Workshop 8 Solutions: Video Solution For Q8.1
Workshop 8 Solutions: Video Solution For Q8.1
Workshop 8 Solutions: Video Solution For Q8.1
Workshop 8 Solutions
Q8.1
Use tables to find the p-values for the following tests. (We assume the population standard
deviation is known). If α=0.05, state the conclusion (no interpretation possible here).
H1: µ ≠ 500
Zcalc = -1.76
Since the alternative hypothesis (H1) is two sided, we need to multiply the p-value by two.
H1: µ >200
Zcalc = 2.63
Since the alternative hypothesis (H1) is one-sided, the p-value is the probability that Z would
1
Business Statistics Week 8
Q8.2
Eighteen per cent of multinational companies provide an allowance for personal long-
distance calls for executives living overseas. Suppose a researcher thinks that multinational
companies are having a more difficult time recruiting executives to live overseas and that an
increasing number of companies are providing an allowance for personal long-distance calls
to these executives to ease the burden of living away from home. To test this claim, a new
study is conducted by randomly sampling 376 multinational companies. Twenty two per cent
of these surveyed companies are providing an allowance for personal long-distance calls to
executives living overseas.
(a) Has the proportion of multinational companies that provide an allowance for personal
long- distance calls for executives living overseas increased? Use the p-value approach
at the 1% level of significance.
Let X = number of multinational companies that provide an allowance for personal long-
distance calls for executives living overseas
Note that both are greater than 5, hence the normal approximation is reasonable.
Step 1: Hypotheses
H0 : 0.18
H1 : 0.18 (One-tailed test)
𝑝−𝜋
𝑍= is distributed approximately as N(0,1)
𝜋(1−𝜋)
√
𝑛
0.22 − 0.18
𝑍𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐 = = 2.02
√0.18(1 − 0.18)
376
2
Business Statistics Week 8
Step 3: p value
Step 5: Conclusion
The sample evidence shows that the proportion of multinational companies that provide
an allowance for personal long-distance calls for executives living overseas has not
increased.
If the true proportion of multinational companies that provide an allowance for personal
long-distance calls for executives living overseas is 18%, then 2.17% of the time we
would expect a sample proportion at least as large as the one we actually got.
In the context of this question, Type I error occurs when we conclude that the
proportion of multinational companies that provide an allowance for personal long-
distance calls for executives living overseas is higher than 18%, when it actually is not.
3
Business Statistics Week 8
Q8.3
The approval process for a life insurance policy requires a review of the application and the
applicant’s medical history, possible requests for additional medical information and medical
examinations, and a policy compilation stage where the policy pages are generated and then
delivered. The ability to deliver policies to customers in a timely manner is critical the
profitability of this service. During one month, a random sample of 25 approved policies is
selected and the total processing time in days is recorded. The sample mean is found to be
34.64. The population standard deviation is 27.00.
(a) In the past, the mean processing time averaged 45 days. What assumption about
the population distribution is needed in order to be able to complete the hypothesis
test?
(b) At the 5% level of significance, is there evidence that the mean processing time has
changed from 45 days? Use the p-value approach.
𝜎 2
Assume 𝑋~𝑁(𝜇, 𝜎 2 ) therefore 𝑋̅~𝑁 (𝜇, )
25
𝑋̅ = 34.64 σ = 27 n = 25 α = 0.05
Step 1: Hypotheses
H0: µ = 45 days
̅−𝜇
𝑋
𝑍=𝜎
⁄ 𝑛
√
34.64 − 45
𝑍𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐 = = −1.92
27⁄
√25
4
Business Statistics Week 8
Step 3: p-value
Step 5: Conclusion:
We cannot reject H0 at the 5% level of significance. The sample does not provide enough
evidence against H0. Therefore, the mean processing time has not changed from 45
days.
Power of the test is the likelihood of rejecting the null when it is false. (1-β) is referred
to as the “Power of the Test”.
Eg: Refer to the judicial example- It is the likelihood that the defendant is found guilty
when he actually is.
Power of the test is the likelihood of concluding that the mean processing time has
changed from 45 days when it actually has.
In context of this question, a Type II error occurs when we conclude that the mean
processing time has not changed from 45 days when it actually has.