First Midterm Exam Solutions: Econ 435 Financial Economics
First Midterm Exam Solutions: Econ 435 Financial Economics
II Valuing Bonds
1. Non-arbitrage with risk-free bonds
(a) The prices of the bonds are given by
100
PA = = $90.70
1.052
100
PB = = $95.24
1.05
4 104
PC = + = $98.14
1.05 1.052
(b) Notice that the cash flows of this bond can be replicated by 5 B
bonds and 25 A bonds. Therefore
1
(b) The coupon rate is 10%, which is above the yield to maturity, so
the bond trades at a premium. Intuitively, whenever a bond offers
a coupon rate above prevailing rates, investors will pay more for it.
They are willing to buy at a premium to secure the relatively higher
yield offered by the bond.
(c) First, as the maturity gets closer, the discount factor approaches 1.
Moreover, for bonds that pay coupons, as the payments are made,
the remaining cash flows become closer and closer to the face value
of the bond. These two things together ensure the convergence of
bond prices to the face value.
3. Risky bonds
(a) The bond price is given by
0.5 · 500, 000 + 0.5 · 0.1 · 500.000 275, 000
P = = = $261, 904.76
(1 + 0.03 + 0.02)1 1.05
(b) The YTM is given by
N1 1
FV FV 500, 000
P = ⇒ Y TM = −1 = −1 = 90.91%
(1 + Y T M )N P 261, 904.76
The yield to maturity is higher than the discount rate used in (a)
because the yield to maturity sets the price of the bond equal to
the present value of promised payments, as opposed to the expected
payments discounted by the discount rate to compute the price.
2
2. Interest rates and inflation
We use the Fisher equation
1 + rN
1 + rR =
1+π
Alternatively, we can note that nominal rates and inflation are relatively
low and so we can also use the approximation rR ≈ rN − π. For 1973 we
get
R 1 + 0.12
r1973 = − 1 = 0%
1 + 0.12
For 2006 we get
R 1 + 0.02
r2006 = − 1 = 0.99%
1 + 0.01
R R
We have that r2006 > r1973 : even though nominal rates were higher in
1973, returns measured in terms of purchasing power were higher in 2006.
3
V Valuing Stocks
1. The dividend-discount model
(a)
3 104
P0 = + = 95.39
1.06 1.062
(b)
104
P1 = = 98.11
1.06
(c)
98.11 + 3
P0 = = 95.39
1.06
(d) The 2-year valuation and the 1-year valuation coincides because of the
law of one price. Otherwise there would be an arbitrage opportunity.
VI Valuing a Perpetuity
1.
∞ ∞
X C X 1
n
= C
n=0
(1 + r) n=0
(1 + r)n
!
1 1
=C 1
1+r 1 − 1+r
!
1 1
=C r
1+r 1+r
1 1+r
=C
1+r r
C
=
r
C C
2. If we deposit r today, we can withdraw rr = C every period as interest.