Advs 201800499
Advs 201800499
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (1 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advancedscience.com
range of several nanometers and the determination of the dom- onto metallized substrates. Three macropore sizes (in the
inant factor are crucial issues requiring further investigation.[1] 200–500 nm range) were achieved through the selection of
In the case of ferromagnetic metals, carrier accumulation distinct colloidal sphere diameters. The close packing of the
and relaxation is often driving the change in magnetism.[13,14] spheres, which was achieved by electrophoretic deposition, ena-
In bulk metals, the strong screening effect prevents penetra- bled the formation of ultrathin pore walls, which were found to
tion of the electric field throughout the entire metal. However, exhibit an additional inherent nanoporosity according to ellip-
in the case of ultrathin metallic films with a high surface-to- sometry measurements, thereby rendering a truly hierarchically
volume ratio, a large electric field can be used to control car- porous alloy structure. The macropores are dispersed forming
rier density, and thus magnetism. The use of liquid electrolytes ordered or pseudo-ordered areas of ≈1 µm2. Importantly, the
has been shown to promote a large electric field owing to the dual porosity leads to a high surface-to-volume ratio, which
very small thickness of the electric double layer (EDL) (typically combined with the ultrathin pore walls, yields an excellent
<1 nm), which enables adjustment of the magnetic properties to material for carrier density modulation[2] despite an overall film
a considerable extent.[2] However, the need to use ultrathin mag- thickness of hundreds of nanometers. In fact, reversible coer-
netic layers is hampering the development of practical devices civity (Hc) reduction in the range of 21.6–25.3% was observed
based on these effects. Previously, with respect to thicker films, in all cases. Morphological, chemical, and structural analyses
this phenomenon had only been achieved when mediated by were carried out to correlate the structure–morphology with the
ion migration (magnetoionics)[11] or by producing nanoporous underlying mechanisms of the voltage control of magnetism.
alloys through highly sensitive and complex means such as
micelle-assisted electrodeposition in order to bypass the require-
ment of an ultrathin film.[3] For this reason, a high surface area 2. Results and Discussion
obtained by porosity was deemed a critical factor in attaining the
desired magnetoelectric effect in films with a thickness of hun- 2.1. Sample Morphology and Porosity Assessment
dreds of nanometers. Porous metallic materials have been pre-
pared in literature through the use of hydrogen bubble dynamic Schematic drawings of the colloidal templating process are given
template,[15,16] block copolymers,[17–19] surfactant micelles,[20] in Figure 1a,b. Representative field emission scanning electron
and hard templates.[21,22] Among these, colloidal templating is microscope (FESEM) images of the porous Fe–Cu films obtained
a particularly advantageous method since it entails a swift and after removal of the polystyrene (PS) spheres are shown in
straightforward approach which, in conjunction with the elec- Figure 1c,d. In this case, a monolayer assembly of PS spheres
trodeposition technique, allows for the creation of a multilay- was targeted. It can be clearly observed that the pore walls are
ered 3D architecture with controllable pore size. Moreover, the extremely narrow and, in some locations, they are even below
close packing of the colloidal spheres is conducive to the devel- 10 nm. In addition, transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
opment of exceptionally thin pore walls. imaging performed on a multilayer sample reveals that the
In this work, hierarchically porous thin Fe–Cu films have pore walls are, in turn, porous (as shown in Figure 2). We can,
been prepared by electrodeposition through colloidal templates therefore, consider that the pore walls are equivalent to ultrathin
Figure 1. Schematic drawings of a) the assembly of PS spheres onto the metallized Si substrate and b) the electrodeposited Fe–Cu film after removal
of the nanospheres. FESEM images of resulting Fe–Cu films of c) 500 and d) 200 nm pore size.
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (2 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advancedscience.com
films for the purpose of assessing eventual voltage-driven mag- To evaluate the average degree of porosity inherent in the
netoelectric effects. Also, it should be noted that, while the films material, we first carried out spectroscopic ellipsometry on
were electroplated under the same conditions, the composition the reference electroplated (continuous, i.e., unpatterned and
for the 500 and 350 nm pore dimensions was ≈85 at% Fe while multilayer samples of three macropore sizes) and sputtered
for the smallest sphere size of 200 nm the atomic percentage of samples of similar composition. The optical properties for the
Fe fell to 75 at%. This is on account of the formation of expect- sputtered sample are shown in Figure 3a. The refractive index
edly narrower interstices during packing of the smallest 200 nm
diameter PS spheres. Since deposition of Cu is mass trans-
port controlled,[23] Cu cations can probably infiltrate the spaces
between the spheres in a more facile manner, thus resulting in
compositions slightly more depleted in Fe. Another reason could
be that the potential inside the spaces was positively shifting from
the overpotential for Fe reduction as the cavity size decreased.
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (3 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advancedscience.com
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (4 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advancedscience.com
maximum decrease in Hc was only 4.5%).[2] The most pro- 2.3. Investigation of Crystalline Structure and Surface Elemental
nounced Hc modulation from 0 to −25 V found for the 500 nm Composition during Voltage Actuation
pore sample is illustrated in Figure 4b,c. Figure 5 shows the
dependence of Hc on applied voltage for the 350 and 200 nm Upon verification of the feasibility of the voltage control of mag-
sphere diameters. Importantly, the Kerr amplitude (which is netism for the hierarchically porous Fe–Cu deposits, further
proportional to the saturation magnetization in a first approxi- examination of their structural characteristics and surface com-
mation) does not show variations for different voltage values. position was carried out with a special emphasis on identifying
As expected, for the sputtered, virtually pore-free film, no Hc and tracking any eventual changes resulting from the application
changes were observed with variation of the applied voltage. of voltage, which could contribute to the observed magnetoelec-
Finally, the electrodeposited continuous film showed only tric effects, besides the inherent electric charge accumulation.
small fluctuations with an average coercivity value of ≈117 The grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) patterns of a
which indicates that the electrolyte is interacting mainly with representative multilayer sample of 350 nm macropore size in
the surface but could not easily get infiltrated into the film. the as-prepared state (i.e., before any voltage manipulation) as
Moreover, it is apparent that the inherent nanoporosity of the well as after subjecting it to DC voltages of +13 V for 20 min and
material is not sufficient to induce any sizable magnetoelec- –15 V for 20 min, are shown in Figure 6. As can be readily dis-
tric effects in the absence of the well-defined, ultrathin pore cerned, there are no detectable shifts in the diffraction peaks for
walls. Therefore, the results confirm that the porous structure the large negative and positive voltage values (i.e., no changes
created by colloidal templating is indeed essential for the mag- in the cell parameter). In addition, no other peaks (e.g., stem-
netoelectric effect as it allows for the diffusion of the electrolyte ming from oxidation or a phase transition) were visible either.
throughout the entire porous network and leads to extremely It should be noted that all the porous films present the same
thin pore walls which are, in a sense, equivalent to ultrathin peaks corresponding to body-centered cubic (bcc) Fe and are,
films. therefore, single phase. Typically, phase separation into bcc and
face-centered cubic (fcc) phases can occur in this range of com-
positions for electrodeposited Fe–Cu films with a thickness of
several micrometers.[25] However, it was confirmed that this was
not the case for continuous films of 250–300 nm thickness as
in our case (only peaks from bcc Fe were observed, not shown).
Additionally, in the multilayer porous films, the formation of a
single phase is promoted by the forced growth in the narrow
interstices between the PS spheres. It has been previously
shown that confining electrodeposition in narrow cavities close
to or comparable to crystallite size can suppress phase separa-
tion.[23] Thus, the GIXRD results clearly indicate that the films
remain unaltered during the voltage application.
Subsequently, the chemical composition of the uppermost
surface layer was examined using X-ray photoelectron spectros-
copy (XPS). This revealed the presence of mainly Fe and Cu
oxides at the surface (i.e., a thin oxide passivation layer), which
were not detectable by XRD as they are below the threshold
Figure 5. Dependence of the coercivity on the applied voltage for the Figure 6. X-ray diffractograms of a representative sample taken in as-
electrodeposited Fe–Cu films grown using colloidal templated substrates, prepared condition and following negative and positive values of voltage
with spheres of a) 350 and b) 200 nm. applied.
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (5 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advancedscience.com
3. Conclusions
Porous, pseudo-ordered thin metallic films consisting of non-
toxic, abundant elements and prepared using a simple, easily
Figure 7. XPS detail spectra of a) Fe 2p and b) Cu 2p peaks of a chosen reproducible and environmentally friendly process have been
sample taken at as-prepared conditions and after voltage modulation. fabricated. The magnetic properties can be controlled by voltage
application in a facile manner at ambient conditions leading to a
detection limit. As seen in Figure 7a for the sample of 350 nm reversible coercivity reduction of around 25%. According to the
pore size, there is no appreciable change in the oxidation state of analysis of the film properties in the as-fabricated state as well as
Fe which presents mainly as a mixture of Fe2+ and Fe3+ oxidation after voltage application the phenomenon can be mainly ascribed
states. Contrarily, as shown in Figure 7b there is a clear shift in to carrier accumulation/dissipation. In view of these properties,
the Cu oxidation states, where for +13 V there is an enhancement the films are good candidates for voltage control magnetic appli-
of the Cu2+ peak. When the negative voltage of –15 V is applied, cations aimed at minimization of power consumption.
the Cu2+ peak and corresponding satellites are diminished and
the Cu0/1+ peak emerges strongly due to reduction. These struc-
tural changes seem to be mainly limited to the uppermost surface 4. Experimental Section
and, remarkably, the Fe peaks remain virtually unaltered. Addi- Sample Preparation, Hard-Templating Procedure, and Electrodeposition
tionally, it should be emphasized that a Cu enrichment of the Fe– of Porous Fe–Cu Films: Silicon/silicon dioxide (Si/SiO2) substrates with
Cu solid solution would have resulted in a reduction in saturation a 10 nm Ti adhesion layer and a 90 nm Au seed layer and cut into
magnetization, and in eventual shifts in the XRD peaks, which 1 × 1.5 cm2 dimensions were used with a working area of 1 ± 0.1 cm2.
Prior to use, the substrates were cleaned consecutively with acetone,
is shown not to be the case. Finally, it was previously established
isopropanol, and Milli-Q water. As a preparation for electrophoretic
that a higher Cu content in the electrodeposited Fe–Cu films actu- deposition, they were treated with a 10 × 10−3 m solution of 3-mercapto-
ally causes an increase in Hc rather than the reduction observed 1-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt (MPS) in ethanol at 50 °C for 1 h to
here for negative voltages.[25] Therefore, the structural changes increase the wettability of the surface.[28] Finally, they were alternatingly
induced by the electric field observed in this system mainly influ- rinsed in Milli-Q water and ethanol to remove excessive MPS layers.
ence the Cu species at the surface, whereas the Fe species con- Electrophoretic deposition was implemented using a Keysight B2902A
Precision Source/Measure Unit as a voltage source and a custom 3D-printed
trolling the magnetic behavior remain unaltered. Consequently,
cell consisting of a 1 cm × 1 cm × 0.6 cm poly(methyl methacrylate)
redox effects cannot be advocated to explain the voltage-induced (PMMA) chamber attached to a platinized titanium sheet serving as a
coercivity changes, which should then be mainly attributed to counter electrode. Monodisperse polystyrene (PS) sub-micrometer spheres
the carrier accumulation magnetoelectric effect. Indeed, iron has with three different diameters (200, 350, and 500 nm) in a 2.5% w/v solid–
four unpaired 3d electrons with a high density of states near the aqueous suspension were purchased from Polysciences, Inc.
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (6 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advancedscience.com
The final solution was prepared by mixing of the PS sphere with different void content, thus strongly indicating the existence of a
suspension (0.05 mL) in ethanol (0.45 mL) and was added to the custom gradient of composition through the depth of the film, in agreement with
cell covering a 1 cm2 area of the substrate which was secured by slots at SEM cross sections. More elaborate models, including concentration
the back of the chamber at a 0.5 cm distance from the counter electrode. profiles or a larger number of sublayers, were also employed to analyze
A constant potential of 40 V cm–1 in the case of the two smaller the data but reliable fit improvements could not be obtained due to the
sphere sizes and of 60 V cm–1 for the largest spheres was applied with relatively large experimental uncertainty related to the large pore size.
deposition times of 1 and 5 min, respectively.[28] The deposition time Magnetoelectric Measurements: In-plane hysteresis loops were
was tuned to allow for either monolayer or multilayer assemblies while recorded using a magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) setup from
preserving quality regarding stability and number of defects. Following Durham Magneto-Optics while applying different values of DC voltage
the electrophoretic deposition, the samples were promptly placed on a at ambient conditions using the Keysight B2902A unit as a source. The
hot plate and heated at 50 °C for 15 min to evaporate the ethanol and sample was mounted vertically on a custom 3D-printed PMMA base
stabilize the assembled PS sphere layers.[28] and placed in a quartz SUPRASIL cell filled with anhydrous propylene
Electrodeposition was carried out using a three-electrode cell carbonate containing Na+ ions.[3] The sodium cations served a dual
connected to a Metrohm/Eco Chemie Autolab PGSTAT302N function of reacting with any water entering the system to form NaOH as
potentiostat/galvanostat. A Pt wire served as the counter electrode and a well as to enhance the electrical double layer owing to the presence of the
double junction Ag|AgCl (E = +0.210 V/SHE) as the reference electrode. dissolved Na+ and OH– ions.[3] The anhydrous nature of the electrolyte
The electrolyte (100 mL) was prepared with Millipore Milli-Q water minimized oxidation of the Fe–Cu during the measurements. After each
and ACS Reagent grade chemicals purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and change of the value of applied voltage, a waiting period of 300 s was
contained (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2·6H2O (58.8 g L−1), CuSO4·5H2O (1.25 g L−1), introduced before recording the hysteresis loop to allow the electrolyte to
C6H11NaO7 (22.9 g L−1), NaC12H25SO4 (0.2 g L−1), and C7H5NO3S enter the pore network and the electrical double layer to form.[3]
(0.46 g L−1). The samples were deposited from the as-prepared solution
with a pH of 4.1 at a temperature of 35 °C. The optimized electrolyte
composition and plating conditions were established previously with
unpatterned substrates.[25] Current densities of –25 mA cm–2 and Acknowledgements
deposition times between 15 and 50 s depending on the diameter of the This work was supported by the SELECTA (No. 642642) H2020-
previously deposited spheres and the desired thickness were applied. MSCA-ITN-2014 project. Partial financial support by the Spanish
Finally, the PS spheres were removed by immersing the samples in Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO)
chloroform for 3 h followed by a final rinsing in acetone, ethanol, and (Project Nos. MAT2017-86357-C3-1-R, MAT2015-70850-P and
MQ-water. Unpatterned, continuous Fe–Cu films of 250–300 nm in associated FEDER), the Generalitat de Catalunya (2017-SGR-292), and
thickness were prepared whenever needed and used as control samples. the European Research Council (SPIN-PORICS and FOREMAT, with
Characterization Techniques: The sample morphology was imaged Agreement Nos. 648454 and 648901, respectively) is acknowledged.
by scanning electron microscopy using a Zeiss MERLIN FESEM. E.P. is grateful to MINECO for the “Ramon y Cajal” contract (RYC-2012-10839).
The elemental composition was determined by energy dispersive The ICN2 is funded by the CERCA programme/Generalitat de Catalunya.
X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. The The ICN2 is supported by the Severo Ochoa programme of MINECO, grant
crystallographic structure of the deposits was studied by GIXRD using no. SEV-2013-0295. The authors thank Alberto Quintana and Eloy Isarain-
a Bruker-AXS, model A25 D8 Discover equipped with a LinxEye XE-T Chávez for providing the custom cell for magnetoelectric measurements, as
detector using CuKα radiation and a grazing incidence angle of 1°. well as Dr. Agustín Mihi (ICMAB-CSIC) for additional FTIR measurements
For the surface elemental composition and oxidation state detection, and useful discussion regarding the photonic properties of these systems.
XPS analyses were carried out on a PHI 5500 Multitechnique System
spectrometer from Physical Electronics with a monochromatic X-ray
source placed perpendicular to the analyzer axis and calibrated using
the 3d5/2 line of Ag. TEM analyses were performed with a Jeol-JEM 2011 Conflict of Interest
system with a field emission gun operating at 200 kV.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ellipsometry Measurements and Data Analysis: In order to
quantitatively account for the porosity degree of the electrodeposited
Fe–Cu films, these were characterized by ellipsometry. A virtually
fully dense, sputter-deposited, Fe–Cu film of ≈100 nm thickness was Keywords
prepared by co-sputtering using an AJA International, Inc. magnetron
sputtering system and was taken as a reference. Fe was sputtered at coercivity, colloidal templating, electrodeposition, hierarchical porosity,
200 W (direct current, DC) and the Cu at 20 W (radio frequency, RF) for magnetoelectric effects, voltage-driven effects
20 min. Variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry and reflectivity were
measured using a Sopralab GES5E rotating polarizer ellipsometer with a Received: April 2, 2018
focused spot size of ≈250 µm and CCD detection. At least three angles Revised: May 17, 2018
of incidence were measured for each sample. The angles were adjusted Published online: June 20, 2018
to be around the Brewster angle for each sample, which decreased with
pore size as one would expect for a lower refractive index. The data were
analyzed using the WinElli II software. For the sputtered sample, a two
[1] C. Song, B. Cui, F. Li, X. Zhou, F. Pan, Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 87, 33.
semi-infinite media approximation was applied for the direct inversion
[2] M. Weisheit, S. Fähler, A. Marty, Y. Souche, C. Poinsignon,
of the ellipsometric angles. The data for the electroplated samples
were analyzed within the effective medium approximation, mixing the D. Givord, Science 2007, 315, 349.
reference optical properties (those deduced for the sputtered sample) [3] A. Quintana, J. Zhang, E. Isarain-Chávez, E. Menéndez,
and void. Note that as the pore diameter increases, this approximation R. Cuadrado, R. Robles, M. D. Baró, M. Guerrero, S. Pané,
loses its validity. This was indeed observed in a worsening of the fit B. J. Nelson, C. M. Müller, P. Ordejón, J. Nogués, E. Pellicer, J. Sort,
quality with increasing pore diameter, particularly for the data of the Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1701904.
500 nm pore sample. It was found that fits that assumed a homogeneous [4] C. A. Vaz, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2012, 24, 333201.
volume fraction throughout the film did not result in acceptable fits of [5] C. Bi, Y. Liu, T. Newhouse-Illige, M. Xu, M. Rosales, J. W. Freeland,
the experimental data. The standard deviation of the fit was improved by O. Mryasov, S. Zhang, S. G. E. Te Velthuis, W. G. Wang, Phys. Rev.
a factor of about 5 by modeling the sample as containing two sublayers Lett. 2014, 113, 267202.
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (7 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advancedscience.com
[6] F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, H. Ohno, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 209. [18] L. Wang, Y. Yamauchi, Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2457.
[7] M. Ghidini, F. Maccherozzi, X. Moya, L. C. Phillips, W. Yan, [19] B. Jiang, C. Li, V. Malgras, M. Imura, S. Tominaka, Y. Yamauchi,
J. Soussi, N. Métallier, M. E. Vickers, N. J. Steinke, R. Mansell, Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1575.
C. H. Barnes, Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1460. [20] C. Li, T. Sato, Y. Yamauchi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52,
[8] M. Liu, N. X Sun, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2014, 372, 20120439. 8050.
[9] T. Maruyama, Y. Shiota, T. Nozaki, K. Ohta, N. Toda, M. Mizuguchi, [21] H. Wang, H. Y. Jeong, M. Imura, L. Wang, L. Radhakrishnan,
A. A Tulapurkar, T. Shinjo, M. Shiraishi, S. Mizukami, Y. Ando, Nat. N. Fujita, T. Castle, O. Terasaki, Y. Yamauchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 158. 2011, 133, 14526.
[10] U. Bauer, M. Przybylski, G. S. Beach, Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 174402. [22] P. M. Tessier, O. D. Velev, A. T. Kalambur, A. M. Lenhoff, J. F. Rabolt,
[11] U. Bauer, L. Yao, A. J. Tan, P. Agrawal, S. Emori, H. L. Tuller, E. W. Kaler, Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 396.
S. Van Dijken, G. S. Beach, Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 174. [23] Z. Liu, G. Xia, F. Zhu, S. Kim, N. Markovic, C. L. Chien,
[12] Y. Lee, Z. Q. Liu, J. T. Heron, J. D. Clarkson, J. Hong, C. Ko, P. C. Searson, J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 064313.
M. D. Biegalski, U. Aschauer, S. L. Hsu, M. E. Nowakowski, J. Wu, [24] H. Tompkins, E. A. Irene, Handbook of Ellipsometry, William Andrew,
Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5959. Norwich, NY 2005.
[13] D. Chiba, S. Fukami, K. Shimamura, N. Ishiwata, K. Kobayashi, [25] E. Dislaki, J. Sort, E. Pellicer, Electrochim. Acta 2017, 231, 739.
T. Ono, Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 853. [26] K. Nakamura, R. Shimabukuro, Y. Fujiwara, T. Akiyama, T. Ito,
[14] D. Chiba, T. Ono, J. Phys. D 2013, 46, 213001. A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 187201.
[15] Y. Li, W. Z. Jia, Y. Y Song, X. H. Xia, Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 5758. [27] G. H. O. Daalderop, P. J. Kelly, M. F. H. Schuurmans, Phys. Rev. B
[16] J. Zhang, M. D. Baró, E. Pellicer, J. Sort, Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12490. 1991, 44, 12054.
[17] H. Ataee-Esfahani, L. Wang, Y. Nemoto, Y. Yamauchi, Chem. Mater. [28] J. Pokki, O. Ergeneman, K. M. Sivaraman, B. Özkale, M. A. Zeeshan,
2010, 22, 6310. T. Lühmann, B. J. Nelson, S. Pane, Nanoscale 2012, 4, 3083.
Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800499 1800499 (8 of 8) © 2018 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim