Eapp Lecture WEEKS 5-6 Quarter 1 - Module 5: What Is An Outline?
Eapp Lecture WEEKS 5-6 Quarter 1 - Module 5: What Is An Outline?
Eapp Lecture WEEKS 5-6 Quarter 1 - Module 5: What Is An Outline?
WEEKS 5-6
Quarter 1 – Module 5:
What is an outline?
An outline is a map of your essay or a blueprint. It shows what information each section or
paragraph will contain, and in what order. Most outlines use numbers and/or bullet points to
arrange information and convey points.
It is a tool we use in the writing process to help organize our ideas, visualize our paper’s potential
structure, and to further flesh out and develop points. It allows the writer to understand how he or
she will connect information to support the thesis statement and the claims of the paper. An outline
provides the writer with a space to consider ideas easily without needing to write complete
paragraphs or sentences.
Importance of an outline
An outline allows a writer to categorize the main points, to organize the paragraphs into an order
that makes sense, and to make sure that each paragraph/idea can be fully developed. Essentially,
an outline helps prevent a writer from getting stuck when performing the actual writing of the
essay.
Why outline?
Just like we need a road map when traveling to an unfamiliar destination, good writers create
preliminary or rough outlines after they have generated enough ideas through prewriting to organize
and develop their essays. Strong, thorough prewriting should develop more ideas than you can
actually use in your essay so that you are able to select the most relevant and convincing ideas for
your essay.
Once you have settled on a thesis statement and your main supporting ideas, you can write a
formal outline, creating the “skeleton” of your essay. Looking at your ideas this way can help ensure
that:
• Your main points are on-topic and directly support your thesis.
• Your main points are logically organized.
• Your most important ideas are emphasized, and your less important ideas are subordinated.
• Your main points have enough and relevant supporting evidence.
Thesis Statement
All outlines should begin with a thesis statement of summarizing sentence. This thesis sentence
presents the central idea of the paper. It must always be a complete, grammatical sentence, specific
and brief, which expresses the point of view you are taking towards the subject.
1. depression
2. decrease academic performance
3. suicides
B. Counselling
1. legal consequences
2. academic consequences
II. Prevention
A. Monitoring your Child
Quarter 1 – Module 6:
What is critiquing? Critiquing shares a root with the word “criticize”. Most of us tend to think of
criticism as being negative or mean, but in the academic sense, doing a critique is not the least bit
negative. Rather, it’s a constructive way to better explore and understand the material we are
working with. The word means “to evaluate”. Through our critique, we do a deep evaluation of a
text. A critique is a genre of academic writing that briefly summarizes and critically evaluates a
work or concept. When we critique a text, we interrogate it. When we critique, our own opinions and
ideas become part of our textual analysis. We question the text, we argue with it, and we examine
into it for deeper meanings. Writing a critique helps us to develop a knowledge of the work’s subject
area, an understanding of the work’s purpose, intended audience, development of argument,
structure of evidence or creative style, and a recognition of the strengths and weaknesses of the
work. Always remember that a critical evaluation does not simply highlight negative impressions. It
should deconstruct the work and identify both strengths and weaknesses. It should examine the
work and evaluate its success, considering its purpose.
Approaches in Critiquing Academic Texts A thorough analysis of the text is important to write a
good paper. Remember the judgment you make about a work will reflect your own values, biases,
and experience; however, you must respect the author's words and intentions as presented in the
work. Do not analyze a work in terms of what you would like to see; analyze it in terms of what you
observe. Remember to clearly separate your assumptions from the author's assumptions. The
following are the approaches in critiquing academic works: Formalism. It is a critical approach in
which the text under discussion is considered primarily in the meaning and the implications of the
words. In practice, the critics have been very responsible to the meaning and themes of the work in
question, rather than adopting a linguistic approach.
Below are the guide questions when critiquing a text using formalism approach:
How are the various parts of the work interconnected?
How is the work structured? What techniques, styles, media were used in the work? Are they
effective in portraying the purpose?
How does the author's choice of point of view affect the reader's understanding and feelings about
the text?
Does the work enhance understanding of key ideas? Does the work engage (or fail to engage) with
key concepts or other works in its discipline?
What types of evidence or persuasion are used? Has evidence been interpreted fairly? What
lesson does the author want me (the reader) to learn about life?
Feminism. This approach is concerned with the ways in which the text reinforces or undermines
the economic, political, social, and psychological oppression of women. This looks at how aspects of
our culture are inherently patriarchal (male dominated) and aims to expose misogyny in writing
about women, which can take explicit and implicit forms. Feminist criticism is also concerned with
less obvious forms of marginalization and its goal is to change the world by promoting gender
equality. In critiquing a text using feminism approach, the following guide questions are considered:
How is the life of women portrayed in the work?
Is the form and content of the work influenced by the writer’s gender?
Does the work challenge or affirm traditional views of women?
What does the work say about women's creativity?
What does the work reveal about the actions of patriarchy?
How do the images of women in the work reflect patriarchal social forces that have impeded
women’s efforts to achieve full equality with men?
What marital expectations are imposed in the work? What effect do these expectations have?
What role does the work play in terms of women's history and tradition?
How to Write a Critique Before you start writing, it is important to have a thorough understanding
of the work that will be critiqued. Here are the tips:
1. Study the work under discussion.
2. Take notes on key parts of the work.
3. Develop an understanding of the main argument or purpose being expressed in the work.
4. Consider how the work relates to a broader issue or context. There are a variety of ways to
structure a critique. Like an essay, a critique uses an academic writing style and has a clear
structure, that is, an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Typically, the introduction is short (less than 10% of the critique length) and you should describe
the main argument or purpose of the work in here. Explain the context in which the work was
created. This could include the social or political context, the place of the work in a creative or
academic tradition, or the relationship between the work and the creator’s life experience. Briefly
summarize the main points and objectively describe how the author portrays these by using
techniques, styles, media, characters, or symbols.
Then, the body of the critique should give a systematic and detailed assessment of the different
elements of the work, evaluating how well the author was able to achieve the purpose through
these. For instance, you would assess the text structure and characterization; an assessment of a
painting would look at composition, brush strokes, color and light; a critique of a research project
would look at subject selection, design of the experiment, analysis of data and conclusions. Thus,
the body should include a summary of the work and a detailed evaluation. It should present the
gauge of usefulness or impact of the work in a particular field.
The last part is the conclusion. This is usually a very brief paragraph, which includes a statement
indicating the overall evaluation of the work; a summary of the key reasons, identified during the
critical evaluation, why this evaluation was formed; or, recommendations for improvement on the
work.
Let‟s take a look at the campaign poster below and understand how the work is evaluated using
formalism and feminism approaches.
Sample Critique
Your critique should be written in academic style and logically presented. Order your ideas into
paragraphs. Start with the broad impressions first and then move into the details of the technical
elements. For shorter critiques, you may discuss the strengths of the works, and then the
weaknesses. In longer critiques, you may wish to discuss the positive and negative of each key
question in individual paragraphs. To support your critique, provide evidence from the work itself,
such as a quote or example, and you should also cite evidence from related sources. Explain how
this evidence supports your evaluation of the work.