Doctrine of Ultra Vires

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES

Meaning :-

(a) Doctrine of Ultra Vires – is a fundamental rule of Co.


law
(b) Ultra means – “Beyond” and Vires means - “ Powers”
(c) Ultravires thus means – an act beyond powers
(d) Doctrine of Ultravires - means an act done beyond
the power and authority of the Co.
(e) The Purpose for which a Co. is formed – is provided
under the object clause of MOA
(f) A co. incorporated under Co. Act, 2013 – is
authorized to do things –
 Authorized by Co. Act, 2013
 Specified under object clause of MOA
 Any other –necessary for attainment of such
objects

(g) Doctrine of ultra vires :- An act of Co. :-


 must not be done beyond object clause
 if done beyond object clause –
 is void ( i.e. does not create any legal
relationship)
 cannot be ratified – even if the members
wish to ratify.
 In short is ultra vires the Co.

(h) Whether a particular Act of a Co. – is within


powers / not? – This is a question of fact and
decided on terms of MOA

An Ultra vires Act is different from Illegal Act /


Transaction :-
(1) Similarity :- Ultra Vires Act / Illegal Act both are void
(i.e. act that does not create any legal relationship)
(2) Dissimilarity :- Ultra vires act is any ct beyond object
clause. Such act can be legal / illegal both
However, Illegal Act – is an act which is against / not
in conformity with law.

Reason for Doctrine of Ultra Vires :-

The reason for which restrictions are imposed under


Doctrine is as follows :-

(1) For Investors / Shareholders of Co. :- to ensure such


Investors – to know the object for which their money
is to be employed

(2) For Creditors :- To ensure that the Co. funds are not
wasted in unauthorized

[Case law :- Ashbury Rly. Carriage & Iron Co. Ltd. v/s Riche
(1875) :-

Facts :-In this case the Co. was incorporated with following
objects :-
(a) to make, sell, or lend on hire, railway carraiges and
wagons;
(b) to carry on the business of mechanical engineers and
general contractors
(c) to purchase, lease, work and sell mines, minerals,
land and buildings.
Co. entered into contract with Riche – for financing
construction of a railway line in Belgium
All members of Co. – ratified the contract but later on
repudiated it
As a result – Riche sued Co. for breach of Contract
Question that was raised here was –
(a) Is the contract covered under meaning of General
Contractors
(b) Is Contract void
(c) Can the contracts be ratified by members of Co.
Judgement :- House of Lords held - Contract was ultra
vires the Co. and void
Hence even subsequent assent of the whole body of
shareholders cannot / has no power to ratify it.]

Effects of ultra vires transaction :-

(1) Injunction :-
 Injunction means temporary stay / stop
 If Co. commits ultra vires Act – any member of
Co. can get injunction from Court – to restrain
ultra vires act of Co.
 ( i.e. to restrain Co. from proceeding with such
Act)
(2) Personal Liability of Directors :-
 If any funds of the Co. – are diverted for the
purposes other than given object – then
Directors of the co. are liable for the Breach of
trust
[Note – this is also one of the duty of Directors of a Co. – to
ensure that funds of the Co. are used for the achievement of
objects (only for which Co. is incorporated)
(3) Breach of warranty of Authority :-
 When an Agent – exceeds his authority – such
agent is personally liable for Breach of
warranty of Authority in a suit by the 3rd party
 Directors are agents of a co. – must act within
limits of Co’s powers
 If Director/’s – induce a 3rd party to enter into a
contract with Co. . The contract being unltra
vires in nature – then the Directors in such case
will be personally liable to 3rd party for the loss.
(4) Ultra Vires acquired property :- If Co. has acquired
property under an ultra vires contract / transaction
then Co. has right -
 to hold that property
+
 protect it against damage by other persons

[ Case :- National Telephone Co. V/s Peter Pest Constables –

Facts :- Telephone Co. – placed telephone wires in certain


areas. However, Tel Co. had no power under MOA to put
wires there.
The Defendant cut the wires.

Judgement :- Co. could sue for the damage to the wires.]

(5) Ultra Vires Contracts :-


 A ultra vires contract of Co. – is void ab initio –
(i.e. has no legal effect)
 An ultra vires contract – cannot become intra
vires by reason of –
 Estoppel
 Ratification
 Lapse of time
 Time delay
 Any performance on either side – cannot give /
provide :-
 Unlawful contract any validity
 Be foundation of any right of action on it
(i.e. right to sue and be sued is not
available)

(6) Ultra Vires Torts :-


 Co. is not liable t civil wrongs / Torts –
committed by its servants during the course of
ultra vires transaction
 There are however- certain exception to the
above rule – (i.e. Co. is liable for the torts
committed by its servants) -
 If activity ( during the course of which it
was committed) – falls withi the scope of
MOA
 The servant committed torts in course of
his employment

EXCEPTION TO THE DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES :-

(i.e. where ultra vires act are considered as Intra vires the
Co.)

(1) If act :-
 Is ultra vires the Directors of the Co.
 But intravires the Co.
Then – Co. may by consent ratify such act and
subsequently accept / adopt such Act.

[Note : can be Accepted / adopted :- either by


 By Ratification :- can be made by shareholders
+
can be made by passing resolution in general
meeting
 By Acquiescence (means reluctant acceptance
of something without opposition) – provided
they have a knowledge of facts relating to
transactions to be
(eg – BOD were authorized to invest upto 10 Crores.
However, BOD invested 12 Crores. This is beyond powers
but can be ratified by shareholders.

(2) If the Act is – ultra vires the Articles of the Co.


 Here Articles of the Co. can be altered to include
the act within the powers of the Co.
 (i.e. the Co. – can ratify such act by altering the
Articles by special resolution
 Provided such act can be validated by cnsent of
shareholders ( i.e. power to alter the Articles is
within the powers of the Co.)
(3) If Act is intra vires the Co. (i.e. within power of Co. )
but irregularly done – Here shareholders may ratify
such Act.
(4) If a Person – borrows money from Co. under ultra
vires contract then Co. may sue such person for
recovery.
(5) If Act is ultra vires the co. – then rights arising
independent of the Act (i.e. not related / free from
such Act) are not affected.
(6) If Co. purchase property / taken loan from 3 rd part
under ultra vires contract – In such case :- the 3 rd
party has right –
 To follow hs property / money
 Obtain injunction from Court – restraining the
co. from parting with the property / money
(7) If Co. takes ultra vires loan and uses it to pay intra
vires loan. The person who gave the loan under ultra
vires contract –
 Is substituted in place of Creditor who has paid
off
 Can as such recover the money
IMPORTANT POINTS TO NOTE :-

(1) Provision in case of conflict between MOA &


Provisions of co. Act, 2013:-
 Provided u/s 6
 Under this section any provision of MOA, AOA,
Agreement, Resolution is repugnant / contrary
to any provision of Co. Act, 2013 – is void
(whether passed before of after the
commencement of Co. act, 2013)
 (i.e. the provisions of the Co. Act, 2013 – shal
prevail
(2) Alteration of MOA / AOA must be noted in every
copy issued :-
 Provided u/s 5
 If Co. fails to do so then Co. + every officer in
default – is liable to –
 penalty of Rs 1000/- (for every copy f
MOA and AOA issued without such
alteration being noted / which is without
such alteration)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy