Case History in Complete Denture Patients
Case History in Complete Denture Patients
Case History in Complete Denture Patients
COMPLETE DENTURE
PATIENTS
Introduction
Personal data
Name
Diseases of bone
Osteoporosis
osteoarthritis
pagets diseases
Diseases of bone
Osteoporosis
Osteoarthritis
Paget’s disease
Neuromuscular diseases
Angina pectoris
Myocardial infarction
Diseases of skin
Pemphigus
Oral malignancies
Importance-
The chief complaint may be overlooked during therapy
To access the patients expectations
To determine patients psycological classification
Expectations
Years of edentulousness,max/man
Reasons and sequence of teeth loss
Previous dentures,max/man
Existing or current dentures
Denture success.
Pre extraction records.
Clinical evaluation
• Extraoral
Facial form(frontal)
Facial form(profile)
Muscle tone
• According to M.M.House
Hair, eye , skin colour provides useful guides in the shade selection.
Lip
Thickness- Thin
thick
• Palpation
• Auscultation
Speech- normal
affected
Class 2-Fair
Class 3-Poor
Intra oral examination
Arch size
Class 1-Large
Class 2-Medium
Class 3-Small
Arch form-
Class 1-Square
Class 2-Tapering
Class 3-Ovoid
Ridge form
• Maxillary • Mandibular
Parallel walls
Defects
• Ridge defects such as exostoses,sharp bony spicules
should be noted that may pose problem for complete
denture patients or may warrant preprosthetic
surgery.
• Class 1-Ideal
• Class 2-excessive
• Class 3-Insufficient
Ridge parallelism
• Class 1
• Class 2
• Class 3
Ridge relationship
• Class 1-Normal
• Class 2-Retrognathic
• Class 3-Prognathic
Radiographic evaluation
• According to Neil
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Palatal throat form
According to M.M.House
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Palatal sensitivity
• According to M.M.House
Class 1-Normal
Class 2-Subnormal
Class 3-Supernormal
Mucosa thickness
Class 1-Normal uniform density of mucosal
tissue,investing membrane is firm.
Class 2-Mucous membrane is thick,thin investing
membrane.
Class 3-Excessive thick investing membrane filled
with redundant tissues.
Mucosa condition
• 1According to M.M.House
Class 1-Healthy
Class 2-Irritated
Class 3-Pathologic
Frenum attachments
Class 1-High in maxilla or low in mandible
Class 2-Medium
Class 3-Freni encroach the crest of the ridge
Saliva
Class 1-Normal quality and quantity
Class 2-Excessive saliva
Class 3-Xerostomia
Tongue size
Class 1-Normal in size,devlopnment and function
Class 2-Teeth have been lost long enogh to permit a
change in form and function of tongue
Class 3-Exceesively large tongue
Position of tongue
• According to Wright
Normal
Class 1-Retracted
Class 2-Retracted
Existing dentures
Existing esthetics,phonetics,retention,
stability,extensions and contours
should be evaluated.
Should be rated as-
Good
Fair
Poor
Centric relation and vertical dimensions of occlusion
should be assesed and evaluated
Occlusion plane orientation
Midline
Hygiene-good
-fair
-poor
Wear
Conclusion