performances were as follows:
QUESTION 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GROUP ENTITIES
Candidates were required to use the given information to:-
(a) Prepare the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of the given
company’s group as at the given period in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
(b) Explain if the given company decides to go ahead with the debt factoring
arrangements, explain the Financial Reporting principles involved and
advise how each of the above arrangements would impact upon the
Financial Statements of future years.
(c) Discuss the ethical issues which arise from the proposal by the given
company.
(d) Describe the purpose of the Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 616 candidates who
answered the question, only, 245 (39.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 371 (60.2%)
candidates failed. Out of those who passed 231 (37.5%) and 14 (2.3%) candidates scored
pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question.
Most candidates did not understand the concept and accounting for factoring receivables.
Most of them did not understand the purpose of conceptual framework for financial reporting.
QUESTION 2: IAS 8 — ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING
ESTIMATES AND ERRORS
Candidates were required to use given information to: -
(a) Re-draft the Income Statements of the given company for the given
period
(b) (i) As a graduate accountant to be: Present the extract from the
of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income of the
given company reflecting the change in accounting policy, in
accordance with IAS 8: Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors
81
(ii)Compute the given company’s retained earnings at the given period
and the restated retained earnings as at the given period
(iii)Evaluate how statement of changes in equity for
the given year end should be presented in the
company’s financial statements.
(a)(i) Compute basic and diluted earnings per share as at the given period.
(ii) Discuss two (2) major limitations of using earnings per share as a measure
of a company’s performance.
(iii) Compute basic and diluted earnings per share as at the given period.
82
QUESTION 4: PRESENTATION OF ACCOUNTING & DISCLOSURE;
ENHANCING FINANCIAL REPORTING, PPE, ISA 16, IAS
40 AND IFRS 5
Candidates were required to use the given information to:
(a) Compute the Economic Value Added (EVATM) and comment on the difference
between “Economic Value Added” versus “Profit-based” measures of
performance.
(b) In each of the given case, candidates were required to show entries in the
Financial Statements of the given company in the given year end resulting from
recording the events described. Also they should clearly identify any
depreciation charges involved and how each transaction may impact upon if at
all, the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income of the given
company at the given year end.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 236 candidates
who answered the question, 04 (1.7%) candidates scored pass marks while the
remaining 232 (98.3%) candidates failed. There were neither credit nor distinction
marks in this question
It seems that most candidates had poor knowledge on the topics tested in this
question.
(a) (i) Prepare a report for the given client which analyses and discusses the financial
performance and position of the given company as portrayed by the above
financial statements and the additional information provided.
(ii) Calculate the given company’s net cash flow generated from operating
activities in accordance with IAS 7 – Statement of Cash Flows.
(c) Prepare the journal entries to record the initial and subsequent measurement of
this financial instrument in the financial statements of the given company at the
given period.
(d) Discuss the principles and practices to be used by the given company in
accounting for the valuation and recognition issues in the given case.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 608 candidates
who answered the question only 62 (10.2%) candidates passed while the remaining
346 (56.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 51 (8.4%), 10 (1.6%) and 01
(0.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively.
Most candidates had problems with part (c) of the question that required adequate
knowledge of IAS 38-Intangible Assets.
83
QUESTION 6: IFRS 5: NON-CURRENT ASSETTS HELF FOR SALE AND
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Candidates were required to use the given information to:
(a) Discuss the accounting treatment of each of the above events in the financial
statements of the given company for the given year end considering the
implications of events occurring after the end of the reporting period.
(b) (i) Discuss the accounting treatment of the hedge in the given year end.
(ii) Outline the accounting treatment of the inventory sale and the futures
contract settlement on the given period.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 331
candidates who answered the question only, 02 (0.6%) candidates scored pass marks
while the remaining 285 (86.1%) candidates failed. There were neither credit nor
distinction marks in this question.
Most candidates lacked adequate knowledge on IFRS 5 (Non- Current Assets Held
for Sale), IFRS 2 (Share Base Payments) and also hedging accounting
84
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture
of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate.
The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the
prescribed syllabus.
(b) Candidates’ overall performance of the paper
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out
of 616 candidates who answered the examination only, 192 (31.0%)
candidates passed while the remaining 625 (69.0%) candidates failed. Out
of those who passed 190 (30.8%) and 01 (0.2%) candidates scored pass and
credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this
examination paper.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table
9.1.1
TABLE 9.1.1
C1 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
TABLE 9.1.2
C1 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
394 out of 997 35.9 192 out of 616 31.0
85
C2 AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply
auditing and assurance standards and relevant laws in undertaking and managing
auditing and assurance engagements in complex auditing and reporting situations.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTIONPAPER
This examination paper comprised two sections with six questions. Candidates
were required to answer four questions. Question one carried 40% of the total
marks was compulsory.
III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE
In this paper, topics examined and candidates’ performances were as follows:
QUESTION 1: LEGAL, REGULATORY AND ETHICAL ISSUES; ACCEPTING
ENGAGEMENT AND MANAGING ASSIGNMENT; PLANNING
AND UNDERTAKING AUDIT WORK
Candidates were required to use the given information to:-
(ii) For each matter, clearly evaluate whether the Audit Supervisor’s
proposed audit opinion is appropriate, and if not, recommended an
alternative.
(iii) Explain the contents and importance of the following basic
elements of the auditor’s report:
i) Opinion paragraph
86
Some candidates failed to know audit strategy in accordance with the given
case. Also they failed to know circumstances lead to which audit opinion,
and some were confusing -key audit matters with emphasis of matters
contents and importance.
(a)(i) Briefly explain what do you understand about the “risk of material
misstatement” at financial statement level.
(ii) Explain the risk assessment procedures as referred above.
(d) Identify and explain the four (4) components of the corporate
governance in any organization.
(c)(i) Analyze the event that occurred on 31st May 2020, in view of IAS 10:
“Events after the reporting period” and explain to your staff whether
the event is adjusting or non-adjusting.
(ii) Explain the responsibilities of the external auditor in relation to this
event. Additionally, state what audit procedures should be carried out
to discharge your duties as auditors, while auditing the events after the
reporting period.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 569
candidates who answered the question only 164 (28.8%) candidates passed
while the remaining 405 (71.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed
140 (24.6%) and 24 (4.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks
respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question.
Some candidates failed to differentiate between adjusting and non- adjusting
from the given cases
QUESTION 3: ACCEPTING ENGAGEMENTS AND MANAGING
ASSIGNMENTS; PLANNING AND UNDERTAKING AUDIT
WORKS
Candidates were required to use given information to:-
(a) Explain the responsibilities of the successor and predecessor auditors
when a company is changing auditors.
(b) Discuss the ways in which the auditor’s observations made during
the course of the plant tour will be of help in planning and conducting
the audit.
(c)(i) You tested stock amounts totaling TZS.2,339,000,000 and found
TZS.23,390,000 in overstatements. Ignoring sampling risk, what is
your estimate of the total misstatement in stock?
(ii) Based on the audit of the assets accounts and ignoring other
accounts, explain if the overall financial statements are acceptable.
87
(iii) What do the auditor supposed to do in such circumstances?
(a) Describe the ethical threats which may occur and how they can be
minimized in the above four (4) situations.
(b) (i) Identify and justify the type of opinion you will issue
(ii) Prepare the appropriate paragraphs under
management responsibility, auditor’s responsibility and the
auditor’s opinion for inclusion in the audit report of the given
company.
Those who failed in this question, were unable to prepare the appropriate
paragraphs that elaborate the responsibilities of management and auditors.
Majority ended rushing to the answers instead of elaborating the
responsibilities in full.
88
(c) Explain the matters which should be included in a report in
accordance with ISA 265: Communicating Deficiencies in Internal
controls to those charged with Governance and Management.
(a) Identify and elaborate irregularities that you suspect regarding sales
and inventories in a given case.
(b) (i) Describe actions that auditors can take when being threatened with
removal by the Directors.
(ii) State the requirements of the IFAC’s Code of Ethics relating to the
supply of non-audit services to public company audit clients.
Those who failed were unable to provide concise answer in part (a). They
could not provide good elaboration on the required irregularities.
89
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture
of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate.
The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the
prescribed syllabus.
TABLE 9.1.4
C2 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
465 out of 48.0 398 out of 57.1
969 697
90
C3 BUSINESS AND CORPORATE FINANCE
(c) Prepare a briefing note to the Chairman of the Board in which you
demonstrate the computation of the value of the firm using the Gordon’s
Model and Discounted Cash Flow Method. Propose an issue price based
on each of the two valuation approaches.
Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 571
candidates who answered the question 132 (23.1%) candidates passed while
the remaining 439 (76.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 123
(21.5%) and 09 (1.6%) candidates scored pass and credit marks
respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question.
Most candidates failed to link the required calculations in the report asked.
Some showed weaknesses on the part of applying the required formula to
the relevant requirements.
91
QUESTION 2: FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND MANAGEMENT OF RISKS
(a) Explain main types of foreign exchange rate systems and discuss how
such systems might affect the ability of Financial Managers to
forecast exchange rates.
(a) Write a briefing note to the directors in which you describe the
APV approach, its applicability and limitations.
(c) (i) Estimate the current given period’s value for the given
company
(ii) Assess and comment on the performance of the
management by using the Market Value Added (MVA)
approach and describe the problems with the EVA
Approach.
92
QUESTION 4: GLOBAL BUSINESS; ENVIRONMENTAL & FINANCIAL
ENGINEERING AND PLANNING
Candidates were required to use the given information to:-
(a)(i) Briefly discuss the meaning of “fixed exchange rate”.
(ii) Discuss the cases for and against a country using fixed exchange rate
system.
(b) Design a plan vanilla swap that will appear equally attractive to both
companies and net a bank acting as intermediary 0.1% per annum.
The major weakness was on financial engineering where candidates were not
able to analyze the plain vanilla swap and trading in the futures exchange market.
(a) Compare and contrast operating cash flows and free cash flows as used in the
valuation of a business operation.
(i) Estimate the Free Cash Flow (FCF) to the company for the year given
year end
(ii) Estimate the value of the company for the given year
(iii) Estimate the value of equity and the value per share for the given year
end by using the FCF approach.
Most candidates failed to answer Part b(ii) and (iii) of the question.
(a) Briefly explain each criteria stated above and suggest factors
that could be used to assess them.
(b) (i) Illustrate how the given company might hedge its foreign
exchange risk using currency futures
(ii) Explain the meaning of basis risk and show what basis risk is involved
in the proposed hedge.
(iii) Assuming the spot exchange rate is 120 yen/US$ on 1st September
and that basis risk decreases steadily in a linear manner, calculate what
the result of the hedge is expected to be. Briefly discuss why this result
might not occur.
Most candidates demonstrated poor computations, did not follow the necessary
steps.
94
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture
of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate.
The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the
prescribed syllabus.
(b) Candidates’ overall performance of the paper
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper not was satisfactory.
Out of 571 candidates who answered the examination only, 170 (29.8%)
candidates passed while the remaining 401 (70.2%) candidates failed. No
candidates scored credit or distinction marks in this examination paper.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table
9.1.5
TABLE 9.1.5
C3 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
TABLE 9.1.6
C3 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
November 2019 November 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates %
240 out of 911 24.2 passed
170 out of 571 29.8
95
C4 ADVANCED TAXATION
I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME
Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply
knowledge of public finance, tax laws and Financial Reporting Standards and
Corporate Law in preparing, analyzing and evaluating corporate reports by entities,
both in the private and public sectors.
II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTION PAPER
This examination paper comprised two sections with six questions. Candidates
were required to answer four questions. Question one carried 40% of the total
marks was compulsory.
(a) Based on the above facts and from Umeme Rural Electrification Ltd
perspective, highlight income tax and Value Added Tax implications
of each contract above.
(c) With reference to Income Tax Act, Cap 332 compare and contrast
between taxation of a corporation and that of a partnership.
(d) (i) Briefly discuss any three (3) reasons that make taxpayers to
practise tax
avoidance and tax evasion in Tanzania.
(ii) With examples explain the current efforts made by the
Government of the United Republic of Tanzania to reduce the
problem of tax avoidance and tax evasion.
Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 524
candidates who answered the question, 394 (75.2%) candidates passed while
the remaining 130 (24.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 285
(54.4%) and 109 (20.8%) candidates scored pass and credit marks
respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question.
96
QUESTION 2: TAXATION OF RETIREMENT FUNDS; TAX
ADMINISTRATION AND VALUE ADDED TAX; TAX REFORMS
(a) Briefly discuss the taxation rules relating to transfer of funds among
retirement benefit funds.
(b) Identify three (3) legal and two (2) administration changes in
Tanzania from 2018 aiming at achieving such obligations
(d) Briefly Explain the concept and treatment of partial input tax
in VAT
(a) (i) Explain five circumstances under which an asset is said to have
been
realized.
(b) With reasons, discuss any further five pieces of information you would
require to enable you to calculate taxable income of the given company
for the given year.
97
No major weakness noted in this question.
98
QUESTION 4: INTERNATIONAL TAXATION; TAX ADMINISTRATION;
VALUE ADDED
TAX
Candidates were required to use the given information to:-
(a) Discuss any three usefulness and any two limitations of the method.
(c) Briefly explain the circumstances under which VAT registration may
be cancelled and state the consequences for such cancellation.
(d) discuss in line with Tanzania tax laws, that in Tanzania, ‘tax once
assessed must be paid’.
Those who failed were not able to produce relevant materials to the
question.
(a) (i) Calculate the taxable income of the Trust for the given year and show
how much
tax they should pay.
(ii) compute how much tax they could have paid, if the
beneficiaries were to receive the distribution from the
given company.
(b) Assist the given company on this aspect by answering the following
questions:
101
IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
(a) Assessment of the Examination
The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture
of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate.
The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the
prescribed syllabus.
(b) Candidates’ overall performance of the paper
Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out
of 524 candidates who answered the examination, 402 (76.7%) candidates
passed while the remaining 122 (23.3%) candidates failed. Out of those
who passed 353 (67.4%) and 44 (9.4%) candidates scored pass and credit
marks respectively. No candidates scored distinction marks in this
examination paper.
The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table
9.1.7
TABLE 9.1.7
C4 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Classification of 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 Total
Marks
No. of Candidates 122 353 49 00 524
(Frequency)
Percentage 23.3 67.4 9.4 0.0 100
TABLE 9.1.8
C4 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH NOVEMBER 2019
EXAMINATIONS
NOVEMBER 2019 NOVEMBER 2020
No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed %
484 out of 726 66.7 402 out of 524 76.7
102
CHAPTER III
103
10. Tutors should devote their time to attend NBAA seminars, workshops and Training
of Trainers workshops in order to be aware of current emerging professional issues.
Effective teaching
12. Tutors should prepare scheme of works/lesson plans that will guide them during
the teaching process. Teaching plans have to be provided to enable the students be
aware of what has to be covered and at what time.
13. Tutors should ensure that they are using relevant and up-to-date teaching materials
in order to avoid misleading the students.
14. Tutors should ensure that they attend short courses regarding teaching
methodologies in order to improve their teaching styles and acquire modern
teaching methodologies.
15. Tutors should take time to read comments prepared by markers which have been
summarized in the Examiners’ and Performance Report. By so doing they will
understand their shortfalls and improve in the respective areas mentioned by the
markers.
16. For the subjects which need practical orientation like auditing, it would be much
better for the trainers to invite practicing auditors to teach some of the topics.
17. Tutors should avoid spoon feeding the students, instead they have to apply various
participatory teaching methods in order to bring about effective learning among the
students.
18. Tutors should in as much as possible try to observe the weaknesses of their students
and address them by equipping them with different skills on the subject matter
especially on new statutes.
19. Tutors should at all times be up-to-date with emerging teaching techniques and
should apply them. Tutors should also apply the techniques that make the learner
think more rather than cramming.
20. Tutors should ensure that they equip themselves with knowledge and skills that are
required to teach effectively the students under competence based syllabi
21. Tutors should assist students on how to use the learning materials for effectively
learning
104
RECOMMENDATIONS TO STUDENTS
Applying appropriate learning styles
22. Students should develop study schedules that will guide them during the
preparations for the examinations and ensure that they have covered each and every
topic in the syllabus.
23. Changes taking place in the accounting, auditing, tax, law regimes are vast and
hence students should keep up-to-date with those changes. For example, definitions
and terminologies in accounting and auditing have been modified since the adoption
of the International Accounting/Auditing Standards. Students need to know these
changes in order to be able to apply them in their course of study and in their work
places.
24. Students should develop a culture of reading NBAA Learning materials, various
textbooks and journals in order to get an in depth knowledge and understanding of
the subject matter.
25. Students should put more effort on Public Sector Accounting/Auditing as it seems
they do not give special attention on the area.
26. Students should work hard, think critically and do more practice to enhance their
competence and confidence in attempting examination papers.
27. Students should make sure that they respond to the requirements of the question
asked rather than answering what has not been asked. They should not formulate
their own questions and provide their own answers.
28. Students are required to do comprehensive preparations. They should not base their
preparations on occurrence of topics on past examinations.
105
Assurance of knowledge mastery
32. Students should work hard and not rush to sit for the examinations before they have
assured themselves that they are ready for the examinations. They should not take
chances and play a game of chance (doing examination is not gambling), hoping
that they will find the examinations questions they are familiar with. They need to
ensure that they get value for the money they have used as tuition and examination
fees.
33. Students to take seriously initiative and effort t o cover the whole syllabus
requirement material through reading various books, journals and published articles
not to concentrate mostly in teaching questions and answers of past examinations.
34. Students should avoid attempting the examination unless they have covered a major
part of the respective syllabus; also devote more time in private and group
discussions study rather than considering the examination as “going concern”.
35. Students should make a good use of the learning materials in order to improve their
learning
36. Students should ensure that they avoid learning through memorisation, instead they
have to study and understand subject matters in details
106
44. Students should orient themselves with different type of questions, theoretical and
computational type of questions and do thorough preparations during the study
sessions. They should also equip themselves with analytical skills, especially as at
the higher levels in order to be tackle questions that require such skills.
45. Students should change their reading behaviour of memorizing various questions
and answers by devoting their time in reading various books and get an insight of
the subject matters.
46. Students should make thorough preparation for the examination by
reading extensively the recommendations text books to supplement what they are
getting from the review classes.
47. Students are advised to apply the following techniques among others in order to
pass their examinations.
47.1 Ensuring well coverage of the syllabus
Candidates are required to use the syllabus as their base of determining whether
they are ready to sit for the examinations or not. The problem of most candidates
is total dependence on the trainers. It is not funny to find a candidate attending a
review class without having a syllabus. It is difficult for such a candidate to know
what has been covered by the trainer and what has been left out. Some candidates
instead of ensuring that they have covered the syllabus adequately they rely on
Question and Answers (Qs and As) booklets. Questions and Answers of previous
examinations are good but they are not supplements of the syllabus. By reading
Question and Answer booklets students cannot get sufficient knowledge about the
subject matter. The best way of making use of Qs and as is after the completion
of the syllabus to see how examination questions are set and the best ways to
approach them.
47.2 Active participation in the classroom sessions
The education system of most countries including Tanzania does not prepare
students/candidates to take active role in the classroom. The predominant teaching
method used i.e. lecturing is characterized by various shortcomings including:
subject experts are not always good teachers, students are passive, learning is
difficult to gauge and communication is one way i.e. students are just listening to
lectures and do not participate actively. If a student goes to the class waiting for a
trainer to come and dish information to be grasped, automatically learning
becomes impaired. An effective learning to take place requires the learners to take
effective role in the learning process. Experience shows that students who ask
questions and pose challenges during the learning process they do well in their
examinations. Asking a question or posing a challenge to a trainer does not come
from nowhere, it come only if a student is interested to what he is learning. An
interested student in the learning process is the one who takes trouble to read what
is going to be taught before entering the class. Therefore, trainers are required to
prepare course outlines derived from the prescribe syllabus so as to enable
students to follow. Students can make use of the course outline to prepare on their
own before they go to the classroom. The lesson becomes enjoyable when both
107
students and the trainers are prepared before entering the classroom. In short,
student’s active role in the class is fundamental factor in the effective learning
process.
47.3 Review class attendance
Review classes are quite different from formal schooling. In the formal schooling
context trainers exercise authority of controlling students’ attendance. They can
penalize students who miss classes without genuine reasons. This does not happen
in the review classes because those who are attending review classes are
heterogeneous. Some are employees, some are self employed, and others are fresh
graduates from colleges while others are occupied with various social
responsibilities. It becomes difficult for the trainers to control attendance of such
categories of learners. But we should bear in mind that at higher level education,
classroom attendance is not a responsibility of the trainer. If there is any candidate
who misses classes just because there is no one to question about it, such a student
must have some problems. No one is expecting to see a student missing a class
without having genuine reasons at this level of education. But, generally there is
lack of seriousness among most candidates especially in the case of classroom
attendance. Candidates are therefore reminded that attending classroom sessions
appropriately should be self-motivated.
There is a good number of candidates who never attend review classes with
confidence that they know each and every thing. They register themselves for
examinations as private candidates. Experience shows that candidates who are
attending review classes have a far better chance to pass their examinations than
those who do not attend. Some of the candidates attend review classes only when
they sit for the examinations on the first time but when they are required to refer
or re-seat the examinations they neglect to register for review classes. They claim
to have adequate and sufficient materials and therefore they can study on their
own. This is not always a good decision. Human brain is characterized by the
nature of forgetting. A famous study on forgetting textbook materials compared
the percentage of material remembered after different intervals of time. The results
were as follows:
After 1 day 54% was remembered.
After 7 days 35% was remembered.
After 14 days 21% was remembered.
After 21 days 18% was remembered.
After 28 days 19% was remembered.
After 63 days 17% was remembered.
Remembering what you have heard in lectures is even more difficult to recall
because you are not able to slow down, pause, reflect, or to reread unless you take
excellent notes! In a study on recall after listening to a lecture, students forgot
more than 90% of the points from the lecture after 14 days! (Engle, Susan: Context
is everything: The nature of memory. W.H. Freeman & Co, 1999). If that is the
case, then there is no way a candidate may decide not to attend review classes.
108
47.4 Group discussions
By not sharing ones knowledge of understanding about a particular subject matter
a candidate may think that he knows much about the subject but when it comes into
examination, such a candidate fails! It is very easy for someone to cheat himself
that he knows much about a particular subject matter due to lack of sharing
knowledge with others. Going to the library daily or doing daily self-study is not a
direct ticket to pass examinations. There is a belief that when you are taught
something by your fellow student who understands the subject matter, the
knowledge sticks into your mind than being taught by a trainer. Group discussions
are said to be a good source of learning and sharing of knowledge and experiences
due to its nature of open interaction. Although most candidates who are preparing
for the professional examinations are facing limited time to organize group
discussions, they should not ignore it at all. They should be aware that sometimes
it is far better to discuss a subject/topic in a group than going to the library for self
study. Group discussion is a potential source of learning but it is ignored by most
candidates. Candidates are therefore obliged to form group discussions to discuss
various topics especially those which are most difficult or complicated.
47.5 Practise deep learning
One of the major factors that lead to poor performance in the examinations is
learning things in shallow. Most candidates have ample time to study but they do
not do it until the ‘late hours’. They keep on saying ‘there is enough time to study’.
But since time does not on the favour of anyone in this universe they find
themselves running shortage of time. What follows after this is to make ‘ad hoc’
preparations. In this case therefore they practise what the psychologists call ‘rote
learning’. By definition rote learning is a learning technique which avoids
understanding the inner complexities and inferences of the subject that is being
learned and instead focuses on memorizing the materials so that it can be recalled
by the learner exactly the way it was read or heard. In other words, it is learning
"just for the test".
The major practice involved in rote learning techniques is learning by repetition,
based on the idea that one will be able to recall the meaning of the material the more
they repeat it. However, in many fields, especially mathematics and related
disciplines, this can often produce poor results.
Rote learning is not the best way of studying. Students are required to study a
subject matter in deep. This will make them to own what they have learnt and
express it in their own words. In rote learning a student tries to reproduce what he
has read as it was read. ‘If a student reads something with the aim of reproducing
it as it is, that is not understanding. This method limits a student to learn many
things because memory capacity for human beings is also limited. Students should
also be aware that rote learning does not develop interest to learn. As you memorize
new materials the old ones fade out.
109
47.6 Conclusion
Candidates should take trouble to read various techniques for passing examinations
Rather than concentrating only on studying topics that will appear in the
examinations. Those who have been able to make use of various study techniques
have found themselves enjoying learning and finally pass their examinations.
Studying for the examinations should be enjoyable rather than becoming
cumbersome and boring exercise for the candidates. This is possible if the
candidates apply appropriate techniques in their studies.
110
CHAPTE IV
CANDIDATURE DISTRIBUTION
The Board’s examination candidature comes from various training institutions (Tuition
Providers) in the country. The November 2020 examination session drew candidates from
the following institutions as per Table 10:
TABLE 10
NO OF CANDIDATES
111
IDIANA CONSULTANCY
AND CPA(T) REVIEW
20 CLASS 0 0 2 7 4 13
INSTITUTE OF
ACCOUNTANCY
21 ARUSHA 0 0 0 1 0 1
KAS INSTITUTE OF
22 PROFESSIONAL (T) LTD 5 3 3 2 0 13
23 KMC ASSOCIATES 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 MZUMBE UNIVERSITY 0 0 0 38 0 38
MZUMBE UNIVERSITY
DAR ES SALAAM
25 CAMPUS 0 0 2 3 0 5
MZUMBE UNIVERSITY-
MBEYA CAMPUS
26 COLLEGE 0 0 1 5 0 6
27 PAC ARUSHA 0 6 19 87 45 157
CANDIDATES WHO SAT
28 AS A PRIVATE 8 33 103 511 358 1013
ST.JOSEPH
29 COMMERCIAL SCHOOL 4 0 0 1 0 5
STAR FINANCIAL
30 CONSULTANTS 0 0 2 28 24 54
STEP AHEAD FINANCIAL
31 CONSULTANTS 0 0 6 65 47 118
TABORA GENERAL
32 CONSULTANTS 0 0 1 2 1 4
33 TCCG DODOMA 0 0 0 5 0 5
THE ACCOUNTANT
FINANCIAL
34 CONSULTANTS 0 0 6 64 58 128
35 TIA SINGIDA CAMPUS 0 0 0 0 0 0
UPTAKE BUSINESS
36 RESOURCES(T) LTD 0 0 0 62 37 99
37 VUGA EAGLE CO.LTD 0 0 1 56 27 84
WADE-THROUGH
FINANCIAL
38 CONSULTANTS 0 0 0 1 0 1
39 WAME INVESTMENT 0 1 0 1 0 2
WEXITO CONSULTING
40 GROUP 0 0 17 74 42 133
ZANZIBAR
INTERLLECTUAL
&BUSINESS
41 CONSULTANTS 0 0 2 6 2 10
ZENJI REVIEW CLASS
42 AND CONSULTANCY 0 0 2 31 18 51
TOTAL APPLIED 48 92 420 2270 1517 4347
112
KEY
NAME OF REVIEW CENTRE
S/N INSTITUTION
1 PRIVATE Candidate who did not get an opportunity to attend review classes/or have
attended review classes in the previous examination sessions
- Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Attitude Financial
2 PT ATTITUDE
Consultants -
3 PT CCA - Mwanza
Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Commercial College of
- Arusha Review Classes conducted by Cornerstone Financial
Part-Time
4 PT CORNERSTONE
Consultants - DSM
PT STEP AHEAD FIN. - Part Time Review Class conducted by Step Ahead Financial
5
Consultants
- -Part-Time
Dodoma Review Classes Conducted by Excel Financial & Tax
6 PT EXCEL- MOSHI
Solutions of Moshi
- Part-Time Review Classes conducted by KAS Institute of
7 PT KAS
Professionals
8 PT PAC- ARUSHA - (T) Ltd. – Review
Part-Time DSM. Classes Conducted by PAC Consultants of Arusha
9 PT TABORA G.C. - Part Time Review Class conducted by Tabora General Consultancy
PT SJCS - Part Time Review Class conducted by St. Joseph’s Commercial
10
School –
PT MU-DSM - Part Time Review Class conducted by Mzumbe University – DSM
Tanga
11
Campus
- Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Accountants and Financial
12 PT AFC
Consultants Ltd - DSM
PT BRIGHT - - Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Bright Professionals
13
MOROGORO Tanzania -
- Morogoro Review Classes conducted by Evin School of
Part-Time
14 PT EVIN
Management -
15 PT WAME MWANZA - DSM
Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by WAME Investment -
PT EMINENT - Mwanza
Part Time Review Class conducted by Eminent Financial
16
Consultants -
PT VUGA ARUSHA - DSMTime Review Class conducted by Vuga Eagles Company Ltd -
Part
17
Arusha
- Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Covenant Financial
18 PT COVENANT- FC
Consultants
PT UPTAKE - – DSM
Part Time review classes conducted by UPTAKE Business
19
Resources (T)
PT FILADEFIA F.C - Ltd – DSMReview Classes conducted by Filadefia Financial
Part-Time
20
DODOMA Consultancy
PT ZENJI - - DODOMA
Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Zenji Review and
21
Consultancy -
PT ADONIJAH - Zanzibar
Part Time Review Class conducted by Adonijar Business
22
Consultancy -
PT IDIANA CONSULT. - Njombe Review Classes conducted by Idiana Consultancy -
Part-Time
23
Mbeya
24 PT STAR FIN. CONS. - Part Time Review Class conducted by Star Financial Consultants -
Mwanza
NAME OF REVIEW CENTRE
S/N INSTITUTION
PT BBC - Part Time Review Class conducted by BBC
25
113
26 PT BCC - Part Time Review Class conducted by BCC
27 PT CAG - Part Time Review Class conducted by Controller and Auditor
General
28 PT CBE DAR - Part Time Review Class conducted by College of Business Education
DSM
29 PT - CFC ONLINE - Part Time Review Class conducted by CFC ONLINE
30 PT – EIGHT SKYS - Part-Time Review Classes conducted by EIGHT SKYS Consulting
Ltd
31 PT – MU MBEYA - Part Time Review Class conducted by Mzumbe University – Mbeya
Campus
PT - NAO - Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by National Audit Office –
32
DSM
33 PT – PTC MWANZA - Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by Professional Training
Centre -
PT – PYTHAGORAS - Mwanza
Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Pythagoras Financial
34
F.C. Consultancy
PT - TCCG - Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Tanzania Centre for
35
Corporate
PT – WADE ARUSHA - Governance
Part-Time Review Classes conducted by WADE Through Financial
36
Consultants - ARUSHA
PT - WEXITO - Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by Wexito Consulting Group
37
38 PT - ZIBCO - Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by Zanzibar Intellectual and
Business Consultants
PT - ACG - Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by Accountant General’s
39
Office
40 PT- ACTS FIN. -
CONSULT.
41 PT- CBE DODOMA - Part Time Review Class conducted by College of Business Education
DODOMA
42 PT – DSM CPA REVIEW - Part Time Review Class conducted by DSM CPA review
114
INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE
2. Performance Approach:
Under this approach, the best institution is that which obtains the highest Grade Point
Average (GPA) in relation to the total number of A ,B, C, F grades obtained by
candidates in comparison with total number of papers sat by candidates in that level.
The following formula is applied
(NaPa + NbPb + NcPc + NfPf)
Subject GPA =
(Na + Nb + Nc + Nf)
115
Arising from the above, the best three institutions under this approach for each examination level are as
indicated hereunder: (See tables 15.1 to 15.5(b) on pages 145 to 154 of this report).
Examination Level Best Institution
ATEC I:
Category A: 1-5 Candidates 1st - PT BRIGHT PROFESSIONAL
2nd - PT CBE
- PT ACT F.C
ATEC II:
Category A: 1-5 Candidates 1st - PT ATTITUDE F.C
2nd - PT FILADEFIA F.C
3rd - PT ACT F.C F.C
-
FOUNDATION LEVEL:
Category A: 1-20 Candidates 1st - PT MU –DAR CAMPUS
2nd -
PT AFC
3rd -PT STEP AHEAD FIN.
Category B: Above 20 Candidates 1st - PT EVIN
2nd - PT CORNERSTONE
3rd - PT COVENANT F.C
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL:
Category A: 1-20 Candidates 1st - PT CBE – MBEYA CAMPUS
2nd - PT BCC F.C
3rd - PT MU- MBEYA CAMPUS
Category B: Above 20 Candidates 1st - PTXCEL
2nd - PT MU- MOROGORO
3rd - PT COVENANT F.C
FINAL LEVEL:
Category A: 1-20 Candidates 1st - PT BETA
2nd - PT ACT F.C.
3rd - PT CORNERSTONE
116
TABLE 11.1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVEL AND INSTITUTION WISE
1-5 CANDIDATES - ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL I
No of No of No of No of
Institution Ente Absent Sat papers A % of A B % of B C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
red
BRIGHT PROFESSIONALS
1 0 1 1
TANZANIA 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2.00 1
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
1 0 1 3
EDUCATION
0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1.00 2
ACT FINANCIAL
3 1 2 4
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1.00 2
ST.JOSEPH COMMERCIAL
4 0 4 11
SCHOOL
0 0.0% 1 9.1% 5 45.5% 5 45.5% 0.64 4
COMMERCIAL COLLEGE
5 0 5 6
OF ARUSHA
0 0.0% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 0.50 5
KAS INSTITUTE OF
5 0 5 17
PROFESSIONAL (T) LTD
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 41.2% 10 58.8% 0.41 6
CORNERSTONE
FINANCIAL 2 0 2 5
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0.40 7
EXCEL FINANCIAL AND
2 0 2 5
TAX FOUNDATION
0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 4 80.0% 0.40 7
Subtotals 23 1 22 52 0 0.0% 6 11.5% 18 34.6% 28 53.8% 0.58
RANKING
1ST - PT BRIGHT PROFESSIONAL
2ND - PT CBE
- PT ACT F.C
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
117
TABLE 11.1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVEL AND INSTITUTION WISE
ABOVE 5 CANDIDATES - ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL I
No of % of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
CONVENANT
17 0 17 30
FINANCIAL 0 0.0% 7 23.3% 9 30.0% 14 46.7% 0.77 1
CONSULTANTS
Subtotals 17 0 17 30 0 0.0% 7 23.3% 9 30.0% 14 46.7%
RANKING
1ST - PT COVENSNT F.C.
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level?
118
TABLE 11.2
No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
ATTITUDE FINANCIAL
1 0 1 2
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1.50 1
FILADEFIA FINANCIAL
2 0 2 3
CONSULTANCY
0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1.00 2
ACT FINANCIAL
1 0 1 3
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0.67 3
CORNERSTONE
FINANCIAL 5 0 5 8
CONSULTANTS 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 5 62.5% 0.63 4
RANKING
1ST - PT ATTITUDE F.C
2ND - PT FILADEFIA F.C.
3RD - PT ACT F.C.
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
119
TABLE 11.2 (b)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVEL AND INSTITUTION WISE
ABOVE 5 CANDIDATES - ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL II
No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
CONVENANT
FINANCIAL 30 0 30 94
CONSULTANTS
1 1.1% 25 26.6% 27 28.7% 41 43.6% 0.85 1
PAC ARUSHA 6 0 6 13
0 0.0% 2 15.4% 2 15.4% 9 69.2% 0.46 2
Subtotals 36 0 36 107 1 0.9% 27 25.2% 29 27.1% 50 46.7%
RANKING
1ST - PT COVENANT F.C
2ND - PT PAC ARUSHA
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
120
TABLE 11.3 (a)
121
No of No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat No of papers No of A % of A B % of B No of C % of C F % of F GPA Ranking
BCC FINANCIAL
7 0 7 10
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 1 10.0% 4 40.0% 5 50.0% 0.60 15
PAC ARUSHA 19 2 17 44
0 0.0% 5 11.4% 16 36.4% 23 52.3% 0.59 17
COMMERCIAL COLLEGE
1
OF ARUSHA 1 0 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0.50 18
TANZANIA CENTRE FOR
CORPORATE 1 0 1 2
GOVERNANCE
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0.50 18
STAR FINANCIAL
2 1 1 2
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0.50 18
EXCEL FINANCIAL AND
6 0 16
TAX FOUNDATION 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 50.0% 8 50.0% 0.50 18
ATTITUDE FINANCIAL
2 0 2 5
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 4 80.0% 0.40 22
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
4 0 4 11
EDUCATION 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 9 81.8% 0.36 23
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
EDUCATION-MBEYA 1 1 0 0
CAMPUS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.00 24
VUGA EAGLE CO.LTD 1 0 1 1
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 24
EMINENT FINANCIAL
3 1 2 3
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0.00 24
Subtotals 120 9 105 274 3 1.1% 41 15.0% 113 41.2% 117 42.7%
RANKING
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
122
TABLE 11.3 (b)
RANKING
1ST - PT EVIN
2ND - PT CORNERSTONE
3RD - PT COVENANT F.C
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of Number of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
123
TABLE 11.4 (a)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS
1-20 CANDIDATES - INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
EDUCATION-MBEYA 1 0 1 1
CAMPUS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 1
BCC FINANCIAL
15 0 15 29
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 2 6.9% 14 48.3% 13 44.8% 0.62 2
MZUMBE UNIVERSITY-
5 1 4 10
MBEYA CAMPUS COLLEGE
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 0.60 3
DSM CPA REVIEW CENTER 4 1 3 7
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0.57 4
ZANZIBAR
INTERLLECTUAL 6 1 5 7
&BUSINESS CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 4 57.1% 0.57 4
WADE-THROUGH
1 0 1 2
FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0.50 6
TANZANIA CENTRE FOR
6 0 6 13
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 7 53.8% 0.46 7
TCCG DODOMA 5 0 5 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0.40 8
WAME INVESTMENT 1 0 1 6
0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 0.33 9
TABORA GENERAL
2 0 2 3
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0.33 9
MZUMBE UNIVERSITY DAR
3 1 2 3
ES SALAAM CAMPUS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0.33 9
IDIANA CONSULTANCY
7 1 6 12
AND CPA(T) REVIEW CLASS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 33.3% 8 66.7% 0.33 9
BRIGHT PROFESSIONALS
19 0 19 37
TANZANIA 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 10 27.0% 26 70.3% 0.32 13
ADONIJAH BUSINESS
10 1 9 17
CONSULTANCY LTD 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 29.4% 12 70.6% 0.29 14
ACT FINANCIAL
16 1 15 30
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 26.7% 22 73.3% 0.27 15
COMMERCIAL COLLEGE OF
3 0 3 5
ARUSHA
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 0.20 16
124
No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
ATTITUDE FINANCIAL
7 0 7 16
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 12.5% 14 87.5% 0.13 17
INSTITUTE OF
1 0 1 1
ACCOUNTANCY ARUSHA
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 18
ST.JOSEPH COMMERCIAL
1 0 1 1
SCHOOL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 18
KAS INSTITUTE OF
2 0 2 4
PROFESSIONAL (T) LTD
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0.00 18
Subtotals 115 7 108 209 0 0.0% 5 2.4% 68 32.5% 136 65.1%
RANKING
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of Number of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
125
TABLE 11.4 (b)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS
ABOVE 20 CANDIDATES - INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
No of No of % of No of % of No of % of No of % of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers A A B B C C F F GPA Ranking
EXCEL FINANCIAL AND TAX
38 2 36 78
FOUNDATION 1 1.3% 3 3.8% 44 56.4% 30 38.5% 0.68 1
126
No of No of % of No of % of No of % of No of % of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers A A B B C C F F GPA Ranking
STAR FINANCIAL
28 1 27 47
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 1 2.1% 10 21.3% 36 76.6% 0.26 16
FILADEFIA FINANCIAL
22 0 22 36
CONSULTANCY 0 0.0% 1 2.8% 6 16.7% 29 80.6% 0.22 17
Subtotals 1643 91 1552 3314 1 0.0% 136 4.1% 1397 42.2% 1780 53.7%
RANKING
1ST - PT EXCEL
2ND - PT MU- MOROGORO CAMPUS
3RD - COVENANT F.C.
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted(∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
127
TABLE 11.4 (a)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS
1-20 CANDIDATES - FINAL LEVEL
No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
BETA BUSINESS
1 0 1 1
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 1
ACT FINANCIAL
3 0 3 5
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0.80 2
CORNERSTONE FINANCIAL
19 2 17 35
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 3 8.6% 21 60.0% 11 31.4% 0.77 3
COMMERCIAL COLLEGE
2 0 2 3
OF ARUSHA
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0.67 4
BRIGHT PROFESSIONALS
4 0 4 6
TANZANIA 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0.67 4
DSM CPA REVIEW CENTER 4 0 4 6
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0.67 4
BCC FINANCIAL
12 0 12 24
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 1 4.2% 14 58.3% 9 37.5% 0.67 4
IDIANA CONSULTANCY
AND CPA(T) REVIEW 4 0 4 6
CLASS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0.50 8
ZENJI REVIEW CLASS AND
17 0 17 29
CONSULTANCY
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 44.8% 16 55.2% 0.45 9
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
17 2 15 25
EDUCATION 0 0.0% 1 4.0% 7 28.0% 17 68.0% 0.36 10
FILADEFIA FINANCIAL
12 0 12 17
CONSULTANCY
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 35.3% 11 64.7% 0.35 11
ADONIJAH BUSINESS
7 0 7 9
CONSULTANCY LTD
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 6 66.7% 0.33 12
ATTITUDE FINANCIAL
3 0 3 4
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0.25 13
TABORA GENERAL
1 0 1 1
CONSULTANTS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 14
128
No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
ZANZIBAR
INTERLLECTUAL
2 1 1 2
&BUSINESS
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0.00 14
Subtotals 108 5 103 173 0 0 5 2.9% 83 48.0% 85 49.1%
RANKING
1ST - P T BETA
2ND - PT ACT F.C
2RD - PT CORNERSTONE
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
129
TABLE 11.5 (b)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS
ABOVE 20 CANDIDATES - FINAL LEVEL
No of
Institution Entered Absent Sat papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking
EXCEL FINANCIAL
21 0 21 36
AND TAX FOUNDATION
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 26 72.2% 10 27.8% 0.72 1
CONVENANT
FINANCIAL 342 12 330 595
CONSULTANTS
0 0.0% 25 4.2% 286 48.1% 284 47.7% 0.56 2
130
RANKING
Key:
Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers)
Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level.
131
CHAPTER V
In an effort to meet the demand of the highly needed accounting personnel in the
country, the Board has been able to create cumulatively 24,812 accounting manpower
since its inception in May 1975.
These qualified accounting personnel created are categorized in the
following groups:
Table 12 below shows the statistics of graduates per session and cumulatively since May 1975 to
November 2020
TABLE 12
TABE 4: NBAA GRADUATES – CUMULATIVE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
MAY 1975 TO NOVEMBER 2020
NO. CUM NO. CUM NO. CUM. NO. CUM. NO. CUM. - - NO. CUM.
. .
1ST SESSION - - 04 04 - - 01 01 NE NE - - 05 05
MAY 1975
NOV 1975 – MAY 18,438 18443
2013
78th SESSION - 2971 - 5746 36 3434 - 1537 377 5,168 - - 413 18,856
NOV. 2013
79th SESSION - 2971 - 5746 46 3480 - 1537 478 5,646 - - 524 19,380
MAY 2014
80th SESSION - 2971 - 5746 43 3523 - 1537 369 6,015 01 01 413 19,793
NOV. 2014
81st SESSION - 2971 - 5746 42 3565 - 1537 600 6,615 08 09 650 20,443
MAY 2015
132
1st Mid-SESSION - 2971 - 5746 - 3565 - 1537 03 6,618 04 13 07 20,450
AUGUST 2015
82nd SESSION - 2971 - 5746 42 3607 - 1537 270 6,888 03 16 315 20,765
MAY 2016
2ND MID- - 2971 - 5746 - 3607 - 1537 01 6,889 07 23 08 20,773
SESSION
FEBRUARY 2016
83rd SESSION - 2971 - 5746 40 3647 - 1537 282 7,171 11 34 333 21,106
MAY 2016
3RD MID- - 2971 - 5746 - 3647 - 1537 06 7,177 05 39 11 21,117
SESSION
AUGUST 2016
84TH SESSION - 2971 - 5746 49 3,696 - 1537 420 7,597 19 58 488 21,605
NOVEMBER 2016
4TH MID- - 2971 - 5746 - 3,696 - 1537 - 7,597 05 63 05 21,610
SESSION
FEBRUARY 2017
85TH SESSION - 2971 - 5746 65 3,761 - 1537 410 8,007 17 80 492 22,102
MAY 2017
5TH MID- - 2971 - 5746 - 3,761 - 1537 02 8,009 04 84 06 22,108
SESSION
AUGUST 2017
86TH SESSION - 2971 - 5746 39 3,800 - 1537 450 8,459 20 104 509 22,617
NOVEMBER 2017
6TH MID- - 2971 - 5746 - 3,800 - 1537 - 8,459 04 108 04 22,621
SESSION
FEBRUARY 2018
90thSESSSION - 2971 - 5746 28 3,828 - 1537 63 8,522 15 123 106 22,727
MAY 2018
7TH MID- - 2971 - 5746 - 3,828 - 1537 03 8,525 04 127 07 22,734
SESSION
AUGUST 2018
88TH SESSION - 2971 - 5746 63 3,891 - 1537 371 8,896 17 144 451 23,185
NOVEMBER 2018
8TH MID- - 2971 - 5746 - 3,891 - 1537 02 8,898 01 145 03 23,188
SESSION
FEBRUARY 2019
89TH SESSION - 2971 - 5746 49 3,940 - 1537 433 9,525 20 165 502 23,690
MAY 2019
9TH MID-SESSION - 2971 - 5746 - 3,940 - 1537 10 9,535 09 165 19 23,709
AUGUST 2019
90TH SESSION - 2971 - 5746 53 3,993 - 1537 325 9,860 17 182 395 24,104
NOVEMBER 2019
10TH MID-SESSION - 2971 - 5746 53 3,993 - 1537 41 9,901 03 185 44 24,148
FEBRUARY 2020
91ST SESSION MAY - 2971 - 5746 28 4,021 - 1537 354 10,255 16 201 398 24,546
(AUGUST)2020
92ND SESSION -
NOVEMBER 2020 2971 5746 14 4,035 - 1537 243 10,498 09 210 266 24,812
133
CHAPTER VI
134
1.2.3 Best Female Prizes
In motivating female candidates to work harder in their studies and perform better in the Board’s
examination, two categories of prizes are offered to female candidates as follows:
135
1.3 Prizes won by Candidates:
1.3.1 NBAA Best Level Performance Prize:
The following candidates qualify for the prizes in each examination layer:
136
FOUNDATION LEVEL
Code and Subject Name Name CR No. Amount
Tshs.
A1 – Quantitative Techniques NOLA MATOLO 336304 100,000
INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
Code and Subject Name Name CR No. Amount
Tshs.
B1 – Financial Management No Candidate qualified for the 120,000
Award
B2 – Financial Reporting No Candidate qualified for the 120,000
Award
B3 – Auditing Principles and No Candidate qualified for the 120,000
Practice Award
B4 – Public Finance and Taxation JULIETH KIIZA 436336 120,000
FINAL LEVEL
Code and Subject Name Name CR No. Amount
Tshs.
C1 – Corporate Reporting No Candidate qualified for the 140,000
Award
C2 – Auditing and Assurance Services No Candidate qualified for the 140,000
Award
C3 –Business and Corporate No Candidate qualified for the 140,000
Finance Award
C4 – Advanced Taxation JOAN TEMU 532657 140,000
137
1.3.3 NBAA Best Female Prizes:
In motivating female candidates to work harder in their studies and perform better in the Board’s
examinations, two categories of prizes shall be offered to female candidates.
138
2.0 PRIZES FROM SPONSORING INSTITUTIONS
In support of the Board’s effort to improve candidates’ examination performance a number of professional progressive
institutions have willingly offered different prizes for the best performers.
The names of organizations and amounts offered in each examination session are indicated hereunder:
1 PricewaterhouseCoopers Prizes:
1.1 PricewaterhouseCoopers: Auditing and Assurance Services (C2) Prize Tshs.600,000
1.2 PricewaterhouseCoopers: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.1,000,000
1.3 Best Female CPA (T) Graduate Tshs.500,000
2 Tanna Sreekumar Grant Thornton Prize: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.400,000
3 STANBIC Tanzania Ltd Prize: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize US$ 100
4 TAC Associates Prize: Auditing and Assurance Services (C2) Prize Tshs.200,000
5 A.I Khatri & Company Prize: Corporate Reporting (C1) Prize Tshs.200,000
6 Ernst & Young Prize:
6.1 Auditing and Assurance Services (C2) Prize Tshs.300,000
6.2 Best CPA (T) Graduate Overall Prize Tshs.100,000
6.3 Best Female CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.100,000
16 Innovex Prizes:
16.1 Innovex Best CPA(T) Graduate Prize Tshs.150,000
16.2 Innovex Best CPA(T) Female Graduate Prize Tshs.150,000
139
17 Controller and Auditor General’s Office Prizes
17.1 CAG: Auditing and Assurance Services (C2) Prize Tshs.1,000,000
17.2 CAG: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.500,000
18 Peoples Bank of Zanzibar Prize: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.500,000
19 TAA Best Candidates’ Prizes
19.1 TAA Best Two ATEC Candidates Prizes Tshs.100,000
19.2 TAA Best Two CPA (T) Candidates Prizes Tshs.200,000
20 RSM EASTERN AFRICA Prize: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.500,000 &
Employment
21 Watumishi Housing Company Prize
21.1 Overall Best Candidate in ATEC II Level Prize 100,000
21.2 Best Financial Management (B1) Prize 100,000
21.3 Performance Management (B5) Prize 200,000
21.4 Corporate Reporting (C1) Prize 200,000
140
1. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PRIZES
Name of Prize Name of Winner CR No. Amount
PWC: Auditing and Assurance No Candidate qualified for the Award 600,000
Services (C2) Prize
PWC: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize JOAN TEMU 532657 1,000,000
IPP: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize JOAN TEMU 532657 200,000
141
9. TIB DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD PRIZES
Name of Prize Name of Winner CR No. Amount
TIB Development Bank Ltd:
Business and Corporate Finance (C3) 1ST No Candidate qualified for the 500,000
Prize Award
142
14. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL’S OFFICE PRIZES
The Office of the Accountant General offers special prize awards to candidates with excellent performance in the
Board’s examinations. The awards worth Tshs.2, 440,000 are offered in each examination session.
The conditions of winning the prizes are:
A candidate must obtain an overall pass at a single sitting in the first examination attempt and must score a credit pass
(60%) or above either overall, or in the subject be awarded a prize in the professional examinations as the case may be.
Candidates winning the prizes for the November 2018 examinations are as shown below:
AG’S: Auditing and Assurance Services No Candidate qualified for the 500,000
(C2) Prize Award
AG’S: Best Performance Management (B5) No Candidate qualified for the 500,000
Prize Award
AG’S: Financial Management (B1) Prize No Candidate qualified for the 50,000
Award
AG’S: Financial Reporting (B2) Prize No Candidate qualified for the 50,000
Award
AG’S: Auditing Principles and Practice No Candidate qualified for the 50,000
(B3) Prize Award
AG’S: Corporate Reporting (C1) Prize No Candidate qualified for the 100,000
Award
AG’S: Business and Corporate Finance No Candidate qualified for the 100,000
(C3) Prize Award
AG’S: Advanced Taxation (C4) Prize JOAN TEMU 532657 100,000
INNOVEX: Best Female CPA (T) Graduate JOAN TEMU 532657 150,000
Prize
143
18. PEOPLE’S BANK OF ZANZIBAR PRIZE
Name of Prize Name of Winner CR No. Amount
PBZ: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize JOAN TEMU 532657 500,000
TAA: Best Two CPA (T) Candidate Prize JOAN TEMU 532657 100,000
144
24. MAZARS WISCON ASSOCIATES PRIZE
Name of Prize Name of Winner CR No. Amount
Tshs.
MAZARS WISCON ASSOCIATES: Auditing No Candidate qualified for the 300,000 &
And Assurance Services (C2) Prize Award Employment
____________________
145