Design Analysis of A Refrigerated Warehouse Using LNG Cold Energy
Design Analysis of A Refrigerated Warehouse Using LNG Cold Energy
Design Analysis of A Refrigerated Warehouse Using LNG Cold Energy
14-23, 2003
ABSTRACT
An innovative design approach has been performed using latent heat of the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) during
evaporation to provide cooling for 500 USRT cold storage warehouse. In compared with the conventional,
mechanical cooling designs, tremendous energy savings can be experienced and is discussed in detail in the
paper.
14
International Journal on Architectural Science
where P is the pressure of LNG, kPa; T is the The pressurization process will change the LNG
temperature of LNG, K; V is the volume of LNG, boiling point, which in turn, will change the cold
M3; and R is the gas constant, kPa.m3kg-1.K-1. energy amount that can be reclaimed. The cold
energy potential can be calculated from the
n n enthalpy change of LNG across the ORV, or:
a= ∑∑ x i x j (a i a j ) 0.5
i i
E = H Pin −162 C − H Pout t
°
(2)
n
where the subscripts stand for the enthalpy H at
b = ∑ x i bi different temperature and pressure Pin, Pout. The
i temperature of LNG at liquid state is around -162
o
C, while the temperature of NG at gaseous state is
a i = a ci α i about 20oC in maximum. And the reclaimed energy
potential is expressed in E.
Fig. 1: A schematic diagram showing the conventional LNG transporting process using ORV
for evaporation
15
International Journal on Architectural Science
LNG pressure=1atm
1000
LNG pressure=30atm
LNG pressure=50atm
LNG pressure=80atm
800
600
energy (kj/kg)
400
200
Fig. 2: Calculation result of the LNG cold energy potential under various temperature and pressure
When LNG was imported from ASEAN countries, be reclaimed is beyond doubt and waiting to be
it was pumped from the tanker and stored in explored.
the 60 m-diameter storage tank at -162 oC liquid
state. Pumped out at -148 oC, it was pressurized in
two stages, from atmospheric pressure to 3 atm, 3. SYSTEM DESIGN FOR COLD
and then to 83 atm while entering the ORV. It WAREHOUSE USING LNG RE-
leaves ORV at 15 oC with a pressure drop of CLAIMED COLD ENERGY
around 20 atm, and stays at 63 atm. Therefore, the
calculation yields a total heat exchange capacity of In order to reclaim cold energy during LNG
743Mj per ton of LNG across the ORV. evaporation process, it is necessary to construct a
Combining with the daily LNG utilization rate in closed heat exchange (HX) loop using secondary
our study, which is around 10,864 ton/day, then it refrigerant, as shown in Fig. 5. In addition, the
accounts for 1932 Gcal cold energy wasted per day, ORVs are still needed as a means for adjusting the
or equivalent to 26,662 Refrigeration Tons (USRT) appropriate portion of heat to be reclaimed without
cooling capacity, enough to provide residential interrupting the normal NG supply to the power
cooling for around 8800 families during the utilities. In other words, either the closed-loop heat
summer. This has been validated by an exchanger or the ORV, each will provide a certain
experimental investigation through measuring the percentage of evaporation heat needed to vaporizer
sea water loop with flow rate and temperature LNG into NG, and can be adjusted subject to the
differences entering and leaving the ORV. As cooling load of the warehouse. On the ORV side,
shown in Fig. 3, T1 and T2 denote the measuring residual LNG was evaporated accordingly so that
points of the sea water inlet and outlet temperatures NG at its outlet still maintains the normal
at the ORV, resulting at 27.3oC and 23.5oC temperature and pressure needed for the power
respectively. The point F denotes the sea water utilities.
flow rate measuring location, resulting at 2123.8
ton.h-1. The accumulated heat exchange capacity is In this project, LNG cold energy will be utilized to
26682 USRT. Compared with our estimation, the supply cooling to a 110 RT cold storage warehouse
deviation is within 3%. operating at -35 oC, another 390 RT warehouse at
-20oC, and to provide 146 RT cooling capacity for
Furthermore, Fig. 4 shows a statistics and air-conditioning in preparative rooms at around 15
prediction of the LNG import to Taiwan. o
C. Fig. 6 shows a flow chart of the complete
Following the completion of the second phase of warehouse system using cold energy reclaimed
LNG storage extension project in 1996, the annual from LNG, named the LNGCW system, with major
import rises from 150 metric tons to 450 metric design parameters indicated.
tons, and expected to reach 900 metric tons at the
year of 2020. The huge amount of cold energy to
16
International Journal on Architectural Science
Computer simulation has been performed following storage tanks were connected according to the
the first law of thermodynamics along the flow system flow chart. After an iterative design and
process. Heat and mass balance of the system was simulation process, the system schematics has been
calculated as shown in Fig. 7 where each finalized. Fig. 8 gives an outlook of the completed
component, including heat exchangers, pumps, and LNG cold warehouse architectural design.
Fig. 3: The schematic diagram of the full-scale experiment in measuring the LNG cold energy
released by ORV through sea water
10
8
1x10 ton
7
6
year
Fig. 4: Prediction of LNG import quantity from ASEAN countries to Taiwan in next decades
17
International Journal on Architectural Science
Fig. 5: A schematic diagram indicating cold energy reclaimed from LNG evaporation process
for cold warehouse application
18
International Journal on Architectural Science
Fig. 7: An energy and mass balance simulation result of the LNGCW system
19
International Journal on Architectural Science
4. ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY indicated that the APCL ranged from 91% during
the summer and down to 76% in the winter.
Based on the design analysis shown above, major Assuming 330 operation days a year, the LNG
components were sized accordingly enabling an consumption rate of the LNGCW system can be
economic feasibility evaluation of the LNGCW calculated as shown in Fig. 10, where the daily
systems vs. a conventional mechanical refrigeration average flow rate is 11.2 ton.h-1 and reached its
(CMR) system. peak of 12.3 ton.h-1 in July. Steady state energy
estimation method is used for the cooling load
The LNGCW system necessitates 3 specially calculation, energy analysis and the power
designed close-loop heat changers and storage consumption of refrigeration system in this project.
tanks etc., introducing higher initial investment at It can be calculated for different values of outdoor
the cost of 12.8 million USD. On the other hand, temperature and multiplied by the corresponding
the CMR system consists of huge refrigerant numbers of hours. This method can be accurate if
compressors and condensers, etc. at a cost of the indoor temperature and internal gains are
around 8.3 million USD. In this way, the operation relatively constant and if the systems are to operate
cost plays a key role in justifying economic for a complete season as recommended by the
feasibility. The CMR system suffers from operating ASHRAE Handbook [3]. The calculated power
in low evaporator temperature causing reduced consumption and energy savings of the LNGCW
refrigerant mass flow rate and smaller cooling system was plotted in Fig. 11, indicating a monthly
capacity. In addition, the high compression ratio energy savings of 1,050 MWh on the average.
between condenser and evaporator demands higher
power consumption which worsens the case. The Economic assessment is performed using the life
operation power demand is around 2321 kW. On cycle cost (LCC) method by calculating the present
the other hand, the LNGCW system, with an worth during each period of time.
inherent low evaporative temperature of -162 oC,
can easily provide cooling capacity at a “higher” (1 + i) n − 1
temperature of -30 oC by way of a simple heat Pv = A × (3)
i × (1 + i) n
exchanging process. The operation power demand
is 379 kw, or 16% of that of the conventional CMR
system. where Pv is the present worth, A is the annual
money saving by reduce electricity consumption, i
Based on the outdoor design temperature of 34 oC, is the effective discount rate, and n is the total
the average partial cooling load (APCL) of the cold number of years.
warehouse was calculated as shown in Fig. 9. It
95
90
average partial cooling load %
85
80
75
70
65
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
month
Fig. 9: Annual cooling load estimation of the cold warehouse in this study
20
International Journal on Architectural Science
12
11.5
11
10.5
10
9.5
9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
month
1200
LNGCW power saving per month(MWh)
1150
1100
1050
1000
950
900
850
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
month
Fig. 11: Annual operational power savings estimation of the LNGCW system
21
International Journal on Architectural Science
78
76
saving electricity cost 1000 USD
74
72
70
68
66
64
62
60
58
56
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
month
Fig. 12: Annual operational cost savings estimation of the LNGCW system
8000
US dollars)
6000
3
4000
Net Present Value( 10
Payback Year
2000
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
year
-2000
Fig. 13: The life cycle cost analysis of the LNGCW system in this study
22
International Journal on Architectural Science
REFERENCES
23