Essay: Employee' Job Satisfaction in Vietnamese Organization
Essay: Employee' Job Satisfaction in Vietnamese Organization
1. Job Satisfaction
- When people speak of employee attitudes, they usually mean job satisfaction ,
which describes a positive feeling about a job, resulting from an evaluation of its
characteristics. A person with a high level of job satisfaction holds positive
feelings about his or her job, while a person with a low level holds negative
feelings.
There are two approaches are popular. The single global rating is a response
to one question, such as “All things considered, how satisfied are you with your
job?” Respondents circle a number between 1 and 5 on a scale from “highly
satisfied” to “highly dissatisfied.” The second method, the summation of job
facets, is more sophisticated. It identifies key elements in a job such as the nature
of the work, supervision, present pay, promotion opportunities, and relationships
with co-workers. Respondents rate these on a standardized scale, and researchers
add the ratings to create an overall job satisfaction score.
- Are most people satisfied with their jobs? The answer seems to be a qualified
“yes”. However, Recent data show a dramatic drop-off in average job satisfaction
levels during the economic contraction that started in late 2007, so much so that
only about half of workers report being satisfied with their jobs now.
- Research also shows satisfaction levels vary a lot, depending on which facet of
job satisfaction you’re talking about.
- You’ve probably noticed that pay comes up often when people discuss job
satisfaction. For people who are poor or who live in poor countries, pay does
correlate with job satisfaction and overall happiness. But once an individual
reaches a level of comfortable living, the relationship between pay and job
satisfaction virtually disappears.
- Job satisfaction is not just about job conditions. Personality also plays a role.
Research has shown that people who have positive core self-evaluations —who
believe in their inner worth and basic competence—are more satisfied with their
jobs than those with negative core self-evaluations. Not only do they see their work
as more fulfilling and challenging, they are more likely to gravitate toward
challenging jobs in the first place. Those with negative core self- evaluations set
less ambitious goals and are more likely to give up when confronting difficulties.
Thus, they’re more likely to be stuck in boring, repetitive jobs than those with
positive core self-evaluations.
- Nature of work
- Leadership
- Colleagues
- Working Conditions
- Performance evaluation
2. RESULTS
- The criteria of the scale of the nature of the job, training, and promotion have a
grade 3 rating (normal rating).
- Most of the criteria are wages with normal assessment, only first criteria –
“Participating agencies fully pay insurance according to regulations”, with an
agreed rating. The Department of Industry and Trade, like other state agencies,
benefits for employees such as social insurance and health care regimes that
comply with state regulations.
- On the scale "Performance evaluation" with second criteria – “Fair evaluation
among employees" with an average level of agreed rating. The rest of the criteria
are normal.
- The interviewed employees all have a high level of agreement with the criteria of
the leadership scale such as “Employees receive a lot of support from their
leaders”, “Leaders listen to the views and thoughts of employees are treated fairly,
capable leaders, vision, and management ability”. However, the employees do not
feel that “the leadership values talent and contribution”, the rating of this criterion
is only average.
- The criteria on the “Colleagues” scale are also at the agreed level. However, the
criterion "Colleagues are willing to help and coordinate at work" has a normal
rating.
- On the scale of working conditions, staffs agree with two criteria “Employee's
workplace is very hygienic, clean” and “The employee's workplace atmosphere is
very friendly”. Besides, two criteria “Fully equipped with the necessary
equipment” and “Employees do not have to worry about losing their jobs” with a
normal rating.
- On the satisfaction scale, although the staff asked, most of them answered that
they were satisfied with the agency. However, they do not really like their current
job and want to stick with the agency for a long time.
3. SOLUTION
- The Department can train, foster and train public service enforcement skills and
ability to undertake the work of cadres and civil servants.
- The Department must pay more attention to the quality and effectiveness of the
program your training. Attention should be paid to the results of training and
effective for mocking civil servants after completing the program by collecting
staff's comments on the quality and applicability of the training program, from that
adjust the content of the training if the program is organized by the Department
and give opinions and consultations advises the Department of Home Affairs or the
other agency in charge of the development of the chapters training program
suitable to the needs of the civil servants of their Department.
-The Department focuses on civil servant’ promotion policy that planning and
recommending management staff must be based on competencies, professional
qualifications, fairness, and impartiality. The Department must notify the entire
civil servants of those who have competence and effort at work will be regularly
involved in the capacity development training course to be considered in planning
higher positions.
- The Department needs to perform well internal audits for each department,
Department, and individuals in the entire Department in a timely and complete
Manner and regularly there are inspections unusual failure to notify civil servants
before checking the time and effect. The Department should also have a meeting to
report on the results of the assessment regular work of civil servants every month
to take corrective and timely measures time of handling sanctions, commendation.
- The civil servants' working results should be recorded in a fair and accurate effort
their power through the voting forms of civil servants by month, quarter, year ...
The department should be taken rewarding regulations or being considered for
salary, bonuses, or career advancement.
- Leaders need to note the advice of staff, issues, any reasonable output that can be
used to comment with the superior leaders, consult of civil servants in solving
problems that arise at work, sharing information in the expertise, obtained many
good solutions from employees, helping employees see the relationship between
the work they are doing and the results that the department is achieving.
- The leader must create favorable conditions in the job employees find that the
work they are doing is in accordance with their expertise, care skills, as well as
being able to help them develop their career and productivity.
+ Monthly, when the Department exceeds the set plan, have initiatives to improve
the association co-evaluation, recognition, and review of the annual work results of
civil servants.
+ The Department should give out the typical civil servants to vote for the lift
salary ahead of time to motivate civil servants to work.