Alzaga v. Sandiganbayan

G.R. No.
169328 October 27, 2006
JULIAN A. ALZAGA, MEINRADO ENRIQUE A. BELLO, and MANUEL S. SATUITO, petitioners,

vs.
HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN (2nd Division) and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, respondents.
DECISION
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.:
This Petition for Certiorari assails the April 25, 2005 and August 10, 2005 Resolutions1 of the
Sandiganbayan in Criminal Case Nos. 25681-25684, which respectively reversed the May 27, 2004
Resolution2 of the court a quo and denied petitioners’ Motion for Reconsideration.3
On October 7, 1999,4 four separate Informations for violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act (R.A.) No.
3019 were filed against petitioners Julian A. Alzaga, Meinrado Enrique A. Bello and Manuel S. Satuito
relative to alleged irregularities which attended the purchase of four lots in Tanauan, Batangas, by the
Armed Forces of the Philippines Retirement and Separation Benefits System (AFP-RSBS). Alzaga was the
Head of the Legal Department of AFP-RSBS when one of the lots was purchased. Bello was a Police
Superintendent and he succeeded Alzaga as Head of the Legal Department. It was during his tenure
when the other three lots were purchased. Both were Vice Presidents of AFP-RSBS. On the other
hand, Satuito was the Chief of the Documentation and Assistant Vice President of the AFP-RSBS.5
Petitioners filed their respective Motions to Quash and/or Dismiss the informations alleging that the
Sandiganbayan has no jurisdiction over them and their alleged offenses because the AFP-RSBS is a
private entity created for the benefit of its members and that their positions and salary grade levels do
not fall within the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan pursuant to Section 4 of Presidential Decree (P.D.)
No. 1606 (1978),6 as amended by R.A. No. 8249 (1997).7
On May 27, 2004, the Sandiganbayan granted petitioners’ motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
However, in a Resolution dated April 25, 2005, the Sandiganbayan reversed its earlier resolution. It
held that the AFP-RSBS is a government-owned or controlled corporation thus subject to its
jurisdiction. It also found that the positions held by Alzaga and Bello, who were Vice Presidents, and
Satuito who was an Assistant Vice President, are covered and embraced by, and in fact higher than
the position of managers mentioned under Section 4 of P.D. No. 1606, as amended, thus under the
jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan.
Petitioners’ Motion for Reconsideration8 was denied, hence, this petition raising the following issues:
I
THE COURT A QUO COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION AMOUNTING TO LACK OR EXCESS OF
JURISDICTION IN DECIDING A QUESTION OF SUBSTANCE IN A MANNER NOT ACCORD WITH LAW AND
APPLICABLE JURISPRUDENCE THAT IT HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE PERSON OF THE PETITIONERS
II

JURISDICTION IN DECIDING A QUESTION OF SUBSTANCE IN A MANNER NOT IN ACCORD WITH LAW OR
JURISPRUDENCE THAT THE ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT AND SEPARATION BENEFITS SYSTEM (AFP-
RSBS) IS A GOVERNMENT-OWNED OR CONTROLLED CORPORATION
III

JURISDICTION IN DECIDING A QUESTION OF SUBSTANCE IN A MANNER NOT IN ACCORD WITH LAW OR
JURISPRUDENCE THAT PETITIONERS ALZAGA AND BELLO[,] WHO WERE BOTH VICE-PRESIDENTS OF THE
AFP-RSBS[,] AND PETITIONER SATUITO[,] WHO WAS ASSISTANT VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE AFP-RSBS[,] ARE
COVERED AND EMBRACED BY THE POSITION "MANAGERS" MENTIONED UNDER SECTION 4 a (1) (g) OF
PD NO. 1606, AS AMENDED.9
The petition is without merit.
The AFP-RSBS was established by virtue of P.D. No. 361 (1973)10 in December 1973 to guarantee
continuous financial support to the AFP military retirement system, as provided for in R.A. No. 340
(1948).11 It is similar to the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) and the Social Security System
(SSS) since it serves as the system that manages the retirement and pension funds of those in the
military service.12
The AFP-RSBS is administered by the Chief of Staff of the AFP through a Board of Trustees and
Management Group,13 and funded from congressional appropriations and compulsory contributions
from members of the AFP; donations, gifts, legacies, bequests and others to the system; and all earnings
of the system which shall not be subject to any tax whatsoever.14
Section 4 of P.D. No. 1606, as further amended by R.A. No. 8249, grants jurisdiction to the
Sandiganbayan over:
a. Violations of Republic Act No. 3019, as amended, otherwise known as the Anti-graft and Corrupt
Practices Act, Republic Act No. 1379, and Chapter II, Section 2, Title VII, Book II of the Revised Penal
Code, where one or more of the accused are officials occupying the following positions in the
government whether in a permanent, acting or interim capacity, at the time of the commission of the
offense:
(1) Officials of the executive branch occupying the positions of regional director and higher, otherwise
classified as Grade ‘27’ and higher, of the Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989 (Republic
Act No. 6758), specifically including:
xxxx
(g) Presidents, directors or trustees, or managers of government-owned or controlled corporations,

state universities or educational institutions or foundations;
In People v. Sandiganbayan,15 where herein petitioners Alzaga and Satuito were respondents, this
Court has ruled that the character and operations of the AFP-RSBS are imbued with public interest
thus the same is a government entity and its funds are in the nature of public funds. In Ramiscal, Jr. v.
Sandiganbayan,16 we held that the AFP-RSBS is a government-owned and controlled corporation under
R.A. No. 9182, otherwise known as The Special Purpose Vehicle Act of 2002. These rulings render
unmeritorious petitioners’ assertion that the AFP-RSBS is a private entity.
There is likewise no merit in petitioners’ claim that the Sandiganbayan has no jurisdiction over them
since their positions as vice presidents and assistant vice president are not covered nor embraced by the
term "managers" under section 4 of RA. No. 8249.
We held in Geduspan v. People,17 that while the first part of section 4 covers only officials of the
executive branch with the salary grade 27 and higher, the second part "specifically includes" other
executive officials whose positions may not be of grade 27 and higher but who are by express provision
of law placed under the jurisdiction of the said court. In the latter category, it is the position held and
not the salary grade which determines the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan. Thus, presidents, directors
or trustees, or managers of government owned and controlled corporations, are under the jurisdiction
of the Sandiganbayan.
In the instant case, petitioners Alzaga and Bello were Head of the Legal Department while petitioner
Satuito was Chief of the Documentation with corresponding ranks of Vice Presidents and Assistant Vice
President. These positions are not specifically enumerated in RA. No. 8249; however, as correctly
observed by the Sandiganbayan, their ranks as Vice Presidents and Assistant Vice President are even
higher than that of "managers" mentioned in RA. No. 8249.
In sum, the Sandiganbayan correctly ruled that the AFP-RSBS is a government-owned and controlled
corporation and that it has jurisdiction over the persons of petitioners who were Vice Presidents and
Assistant Vice President when the charges against them were allegedly committed.
WHEREFORE, the instant Petition for Certiorari is DISMISSED. The assailed Resolution of the

Sandiganbayan dated April 25, 2005 that the AFP-RSBS is a government-owned and controlled
corporation and that it has jurisdiction over the persons of the petitioners and the Resolution dated
August 10, 2005 denying petitioners’ motion for reconsideration, are AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
Panganiban, C.J. (Chairperson), Austria-Martinez, Callejo, Sr., and Chico-Nazario
Footnotes
1
Rollo, pp. 8-18 and 20-23; penned by Associate Justice Efren N. De La Cruz and concurred in by
Associate Justices Edilberto G. Sandoval and Francisco H. Villaruz, Jr.
2
Id. at 86-98.
3
Id. at 174-181.
4
Id. at 88.
5
Id. at 94.
6
REVISING PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1486 CREATING A SPECIAL COURT TO BE KNOWN AS
"SANDIGANBAYAN" AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
7
AN ACT FURTHER DEFINING THE JURISDICTION OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN, AMENDING FOR THE
PURPOSE PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1606, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND FOR
OTHER PURPOSES.
8
Rollo, pp. 174-181.
9
Id. at 34-35.
10
PROVIDING FOR AN ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT AND SEPARATION BENEFITS SYSTEM.
11
AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR THE ARMED FORCES OF THE
PHILIPPINES, TO PROVIDE FOR SEPARATION THEREFROM, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
12
People of the Philippines v. Sandiganbayan, 456 Phil. 136, 142 (2003).
13
P.D. No. 361 (1973), sec. 6 and Circular No. 6 dated March 10, 1976 issued by the Department of
National Defense.
14
P.D. No. 361, Sec. 2.
15
456 Phil. 136, 144 (2003).
16
G.R. No. 169727-28, August 18, 2006, SC E-Library and G.R. Nos. 140576-99, December 13, 2004, 446
SCRA 166, 169.
17
G.R. No. 158187, February 11, 2005, 451 SCRA 187, 192-193.

Alzaga v. Sandiganbayan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Alzaga v. Sandiganbayan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Alzaga v. Sandiganbayan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.R. No.

169328 October 27, 2006

JULIAN A. ALZAGA, MEINRADO ENRIQUE A. BELLO, and MANUEL S. SATUITO, petitioners,

THE COURT A QUO COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION AMOUNTING TO LACK OR EXCESS OF

THE COURT A QUO COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION AMOUNTING TO LACK OR EXCESS OF

The petition is without merit.

(g) Presidents, directors or trustees, or managers of government-owned or controlled corporations,

WHEREFORE, the instant Petition for Certiorari is DISMISSED. The assailed Resolution of the

Panganiban, C.J. (Chairperson), Austria-Martinez, Callejo, Sr., and Chico-Nazario

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.