Study On Acoustics in Buildings-IJRASET
Study On Acoustics in Buildings-IJRASET
Study On Acoustics in Buildings-IJRASET
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.37995
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429
Volume 9 Issue IX Sep 2021- Available at www.ijraset.com
Abstract: Acoustics in buildings is that part of science in which importance has been given to the sound quality in building,
which enables a proper understanding of the different factors influencing the same. Acoustics being one of the important factor
which enables in reduction of transmission of noise and enable a better sound quality in the room. But however either very less
or insufficient amount of work has been put in considering the scope of the subject. Some other limitations are builders either do
not give priority to that aspect due to lack of information or the improper design and poor implementation. Also The Indian
Standard Codes in this area are too old and need updation considering the Modern Scenario and Modern Construction
Practices. So efforts have been made to consider this situation and find the best practices, recent innovations and methodologies
which could help in maintaining proper Acoustics in Buildings, Halls, Auditorium's etc. And what role could a Civil Engineer
play in elimination of this problem.
Keywords: Acoustics, Buildings, Material Properties
I. INTRODUCTION
Acoustics in one of the very important parameters to ensure proper living conditions in the room or a building. But however, much
importance is not being taken for that field during the design of buildings. The reasons for this include either no proper building
guidelines or Acoustics as a whole is never looked at because India being A developing In the country due though to very mass
constructions are done not much emphasis is being given to the field of acoustics. Some of the advanced countries have given
importance to this field during construction process. So now an attempt has been made to understand the importance of acoustic
parameters and emphasis has been given to the recent innovative methodologies available and how those methodologies could be
more appropriate in calculating and analysing the sound quality parameters in buildings. So, for the proper understanding it has been
divided into various segments of research where firstly proper emphasis is giving the sound measuring methodologies compared to
those in the IS codes and their efficiency respectively. Nextly the usage of different acoustic materials and their orientation has been
given importance. On the basis of all the data available for different material and respective materials properties the usage has been
recommended based on some of the international standards. Then a model has been drafted where buildings are classified based on
their usage, Importance and working and steps to be followed are recommended.
To get around this problem, it is more common to measure the T20 and T30 times and to then multiply these by 3 and 2 respectively
to obtain the overall T60 time. The T20 and T30 values are usually called “late reverberation times” as they are measured a short
period of time after the noise source has been switched off or has ended.
Nevertheless, a small number of measurements were made using directional loudspeaker in order to examine the influence of the
directional properties of the source on measurement results. Several parameters can actually be measured and calculated from the
energy decay curve obtained from reverberation time measurements. The RT30 parameter is considered to be the most accurate and
the goal is to be able to measure it whenever possible. If this is not the case, the RT20 parameter is used as the indicator of
reverberation time. The EDT is only used when all else fails, however, it should be noted that it is not a true measure of
reverberation time because it can and often does differ a lot from RT20 and RT30.
B. Room 2
Hall Way in one the buildings of Faculty of EE and Computing In Zagreb
Dimensions :- Room Volume of approximately 800 m3
C. Room 3
High Voltage laboratory located at the facility of EE and computing in Zagreb.
Room Volume of approximately 2000 m3 with all surfaces made of concrete and no acoustic treatment whatsoever
D. Room 4
Drama Theatre in Zagreb
Dimensions :- Length of about 23.2 m, width 15.6 m and has a room volume of 3130 m3 and the theatre has about 218 seats.
B. Room 2
Relation between Reverberation Time (in Seconds) and Frequency (Hz)
1) Observations: In room 1 all methods provide results that are in very good agreement, unlike in room 2, as shown in Figs.11 and
12. One explanation could be the different acoustical properties of both rooms. On one hand, room 1 is acoustically dampened
space of an ordinary shape, while room 2 is quite the opposite, a space with highly reflective surfaces and an exceptionally
irregular shape. The results also show the best agreement at high frequency octave bands, while the dispersion of results
becomes evident as the frequency decreases. At low octave bands, however, the decay curve loses its smoothness because of
room modes and usually has more than one slope, so it can be difficult to determine the right one.
C. Room 3
Relation between Reverberation Time (in Seconds) and Frequency (Hz)
In room 3 the omni-directional source and the balloon were positioned at position S1 indicated on the floor plan of the room, while
the small loudspeaker, being a part of a permanent sound reinforcement system installed in the room, is placed at position S2. The
resulting reverberation times are shown for position 1 in Figs.13 and 14. The measurements performed using the integrated impulse
response method utilized the sine sweep as the excitation signal, while the method of recording the room response to an impulsive
source used balloons as the source of excitation. The comparison of results shown in Figs.11 and 14 reveal that the choice of the
sound source is much more critical in smaller rooms where the sound field is never truly diffuse. The differences become larger at
lower frequencies due to the smaller room dimensions and more emphasized room modes.
Furthermore, these results suggest that the choice of measurement method is not critical in room 3, whereas in room 2 it is important
as the results obtained using different methods are significantly different. Other authors suggest that the integrated impulse response
method using the sine sweep is preferred due to the best S/N ratio and low sensitivity to harmonic distortion. Fig.15 shows the
measurement results in room 3 for all positions using the integrated impulse response method with the sine sweep as the excitation
and the omni-directional sound source coupled with the subwoofer as the sound source. These measurement results are in much
better agreement then the ones in room 2 because the shape and interior of room 3 do not allow the forming of standing waves.
Furthermore, the size and non-existence of acoustic treatment in room 3 lead to a very small room radius. As a consequence, all
microphone positions are deeply in the diffuse sound field.
D. Room 4
Relation between Reverberation Time (in Seconds) and Frequency (Hz)
Finally, Fig.16 shows the results of reverberation time measurements in room 4 at position 1. It is obvious that the results differ very
much due to the difference in directivity of the sources, and the small dynamic range of pistol shots compared to the range obtained
using the integrated impulse response method.
E. Conclusions
The reverberation time was measured in two reverberant and two rather damped rooms of different size and shape. Although the
reverberation time measurements are standardized demanding an omni-directional sound source and repeatable measurement
method to be used, the shown results suggest that other types of sound sources and measurement methods can be used with almost
no influence on the final result if the measured room is large and reverberant. However, this conclusion is valid if the sound field in
the room is diffuse. The basic conditions that have to be met are that the room has no emphasized room modes in the frequency
band of interest and that its shape and acoustic finishing leads to sufficiently long reverberation time. If the room is large enough, its
dominant modes form at frequencies below the frequency range of interest. On the other hand, if the room is of irregular shape
and/or smaller size, much more attention should be paid to the choice of appropriate measurement method and excitation source.
Furthermore, measurement positions and their number should be carefully chosen as the resulting reverberation time will be merely
the average of the results measured at different positions.
F. Recommendations
The first issue that has to be analysed is the question of available dynamic range each method is able to provide, given that the
measurement setup is always the same.
1) The energy decay curves indicate that the integrated impulse response measured using the swept sine signal and a balloon burst
provide by far the greatest available dynamic range, thereby ensuring the maximum commodity in the process of calculation of
reverberation time.
2) On the other hand, the integrated impulse response measured using the pink noise and the MLS signal are not able to provide
the required dynamic range, but they can still be utilized if certain precautions are taken.
3) Finally, the interrupted noise method provides a dynamic range so small, compared to other methods, that the results obtained
from it cannot be considered as reliable.
Where:
Σ = sabins (total room absorption at given frequency)
S = surface area of material (feet squared)
α = sound absorption coefficient at given frequency or the NRC
After we calculate a, we can then use the Sabine Formula to calculate the reverberation time.
2) Sabine Formula
RT60 = 0.049 V/a
Where:
RT60 = Reverberation Time
V = volume of the space (feet cubed)
a = sabins (total room absorption at given frequency)
In an existing room, one can go on site and measure the reverberation time using a loud speaker and a sound level meter. And can
also calculate the reverberation time using the Sabine’s Formula created by Wallace Clement Sabine. This equation is based on the
volume of the space and the total amount of absorption within a space. The total amount of absorption within a space is referred to
as sabins. It is important to note that the absorption and surface area must be considered for every material within a space to
calculate sabins. To obtain the Sabin values, we use the volume (length x width x height) of the room and the materials of the
Resurfaces. The table below provides the sabins at each octave band frequency for common construction materials.
Moreover, according to these authors, a large variety of results can be obtained when the user has a free choice of coefficients of
absorption. These formulas for determining reverberation time are only some of the ones that exist for this calculation. Other
formulas are those of Fitzroy, Tohyama and Suzuki, Kuttruff, Pujolle, Nilsson. Thus, there are many doubts about which formula
should be used. These formulas produce better results according to the characteristics of the room in question. The importance of
evaluating reverberation time in classrooms lies in the fact that reverberating environments affect concentration ability and speech
intelligibility, forcing teachers to speak louder, considering that this will contribute for the understanding of the teacher s speech by
the students. However, speaking louder does not improve intelligibility in excessively reverberant conditions. In the present work, in
addition to calculating reverberation time by means of several formulas and computer simulation of this parameter, in situ
measurements were taken using two methods, the interrupted noise method and the integrated impulse response method. The main
objective of this work was to evaluate different procedures for determining reverberation time in a classroom of approximately 250
m3.
The application of the analysis of variance using the simulated RT data at the frequency of 500 Hz, the integrated impulse response
measurement and the interrupted noise measurement resulted in a p value of 46%. Because the value of p is higher than 5%, the null
hypothesis (H0) that the values of reverberation time obtained by the three methods (simulation, integrated impulse response
measurement and interrupted noise measurement) are statistically equal is accepted. The analysis of variance of the mean RT values
obtained at the frequencies of 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz resulted in a p value of 1.6%, i.e., lower than 5%. Thus, the null hypothesis
(H0) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis that at least one of the methods is different is accepted. To determine which of the
methods is different, a multiple comparison was made using Tukey’s multiple comparison method.
This comparison revealed a significant difference between the values obtained by computer simulation and by the interrupted noise
method. In contrast, it was found that the values obtained by computer simulation and by the Integrated impulse response
measurement did not differ significantly. In addition, the two methods of measurement generated statistically equal results. The
analysis of variance of the mean RT values obtained at the octave-band frequencies of 125–4000 Hz yielded a p value of 8.7%,
indicating that that all the methods are statistically equal. As for the values obtained by means of the RT calculation formulas, a
comparison was made with the calculated confidence interval using the measured and simulated RT values. Table 5 presents the
confidence intervals of the RT values obtained by the two measuring methods and the computer simulation of the RT values at 500
Hz frequency, the mean RT at 500–2000 Hz octave- band frequencies, and the mean RT at 125–4000 Hz octave-band frequencies.
This table also compares the RT values calculated with the Sabine, Eyring and Arau-Puchades formulas and the confidence intervals
(= indicates within the confidence interval, while – indicates outside the confidence interval). An analysis of the table reveals that
most of the RT values calculated by Eyring’s formula lie within the confidence intervals calculated for the measurement and
computer simulation methods.
The calculated value falls outside the confidence interval only when one compares the RT value calculated by this formula for the
octave-band frequencies of 125–4000 Hz and the RT value in the same frequency range measured by the interrupted noise method.
A comparison of the RT values obtained by measurements and computer simulations against the RT values obtained with the Arau-
Puchades formula indicates that in all the compared cases, methods and frequency ranges, the RT values calculated with this
formula fall outside the confidence interval. Astolfi et al. evaluated eight classrooms with volumes ranging from 160 to 466 m3 ,
and found that ‘‘the Odeon 6.5 soft-ware and the Sabine formula yielded the most accurate results for RT in empty classrooms”. A
comparative analysis of the RT values obtained in this study using Sabine’s formula and those obtained by computer simulation
(Table ) indicates that the values obtained by this formula fall within the confidence interval calculated by computer simulation.
However, a comparison of the RT values calculated through this formula against the measured RT values indicates that the values
calculated by the formula are outside the confidence interval of the measured RT. Based on these data, it can be concluded that the
most suitable formula for calculating the RT in this classroom is that of Eyring, while the least suitable formula to determine the RT
in this room is that of Arau-Puchades.
B. Conclusions
The comparison of the results of the procedures to determine the RT based on the relative difference and on the statistical analysis
clearly showed a statistical difference when the relative difference exceeded 5%. An example of this is the statistical difference
between the data of mean RT at 500– 2000 Hz octave-band frequencies measured by the interrupted noise method and the simulated
RT data, which showed a relative difference of 7% between these methods. When the relative difference was compared with the
calculated values and confidence interval between the mean and simulated RT values, a relative difference higher than or equal to
4% already yielded RT values outside the confidence interval. The statistical analysis demonstrated that there is no significant
difference between the two measurement methods, interrupted noise and integrated impulse response. These findings are in
agreement with Astolfi et al. With regard to computer simulation using the Odeon software, there was no difference between this
method and the two measuring methods when the RT was evaluated at the frequency of 500 Hzand the mean RT at octave-band
frequencies of 125– 4000 Hz. However, when the mean RT at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz frequencies was evaluated, simulated values
differed from the values measured by interrupted noise method. According to Bork, the accuracy of the data simulated in the
computer is in general influenced by and actually dependent on several parameters besides those directly considered by the
software. A very relevant parameter for the precision of a computational simulation is the precision of the values attributed to the
coefficients of absorption of the materials inside the room under study. It is normally very difficult to identify the absorption
coefficient of the materials in existing buildings. The values used in this work are standard ones and therefore do not take into
account the wear and particularities of the materials in the room.
According to Christensen, in addition to the coefficients of absorption, the imprecision of scattering coefficients inserted in
computer simulations is one of the main sources of error. In the present work, similarly to what was reported by Bistafa and
Bradley, the reverberation times calculated by Sabine’s formula were slightly longer than those calculated by Eyring’s formula, but
were still very similar, while Arau-Puchades’ formula resulted in much longer reverberation times. The accuracy of the calculated
values was much greater when the first two formulas were used, without the need to use more complex formulas such as that of
Arau-Puchades. Therefore, Arau-Puchades’ formula proved to be the least suitable for calculating the RT of the room of this study.
The values obtained with Eyring’s formula were very similar to those obtained by the two measurements and by the computer
simulation.
E. Scope of Research
1) Increasing Reverberation Time Using Diffusers: An Acoustic Design for More Sustainable Halls
2) Achieving Optimal Reverberation Time in a Room, using Newly Patented Tuning Tubes
F. Loudness
In general terms , loudness is the subjective perception of sound pressure. According to American Standards Association it is
defined as “That attribute of auditory sensation in terms of which sounds can be ordered on a scale extending from quiet to loud.” In
different industries loudness has different measurements and different measurement standards. For example in the broadcasting
industry by ITU BS 1770.3 relative loudness of different segments of electronically reproduced sounds, such as for broadcasting and
cinema are measured. Some other methods have a general scope to measure and help to characterize a few common observations
like Environmental noise are Steven’s loudness and Zwicker's loudness More modern standards, such as Nordtest ACOU112 and
ISO/AWI 532-3 (in progress) take into account other components of loudness, such as onset rate, time variation and spectral
masking.
Loudness is the subjective perception and cannot be measured directly. So loudness will be measured by considering typical human
perception in mind.
G. Terminologies
1) Sound Pressure: Root mean square value of variation of air pressure measured in pascal (Pa) above and below atmospheric
pressure caused by sound.
2) Sound Pressure Level : Quantity of sound pressure in decibels expressed by the formula
SPL (dB) = 10 log10(p2/p 2)
Where p - root mean square pressure in Pascals
po- reference sound pressure (20 µPa) Tables and Recommendations:
With respect to loudness of sound there are many codes which cover about the same which are all covered under NBC 2016 where
various tables deal with various aspects of loudness at various places like roads, railways, airports, broadcasting stations, industrial
buildings, non industrial buildings etc. Tables and recommendations for various aspects of loudness was derived from several
codebooks and is summated together in NBC 2016. Acoustics of the building is covered in Volume 2, Part 8 (Building Services),
Section 4 (Acoustics, Sound insulation and Noise control of Buildings) of NBC 2016.
The codes which are used for acoustics of the buildings are as follows :-
a) IS 1950 : 1962 Code of practice for sound insulation of non-industrial buildings
b) IS 3483 : 1965 Code of practice for noise reduction in industrial buildings
c) IS 4954 : 1968 Recommendations for noise abatement in town planning
d) IS 11050 (Part 1) : Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements
e) IS 11050 (Part 2) : Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements: Part 2 Impact sound
f) BS 8233 : 2014 Code of practice for sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings
B. Internal Factors
1) Industrial Building: Source of noise will be mostly from the industrial equipment inside the industry. External noise contribute
to a small amount in Industrial Buildings.
2) Non Industrial Buildings: Internal factors will be a significant source of noise.
3) Social Factors
a) Social event loudness will be perceived by different people in the same society on various aspects
b) The group of people who participate in the event would feel that the loudness is one essential aspect in the event while the other
part of society at that same time may perceive it as noise which affects the sound quality in their place.
B. Railways
1) Railway cuttings reduce the spread of noise, whereas embankments extend it. The elevated railway on viaducts or embankment
is very common in built-up areas. The elevation increases exposure to noise but in addition the construction of the viaduct may
affect the propagation of noise. In this respect solid embankments are preferable to built-up arches, which tend to act as sound
boxes.
2) Wherever possible, no residential or public building zone should abut onto railway lines, especially on the marshalling yards
which is particularly objectionable because of the shrill, clanging and intermittent noise they generate, often at night. The
appropriate zones alongside railway lines are industrial and commercial buildings other than office buildings. Where these
precautions are not practicable and housing has to abut on to railway lines, every attempt may be made to house as few people
as possible in the vicinity of the railway lines.
3) For underground transport, noise control methods should be considered in the following
a) In stations, where high noise levels are produced at the arrival and departure of trains
b) In tunnels, during high speed train movement
c) Where an underground rail transit system passes close to existing structures or high rise buildings, adequate attention should
also be paid to the problem of ground vibration transmitted to the building, and proper isolation should be provided for critical
areas
d) Wherever elevated railway tracks are provided, adequate measures should be taken to avoid the spread of noise in the
surrounding built up areas
e) In transit cars, where sound insulation is of vital importance to provide comfortable conditions for the commuters
C. Roadways
1) Precautions may, therefore, be taken in the planning of dwellings in relation to arterial and trunk roads as with railways. Care
may be taken that local housing roads do not provide shortcuts for heavy traffic through residential areas. Hilly roads present
the additional noise of gear changing. Trees with heavy foliage planted on both sides of the carriageway help slightly to muffle
the noise, provided the foliage extends for a considerable distance (30 m or above).
2) For zoning and planning of new buildings in urban areas, it is recommended that external LA10 be limited to a maximum of 70
dBA when the dwellings are proposed to have sealed windows and 60 dBA when the dwellings are proposed to have open
windows. Indeed it is desirable to confine major new residential development to locations subject to LA10 levels substantially
lower than those given above.
3) It is recognized, however, that within the large urban areas, the use of sites where the external LA10 is greater than 60-70 dBA
cannot always be avoided. In that case it is suggested to utilize such design solutions as barrier blocks in order to reduce
external LA10 noise levels to at least 60-70 dBA at any point 1.0 m from any inward looking façade. When the orientation of
the site and the density of development are such that this cannot be fully achieved some form of dwelling insulation will have to
be provided. It should be appreciated that where open windows are necessary, the occupants would have to put up with
discomfort if the above conditions are not met.
D. Highway Barriers
1) Barriers are often the most effective means of reducing traffic noise around residential areas. They have the great advantage that
they generally protect most or all of the site. In nearly all situations, a well-designed barrier of even a modest height (say 3 m)
can at least ensure that all areas of open space are free from excessive noise levels.
2) There are two types of barriers that can be built to protect sites; one which are built solely for the purpose of reducing noise and
the other which form part of the building complex (barrier blocks). Free standing walls and artificial mounds are typical
examples of the first type while single and multi-storeyed utility buildings and garages are the most common form of the
second.
3) Of the two types, laying out barrier blocks of a complex in an appropriate fashion is a better option because they are cheaper
and also tend to form a more effective barrier overall because of their greater height and width. Barrier walls or mounds are
more limited in their effect than barrier blocks for they protect little more than the area of the site close to ground level
essentially because of the lack of height, as continuous walls much higher than 3 m are often difficult to construct.
E. Construction Noise
1) Noise control can be done at the source or in the noise propagation path. While it is preferable to adopt noise control at the
source, it may not be practically possible to implement it for some of the construction equipment. Given the diversity of noise
sources, mitigation strategies in case of construction noise have to be dealt with appropriately depending on the spectral
characteristics of sources.
2) Source noise control strategies include providing acoustic enclosures for sources like diesel generators, choosing less noisy
construction machinery and selecting alternative construction practices which involve lesser noise generation.
3) Noise control in the propagation paths primarily involves provision of noise barriers around the construction sites. Positioning
of major fixed construction equipment/ installations such as batching plants and diesel generators have a significant impact on
the noise spectrum and its impact.
4) Also, time of operation and duration of noisy construction activities have significant impact on the resultant annoyance.
F. Residential Buildings
1) Site Planning: The most desirable method is to locate the residential buildings in a quiet area away from the noisy sources like
the industrial areas, rail tracks, aerodromes, roads carrying heavy traffic, etc.
a) To minimise ground reflection, the dwellings should be surrounded by the maximum amount of planting and grassed areas and
the minimum amount of hard surfacing. This applies particularly to high density areas. Where for maintenance reasons a large
amount of hard paving is necessary, it should be broken up by areas of planting and grassing. Narrow hard paved courts should
be avoided between adjacent tall buildings.
b) Roads within a residential area should be kept to a minimum both in width and length, and should be designed to discourage
speeding. Area-wise planning, with zones from which vehicular traffic is altogether excluded will greatly help to reduce noise.
Roads with through traffic should be excluded from residential areas, but where sites have to be developed adjacent to existing
major roads the same principles should be observed in the siting of blocks as with railway lines
c) Play areas for older children should be sited as far away from dwellings as possible. Special care should be taken with old
peoples’ dwellings. They should not be placed immediately adjacent to service entries, play spaces, or to any entrances where
children may tend to congregate.
2) Internal Planning: The orientation of buildings in a locality should be planned in such a way as to reduce the noise disturbance
from neighbourhood areas. The non-critical areas, such as corridors, kitchens, bathrooms, elevators and service spaces may be
located on the noisy side and the critical areas, such as bedrooms and living space, on the quiet side.
G. Educational Buildings
1) Site Planning: Where outdoor noise nuisance exists from local industry, busy roads, railway, airfields, sport grounds or other
sources beyond the control of the school authority, school buildings should be sited as far away from the sources of noise, as
possible.
a) Rooms should be planned in a manner so that the minimum amount of glazing is placed on the side facing the external noise.
b) Noises arising from the activities of a school and from the use of the buildings after school hours may constitute a nuisance to
occupants of surrounding property; therefore, it is desirable to place playgrounds, workshops, swimming pools, music rooms,
assembly halls and gymnasia as far away as possible from buildings which require a quiet environment.
H. Internal Planning
The following principles should be observed in the detailed planning of educational buildings: Grouping Noisy rooms should be
separated from quiet ones, if possible. In general, it is desirable that rooms should be grouped together in accordance with the
classification. Windows and ventilators Windows of noisy and quiet rooms should not open on to the same courtyard or be near to
one another. Skylights and ventilators over noisy rooms should be avoided, if they are likely to be a source of nuisance to adjacent
upper floors. Doors Swing doors into rooms should only be used where no problem of sound transmission exists. Reduction of
insulation between rooms and corridors due to doors shall be borne in mind. The type and method of fitting of doors is important
and necessary care shall be paid in this respect. Sliding partitions, if used, should be acoustic operable partitions. Pass-through
doors, if provided, should be acoustic doors with drop seals. Open planning and circulation areas Where open planning is used to
permit spaces, such as assembly halls, dining rooms or entrance halls to be used in association with each other or for circulation, the
degree of disturbance caused by interfering noise to teaching areas needs careful consideration; traffic through such areas should be
strictly controlled; full use should be made of sound absorbent treatments to reduce the spread of noise from one space to another. If
rooms have large glazed panels or ventilation openings facing directly on the circulation areas, human traffic passing by the rooms
should be controlled. Preferably a baffled ventilation system or double windows should be used. Fan-lights over doors should be
fixed and glazed. Furniture In all educational buildings, regardless of the character of the floor finish, rubber buffers should be fitted
to the legs of chairs and tables.
I. Sound Insulation
1) Suppression of noise at source:
2) All items of equipment that are potentially noisy should be selected with care.
3) Water closet cisterns should not be fixed on partitions next to bedrooms or living rooms.
4) Plumbing pipes should be isolated from the structures.
5) Lift motors should be mounted on resilient supports.
6) Access doors from machine rooms to internal staircases should be well fitting and of solid construction.
7) Special noise control measures may be required for electrical and mechanical services such as diesel generators, outdoor air
conditioning units, cooling towers, etc.
8) Reduction of airborne noise transmitted through the structure
9) Reduction of airborne noise requires the use of rigid and massive walls, or acoustically designed dry walls, without any
openings.
10) Openings are the major cause of penetration of noise through a barrier.
11) While designing it should be borne in mind that all components should provide a sound transmission compatible with that of the
rest of the barrier so that an equivalent amount of sound energy is transmitted through each portion of the barrier.
12) Ventilating ducts or air transfer openings where provided should be designed to minimise transmission of noise.
13) For this purpose, sound attenuating devices having necessary insertion loss may be installed in these openings.
14) All partitions should be sealed effectively where they butt against the rest of the structure.
15) All doors and windows should be properly gasketed where a high degree of sound insulation is desired.
16) Reduction of structure borne noises:
17) This requires the use of discontinuous or nonhomogeneous materials in the construction of the structure.
18) Reduction of impact noise:
19) The floor of a room immediately above the bed room or living room shall result in an impact sound pressure level (L'nT,w) not
greater than 60 dB. Typically, a 150 mm thick concrete floor with thick carpet (12 mm) covering would satisfy this
requirement.
20) The floor of a room immediately above the bed room or living room shall result in an impact sound pressure level (L'nT,w) not
greater than 60 dB. Typically, a 150 mm thick concrete floor with thick carpet (12 mm) covering would satisfy this
requirement.
J. Echo
In acoustics, Echo is a reflection of sound that arrives at the listener with a delay after the direct sound. This can be heard when the
reflection returns with sufficient magnitude and delay to be perceived distinctly. The delay is directly proportional to the distance of
the reflecting surface from the source and the listener. The human ear cannot distinguish echo from the original direct sound if the
delay is less than 1/10 of a second. The velocity of sound in dry air is approximately 343 m/s at a temperature of 25 °C. Therefore,
the reflecting object must be more than 17.2m from the sound source for echo to be perceived by a person located at the source.
K. Remedy
1) An echo can be avoided by covering long distance walls and high ceiling with suitable sound-absorbing material.
2) Install carpet throughout the room for complete coverage.
3) Install a new floor with sound-dampening underlays.
4) Install a new floor that's made of cork.
5) Install mass loaded vinyl if you want to cover all walls completely.
6) Add insulation to help with temperature at the same time.
L. Echelon Effect
The process of combination of multiple echoes and forming of a new sound is known as echelon effect. A set of railings or
rectangular surfaces is said to produce echelon effect. This echelon effect affects the original quality of sound.
1) Remedy: To minimize echelon effect in acoustics of building, stair type construction in the hall should be avoided. If it is
necessary, then the spacing between the stairs must be unequal or stairs may be replaced by a ram. The steps of stair case
should be covered with carpet.
X. NOISE
A. Objective
The objective is to detail a potential significant noise impact that could result the proposed action. To identify and quantify any such
potential impact from the action, a noise analysis is designed and conducted and consist of three parts:
1) A screening analysis to determine location where traffic generated by the proposed action would have the potential to cause
significant noise impact.
2) A detailed analysis at any location where traffic generated by the proposed action would have the potential to results in
significant adverse noise impact to determine the magnitude of increase in noise level.
3) An analysis to determine the level of building attenuation necessary to ensure that interior noise level in proposed buildings
satisfy applicable interior noise criteria.
1) Sound Absorption: Sound absorption is the capability of a surface, or building material, to absorb sound instead of reflecting it.
Sound waves will continue to bounce around a room for a time after they are created if the majority of surfaces in a room is
reflective. Surfaces that absorb sound better will not allow for reflections to bounce around as much, and will deaden the sound
wave more quickly. Many common building materials, such as gypsum board, wood, concrete, brick and tile, are fairly
reflective and do not absorb much sound. Softer materials, such as carpet, foam padding, and fiberglass insulation, are far better
at absorbing sound. The use of absorptive materials can be helpful in controlling sound. Fiberglass insulation is very absorptive
and can be usedwhere sound control is a concern. Thick carpet with padding is also very absorptive, and acoustical ceiling tiles
are designed to absorb rather than reflect sound. Even in cases where these options are not viable, absorptive materials can be
added to finished rooms in other ways: furniture with thick cushioning is extremely absorptive, as are thick and heavy curtains
and drapes. Items such as these can be added or arranged in ways that will allow for greater sound absorption. Acoustical
baffles with absorptive materials can be purchased for use in areas where sound is a major concern, and most are designed to be
unobtrusive and visually nondescript so as to allow for installation without drastically altering the aesthetics of a room.
2) Airborne Sound Transmission: Airborne sound transmission in interiors deals with how well sound is controlled from room to
room, and from the outdoors to indoors (or vice versa) through walls and ceilings. Sound transmission loss is the decrease in
sound energy when it passes through a building element. Different materials provide different levels of transmission loss and,
thus, different levels of diffusion of sound. Dense, heavy materials increase the mass of floors and walls, allowing less sound to
pass through. De-coupling can also be used to control sound, in this case. A break in framing or a resilient drywall connection
breaks the path of vibration for the sound wave, causing it to halt. This is the most effective method for controlling strong, low
frequencies, which are the hardest to block. Blocking airborne sound from leaking through gaps and cracks by sealing them is
also effective.
3) Impact-Sound Transmission: After an impact noise is transmitted through a floor or ceiling assembly, the airborne sound that
has made it through is the impact-sound transmission. The sound of someone stomping around on the floor above you is an
impact sound transmitted through the ceiling to the room you are in. As with airborne sound transmission and sound absorption,
the media of building materials used in construction come into play. Wood joist floor-ceiling systems transmit a lot of impact
sound. Adding fiberglass insulation will improve their capability of blocking impact sound, as will decoupling by using a wire-
suspended drywall ceiling. Lightweight concrete flooring is generally good at reducing airborne sound transmission, but it does
not do as well blocking impact sound. De-coupling is crucial to improving impact sound control in this instance. Resilient
underlayment’s beneath floating floors can isolate the finished flooring from the concrete slab.
4) Sound Insulation: Sound insulation/sound proofing is a method used to subdue the level of sound passing through the insulating
building component. People generally confuse sound absorption and sound insulation to be the same. The two are very different
from each other. Sound absorbents which are mostly pours materials absorb thus reduce the sound which is reflected from
surfaces. On the contrary sound insulating construction reduces sound passing through it. Sound absorbers, are poor sound
insulators. While hard material used for sound insulation are inferior sound absorbers. Impact Insulation- is a rating of how well
a building floor reduces the impact of sounds, such as footsteps.
A. Wall Insulation
Walls are a vertical barrier of sound. Proper construction of walls can increase the level of sound insulation. Construction of walls
for sound insulation can be of four types –
1) Rigid Homogeneous Walls: Stone, brick or concrete masonry constructions come under this section. The sound insulation in
these walls depends upon their weight per unit area. Sound insulation in these increases if the thickness of wall increases. Due
to this these walls become uneconomical and bulky after a certain limit.
2) Partition Walls of porous materials: These can be rigid or non-rigid. Rigid porous materials such as porous concrete masonry,
cinder concrete etc. increase insulation about 10.%. While partition walls of non rigid porous materials provide very low sound
insulation. However they can be used if combined with rigid materials.
3) Double Wall Partition: A double wall partition comprises of Plaster boards Or fibre boards or plaster on laths on both sides.
With sound absorbing cushion in between. Rough wooden blocks are provided to support the cushion. Double wall partition is a
wall of rigid as well as non–rigid porous materials.
4) Cavity Wall Construction: This is said to be the most adequate wall construction from the sound proofing point of view. In this
two walls are made with a gap of minimum 5cm between them. This gab can be left air filled as we know sound travels the
slowest in air or can be filled with some flexible material, like quilt etc. On the surface of the wall Celotex or other insulating
board may be fixed.
8) Composite units of perforated board (hardboard, asbestos board or metal sheet) backed by mineral or glass wool quilt or slab;
and
9) Special absorbers constructed of hardboard, teak ply, etc, backed by air.
B. Acoustic Foam
Acoustic foam does not block sound. It is used in sound absorption applications such as gymnasiums to reduce reverberations as
noise travels and bounces off reflective surfaces. To block sound, acoustics specialists rely on mass primarily, while eliminating any
gaps in walls where sound can leak through and eliminating, as well, any mechanical couplings between inner and outer walls.
Soundproof sheetrock, mass loaded vinyl barriers, and sound isolation clips are some of the products used for soundproofing.
Sometimes laminated materials are used to reduce the transmission of sound through walls by disrupting the resonant frequencies of
like materials. There are also specialized products available for use in construction such as soundproof windows, sound reduction
windows, and sound resistant doors. The standard unit of sound absorption, or Sabin, is based on the amount of absorption a 1 ft-
square section of material will achieve over a frequency range of 125-4000 Hz. It is often impractical or undesirable to completely
cover a room with acoustic material. In these instances, discrete placement of material in small patches proves more effective than
placing it all in one spot. Likewise, placing material asymmetrically—on non-parallel walls, for instance—usually achieves a greater
quieting effect, as does locating the material near corners and edges rather than in the centers of walls. Situations like these can
often be tricky to quiet, and often the advice of an acoustical contractor or an architect familiar with acoustical construction can be
helpful.
which are harder to attenuate with absorbent barriers: very often these vibrations are transmitted into the floor and the structure
of the building. This noise is best attacked by isolating the machines from the structure with resilient pads or isolation mounts.
D. Considerations
There are a few subjective measures associated with sound, among them loudness and quality. Loudness is expressed in units of
phons to provide a qualitative measure, a phon being defined as the pressure level in dB of a 1000 Hz. tone against which a person
compares another pure or complex tone. Another measure, the sone, is defined as the loudness of a 1000 Hz., 40 dB tone. A
relationship can be plotted between phons and sones. Quality is the subjective measure of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of
sound which can make sounds of the same loudness appear more or less disturbing. Music typically combines fundamentals and
harmonics to produce a pleasing sound, whereas in the case of noise, the frequencies are irregular and random. Among the attributes
used to describe sound quality are pitch and timbre. Pitch is determined mainly by frequency, then intensity and wave shape while
timbre is determined mainly by wave shape, then by intensity and frequency. It is these differences that enable us to distinguish the
same note played on a brass horn and a woodwind as coming from different instruments. Stylized acoustic wall panels soften the
hard, reflective surfaces of interior spaces. As mentioned, sound can find its way through the smallest gaps in an otherwise
impenetrable barrier, a phenomenon known as “flanking. Penetrations through walls for piping and ductwork will also permit sound
to pass, as will the pipes themselves, and these gaps should be properly sealed. Where barrier walls adjoin other walls or floors, a
sealant can be used as well to close up any gaps. A few rules of thumb apply to soundproofing and sound absorbing. Usually,
doubling the mass of a wall will produce a noticeable reduction in the level of sound coming through it. When adding sound
absorption to a room, usually it takes a 3 dB reduction in sound levels to affect a perceptible difference. Most of the material
described herein relates to common industrial sound and noise problems found in offices, factories, etc. There are special cases
where the acoustics of a room are important from the standpoint of being able to hear the sounds without losing their liveliness:
concert halls, recording studios, etc. Here is where diffusors come into play. They create a sense of spaciousness in a room by
scattering sound waves to reduce echo and standing waves, giving the sound better clarity.
E. Resources
In addition to organizations that sponsor standards for industrial noise control such as OSHA and ANSI, the following organizations
can provide useful information on various aspects of acoustic materials.
1) Acoustical Society of America’s homepage
2) The site for Institute of Noise Control Engineering
3) Noise Reduction Materials for Tractor, Excavator, and Bulldozer Cabs
F. Acoustic Materials
When the sound intensity is more, then it gives the great trouble or nuisance to the particular area like auditorium, cinema hall,
studio, recreation centre, entertainment hall, college reading hall. Hence it is very important to make that area or room to be sound
proof by using a suitable material called as ‘Acoustic material’. It is measured in decibels (dB). Acoustic material play a vital role in
the various area of building construction. In studio, class room, reading hall, cinema theatre, more concentration is required to listen,
hence the acoustics treatment is provided so as to control the outside as well as inside sound of the various building until such that
sound will be audible without any nuisance or disturbance.
1) Types of Acoustic Material
a) Acoustic plaster
b) Acoustic tiles
c) Perforated plywood
d) Fibrous plaster
e) Staw board
f) Pulp board
g) Compressed fibre board
h) Hair felt
i) Cork board slabs
j) Foam glass
k) Asbestos cement boards
2) Sound Fibre Rock: Sound fibre rock is made from non-combustible rock fibre. It is available in four different thickness. It is
supplied in slabs of size 1000 x 600 mm. The slabs can also be supplied as part of an acoustic composite product with lead or
polymeric barries.
a) Properties of sound fibre-rock
It is resistance to high temperature.
It has excellent sound and thermal qualities.
It is simple to cut and install.
3) DMP2 Damping Mat: DMP2 damping mats are light in weight and PVA- based, visco-elastic polymer. It is designed for use in
acoustic applications where a high level of vibration damping is required. These type of material come with a self- adhesive
backing. It is available in standard sheet sizes of 1600 x 1000 mm or die- cut to shape.
Applications of DMP2 damping mats
a) It is extensively used to reduce vibration in sheet metal and other resonant surfaces such as vehicle body parts, machine panels,
steel sinks and table etc.
b) DMP2 damping mats are particularly suitable for clean- room environments.
4) Damping mats (DM3, DM5, DM5A, DM 10): Damping mats are manufactured from bitume with added mineral fillers and
synthetic rubber forming a highly visco-elastic product. It is available in four standard grades. Damping mats come with self-
adhesive backing.
Applications of damping mats
Barrier mats are used to reduce vibration in sheet, metal and other resonant surfaces such as vehicle body parts, machine panels,
steel sinks and table etc.
It improves the sound insulation by adding mass to the structure.
5) Sound Fibre-Poly: It is manufactured from non-irritating water repellent polyester fibres. It is designed for use in acoustic and
thermal insulation applications. It can be supplied in sheet form in packs 10 or cut to a specific size and shape. It can also be
supplied in fabric wrapped form for architectural applications or with other performances enchanting facings.
a) Properties of Sound fibre-poly
It is rot proof, odourless, non-hygroscopic , will not sustain vermin.
It will not encourage the growth of fungi or bacteria.
It is dimensionally stable under varying conditions of temperature and humidity.
For long term protection, it should be stored in a dry well ventilated area.
6) Insulation Blankets: There are two types of insulation blankets with a name of SCL and SCP. There are noise insulation quilted
blankets. SCL and SCP can be supplied in standard sheet size of 2000 x 1200 mm or can be supplied as individually tailored
parts to suit for particular application. Blankets can be stitched and edge bound and can also be supplied with eyelets or Velcro
for fixing. SCl and SCP are also available with other higher performance facings. SCL is manufactured from two layers of
quilted glass fibre and a lead core with hardwearing PVC coated glass cloth material on outside. SCP is manufactured from two
layer of quilted glass fibre and a polymer barrier core with hardwearing PVC coated glass cloth material on the outside. These
are high performance blankets offer a cost effective alternative to SCL.
a) Properties of Insulation Blankets
They are extremely flexible with a high degree of durability.
They are fire resistant and also resistant to most common fluids, mineral oil and petroleum.
b) Application of Insulation Blankets: SCL are high performance insulation blanket which are designed for under bonnet vehicle
installations, plant equipments, agricultural vehicles and industrial pumps.
7) Barrier Mats: It consist of thermoplastic polymer with phthalate esters and mineral fillers, making it an extremely durable and
flexible product. It is available plain, self-adhesive backed or with a reinforced class ‘0’ foil facing. It is available in thickness
of 2.5 mm and 4.5 mm.
a) Properties of Barrier Mats
It is black in colour.
Its density varies from 50 N/m2 to 100 N/m2.
Its hardness is 90°.
It is resistant to fire.
Its operating temperature is 90°C for extended period and 120°C for short period.
b) Application of Barrier mats: Barrier mats are designed to add mass and reduce noise transmission on various products,
including mechanical and electrical equipment, automotive components and extensively within the building industry on walls,
floors and ceilings etc.
8) Sound Lag: Sound lag L and P are the two types of noise insulation blankets. Sound lag L is manufactured from two layers of
glass fibre with a lead core and a reinforced class `0′ foil, vapour barrier outer coverings. The inner layer of glass fibre is quilted
with a scrim backing to prevent fibre breakout. Sound lag P is a cost effective, flexible polymeric barrier mat, faced with class
‘0’ foil vapour barrier and non-irritant polyster fibre inner layer.
Applications of sound lag
a) It is designed to control noise breakout from ducting and pipe work by extremely wrapping to contain the noise within the duct.
b) It enjoy a decoupled mass technique i.e. heavy barrier layer isolated from the duct or pipe surface by a resilient layer of
insulation acting like spring.
c) Sound Lag L is used in applications requiring a high level of thermal insulation and improved sound absorption.
d) It has a good acoustic performance.
9) Sound foam, S: It is a flexible open cell polyurethane foam, offering excellent sound absorbing qualities over a wide range of
frequencies. It is available plain or self- adhesive backed. It is easy to handle and to cut and install. It can be available in sheet
form from 6 mm to 100 mm thick, or it can also be available die – cut to size and shape. It can also be available as part of
acoustic composite product with lead polymeric barriers or damping sheets.
a) Applications of sound foam S
It is a self-extinguishing acoustic foam.
It is used extensively in the motor industry for vehicle and compressors, generators, enclosures.
10) Sound Foam: It is flexible open cell polyurethane foam, offering excellent sound absorbing qualities over a wide range
frequencies. It is available plain or self- adhesive backed. It is easy to handle and to cut and install. It is a black non- flammable
acoustic foam. It is impregnated with fire retardant chemicals which enables the material to achieve class ‘0’ fire rating as
defined by the building regulations.
a) Application of sound foam 0: It is extensively used in air conditioning and air handling system, ducting and also compressors,
generators, enclosures and other applications.
XIV. SITE SELECTION
The acoustic design of a building starts with the selection of the site. The acceptance of any given sound depends on many factors
that vary according to the type of building, the type of activity being performed, and the social and cultural habits of the occupants.
The quality of sound in any given indoor space is determined by the sources of the sound or noise and quality of the building
envelope including:
1) Exterior noise (nearby traffic, neighbours...)
2) Interior noise (music, phone conversations...)
3) Impact noise (footsteps...)
4) Sound vibrations through the structure
5) Equipment noise (ventilation systems, electronic equipment, pipes, elevators...)
A. Noise
A satisfactory indoor acoustical environment actually starts by knowing what is going on outdoors. Building acoustics can help to
mitigate the effects of noise disturbance which can have negative effects on health, wellbeing and general quality of life. Noise
disturbance has become a more common problem as a result of industrialization, urbanization and the rapid increase in the number
of household appliances, devices, equipment and alarms. However, greater awareness in planning and improved standards of
construction can help mitigate potential noise problems. The Noise pollution is defined as:
1) Environmental Noise: Which includes noise from transportation sources.
2) Neighbour Noise: Which includes noise from inside and outside buildings.
3) Neighbourhood Noise: Which includes noise arising from industrial and entertainment premises, trade and businesses,
construction sites and noise in the street.
D. Acoustic Comfort
Considering the types of noise and architecture, noises can either be transmitted through the air or through the building fabric itself
(through the envelope), vertically (from floor to floor), or laterally (through internal partitions). Acoustic comfort in a building is
dependent on the acoustic characteristics of the building fabric, as regards acoustic transmission and absorption. When designing for
acoustic comfort today, we must take into account a variety of external and architectural factors:
1) The types of noise to be managed, from protecting the building’s users from incoming levels of noise, but also perhaps from
polluting the environment with noise produced from the building, as well as managing the internal noise within the building.
2) The spectrum of noise to be managed (low or high frequencies
3) The construction system and materials the building’s activity : sleeping, working, teaching or healthcare
A. Construction Documentation
If you’ve developing construction documentation, it’s a good idea to provide specifics for any acoustic solutions you’ve suggested.
Many contractors don’t take the acoustic properties of materials into account when they’re building, so include the required
specifications here. For building systems, it can be helpful to specify a maximum decibel level instead of a range. For example,
instead of specifying HVAC equipment with a decibel level between 25 and 35, specify a decibel level of 25.
Including soundproofing specifications in the construction documentation is particularly important for noise dampening kits, floor
underlayments and in-wall equipment like rails and pads. Documentation might include specific manufacturers, or simply how
much soundproofing the materials should provide.
B. Construction Administration
Many contractors aren’t experienced with acoustic design. Site visits during construction will help ensure soundproofing materials
are being installed correctly, and that building systems aren’t too noisy. On-site follow-up is particularly important if you’ve
specified the use of sound isolation rails or decoupling the drywall from the framing as a way to dampen sound. It’s common for
contractors to screw drywall to the framing and to the noise dampeners, which defeats the purpose of decoupling the drywall.
C. Design Objectives
The acoustical environment for an auditorium project can be enhanced in following respects (Barron, 1993): The floor area and
volume of the auditorium should be kept at a reasonable minimum for adequate loudness in every part of the auditorium. Optimum
reverberation characteristics should be provided in the auditorium to facilitate whatever function is required. The sound energy
should be uniformly distributed within the room. The room should be free from acoustical defects (distinct echoes, flutter echoes,
picket fence echo, sound shadowing, room resonance, sound concentrations and excessive reverberation). First of all, there should
be adequate loudness in every part of the auditorium, especially in remote seats. The problems of providing adequate loudness result
mainly from the inverse square law and excessive absorption by the audience attenuating the direct sound before it reaches the
listener (Egan, 1988). Above all, the floor area and volume of the auditorium should be kept at a reasonable minimum, thus
shortening the sound paths. The following table details recommended Volume‐per‐ seat values for various auditoria (Table 1). The
volume for the DBS auditorium is 7,324 m3 (The calculation was conducted in SketchUp 8.0). The total number of seats is 800. So,
the Volume‐per‐ Seat is 7,324 m3 /800 = 9.2 m3 . The value falls into the range for Concert Halls. For other criteria, the authors
conducted building simulation to verify its performance.
B. Methodology
Odeon 5.0 was used to estimate RTs in the DBS auditorium. The method estimates a mean absorption coefficient, which is inserted
in the Sabine, Eyring and Arau‐Puchades formulas to give an estimate of the reverberation time (Christensen, 2009). Instead of
simply taking the areas of the surfaces and multiplying by the corresponding absorption co-efficient to obtain the total absorption in
the room, Odeon also sends out ‘particles’ from the source, assuming diffuse conditions thus reflecting them in random directions,
keeping a count on how many times they hit each surface.
Surfaces that are hit very often then carry greater weight in the overall mean absorption coefficient of the room. Surfaces, which are
not detected at all in the ray‐tracing process, are left out of all calculations and surfaces which are hit on both sides are included
twice in the calculation. As a result the estimated reverberation time corresponds to the sub‐ volumes in which the selected source is
located. Note however that if a part of the area of a surface, which is present in the sub‐volume, is located outside that sub‐volume
(e.g. if two sub‐ volumes share the same floor surface) then area and surface estimates for the statistical calculations may not be
entirely correct. In Odeon, two mean absorption coefficients are inserted in the Sabine and Eyring formula to calculate reverberation
times. The mean absorption coefficients used for the Arau‐ Puchades formula are derived in similar ways except that separate values
for surface hits, area and the corresponding mean absorption coefficient are calculated as projections onto each of the main axis of
the room. The DBS model was based on the architects’ design scheme and the principle of material selection is to minimize the
sound absorption (Figure). The condition was the auditorium occupied (audience on the wooden chairs); one speaker was located in
the center of the stage. The result was shown in Figure 4 (estimated RTs) and 5 (absorption sources). The estimated RT for the DBS
auditorium at the mid‐frequency (500 Hz) cannot fall in to the range 1.4 ‐ 1.7 seconds. The RTs at the high‐ frequencies (1000 Hz,
2000 Hz etc.) are even lower than 1.0 seconds. Undoubtedly, the audience absorbed the largest part of sound; the ceiling in the wake
of the audience. Considering the absorption due to audience that is hard to change, efforts should be made on the ceilings.
C. Sound Distribution
Averagely distributing sound energy is of importance to achieve a good acoustic design. In an enclosed space, the direct sound
decreases in level in the same way as outside. Most of the sound energy we receive in enclosed spaces has been reflected by walls
and ceiling surfaces. The geometries of reflection for light and are identical.
The reflected wave behaves as if it had originated from the image position (Schultz and Watters, 1964). But, for sound, much larger
surfaces are required owing to the much longer wavelengths involved. An acoustic mirror is a large, plane, massive surface of, for
instance, concrete or timber. Sound reflected by one surface will continue to be reflected between the room surfaces, until its energy
is removed by absorption. “3D Billiard” in the Odeon software was used to simulate the sound energy propagation and distribution.
Figure shows the result. One of outstanding issues is that the upper part of the stage obstructs the sound propagation to the audience.
The direct sound (deep red balls) has not yet reached the rear wall, but some balls have been reflected eight times (green balls) in the
stage. It means that the outlet of the stage needs acoustic treatment. Reflectors should be considered.
D. Sound Defects
Any time the surfaces of a room focus the sound which is reflected from them, they create spots of high intensity and other spots
with low intensity. This is generally undesirable in an auditorium since we want a uniform, evenly dispersed sound to all listeners
(Andrade, 1932). The “3D Billiard” again, is used to display sound effects such as scattering, flutter echoes or sound focusing. A
number of billiard balls are emitted from the source and reflected by the surfaces in the room. To visualize any sound effect, a large
number of billiard balls (10,000 balls) were used. The results are shown in Figure 7. As expected, the real walls of the stage
contributed to a sound focusing in the front of the auditorium. The focused sound energy will cause sound distortion, which should
be avoided. The main reason is that the real wall is concave. This form should be avoided in auditorium design.
Partitions made by Burnt clay blocks, cement blocks, lightweight concrete blocks, gypsum blocks, Wood wool slabs etc. are of
category
While partitions made from wooden panels, plywood, gypsum boards, lathe and plaster, hard and soft boards,metal sheets etc.
are of category
Requirements of an ideal partition wall
It should be as thin as possible.
It should be sound proof.
It should be light proof.
It should be easy in construction.
It should be economical.
It should provide adequate privacy.
8) Advantages
Following are the advantages of Plasterboard partition walls:
a) It is light in weight
b) Easy of installation
c) Lightproof
d) Easy to handle
e) well in fire-resistant
C. Additions On Walls
1) Staggered Stud Wall Construction: A well-built staggered stud wall increases the sound damping of a wall. Basically, this
involves staggering 2x4 boards along alternate edges of the top and bottom frame. In existing walls, this includes the addition of
furring strips to bring the outside frame to 2x6. When completed, the result is, effectively, two separate wall surfaces in one
wall, which keeps sound from reverberating through the studs the way they would in a single stud construction. Its not
advisable to use of this wall. Insulation is generally compressed, the top and bottom plates transfer a lot of energy, etc. The red
boards are 2x1 furring strips we cut down to run around the perimeter of the wall. Add Soundproofing IB-1 Clips Adding
Soundproofing Clips improve sound isolation by decoupling drywall from your room framing. Install Soundproofing Clips
directly to ceiling or wall framing using standard screws. Snap 7/8" Drywall Furring Channel into Soundproofing Clip to
decrease the conduction contact area and increase the flexibility. Fasten standard drywall following local building codes. The
combination of increased resilience and the mass from the drywall create a powerful ally against noise.
2) Resilient Channel Wall Assembly: It is not suggested installing Resilient Channel walls. They test well in the lab but when
installed in the field they are seriously prone to malfunction. Our purpose for posting this data is so you have a point of
reference. Resilient Channel was the standard in soundproofing in the past, but has become obsolete.
A. Introduction
Wall and floor constructions which can be done to insulate the sound to the range required is given in this document. The range is
taken in Weighted Standardized level difference which is measured in Decibels.
The following guidelines are general guidelines and can change with respect to many external factors which need to be kept in
consideration time and again.
C. Floor Construction
1) Sound Insulation Range : DnT,w = 49 to 54 dB
a) A concrete floor having mass per unit area not less than 365 kg/m2 , including any screed or ceiling finish directly bonded to
the floor slab; together with a floating floor or resilient floor covering equivalent to rubber or sponge rubber underlay or thick
cork tile (for example carpet and underlay or sponge rubber backed vinyl flooring)
b) A solid floor consisting of,
A solid slab; or
Concrete beams and infilling blocks; or
Hollow concrete planks; together with a floating floor. A ceiling finish is required for a beam and block floor. In each case the
slab should have a mass per unit area of at least 300 kg/m2 , including any screed or ceiling finish directly bonded to it.
Where a floating floor is laid over a floor of beams and hollow infill blocks or hollow beams along the top of the structural floor, it
should be sealed and levelled before the resilient layer is put down. It is also essential to have due regard for conduits and pipework
which should be laid and covered so as to prevent any short circuit of the floor’s isolating properties. If precast units are used as a
structural floor, it is essential that the joints are filled to ensure that the sound insulation performance is maintained. The resilient
material is laid to cover completely the structural floor and turned up against the surrounding wall along all edges. The resilient
layer is usually of mineral fibre, or a special grade of expanded polystyrene. When the screed is laid, it is important that none of the
mix finds its way through the resilient layer to the structural floor, as this will short circuit the isolation between the two decks and
significantly reduce the sound insulation
c) A floor consisting of boarding nailed to battens laid to float upon an isolating layer of mineral fibre capable of retaining its
resilience under imposed loading. With battens running along the joists, a dense fibre layer can be used in strips. The ceiling
below to be of metal lath and plaster not less than 29 mm thick, with pugging on the ceiling such that the combined mass per
unit area of the floor, ceiling and pugging is not less than 120 kg/m2. This construction will only give values for DnT,w of 50 to
53 dB, and a value for L' nT,w of 75 Db
d) A floor consisting of 18 mm tongued and grooved chipboard on 19 mm plasterboard laid on battens running parallel to the
joists and supported on 25 mm thick mineral wool of about 90 kg/m3 to 140 kg/m3 density; 100 mm of fibre absorbent (as used
for insulation in roof spaces) laid between the joists on top of the plasterboard ceiling
e) A floor consisting of 18 mm tongued and grooved chipboard on 19 mm plasterboard floating on a 25 mm thick mineral wool
layer of about 60 kg/m3 to 80 kg/m3 density; this on a 12.5 mm plywood platform; 100 mm of fibre absorbent laid between the
joists on top of the plasterboard ceiling.
For the purpose easy distinction the buildings have been classified based on their purpose and usage into three categories
BIBILOGRAPHY
[1] Statistical Comparison of Reverberation Time – Carolina Reich Marcon Passero, Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin
[2] Reverberation Time Measuring Methods - K. Jambrosic, M. Horvat and H. Domitrovic Faculty of EE and Computing, Unska 3, Department of
Electroacoustics, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Sound Absorption by a Helmholtz Resonator – M. A. Mironov
[4] Spectrographic Study on a Echo – IEEE Archived Research Paper
[5] Acoustic Properties of Materials - ICA(International Commission for Acoustics)
[6] Acoustic Properties of Building Materials - Federal University of Technology, Akure
[7] Acoustic Material Data - www.cern.org
[8] IS:2526 – 1963 Code of Practice for Acoutical Design of Auditoriums and Conference Halls
[9] British Standards BS 8233 : 2014 Sound Reduction and Noise Insulation in Buildings