BAC Assignment May 2021
BAC Assignment May 2021
BAC Assignment May 2021
1. The Essential Readings given to you for this module should be your primary reference sources
for this assignment. These are found on Blackboard under ESSENTIAL READINGS. Any and all
additional, independently researched sources that you use must meet the requirements for
being reliable academic sources (as explained in Lecture Topic 20).
2. In order to pass, your assignment must show rigorous acknowledgement of sources in the
form of a) in-text reference citations and b) a reference list.
3. Make sure you follow the Guidelines for writing the assignment on p.2 of this document.
Assignment brief:
Part 1. Critically assess the Hofstede and Trompenaars models of national culture.
Part 2. Use ONE of the case studies listed below to discuss how a specific cross-border business
venture was impacted by cultural differences, as follows:
a) Referring to the Hofstede and Trompenaars models of national culture, assess and explain
how national culture may have influenced the actions and behaviours of the organisations, and
the outcome of the venture.
b) Referring to the Organisational Culture Inventory, explain how organisational culture may
have played a role in the failure or success of the venture.
Or: use a cross-border venture of your own choice as a case study. (We recommend in this
case that you discuss your choice with one of your lecturers beforehand).
Part 1:
First show your understanding of each of the models (Hofstede and Trompenaars) and the
dimensions of national culture that each proposes. (To further illustrate your understanding, you
could think of using the countries involved in your chosen cross-border case study to explain how
things are likely to work in these countries on some of the culture dimensions).
Then think about criticisms of the models. Some of these criticisms are likely to relate to how the
models were developed and how data was collected. Other criticisms might relate to how the
world has changed in recent years under the impact of globalisation and mass migration, and what
superdiversity means for notions of ‘national culture’.
Part 2:
Introduce your chosen venture, giving a short summary of the venture: the context and the general
outcome. Then:
• What were the cultural challenges for the organisations involved in the venture?
In thinking about the challenges, use what you know about the national cultural tendencies
of the two (or three) countries. How different or similar are they on the dimensions of
culture? (Use the statistics on the Hofstede’s country comparison website and the
Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner book as evidence).
• Going beyond Hofstede and Trompenaars, what do you know about typical workplace
values, attitudes and communication styles in the two countries in the venture?
• How do you think these different (or similar) cultural tendencies could have impacted the
outcomes? Do you think that cultural differences were taken into account by the
organisations? Were adaptations made? Or were they not understood?
b) Referring to what you learned about corporate culture and the Organisational Culture
Inventory, discuss:
• Compared to Ideal Culture, how do you think the Actual Culture of the
company/companies in your venture would look if mapped onto the OCI? (You will have
to make assumptions about their Actual culture, based on your research on the
companies).
• Suggest why the Actual Cultures of these companies could have either helped or hindered
a successful outcome in the venture.
Conclusion:
Provide a paragraph with a few well thought out conclusions: How useful, in your opinion, are the
Hofstede and Trompenaars models of national culture in helping to explain successes or failures in
the venture? How do the two models compare in usefulness, in your opinion? How useful was the
OCI in helping to explain the outcome of the venture?