Failure Failure: Chapter 8
Failure Failure: Chapter 8
Failure Failure: Chapter 8
Chapter 8 -
Chapter 8: Mechanical Failure
ISSUES TO ADDRESS...
• How do cracks that lead to failure form?
• How is fracture resistance quantified? How do the fracture
resistances of the different material classes compare?
• How do we estimate the stress to fracture?
• How do loading rate, loading history, and temperature
affect the failure behavior of materials?
Chapter 8 - 3
Fracture mechanisms
• Ductile fracture
– Accompanied by significant plastic
deformation
• Brittle fracture
– Little or no plastic deformation
– Catastrophic
Chapter 8 - 4
Ductile vs Brittle Failure
• Classification:
Fracture Very Moderately
Brittle
behavior: Ductile Ductile
Chapter 8 - 5
Closer look at Ductile Failure
Chapter 8 - 6
Example: Pipe Failures
• Ductile failure:
-- one piece
-- large deformation
• Brittle failure:
-- many pieces
-- small deformations
Chapter 8 - 7
Moderately Ductile Failure
• Failure Stages:
void void growth shearing
necking fracture
nucleation and coalescence at surface
• Resulting 50
50mm
mm
fracture
surfaces
(steel)
100 mm
particles From V.J. Colangelo and F.A. Heiser, Fracture surface of tire cord wire
serve as void Analysis of Metallurgical Failures (2nd loaded in tension.
tension Courtesy of F F.
ed.), Fig. 11.28, p. 294, John Wiley and Roehrig, CC Technologies, Dublin,
nucleation Sons, Inc., 1987. (Orig. source: P. OH. Used with permission.
sites. Thornton, J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 6, 1971, pp.
347-56.) Chapter 8 - 8
Moderately Ductile vs. Brittle Failure
Chapter 8 - 9
Brittle Failure
Arrows indicate point at which failure originated
Polypropylene Al Oxide
(polymer) (ceramic)
Reprinted w/ permission Reprinted w/ permission
from R.W. Hertzberg, from "Failure Analysis of
"Defor-mation and Brittle Materials", p. 78.
Fracture Mechanics of Copyright 1990, The
Engineering Materials", American Ceramic
(4th ed.) Fig. 7.35(d), p. Society, Westerville, OH.
303, John Wiley and (Micrograph by R.M.
Sons, Inc., 1996. Gruver and H. Kirchner.)
3 mm
1 mm
(Orig. source: K. Friedrick, Fracture 1977, Vol.
12
3, ICF4, Waterloo, CA, 1977, p. 1119.) Chapter 8 -
Transgranular Brittle Fracture in
Brittle
B ittl MMaterials
t i l
Chapter 8 - 13
Intergranular Brittle Fracture in
Brittle
B ittl MMaterials
t i l
-- larger
l samples
l contain
t i llonger flflaws!!
Chapter 8 - 15
Geometric Definitions
Chapter 8 - 16
Flaws are Stress Concentrators!
• Griffith Crack
1/ 2
a
m 2o K t o
t
t where
t = radius of curvature
o = applied stress
m = stress at crack tip
Chapter 8 - 17
Concentration of Stress at Crack Tip
Chapter 8 - 18
The 3 Modes of Crack Surface
Displacement
Chapter 8 - 19
Engineering Fracture Design
• Avoid sharp corners!
max
Stress Conc
Conc. Factor
Factor, K t =
0
2.5
w
max
2.0 increasing w/h
r, h
fillet 1.5
radius
1.0 r/h
0 0.5 1.0
sharper
h fill
fillett radius
di
Chapter 8 - 20
Crack Propagation
Cracks having sharp tips propagate easier than cracks
having blunt tips
• A plastic material deforms at a crack tip, which
“blunts” the crack.
deformed
region
brittle ductile
Chapter 8 - 21
Something to Remember
(forever)
Compressive stress Tensile stress
brittle brittle
ductile ductile
Chapter 8 - 23
Plane Strain Fracture Toughness
KIc
For thin specimens, the value of Kc depends on the thickness.
However, when the speciment thickness is much greater than the
crack dimensions,, Kc becomes independent
p of thickness under
which circumstances a plane strain condition exists leading to
plane strain fracture toughness KIc.
K Ic = Y a
Mode 1
K IcI = Y a
25
Chapter 8 -
Fracture Toughness Ranges
p
Graphite/
Metals/ Composites/
Ceramics/ Polymers
Alloys fibers
Semicond
100
C-C(|| fibers) 1
70 Steels
60 Ti alloys
50
40
Al alloys
30 Mg alloys Based on data in Table B.5,
a · m0.55 )
20 C lli t & R
Callister Rethwisch
th i h 8 8e.
Al/Al oxide(sf) 2 Composite reinforcement geometry is: f
Y2 O 3 /ZrO 2 (p) 4 = fibers; sf = short fibers; w = whiskers;
C/C( fibers) 1 p = particles. Addition data as noted
10 (vol. fraction of reinforcement):
Al oxid/SiC(w) 3
Si nitr/SiC(w) 5
K Ic (MPa
design
Kc 1 K c
amax
Ydesign
d i
Y amax
amax
fracture fracture
no no
fracture amax fracture
Chapter 8 - 28
Design Example: Aircraft Wing
• Material has KIc = 26 MPa-m0.5
• Two designs to consider...
Design A Design B
--largest flaw is 9 mm --use same material
--failure stress = 112 MPa --largest flaw is 4 mm
K Ic --failure
f il stress
t =?
• Use... c
Y amax
• Key point: Y and KIc are the same for both designs.
KIc
= a = constant
Y
--Result:
112 MPa 9 mm 4 mm
c amax
A c amax B
30
Chapter 8 -
Impact Testing
• Impact loading: (Charpy)
-- severe testing case
-- makes
k material
t i l more b
brittle
ittl
-- decreases toughness
Adapted from Fig
Fig. 8
8.12(b),
12(b)
Callister & Rethwisch 8e. (Fig.
8.12(b) is adapted from H.W.
Hayden, W.G. Moffatt, and J.
Wulff, The Structure and
Properties
p of Materials,, Vol. III,,
Mechanical Behavior, John Wiley
and Sons, Inc. (1965) p. 13.)
fi l height
final h i ht i iti l h
initial height
i ht
Chapter 8 - 31
Influence of Temperature on
Impact Energ
Energy
• Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Temperature (DBTT)...
( )
Chapter 8 - 32
Effect of Carbon Concentration on
Ductile to Brittle Transition in Plain C
Steels
Chapter 8 - 33
Design Strategy:
Stay
St Above
Ab The
Th DBTT!
• Pre-WWII: The Titanic • WWII: Liberty
y ships
Reprinted w/ permission from R.W. Hertzberg, Reprinted w/ permission from R.W. Hertzberg,
"Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering "Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering
Materials",, (4th ed.) Fig. 7.1(a), p. 262, John Wiley and
Materials Materials",, (4th ed.) Fig. 7.1(b), p. 262, John Wiley and
Materials
Sons, Inc., 1996. (Orig. source: Dr. Robert D. Ballard, Sons, Inc., 1996. (Orig. source: Earl R. Parker,
The Discovery of the Titanic.) "Behavior of Engineering Structures", Nat. Acad. Sci.,
Nat. Res. Council, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., NY,
1957.)
35
Chapter 8 -
ANNOUNCEMENTS
36
Chapter 8 -