SME Assignment Comcast
SME Assignment Comcast
SME Assignment Comcast
Assignment
Fahad Ahmad
17U00092
Section A
Ans. HBO and CBS introduced OTT services in order for a direct to consumer service through
streaming instead of having a customer pay a full television subscription. Both platforms looked
to gain better deals with current distribution partners without having to worry about a middle
man any more. They would be able to create their own pay packages at the fraction of the cost
and rebid at a higher rate. Furthermore it reduced the dependency on Cable Operators: HBO had
come to be known for its original high-quality content, but they were still reliant on the cable
operators to market their channel which resulted in a varying viewer base ranging from 14% to
42% across different cable companies. Additionally, in terms of revenue, they had to negotiate
with the cable companies for a per subscriber fee. From Comcast after negotiations, they
received $7.7 per subscriber, which was almost half of what the subscribers were paying to
Comcast ($15). Furthermore, net neutrality prevented HBO from getting any prioritization.
Moving to OTT at this stage would help HBO get more direct subscribers and a larger share of
Q2. How should Comcast respond to the announcements of HBO and CBs?
Ans. Comcast has a few options. Comcast could join other TV networks and aim to become a
streaming service themselves. This will result in an easy access to all the consumers who are
already connected to the comcast cables and internet service. However, it will also add a bonus
consumer angle that those who did not have access to these options will also get to view them
cutters, cancelling their subscriptions to multichannel television services available over cable or
satellite, dropping pay television channels or reducing the number of hours of subscription TV
Q4. Is pay- TV ripe for unbundling? What is the future of television industry?
Ans. The pay-tv bundle is a gigantic iceberg that’s slowly melting. As Internet-video options
proliferate, consumers will have a growing list of reasons to stop paying $90 or more per month
for multichannel television. And the jockeying is now under way among programmers and
distributors to prep the life rafts if viewers decide to jump en masse. A key change in the
landscape: Major media companies, after years of resisting the Internet’s pull, have finally
decided to step into the brave new over-the-top world, with video delivered not via satellite or
their cable service this year. It's not a matter of money, although saving money is a significant
advantage of dropping cable. Still, it's more about having more options and a more convenient