Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 37 views

    Torts Exam Revision Notes

    Uploaded by

    holo
    This document provides revision notes on various topics in torts law, including: 1. An overview of tort law, its objectives of compensation and standard setting, and categories of damages. 2. Details of vicarious liability and the duties of care, breach, causation, and defenses in negligence cases. 3. Discussions of private nuisance, breach of statutory duty, and special situations like omission of duty and mental harm. 4. Explanations of heads of damages like economic loss and non-economic loss, as well as principles for assessing damages from cases like Malec v. JC Hutton.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Torts Exam Revision Notes

    Uploaded by

    holo
    37 views6 pages
    This document provides revision notes on various topics in torts law, including: 1. An overview of tort law, its objectives of compensation and standard setting, and categories of damages. 2. Details of vicarious liability and the duties of care, breach, causation, and defenses in negligence cases. 3. Discussions of private nuisance, breach of statutory duty, and special situations like omission of duty and mental harm. 4. Explanations of heads of damages like economic loss and non-economic loss, as well as principles for assessing damages from cases like Malec v. JC Hutton.

    Original Title

    28602-sample

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides revision notes on various topics in torts law, including: 1. An overview of tort law, its objectives of compensation and standard setting, and categories of damages. 2. Details of vicarious liability and the duties of care, breach, causation, and defenses in negligence cases. 3. Discussions of private nuisance, breach of statutory duty, and special situations like omission of duty and mental harm. 4. Explanations of heads of damages like economic loss and non-economic loss, as well as principles for assessing damages from cases like Malec v. JC Hutton.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    37 views6 pages

    Torts Exam Revision Notes

    Uploaded by

    holo
    This document provides revision notes on various topics in torts law, including: 1. An overview of tort law, its objectives of compensation and standard setting, and categories of damages. 2. Details of vicarious liability and the duties of care, breach, causation, and defenses in negligence cases. 3. Discussions of private nuisance, breach of statutory duty, and special situations like omission of duty and mental harm. 4. Explanations of heads of damages like economic loss and non-economic loss, as well as principles for assessing damages from cases like Malec v. JC Hutton.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    TORTS EXAM REVISION NOTES

    Index
    Table of Contents
    Topic 1 – Overview of Torts Law .......................................................... 2
    Topic 2 – On Assignment (Non-Examinable)
    Topic 3 – On Assignment (Non-Examinable
    Topic 4 – Vicarious Liability ................................................................ 10
    Topic 5 – Negligence and Duty of Care .............................................. 18
    Topic 6 – Breach of Duty of Care ....................................................... 27
    Topic 7 – Causation ............................................................................ 36
    Topic 8 – Remoteness ........................................................................ 45
    Topic 9 – Special Duty Situations: Omission ...................................... 48
    Topic 9 – Part 2 – Special Duty Situations: Pure Mental Harm.......... 55
    Topic 10 – Defences to Negligence .................................................... 60
    Topic 11 – Private Nuisance ............................................................... 68
    Topic 12 – Breach of Statutory Duty .................................................. 74
    Topic 1 – Overview of Torts Law
    Overview of Tort Law
    Tort: Non-criminal conduct that gives rise to causes of action with civil remedies.
    - A miscellany’ of civil wrongs.
    - Judged by the balance of probabilities – is something more probable of occurring
    than not.

    Objectives of Torts
    Primary Objective:
    Compensation for loss (Compensate plaintiff for loss suffered due to actions of the
    defendant).

    Other Objectives:
    - Normative (standard setting) and
    - Punitive (punishment).

    - Also loss spreading (spreading loss from victim to others)


    Examples:
    - Statutory compensation schemes, TAC and WorkCover (not examinable)
    - Property (house and car)
    - Public liability insurance (house, car, government authorities, businesses,
    sporting/recreational associations)
    - Professional indemnity insurance
    - Cf criminal law (stricter elements and standards of proof)

    Legislative Tort Reforms


    - Community outcry about the cost of public liability and/or professional indemnity
    insurance – amateur sporting associations, medical professionals and councils.
    - Lobbying by insurance industry resulted in ‘Ipp Report’ in Sept 2002, which
    recommended reform
    - Each jurisdiction introduced reforms
    - Victoria: Wrongs Act 1958

    The Reforms commonly provide for:


    Codification of the elements of negligence and provisions dealing with the controversial
    areas such as:
    - Obvious risks
    - Recovery for psychiatric injury
    - Damages reforms: sets thresholds to prevent minor claims and imposes damages
    caps (see below)
    - Good Samaritan, volunteer and food donor protection
    - Waiver agreements with providers of recreational services
    Categories of Damages
    - Compensatory
    - Aggravated (Topic 2)
    - Exemplary/Punitive (Topic 2)

    Damages (for living plaintiffs)

    Four fundamental principles of compensatory damages awards


    Established by/derived from - [Todorovic v. Waller (1980)]

    1. Compensatory Objective
    Plaintiff to be put in the [monetary] position as if the injury had not been sustained.

    2. Once and for all rule (damages are awarded once and for all)
    Two consequences of the once and for all rule:
    a) Lump sum awards; can not be varied
    [Fetter v. Beal (1701)]
    [Gilchrist v. The Estate of the Late Sara Alexander Taylor (2004)]

    b) Courts must make predictions about the plaintiff’s future health, employment etc.
    Vicissitudes of life: Wynn v NSW IMC; Malec v JC Hutton (HCA, 1990)
    Malec v. JC Hutton (HCA, 1990)
    Facts:
    - While working between 1972 and 1980 in D’s abattoir P contracted brucellosis due
    to D’s negligence, in the period 1975-1977
    - But by 1983 the condition was no longer present.
    - Since 1979 he suffered a neurotic condition that was a consequence of the
    brucellosis. This rendered him unemployable
    - From 1982 he suffered from a back condition that was unrelated to the
    employment. This back condition alone rendered him unemployable
    - Trial judge, held that, on the balance of probabilities (BOP), the neurotic condition
    was not related to the brucellosis
    - FC of Qd SC, held that, on BOP, neurotic condition was related to brucellosis but it
    was ‘likely’ on BOP that P would have suffered neurotic condition anyway because
    of his non work-related back condition

    Holding:
    - Deane, Gaudron and McHugh JJ:
    - Future and hypothetical events to be distinguished from past events (that had
    happened before trial)
    - Balance of probabilities analysis not appropriate to future events which involve
    prediction/conjecture and are not susceptible of exact proof
    - Damages must be discounted for the probability that the future event would
    occur and the plaintiff would suffer the same loss independently of the tortious
    accident due to a pre-existing medical condition
    - Future event only to be ignored where it is speculative (less than one per cent)
    - Applied to this case:
    - no certainty that M’s back condition would have led to the same psychiatric
    condition; it could be said only that there was a chance this would occur.
    - Damages for pain and suffering and for gratuitous care to be reduced by the
    chance that a similar psychiatric condition would have developed from factors
    unconnected with d’s negligence (the back injury)

    Structured Settlements: s28N


    But, the court can now approve an agreement to settle by a structured settlement
    - S28N Wrongs Act
    - No tax consequences
    - Advantages: financial management and future reassessment
    - Limitations: No power to order parties to enter into a structured settlement and only
    applies to settlements.
    3. The court doesn’t care how, or if, the plaintiff spends the money
    - The permanently unconscious plaintiff [Skelton v. Collins (1966)], plaintiff couldn’t
    spend money but was still compensated.
    - Damages for ‘gratuitous attendant care services’ (aka Griffiths v. Kerkemeyer
    damages).
    - However, if the damages are awarded as a lump sum, and the defendant’s
    negligence has rendered the plaintiff unable to manage the money, the plaintiff is
    entitled to recover for the costs of managing the fund into which that lump sum is
    paid: [Gray v. Richards [2014] HCA 40].

    4. The plaintiff bears the burden of proof on damages

    Heads of Compensatory Damages


    Economic Loss (Pecuniary Damages)
    - Medical, hospital, rehabilitation expenses
    - Includes damages for gratuitous attendant care services
    - Loss of earning capacity

    Non-Economic Loss (Non-Pecuniary Damages)


    - Pain and suffering
    - Loss of amenities of life
    - Loss of enjoyment of life; (s28LB)
    - Plus loss of expectation of life.

    Terminology
    Special v. General Damages
    - Special damages: can be quantified with a degree of precision (past economic loss)
    - General damages: can not be quantified with a degree of precision (future economic
    loss, non-economic loss)

    Nominal and Contemptuous Damages


    - Nominal damages: awarded for an infringement of a personal right, but where no
    damage has occurred
    - Available for torts actionable per se such as trespass to land and battery
    - Often in range of $5k to $15k
    - Contemptuous damages: same as above, however a derisory amount (e.g. $1) in
    recognition that the claim is unmeritorious + P might be liable for costs

    Legislative reforms
    - Part VB and VBA of the Wrongs Act
    - Caps and thresholds on damages
    - Important note: reforms are not applicable to where ‘the fault concerned is an
    intentional act done with intent to cause death or injury or that is sexual assault or
    other sexual misconduct’: ss 28C, 28LC.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy