Philippine Politics and Governance: Quarter 1: Week 11 - Module 11
Philippine Politics and Governance: Quarter 1: Week 11 - Module 11
Philippine Politics and Governance: Quarter 1: Week 11 - Module 11
i
PHILIPPINE POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE
Grade 11 Quarter 1: Module 11- Week 11
First Edition, 2020
Copyright © 2020
La Union Schools Division
Region I
All rights reserved. No part of this module may be reproduced in any form without
written permission from the copyright owners.
Management Team:
ii
Philippine Politics and
Governance
Quarter 1: Module 11 - Week 11
iii
Target
The Philippine government has three (3) branches: executive, legislative and
judicial. Each branch has a specific function different from the others. The
executive branch is in charge of rule-implementation, the legislative branch is
tasked with rule-making, and the task of the judicial branch is rule-adjudication or
rule-implementation. There is no one who must dominate the others because they
are considered to be co-equal branches. Obviously, this is the principle of
separation of powers which seeks or aims for checks and balances in the
government.
In the previous lesson, you have already learned about the executive branch
and legislative branch of the governeent. In the national level, the executive branch
is composed of the President and the Cabinet members and secretaries. They are
in-charge of implementing the laws and policies of the State. The legislative branch
is the Congress, which is bicamiral in nature. It is divided into two: the Senate and
the House of the Representatives. The former is considered to be the upper house
because the members are voted nationally and the latter is called the lower house
or chamber of the legislative branch. There are twenty-four (24) senators who will
serve six (6) years per term per election (1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VI,
Section 4). There is no exact number of members of the lower house because it
depends on the number of legislative districts and the number of party-list
representatives who will get their seats. Each member of the house shall serve for
three (3) years and three (3) consecutive terms (1987 Philippine Constitution,
Article VI, Section 7).
This lesson will provide you with information and various activities that will
help you understand the roles and responsibilities of the judicial branch of the
government.
After going through this lesson, you are expected to analyze the roles and
responsibilities of the Philippine Judiciary.
1
Jumpstart
Activity 1 Choose Me
Directions: Choose from the box the word/s that best describe/s the each item
below. Write your answers in a separate sheet of paper.
Discover
Judicial Power
Article VIII, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution stipulates that Judicial power
will be vested in the Supreme Court and all lower courts. Judicial power is the
power to apply the laws to contests or disputes or concerning legally recognized
rights and duties between the state and private persons, or to individually litigants
in cases properly brought before judicial tribunal.
2
The 1987 Philippine Constitution, as mentioned by Paliwen and Paliwen
(2017) states that judicial power entails two activities: (a) to settle actual
controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable and (b)
to settle whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to
lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the
government. Obviously, Philippine Judiciary not only rules on legal issues but also
on the other two branches (executive and legislative), as what the late senator
Mirriam Defensor Santiago said, “ whenever the court finds that the other
department has committed grave abuse of discretion”.
Furthermore, the scope of judicial power includes:
a. Adjudicating Power or the power to settle legal disputes;
b. Power of Judicial Review or the power of the Supreme Court to
interpret and make judgments with respect to the law; and
c. Incidental Powers or powers necessary for the discharge of the judicial
function (Tabajen and Pulma, 2016). Thus, the central function of the
judges is to adjucate and interpret the law (Francisco and Francisco,
2016).
There are three kinds of courts in the country: the regular courts, the special
courts, and the quasi-judicial courts or quasi-judicial agencies.
Supreme Court
Chief Justice(Head)
3
Regular courts include the following: (1) Supreme Court; (2) Court of
Appeals; (3) Regional Trial Courts; and (4) Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal
Trial Courts, Municipal Circuit Trial Courts, and Municipal Trial Courts in Cities.
The first two are review courts and the last two are trial courts. Special courts are
tribunals that have limited jurisdiction over certain cases or controversies. The
Shari’a Court, the Court of Tax Appeals, and the Sandigan Bayan are examples of
special courts (Villanueva, 2017). Quasi-courts or Quasi-judicial agencies exercise
adjudicatory powers in certain types of controversies. These include agencies such
as the Civil Service Commission, Commission on Elections, and Commission on
Audit (Pangalangan, 2011).
The Supreme Court, also known as the court of last resort is the highest
court, composed of a Chief Justice and fourteen (14) Associate Justices. They are
all appointed by the President from a list given by the Integrated Bar of the
Philippines (1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VIII, Section 4).
The following are the functions of the Supreme Court according to the 1987
Constitution, Article VIII, Section 5:
1. Exercise original jurisdiction over cases affecting ambassadors, other public
ministers and consuls, and over petitions for certiorari, prohibition,
mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus;
certiorari – individual action; a writ issued by a superior court
requiring a lower court or a board of officer exercising judicial
function to transmit the records of a case to the higher tribunal for
the purpose of review
prohibiton – a written order by which a superior court commands a
lower court or a corporation, board, or a person to desist from
further proceedings in action or matter
mandamus – an order issued by a higher court commanding a
lower court or corporation, board, or a person to perform a certain
act, which is its duty to do. It orders a compliance or performance
of an act.
quo warranto – an action by the government to recover an office or
franchise from an individual or corporation usurping or unlawfully
holding it
2. Review, revise, reverse, modify, or affirm on appeal or certiorari, as the law
or the Rules of Court may provide, final judgments and orders of lower
courts in:
a. all cases in which the constitutionality or validity of any treaty,
international or executive agreement, law, presedential decree,
proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in
question
4
b. all cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or
toll, or any penalty imposed in relation thereto
c. all cases in which the jurisdiction of any lower courts is in issue
d. all cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or
higher
e. all cases in which only an error or question of law is involved
3. Assign temporarily judges of lower courts to other stations as public interest
may require. such temporary assignment shall not exceed six months
without the consent of the judge concerned;
4. Order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice;
5. Promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcemennt of
constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts, the
admission to the practice of law, the integrated bar, the legal assistance to
the underprivileged. Such rules shall provide a simplified and inexpensive
procedure for the speedy disposition of cases, shall be uniform to all courts
of the same grade, and shall not diminish, increase, or modify substantive
rights. Rules of procedure of special courts and quasi-judicial bodies shall
remain effective unless disapproved by the Supreme Court; and
6. Appoint all officials and employees of the Judiciary in accordance with the
Civil Service Law.
The Court of Appeals is the second highest tribunal or legal court in the
country. It is composed of a presiding officer and sixty-nine (69) associate justices
who are appointed by the president. Generally, Court of Appeals receives, reviews,
and resolves appeals on decisions of Regional Trial Courts, as well as that of the
Office of the Ombudsman in cases wherein one of the parties is not satisfied with
the decision. Court of Appeals also has the power on the issuance of certain legal
documents and orders (Paliwen and Paliwen, 2017).
5
C. The Court of Tax Appeals
The Court of Tax Appeals is composed of one presiding justice and five
associate justices. It retains exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review by appeal not
only civil tax cases but also those that are criminal in nature (Villanueva, 2017). It
focuses on reviewing and resolving appeals of decisions from the Commissioner of
Internal revenue, Commissioner of Customs, Department of Finance, Department
of Trade and Industry, and other legal courts concerning cases related to tax, tariffs,
and other monetary obligations to the government (Paliwen and Paliwen, 2017).
D. The Sandiganbayan
The Sandigan Bayan is a special court that has jurisdiction over civil cases
like graft and corruption and other cases committed by government officials, public
officers and employees and those in government-owned or government-controlled
corporations (Villanueva, 2017).
The Shari’a Court has the powers similar to the regular courts but the
subjects over whom judicial powers exercised are limited to Muslim Filipinos
(Pangalangan, 2011).
Section 15, Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution provided a timetable for the
resolution of the cases brought to the judiciary:
6
(a) two years for the Supreme Court;
(b) one year for the lower collegiate courts; and
(c) three months for all other lower courts.
In case the issue is not resolved within those periods, a certification signed
by the Chief of Justice or presiding judge stating why the case has not been
resolved shall be issued and served to both parties. Section 15, paragraph 4 further
states that “despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the court,
without prejudice to such responsibility as may have been incurred in consequence
thereof, shall decide or resolve the case or matter submitted thereto for
determination, without further delay”.
Explore
Enrichment Activity 1
Directions: Complete the graphic organizer. Write your answer in a separate sheet
of paper.
The Three Kinds of Courts and their Composition
7
Enrichment Activity 2
Directions: Complete the table by listing down the roles and responsibilities of
each court. Write your answer in a separate sheet of paper.
Court of Appeals
Sandiganbayan
Lower Courts
Shari’a Court
Deepen
Activity 1
Directions: Answer the following questions briefly but substantially. Write your
answer in a separate sheet of paper. Your answers will be scored based on the
rubrics below.
Criteria Score
Content 2
Mechanics 2
Neatness 1
1. How does the Philippine judiciary exercises political neutrality and fairness?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
8
2. Why does the expanded judicial system of the Philippines (which comprises
regular courts, special courts, and quasi-judicial agencies) important in the
speedy administration and delivery of justice?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
3. What is your concept of justice? Does it work in our present legal system?
Why or why not?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Activity 2
Directions: Guided with the provided rubrics below, cut and paste a
newspaper/magazine clipping depictng proof or manifestation that the Philippine
Judiciary is “for truth, no matter who tells and for justice, no matter who it is for or
against”. Explain further the content of the clippings. Use a separate paper for your
output. Use a separate sheet of paper for your output.
Criteria Score
Content 2
Mechanics 2
Neatness 1
9
Gauge
Assessment 1
Directions: Analyze each statement below. Write TRUE if it is correct, otherwise
FALSE. Place your answers in a separate sheet of paper.
1. The judicial system of the Philippines is expanded, it comprises regular
courts, special courts, and quasi-judicial courts.
2. The Sandiganbayan is the second highest court or tribunal in the country
3. It is important that the judiciary is an independent entity, free from control
by anyone because it reflects the quality of democracy that the country lives
up to.
4. As the one that dispenses justice, the Judiciary must be continuously
reformed to adapt to changing times.
5. The judicial branch never allows transfers of one judge or case from one city
to another.
6. The Chief Justice is appointed solely by the President
7. The jurisdiction of lower courts is limited to cases on the violation of
municipal ordinances, trespassing, gambling, assault, and estafa.
8. The Court of Tax Appeals reviews decisions from the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Customs, Department of Finance, and
Department of Trade and Industry.
9. The Supreme Court is also known as the court of last resort.
10.Despite the expiration of the applicable mandatory period, the court shall
decide or resolve the case submitted thereto for determination wiout further
delay.
Assessment 2
10
Answer Key
11
References
Printed Materials
Francisco, P. S. and Francisco, V.J. (2016). Introduction to Philippine Politics and
Government. Manila, Philippines: Midshapers Company Incorporated
Pangalangan, R. (2011). The Philippine Judicial System, Asian Law Series, no. 5,
retrieved from http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Als/05.html.
Paliwen, R.A. and Paliwen, R.M. (2017). Philippine Politics and Governance, First
Edition. Manila, Philippines: Rex Bookstore
Tabajen, R. C. and Pulma, E. B. (2016). Philippine Politics and Governance. Pasay
City, Philippines: JFS Publishing Services
Villanueva, Prince Aian G. (2017). Philippine Politics and Governance, Senior High
School Series. Makati City, Philippines: Diwa Learning Systems Inc.
1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VIII, Section 1
1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VIII, Section 4
1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VIII, Section 8
1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VIII, Section 15
1987 Philippine Constitution, Article XI, Section 4
Website:
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/about/gov/judiciary/
12