Chapter One Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis: Unit Outline
Chapter One Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis: Unit Outline
After going through the major assumptions upon which the CVP model is developed, you will be
Page
exposed through the application of CVP in determining the BEP, target profit; in a single and
multiple product companies. You will also come across on how CVP is used to conduct a
sensitivity analysis as well as its application in NFPs.
Notice that on advanced managerial accounting courses you will come across with diverse and
advanced applications of CVP analysis in various financial and strategic decisions.
Cost-volume-profit analysis determines how costs and profit react to a change in
the volume or level of activity, so that management can decide the 'best' activity
level.
1.2.2 Underlying Assumptions of CVP Analysis
CVP analysis is a short-run model that focuses on relationships among several items: selling
price, variable costs, fixed costs, volume, and profits. This model is a useful planning tool that
can provide information on the impact on profits when changes are made in the cost structure or
in sales levels. However, the CVP model, like other human-made models, is an abstraction of
reality and, as such, does not reveal all the forces at work. It reflects reality but does not
duplicate it. Although limiting the accuracy of the results, several important but necessary
assumptions are made in the CVP model. These assumptions follow:
1. All revenue and variable cost behavior patterns are constant per unit and linear within the
relevant range.
2. Total contribution margin (total revenue - total variable costs) is linear within the relevant
range and increases proportionally with output. This assumption follows directly from
assumption 1.
3. Total fixed cost is a constant amount within the relevant range.
4. Mixed costs can be accurately separated into their fixed and variable elements. Although
accuracy of separation may be questioned, reliable estimates can be developed from the
use of regression analysis or the high-low method.
5. Sales and production are equal; thus, there is no material fluctuation in inventory levels.
This assumption is necessary because of the allocation of fixed costs to inventory at
potentially different rates each year. This assumption requires that variable costing
information be available. Because both CVP and variable costing focus on cost behavior,
they are distinctly compatible with one another.
6. There will be no capacity additions during the period under consideration. If such
additions were made, fixed (and, possibly, variable) costs would change. Any changes in
fixed or variable costs would violate assumptions 1 through 3.
7. In a multiproduct firm, the sales mix will remain constant. If this assumption were not
made, no weighted average contribution margin could be computed for the company.
8. There is either no inflation or, if it can be forecasted, it is incorporated into the CVP
model. This eliminates the possibility of cost changes.
9. Labor productivity, production technology, and market conditions will not change. If any
of these changes occur, costs would change correspondingly and selling prices might
change. Such changes would invalidate assumptions 1 through 3.
These assumptions limit not only the volume of activity for which the calculations can be made,
but also the time frame for the usefulness of the calculations to that period for which the
3
specified revenue and cost amounts remain constant. Changes in either selling prices or costs
Page
will require that new computations be made for break-even and product opportunity analyses.
The nine assumptions listed above are the traditional ones associated with CVP analysis. An
additional assumption must be noted with regard to the distinction of variable and fixed costs.
Accountants have generally assumed that cost behavior, once classified, remained constant over
periods of time as long as operations remained within the relevant range. Thus, for example,
once a cost was determined to be “fixed,” it would be fixed next year, the year after, and 10 years
from now.
The above assumptions thus, imply that cost-volume-profit analysis is always based on
contribution per unit (assumed to be constant unless a question clearly says otherwise) and never
on profit per unit because profit per unit changes every time a few more or less units are made.
Activity 4.1:
a) Explain how CVP helps for management decision making process
b) List and explain the underline assumptions in a CVP analysis
1.3 Applications of CVP Analysis
Dear learners in the previous parts of this unit you have gone through the meaning
and underlying assumptions of CVP. As you have learnt CVP can be used by
managers in a variety of sectors as management decision tool.
On the subsequent part of the module you will find an explanation and illustrations on the
applications of CVP in different scenarios.
1.3.1 Break Even Analysis
CVP analysis has wide-range applicability. It can be used to determine a company’s break-even
point (BEP), which is that level of activity, in units or dollars/Birr, at which total revenues equal
total costs. At breakeven, the company’s revenues simply cover its costs; thus, the company
incurs neither a profit nor a loss on operating activities.
At the breakeven point total revenue is equal to total cost (both variable and fixed)
For instance Sebastopol Cinema sold 4,800 tickets during a show one month run. The following
contribution margined approach income statement show that the operating income for the month
will be zero:
Sales Revenue (4800 X Br25) --------------------------- Br 120, 000
Less Variable Cost (4800 X Br 15) -------------------------- 72,000
Total Contribution Margin----------------------------------Br 48,000
Less Fixed Costs-------------------------------------------------- 48,000
Operating Income---------------------------------------------------Br 0
The income statement above highlights (1) the distinction between variable and fixed cost and
(2) the total contribution margin, which is the amount that contributes towards covering
Sebastopol Cinema’s fixed cost and income generation. To state it differently, each ticket sold
add Birr 10 to the firm’s bottom line profit. The Birr 10 unit contribution margin is derived by
deducting the unit variable cost Birr 15 from Birr 25 the unit selling price of a ticket.
How could you compute Sebastopol Cinema’s breakeven point if you didn’t already know it is
Birr 4,800 tickets per month? Well on the following discussion you will get the basics of CVP
analysis to determine BEP and other application. CVP analysis can be done using three
alternative approaches, namely: contribution margin approach, equation approach and graphical
approach.
4 Page
In discussing CVP application we will assume that the following variables have the meanings
given below:
SP = Selling Price Per Unit
Q = Units Produced and Sold
VCU = Variable Cost Per Unit
CMU=contribution margin per Unit
CM%= contribution margin percentage (CMU÷SP)
FC = Total Fixed Costs
TOI =Target operating Income
TNI=Target Net Income
t = Tax rate
1.3.1.1 Equation Method
In using equation approach to CVP analysis, you need to convert your income statement in the
following equation form.
Revenue –Variable Costs- Fixed Costs = Operating Income
Your Sales Revenue is equal to the number of units sold times the price you get for each unit
sold:
Sales Revenue = SPQ
Assume that you have a linear cost function, and your total costs equal the sum of your Variable
Costs and Fixed Costs:
Total Costs = Variable costs + Fixed costs
The profit equation can, therefore rewritten as:
(SPXQ) - (VCUXQ) + FC = OI
This equation provides the most general and easiest approach to remember approach to any CVP
situation. The determination of breakeven level using this method can easily performed by
making the operating income on the right hand side of the equation zero. Here the basic
assumption is that, when you are at breakeven, your Sales Revenue minus your Total Costs is
zero.
At breakeven point,
(SPXQ) - (VCUXQ) + FC = 0
From the information given above for the Sebastopol Cinema, you can determine the breakeven
point (BEP) using the equation approach as follows:
(Br25 X Q) – (Br15 X Q) + Br48, 000 = 0
Br10Q = Br 48,000
Q= 4,800
If Sebastopol sells fewer than 4800 tickets, it will have a loss, if it sells 4800 tickets, it will
breakeven; and if the sales are more than 4800 units, it will make a profit.
The breakeven point stated in units can be stated in terms of Birr by multiplying the breakeven
quantity and unit selling price. The breakeven point in Birr= BEQ x SP
= 4,800 x Br25
= Br120, 000
1.3.1.2 Contribution Margin Approach
5
The contribution margin technique is merely a short version of the equation technique. The
Page
formulas used in the determination of the breakeven point in unit as well as in value are derived
by the rearrangement of the terms in the equation method above, which is
(SP x Q) – (VCU x Q) – FC = OI
Re-written equation takes the following format:
(SP-VCU) x Q = FC + OI
That is, Q= FC + OI/ (SP-VCU)
The difference between unit selling price and unit variable cost is termed as unit contribution
margin. You can replace the (P-V) by the term "Contribution Margin per Unit (CMU),
Q = FC + OI/CMU
As you know from the discussion above at breakeven point the target operating income is Birr 0,
so replacing OI by 0, you will get,
Q = FC/ (SP-VCU)
A. Breakeven point in units using contribution Margin Approach
Breakeven point in units using this formula is determined by dividing the total fixed cost by the
contribution margin per unit due to the fact that this approach centers on the idea that each unit
sold provides a certain amount of fixed costs. When enough units have been sold to generate a
total contribution margin equals to the total expense and only after that point the units sold
contributes for profit of the organization.
The breakeven number of tickets that Sebastopol Cinema must sold to reach at breakeven using
this method can be determined as:
Q = FC/CMU
Q = Br 48, 000/Br10
Q = 4,800 units
B. Determining breakeven point in terms of sales value (Dollar/Birr)
To find the breakeven sales value, you can use contribution margin percentage in place of
contribution margin per unit in the formula you used in the determination of breakeven units.
Contribution margin percentage is simply the ratio of contribution margin to selling price.
CM% = CMU/USP
It can also determined by dividing the total contribution margin to total sales when the unit
selling price and variable cost is not known. We will see how this formula is used in such a
situation later. Before that let see how the formula works using the above example.
CM % on our example of Sebastopol Cinema = UCM/USP
= Br 10/ Br 25
= 0.4
This can be interpreted as, units sold cover variables costs and contribute 40 percent to cover
fixed cost and increase in profit.
The break even sales amount (Birr) for Sebastopol Cinema = FC/CM%
= 48,000/0.40
= Br 120,000
The breakeven sales determined using equation method was a mere multiplication of the
breakeven point in unit and the unit selling price (4800 units x Br 25) which is exactly the same
6
with what you determined using a more complicated contribution margin approach.
Page
Operating Loss
120,000
Total Variable Cost
48,000
Breakeven Point
4,800 Units
The
breakeven points for Sebastopol cinema can determined from the graph by identifying the level
of output and sales value where the total revenue and total cost line cross to each other. In the
case of Sebastopol cinema this happened when 4800 tickets are sold for birr 120,000 in which
both the unit and the Birr value are similar with what have been determined in the equation and
contribution margin approaches. The graphical approach is usually preferred by managers as it
can provide a detail insight of the cost volume and profit relationship pictorially.
Activities 4.3.1.3: What are the different approaches in solving problems in a CVP model?
1.3.2 Target Operating Income Analysis
Using CVP analysis managers can determine the total sales in unit and Birr/Dollar needed to
reach the target profit level. The computation of sales volume in unit and/ or in amount to attain
the targeted profit is similar with that of the break even analysis, except that the targeted profit is
more than offsetting the cost. For instance, the management of Sebastopol Cinema desires to get
Br 9000 profit for the coming month, instead of operating at breakeven point, how many tickets
must be sold? Managers want to answer this question to provide the necessary resource support
to attain the desired profit at already determined volume of activity. The analysis can be
performed using equation method or contribution margin approach on the basis of personal
preference.
See both the methods using the information given for Sebastopol Cinema to determine the target
8
sales in unit and Birr to that enable the firm to earn the targeted profit of birr 9,000 cab be
Page
determined using the equation method and contribution margin method as follows:
Equation Method to Determine Contribution Margin Approach
(Target sales unit) (Target sales unit)
(SP x Q) - (VCU x Q) -FC= TOI Q = FC +TOI/ CMU
(25 x Q) – (15 x Q) - 48,000= 9000 Q = (48,000 + 9,000)/10
10Q= 57,000 Q= 5,700
Q= 5,700
Equation Method to Determine Contribution Margin Approach
(Target sales in birr) (Target sales in birr)
TR= SP x Q Target Sales in Birr = (FC + TOI)/CM%
=25 x 5700 = (48,000 + 9000)/ 40%
= Br 142,500 = Birr 142, 500
Both the methods provided similar result that the cinema must sell 5,700 tickets at a total of Birr
142, 500 to meet its target profit goal of birr 9000.
Here you can recognize that each ticket sales beyond the breakeven point
contributes to the firms operating income.
1.3.3 The Impact of Income Tax on CVP Analysis
Profit seeking enterprises must pay tax on their profit, meaning that target income figures are set
at high enough to cover the firm’s tax obligation to the government. The relationship between an
organization‘s before tax income and after tax income is expressed in the following formula:
After Tax income = Before Tax Income – Income Taxes
NIAT = NIBT- (NIBT x t)
= NIBT x (1-t)
Dividing both sides by (1-t) you can get:
NIAT/ (1-t) = NIBT
Which gives you the desired before tax income that will generate the desired after tax income,
given the company’s tax rate.
For instance, if the target profit given for Sebastopol Cinema above is expressed on after tax
basis and the firm is subject to a 40 percent income tax rate, what will be the required sales of
ticket in units and Birr? If you want to know how many units that you need to produce and sell in
order to generate a target Net Income (or after-tax profit), just convert the after-tax number into a
before-tax number.
NIBT = NIAT/ (1-t)
=Br 9000/ (1-0.4)
= Br 15,000
You can then substitute the before-tax profit figure in the formulas used in target operating
income analysis. The analysis of sales of tickets and amount of Sebastopol cinema to earn the
desired profit after tax can be determined using the equation and contribution margin approach as
shown on the following table:
Equation Method to Determine Contribution Margin Approach
(Target sales unit) (Target sales unit)
9
1.4.2 Contribution margin technique and sales required for desired income for a multi-
product company
Page
The logic to calculate sales required for designed income (profit) for a multi-product company is
the same as for a single product company. In the formula for determining the sales required for
desired profit, we just substitute contribution margin per unit for one product with weighted
average contribution margin for multiple products.
The formula to calculate the required unit sale for a given desired income is shown below:
Unit Sales = Fixed Costs + Profit
Weighted Average Contribution Margin per Unit
And the amount of sales in dollars can be determined using the following formula:
Sales (Birr) = Fixed Costs + Profit
Contribution Margin Ratio
1.5 Not for Profit Organizations and Cost-Profit-Volume (CVP) Analysis
Managers in not-for-profit (NFP) organizations also routinely use CVP analysis to examine the
effect of activity and others short run changes on revenue and costs. For example, activity
administration must analyze the impact of increment in population on the different tax revenue
and the cost of providing services such as education, transportation, and police protection etc.
Mangers in diverse NFPs such as, universities, Public hospitals, and charitable and development
oriented nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are also apply CVP as operational analysis
model. For instance Jimma University can use CVP in analyzing the change in student
population and its impact on the cost of service provision such as, cafeteria, library teaching,
tutorial, research guidance and the like.
Activity: Explain how do nonprofit organizations apply CVP model in their administrative
decisions?
Chapter Summary
Unit five presents the cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis model and illustrates how managers use
that model in their profit planning and answer important “what-if” business questions. CVP
analysis helps management accountants alert managers to the risks and rewards of decisions they
are considering, by illustrating how the “bottom-line” is affected by changes in activity levels
and/or key pricing or cost components. CVP analysis is based on several assumptions, one of
which is that fixed costs can be distinguished from variable costs. However, whether a cost is
variable or fixed depends on the time period for the decision and also the range of activity
(relevant range) being considered. You were also presented with a method for applying CVP
analysis to a single product companies and companies with multiple products, and to the scenario
of NFP.
14
Page