Basc Module Readings in Philippine History
Basc Module Readings in Philippine History
Basc Module Readings in Philippine History
HIS100- READINGS IN
PHILIPPINE HISTORY
Learning Module
OVERVIEW
This module is allotted for tertiary students who are enrolled in the subject,
the past of Filipino nation through the lens of eyewitnesses or primary sources from
different periods of our history since Pre-Colonial times (these primary sources were
arranged chronologically as based from the CHEd Memorandum Order No. 20, series of
2013.
Moreover, the heart of this course will be the second module that pertains to the
content and contextual analysis of selected primary sources in Philippine History in order
to consider the following; historical context of the source, the author/s’ background and
intent, relevance and meaning that may affect the present Philippines and applying
Besides, this course may allow student to analyze Philippine historical context in
different perspectives from primary sources to classify authors’ main argument, compare
Higher Education, at the end of the course, the students are expected to evaluate and
analyze several primary sources to determine its contribution. Yet, through these ideal
activities to be done, the course may enhance the students’ capabilities like development
or critical and analytical skills, demonstrative ability to use primary sources, effective
He was born on April 19, 1996 at Baliwag, Bulacan to Enrico R. Hipolito, a Civil
Engineer and Maria Amparo V. Custodio a former bank cashier. He has a sibling named
Eric Paulo C. Hipolito, an Information technologist.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Cover Page 1
Overview 2
Table of Contents 4
I. Introduction 7
III. Pre-assessment 8
IV. Discussion 8
V. Evaluation 14
References 16
III. Pre-assessment 19
IV. Discussion 19
V. Evaluation 32
References 33
I. Introduction 35
III. Pre-assessment 36
IV. Discussion 36
V. Evaluation 44
References 46
I. Introduction 48
III. Pre-assessment 49
IV. Discussion 49
V. Evaluation 54
References 56
I. Introduction 58
III. Pre-assessment 59
IV. Discussion 59
V. Evaluation 63
References 64
HIS100- Readings in
Philippine History
Learning Module
*Module 1
I. INTRODUCTION
Many scholars viewed that history is the “window to the past.” Aside from,
history also contained several definitions based from different historians and this area of
Social Science also sphered in controversial manners sometimes.
Nick Joaquin, a famous writer sees history as a culture that is not merely a
chronological reconstruction of the past or an analytical interpretation of past events,
instead it is a process of creation or a formation of culture, specifically a “national
culture.”
Besides, after defining history in a context, we must understand that before having
history, painstaking historical research was done by the historians incorporated with the
process of conducting surveys from different sources of information to gain extensive
knowledge on a particular topic. Likewise, the sources that those historians gained from
their surveys should be distinguished whether it is a primary or secondary source, then,
the researcher must undergo historical criticism that includes external and internal
criticism.
This first module consists of introductory parts for studying Philippine History
aligned with the prescribed pedagogy and methodology of Commission on Higher
Education. Module 1 tackles two sub-topics; “Meaning and Relevance of History” and
“Distinction of Primary and Secondary Sources; External and Internal Criticism.”
At the end of Module 1, you are expected to answer the key question below:
“How history should be define, understand and research in the 21 st Century?”
III. PRE-ASSESSMENT
Define the following through your own words:
1. PRIMARY-
2. FIRSTHAND-
3. SOURCE-
4. SECONDARY-
5. SECONDHAND-
IV. DISCUSSION
Role of Historians
To look at the available sources and select the most relevant for history and
subject of study
To organize the past that is being created
To seek for the meaning of recovering the past to let the people see the continuing
relevance of memories (Historical Understanding)
*History is a Social Science area like Economics, Political Science, Sociology,
Anthropology, Philosophy, Geography and Psychology.
Historiography
“Writing of history” (Historical Writing)
Based on critical examination of sources, selection of particular details from
authentic materials in those sources and the synthesis of those details into a
narrative
Process of Historiography:
1. Choosing a topic.
2. Looking for data through Historical sources.
3. Determining the data as a Primary or Secondary source.
4. Analyze the data through historical criticisms.
5. Writing the entire narrative.
Importance of History
To unite a nation
To legitimize regime and forge a sense of collective identity through collective
memory
To make sense of the present
To not repeat mistakes of the past
To inspire people to keep their good practices to move forward
10
2. Secondary Sources
Produced by authors who used and interpreted primary sources
Analyzed a scholarly question and often use primary source as evidence
Include books, theses, dissertations, journals, magazines, knowledge of historians
Written few years after the exact time of the event
Primary and Secondary sources should be evaluated its validity and credibility by asking
these questions:
1. How did the author know about the given details? Was the author present at the
event?
2. Where did the information come from? Is it a personal experience, an eyewitness
account etc.?
3. Did the author conclude based on a single or multiple source?
11
Historical Criticism
1. External Criticism
Verification of authenticity by examining physical characteristics; consistency
with the historical characteristics of the time when it was produced, and materials
used.
2. Internal Criticism
Looks at the truthfulness and factuality of the evidence by looking at the author of
the source, its context, the agenda behind its creation
It looks at the content of the source and examines the circumstance of its
production
12
13
V. EVALUATION
A. Write “PS” if the item is a Primary source of historical record, while if it is a
Secondary source, write “SS.”
__________________1. “Batas Militar: Martial Law Under President Ferdinand E.
Marcos Full Documentary”
__________________2. “La Revolucion Filipina” of Apolinario Mabini
__________________3. National Historical Commission of the Philippines YouTube
Channel
__________________4. Historical Data Papers from National Library of the Philippines
(Microfilm)
__________________5. “War Memoirs of Jose P. Laurel” by Jose P. Laurel
__________________6. “Brains of the Nation” by Resil B. Mojares
__________________7. “A Question of Heroes” by Nick Joaquin
__________________8. “Anting-anting ni Manuel Quezon” at National Museum of the
Philippines- Museum of Anthropology
__________________9. “Veneration Without Understanding” by Renato Constantino
__________________10. Homo luzonensis Ecofacts (fossils) unearthed by UP
Archaeological Studies Program
14
C. Create a Venn diagram that compare and contrast the characteristics of primary
and secondary source materials.
15
References
Printed materials:
Asuncion, N. M. & Ofalia, B. C. (2019). Readings in Philippine history. C & E
Publishing, Inc.
Halili, M. C. N. (2010). Philippine history. REX Bookstore, Manila, Philippines
Link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F600NvSGhu4&t=139s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6ctVvdL3SI&t=2069s
16
HIS100- Readings in
Philippine History
Learning Module
*Module 2
17
I. INTRODUCTION
At present, history is somehow complicated to be discussed with the students
because of different information spread in the internet that are not historically based from
credible sources. Many students tend to read more on social media that was why many
students nowadays believe on different historical facts, point-of-views and analysis based
from “unhistorical” sources.
This issue became the core of this Module 2 that covers several and selected
primary sources in the history of the country that considered to be the most accurate
source in deciphering information in regards to different scenarios in the past of the
Filipino nation.
“First Voyage Around the World” by Pigafetta will be the source for the
Magellan expedition, “Customs of the Tagalog” by de Plasencia for Pre-colonial
Philippines, “Kartilya ng Katipunan” by Jacinto will discuss the Katipunan and 1896
Philippine revolution against Spain, “Mga Gunita ng Himagsikan” by Aguinaldo will
guide us in discovering the second phase of Philippine revolution, “Acta de la
Proclamacion de la Independencia del Pueblo Filipino” by Bautista will cover the
information about Philippine independence against Spain, “Political Caricatures of the
American Era” by Alfred McCoy and “Filipino Grievances Against Governor Wood” by
Commission on Independence will mention the stories of American Government in the
country, “President Corazon Aquino’s Speech Before the U.S. Congress (September 18,
1986)” will be talked about the Marcos dictatorship until its end, “Raiders of the Sulu
Sea (Documentary)” will discuss the history of Filipino-Muslim conflict and “Works of
Luna and Hidalgo” will discuss the Post-War Philippines.
18
III. PRE-ASSESSMENT
In three words, how can you describe the method of teaching in Philippine History?
Then, explain your answers.
1.
2.
3.
IV. DISCUSSION
PRIMARY SOURCE 1: “First Voyage Around the World” (“Primer Viaje en Torno
del Globo”)
Written by Antonio Pigafetta in one of the five ships that first circumnavigate the
world
It covers the time when Ferdinand Magellan’s fleet “Armada de Molucca” started
the voyage (1519) until it was successfully went back to Spain
The copies of this account was presented by Pigafetta to Pope Clement VII, King
Francis I’s mother, etc.
His original diary was lost and not known in what language it was written
Survived in 4 manuscript versions; 1 Italian (Carlo Amoretti) and 3 French
19
APRIL 8, 1521
Magellan went to Zubu (Cebu) and met Rajah Humabon
The rajah wanted to Magellan and his men to pay tribute to them but told his
translator Enrique that they are working for King of Spain and threatened him a
war
20
21
22
8. Economic life
agriculture, fishing, hunting, shipbuilding, foreign trades
9.Language
Baybayin
10. Burials
Normal people buried beside their house, Datu buried under a porch after a
four-day mourning
Mourning was accompanied by drinking
11. Witchcraft
Mancocolam, Hocloban, Manggagauay, Tigbalang, Patianac
23
24
The following contents of “Mga Gunita ng Himagsikan” were from the sixth chapter of
Nick Joquin’s “A Question of Heroes:”
Aguinaldo had a rich family (Carlos Aguinaldo and Trinidad Famy)
Aguinaldo studied at Colegio de San Juan de Letran but stopped because of
father’s death
Aguinaldo became Cabeza de Barangay of Binakayan (1895) because of
Maura Law
Aguinaldo became the first Capitan Municipal of Cavite Viejo (Kawit)
Participated in Masonry with the name “Colon” and in Katipunan with the
name “Magdalo”
Santiago Alvarez (from Noveleta) urged him to join Katipunan in Manila
(1895)
Aguinaldo led the Magdalo faction in Cavite.
He married Hilaria del Rosario of Imus in 1896.
“Capitan Municipal sa araw, Katipunan sa gabi”
25
26
It was read during the declaration of Philippine Independence on June 12, 1898 at
Kawit, Cavite
It’s declaration was accompanied by playing of the Philippine national anthem
composed by Julian Felipe through the band, “San Francisco de Malabon”
The declaration was signed by 97 Filipinos and an American official, Col. M.L.
Johnson
The text of declaration reminisced the start of 1896 Revolution in Caloocan and
the eight provinces who joined the Katipunan
“Sa huli, napagkasunduan ng lahat na ang Bayang ito, na malaya na mula sa
araw na ito, ay dapat gamitin ang watawat na dati nang ginagamit nito, na may
disenyo at kulay na inilalarawan sa inilakip na guhit: Ang tatlong panig na
makikita rito ay tiyak na sumasagisag sa puting tatsulok na simbolong
nagbibigay-pagkakakilanlan sa bantog na kapisanang “Katipunan,” na sa
pamamagitan ng sanduguan ay nagpasiklab sa pag-aalsa ng masa; ang tatlong
bituin na kumakatawan sa tatlong pangunahing isla ng Arkipelago – Luzon,
Mindanao, at Panay kung saan nagsimula ang mapanghimagsik na kapatiran;
ang araw na representasyon ng mga dambuhalang hakbang na isinagawa ng mga
anak ng bayan sa landas ng kaunlaran at kabihasnan; ang walong sinag na
sumisimbolo sa walong probinsiya–Manila, Cavite, Bulacan, Pampanga, Nueva
Ecija, Bataan, Laguna, at Batangas–na nagdeklara ng digmaan, nang unang
masindihan ang mitsa ng himagsikan; at ang mga kulay na bughaw, pula, at puti,
na lahat ay nagsisilbing paggunita sa watawat ng Estados Unidos sa Hilagang
Amerika, bilang pagpapakita ng malalim na pasasalamat sa Dakilang Bansa na
nagkaloob at nagkakaloob ng walang pag-iimbot na pagtatanggol. At sa ganang
ito, inihaharap ngayon itong watawat sa mga Ginoong nagtitipon.”
“Ypinanaog ang Bandera nacional dito sa bahay ng nasirang Dn. Maximo
Ynocencio, patungo sa bayan ng Cauit, o C. Viejo, p.a. proclamahin ang
aspiracion ng Yndep.a nitong Sangkapuluang Katagalugan o Filipinas, oras ng a
las cuatro at dalauang minuto ng hapon. Cavite a 12 Junio 1898.”
The document lost during the pilferage of historical documents in 1990s but
finally returned to National Library in 1994 through historian Milagros Guerrero.
27
28
29
30
31
V. EVALUATION
Create a Content and Contextual Analysis of each Primary Sources that presented
above using the Analysis Template made by your Instructor. Below are the sample
templates.
32
References
Printed materials:
Asuncion, N. M. & Ofalia, B. C. (2019). Readings in Philippine history. C & E
Publishing, Inc.
Links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7VoYbMNXP4&t=1792s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJW5ID1YhMQ&t=282s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFn6JeZGLK4&t=548s
http://malacanang.gov.ph/7013-andres-bonifacios-decalogue-and-the-kartilya-ng-
katipunan/
https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/xavier-university-ateneo-de-
cagayan/information-technology/summaries/filipino-grievances-against-governor-
wood/8856198/view
https://xiaochua.net/2013/03/26/xiao-time-21-march-2013-ang-mga-pamana-ni-emilio-
aguinaldo/
33
HIS100- Readings in
Philippine History
Learning Module
*Module 3
34
I. INTRODUCTION
“Readings in Philippine History” authors Nestor M. Asuncion and Geoffrey
Rhoel C. Cruz mentioned that nevertheless, Philippines has such rich colonial past as it
riddled with conflicting perspectives that paved the way for numerous controversies arise.
We can surmise that history is very a controversial area of Social Science in fact that it
deals with the deciphering of the past events happened. Basically, the study of history
may be contextualized in the principle that “as long as you go further (in terms of
historical timeframe) with the topic that you are studying, the lesser the primary sources
that you can gain as evidence.”
On the first place, Philippine history is full of controversial events that resulted
because of controversial acts of controversial personalities. Anyhow, these historical
controversies help people to demonstrate the ability to formulate arguments in favor or
against a particular issue using primary sources.
Module 3 analyzes the different controversies and conflicting views in Philippine
history through the use of primary and secondary sources as it synthesizes three historical
events in Philippine history that are considered to be controversial. It is a single historical
event but appeared to be in many conflicting views.
The author included only the three required controversial topics in Philippine
history by the Commission on Higher Education as indicated on their Curriculum/Course
Guide such as the Site of the First Mass, Cry of Balintawak or Pugad Lawin and
Retraction of Rizal.
35
III. PRE-ASSESSMENT
Identify the following:
__________________ 1. Katipunan leader who led the declaration of revolution
Against Spain?
__________________ 2. When is the death anniversary of Dr. Jose Rizal?
__________________ 3. How many provinces declares revolution against
Spain during 1896?
__________________ 4. Where was Dr. Jose Rizal executed?
__________________ 5. What was the punishment given to the GOMBURZA?
IV. DISCUSSION
Site of the First Mass
On April 1, 1521 (originally March 31), the first mass in the Philippines was
happened in “Mazaua.” Besides, Republic Act No. 2733 declared Barangay Magallanes
in Limasawa, Southern Leyte as the site of the first mass
In contrary, Dr. Sonia M. Zaide presented evidences that the site of the first mass was
not in Limasawa but in Masao, Butuan, Agusan del Norte.
In some ways, the site of the first mass was first mentioned by Maximillian
Transylvanus on his “De Moluccis…” in 1523 because he interviewed the survivors of
Magellan expedition. The survivors mentioned that they landed in “Messana” where the
first mass officiated.
Limasawa as site of the first mass Masao as site of the first mass
Carlo Amoretti (1800) of Gian Battista Ramusio (1536)
Ambrosiana Library said that wrote a chronicle about the
Mazaua where Magellan landed voyage of Magellan where he
before and the Limasawa insisted Butuan as the site of the
mentioned by Fr. Francisco first mass.
Combes are the same.
Sonia Zaide pointed-out the ff.:
Limasawa was supported by Fr. 1. As the place called “Mazaua,”
Pablo Pastells, Dr. Trinidad H. Limasawa has four syllables and
Pardo de Tavera, Jaime de Veyra begins with another letter, while
and James Alexander Robertson. Masao has conclusive syllable.
2. The expedition traveled 20-25
Fr. Francisco Colin wrote a book leagues from Homonhon. If they
36
*Saint James The Great Church, Bolinao, Pangasinan the first site? (A marker claims
that it 1324, Fray Odorico Pordenone from Friuli, Italy officiated the first Catholic mass
in the country)
37
In the case of “Cry” of Balintawak, Borromeo-Buehler pointed out that this “Cry”
commemorated the “Unang Laban,” the Katipunan encounter with a detachment of the
Guardia Civil on August 26, 1896.
On the other hand, the “Cry” of Pugad Lawin appeared for many controversies.
The name “Pugad Lawin” did not appear on any map of Caloocan at that time. In 1917,
Pio Valenzuela insisted that the Pagpupunit and Pasya were happened on the house of
Melchora Aquino in Pasong Tamo, Barrio Banlat, Caloocan (“Pacpac Lawin”). But on
1920’s Valenzuela restated that the two events happened at Juan Ramos’ house in Barrio
Bahay Toro, Caloocan (“Pugad Lawin”).
Moreover, Isagani Medina believed that Pagpupunit preceded the Pasya. But it
was not believed by many and insisted that Pagpupunit happened soon after the Pasya
had been taken, and in the same vicinity.
Allegedly, the Pagpupunit was happened on August 23, while Pasya was
happened on August 24 because of the following documents (Medina):
- Biak na Bato Constitution (1897)
- Carlos Ronquillo’s chronicles (1896)
- La Liga Filipina Monument, Tondo (1903)
- Santiago Alvarez’ memoirs (1927)
Where did the allegedly Pagpupunit (August 23) and Pasya (August 24) really happen?
Leading revolutionists went first to Poblacion, Caloocan after leaving Manila, and
then headed eastwards via Kangkong towards Pasong Tamo and eventually
Balara.
Some sources say they left Kangkong as early as August 23, whereas others say
they were still in Kangkong as late as August 26.
Three places where the Pagpupunit and Pasya was happened:
-Apolonio Samson’s house in Barrio Kangkong, Caloocan
-Melchora Aquino’s house in Pasong Tamo, Barrio Banlat, Caloocan
-Juan Ramos’s house in Barrio Bahay Toro, Caloocan
38
“Walang tigil ang ambon na humina at lumakas habang tinatahak ng Katipunan ang
malalawak at mapuputik na bukiran at parang.
Basaan ang mga damit, namimitig ang katawan sa malamig na simoy ng hangin. Pagal
at walang imik sa paglalakad.”
-Santiago Alvarez, 1896
39
*From the survey, Jim Richardson surmised that the KKK Veterans’ statements that the two
events happened in Kangkong, Caloocan was legitimate. Yet, Teodoro Agoncillo and Isagani
Medina considered the memoirs of Valenzuela because of his being an “eye witness.”
Teodoro Agoncillo wrote the book, “Revolt of the Masses” in 1956 that was
based fully on Valenzuela’s memoirs. He insisted that the Pagpupunit and Pasya were
happened on August 23, 1896 in Pugad Lawin particularly in Bahay Toro, Caloocan
(Juan Ramos’ house).
In 1983, “Pugad Lawin Historical Committee” was established who investigated
the “Cry” but did not find any fresh document that the “Cry” happened in other places. Its
investigation relayed to the National Historical Institute, then, a historical marker was
placed on Bahay Toro, Quezon City (alleged Pugad Lawin) on August 23, 1984.
However, in order to simplify the issue, Dr. Ambeth Ocampo suggested that it is
much better to be called as “Sigaw sa Caloocan” (Cry of Caloocan). In some ways, to
play safe, Prof. Xiao Chua suggested it to be called as “Unang Sigaw ng Himagsikan”
(First Cry of Revolution).
Retraction of Rizal
December 28, 1896
Archbishop of Manila Fr. Bernardino Nozaleda requested the Jesuit Professors of
Rizal in Ateneo Municipal to give him some spiritual consolation. Part of this was
to convince him to “retract” his Freemasonry linkages.
December 29, 1896
Fr. Balaguer went to Rizal on 11:00 AM together with Fray Jose Villaclara tried
to convince him to write a retraction paper. But still believing in the Holy
Scriptures, Rizal supposedly refused to retract his anti-Catholic views by
40
exclaiming: “Look, Fathers, if I should assent to all you say and sign all you want
me to, just to please you, neither believing nor feeling, I would be a hypocrite and
would then be offending God!”
But historians believed that Rizal had a deal with the friars that he will make a
retraction paper in return, they will allow him to marry with Josephine Bracken and to
produce a marriage certificate. Allegedly, friars agreed with this deal. After their
conversation, Fr. Balaguer reported to the Archbishop that the only hope to save the life
of Rizal was to retract.
At 2:00 PM, Rizal had talks with Fr. Estanislao March and Fr. Jose Villaclara
then, Fr. Balaguer returned to his cell at 3:30 PM to discuss (again) the retraction.
History did not know about the result of their second discussion.
Around 5:30 PM, Don Silvino Lopez Tuñon, the Dean of the Manila Cathedral,
accompanied by Frs. Balaguer, March and Villaclara to talk with Rizal and
exchange some views with him. Historians did not find any papers about their
conversation but one thing is for sure, this was about the retraction paper of Rizal.
Before he took his last supper, he had confessed to Fray Faura. Afterwards, an
amiable talk happened to Rizal and Manila’s Royal Audiencia Fiscal Don Gaspar
Cestaño at 9:30 PM.
Exactly 10:00 PM, Rizal and some Catholic friars worked on his retraction
papers. Fr. Balaguer allegedly brought a retraction draft to Rizal made by
Archbishop Nozaleda but Rizal did not like it because it was too long. Fray Pio
Pi, the Superior of Jesuit Mission in the Philippines, made a shorter retraction
paper that was liked by Rizal and signed it.
41
The retraction paper was also signed by two witnesses; Juan Del Presno, chief of
the Civil Guards who watched Rizal in Fort Santiago and Eloy Maure, adjutant of plaza
in Intramuros.
As stated by Father Balaguer, he was the one who married Rizal and Bracken
before his execution (6:00 AM of December 30, 1896).
Gregorio Zaide, said that Rizal’s assumed retraction and his supposed church
marriage with Josephine Bracken have been considered as a highly dubious by many
Rizal scholars until the present time.
Nevertheless, the alleged retraction paper “signed” by Rizal did not do anything.
Spanish military court became firm on its decision to sentence him to death by means of
firing squad as duly allowed by Governor General Camilo G. Polavieja.
The retraction paper was found in 1935. The issue on Rizal’s retraction was
proven because of a document that could be an “independent eye witness account,” the
spy records of Federico Moreno from the members of Cuerpo de Vigilancia Manila. This
Cuerpo were the Spanish spies stationed in prison cell of Rizal during his stay in
Intramuros.
42
43
V. EVALUATION
A. Complete the matrix below by stating your side/opinion in regards to these historical
controversies.
Where did the first mass Explain your side below Source/s of your
happened; Limasawa or answer/s
Masao? (Just state below
your choice)
Did Rizal retract; Yes or Explain your side below Source/s of your
No? (Just state below your answer/s
choice)
44
PUGAD
LAWIN
C. Research and enumerate three primary sources that can be the basis for analyzing
the below historical issues.
SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
1.
2.
3.
RETRACTION OF RIZAL
1.
2.
3.
45
References
Printed materials:
Asuncion, N. M. & Cruz, G. R. (2019). Readings in Philippine history. C & E
Publishing, Inc.
Halili, M. C. N. (20014). Philippine history (Second Edition). REX Bookstore.
Zaide, G. F. & Zaide, S. M. (1994). Jose Rizal: Life, works, and writings of a genius,
writer, scientist, and national hero (Second Edition). All-Nations Publishing Co.
Inc.
Links:
https://sites.google.com/site/katipunandocumentsandstudies/studies/notes-on-the-cry-of-
august-1896
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dtc9q_V8_hs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYzG6tbcYxk&t=2s
46
HIS100- Readings in
Philippine History
Learning Module
*Module 4
47
I. INTRODUCTION
Throughout history, Philippine context in terms of social, political, economic and
cultural were very susceptible in several issues. Likewise, these issues in terms of their
respective categories may be reckoned as “lessons” from the past that can be the guide
for the present and future issues that our country may face. In fact, issues are cannot be
debunk in every situation of our lives as Filipinos because first of all, it is in the
behavioral aspect of the Filipinos that they cannot avoid themselves to be inside the circle
of problems.
“History may repeat itself” based on a common and lay-man’s tongue. Yet, the
Dr. Ambeth Ocampo revised this infamous line with his version; “We repeat history.”
Indeed, for the past hundred years of the Philippines, many happenings before are
continuously and repeatedly happen at the present. These issues rise in a circular manner
and can be continuously and repeatedly occur for the next generation.
On the other hand, writers Nestor Asuncion and Geoffrey Rhoel Cruz mentioned
that these issues may be touted as products of the demands made by the Filipino people
throughout the existence of our sovereignty. Further, these issues must be given attention
by each administration with hope of achieving progress and maintaining order.
4th module will discuss the major issues in the Philippines in the context of
economic (agrarian reform), political (Philippine Constitution) and social (taxation).
These issues were the issues that shaped our history from the American occupation that
considered to be the era in the Philippine historiography as the start of Filipino
nationhood. Besides, this module may enumerate other issues in the Philippine history
that until the preset time occurs.
48
III. PRE-ASSESSMENT
Identify the main task and current situation of the following sectors in the Philippines:
1. Government-
2. Business industry-
3. Landowners-
4. Landless farmers-
IV. DISCUSSION
Agrarian Reform Policies from Commonwealth Period to the 5th Republic
Agrarian Reform is a government system that is concern with the relation between
production and distribution of land among farmers. It may also be considered as the
processing of raw materials that are produced by farming the land from the respective
industries.
During American period, the following were implemented as springboard for
Agrarian Reform:
Philippine Bill of 1902 (set the ceiling on the hectares of private land with 16 hec.
and corporations with 1,024 hec.)
Land Registration of 1902 (registration of private lands through Torrens Title
System)
Cadastral Act (need of certification/title as registered land)
Homestead Program of 1903 (tenants were allowed to enterprise with 16 hec. of
farm)
Friars Land Act of 1904 (lease and sale of friars lands during Spanish period)
Quezon’s Administration
Rice Share Tenancy Act of 1936 (50-50 tenant-landlord relation)
Regulation of 10% interest
49
No dismissal of tenants
Contract for 1 year only
Japanese Occupation
HUKBALAHAP controlled Central Luzon
Peasants earned fixed rental of lands
Roxas Administration
Tenant Act (70-30 landlord-tenant and regulated shared tenancy)
No dismissal of tenants
Ramon Magsaysay
Agriculture Tenancy Act of 1954 (tenure of tenants-land owners)
Land Reform Act of 1955 (rice and corn land distribution over 200 hec. for
farmers and other corporations)
Macapagal Administration
Agricultural Land Reform Code (private land distribution to farmers on easy term
payment)
Retention limit of 75 hec.
Exemption rule of big companies and transfer of landlordism
Marcos Administration
Agrarian Reform Special Fund Act (Republic Act No. 6390)
Tenant Emancipation Act (operational land transfer)
Presidential Decree No. 27 (7 hec. up sell)
Created the Department of Agrarian Reform
50
Aquino Administration
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988 (promotes social justice and
owner-cultivatorship of economic-sized farms)
Philippine Constitutions
1. Biak na Bato Constitution (1897 Constitution), first informal constitution of the
Philippines
2. Malolos Constitution (1899 Constitution, first formal constitution of the
Philippines
3. 1935 Constitution (Commonwealth Constitution)
4. 1943 Constitution (Puppet Constitution)
5. 1973 Constitution (Martial Law Constitution)
6. 1986 Constitution (Freedom Constitution)
7. 1987 Constitution (Anti-Marcos Constitution)
*1935 Constitution
Legal basis of Commonwealth Republic under the American Government
Featured “Bicameral Legislator” in the Philippine Legislative (Senate and
Congress)
Gave President and Vice President four-year term without re-election
Started the “Suffrage” in the Philippines (21+ male and extended to women)
*1973 Constitution
Also known as the “Martial Law Constitution”
Established Parliamentary Government with Prime Minister and a President
Gave the legislative powers to a Unicameral National Assembly elected by the
people
Legalized all decrees, proclamations and orders by the president
*1987 Constitution
Also known as “Anti-Marcos Constitution”
51
Philippine Taxation
Taxation considered as the “Lifeblood of the government” as it covers the raising
of revenue. It is one of the three powers of state aside from “Power of Eminent Domain”
and “Police Power.”
Nonetheless, it is the simplest way to identify the collection of “Taxes” (amount
of money that a government requires people to pay according to their income that is used
for government projects).
52
At present, Philippine tax laws are based on the National Revenue Code, as
revised with the passage of the Tax Reform Act of 1997 and the Tax Reform for
Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) Law in 2017.
53
V. EVALUATION
A. Answer the question below as much as you can. Expound your answers in order to
elaborate your side.
Consider yourself as a landowner of a ten-hectare agricultural land. Would it be fair for
you if parts of your land were to be distributed to farmers in the implementation of the
agrarian reform law? Justify your answers.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
B. Compare the salient provisions of the different constitutions in the Philippines.
Categories Malolos 1935 1973 1987
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Form of
government
Provisions on
civil liberties
Provisions on
taxation
Provisions on
Political
dynasty
54
RESPONSE # 1
RESPONSE # 2
ANALYSIS
55
References
Printed materials:
Asuncion, N. M. & Cruz, G. R. (2019). Readings in Philippine history. C & E
Publishing, Inc.
Links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I1H3a8SP_M&t=1015s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec1m6AMfWgs
56
HIS100- Readings in
Philippine History
Learning Module
*Module 5
57
I. INTRODUCTION
The study of history is very broad, in fact that history consists of several stories of
people, places, things and events happened in the past. Basically, the content of
traditional way of teaching history in elementary and secondary education basically
grounded with the “national history” that depicts the topics from Pre-colonial Philippines
until the present administration.
On the other hand, many historians claimed that before we understand history in
“national perspective,” we must first understand the history of our own place in order to
appreciate more the history of the entire country. National Historical Commission of the
Philippines created in 1995 a handbook for provincial historical committees that aimed to
have further research and study the local histories in the country.
In this module, students will gain the idea on how the historical research in terms
of local history may do using the guidelines/outline of NHI for local history writing. This
may align to the main concept of the last chapter that the curriculum/course guide for
“Readings in Philippine History” as it deals with the promotion of local history in rely
with oral history, museums, historical shrines, indigenous practices, rituals etc.
Moreover, the author of this module gave personal definitions on the mentioned
entities for clarification. Local history defined as the history of specific area (e.g., barrio,
town, province), Oral history somehow considered as the history passed from generation
to generation and came only from testimonies of elders. Likewise, NHCP mandated the
most well-preserved museums in the country, while Historical shrines recognized by
NHCP with their historical markers.
58
III. PRE-ASSESSMENT
Identify the following:
1. When was the year of your town’s establishment?
2. Who was the first municipal mayor of your town?
3. How many barangays are there in your town?
4. Who named after your street?
5. What is the largest barangay in your town?
IV. DISCUSSION
OUTLINE FOR A LOCAL HISTORY RESEARCH
Part One: NAME AND IDENTITY
Name of barangay/town/city/province
A. Present official name
B. Native name (its derivation)
C. Changes in the name and derivation
D. Origin
a. date of establishment
b. name of founders
c. names of first inhabitants
59
e. laws
f. enjoyments
D. Industries
a. native names
b. description
E. Intellectual life
a. arts
b. sciences
c. literature
60
c. fortuitous events
Historical personages
A. Prominent people
B. Notorious criminals
C. Barangay/Town/Province officials
a. names
b. dates of terms of office
c. accomplishments
61
B. People’s reaction
C. Arrival of Japanese in the locality
Historical events
A. Political events
B. Economic conditions
C. Social conditions
D. Fortuitous events
Historical personages
A. People who affected by the war
B. Notorious criminals
C. Barangay/Town/Province officials
a. names
b. dates of terms of office
c. accomplishments
62
V. EVALUATION
A. Identify three tourist attractions from your town and search for its exact location,
historical background and significance.
Tourist Spot Exact location Historical background Significance
1.
2.
3.
B. Through 5-10 sentences for each item, interview your parents in terms of the
historical development of your barangay from their childhood years until the present in
terms of:
1. POLITICS
2. AGRICULTURE
3. INDUSTRY/BUSINESS
63
Reference
Printed Material:
National Historical Institute (1995). Handbook for provincial historical committees.
Manila.
64
VISION
An outstanding higher education institution in the nation with provision of
excellent education and quality service.
MISSION
To strive for excellence in Agriculture and other allied disciplines; and, to provide
for and address ever-changing educational needs and services for those seeking to expand
their intellectual horizons.
OBJECTIVES
1. Ensure that graduates are provided with knowledge, skills, competence and moral
values that lead to productive careers both in private and public sectors and the
readiness to face future employment challenges in both national and international
industries making them contributors to national progress.
2. Develop and maintain personnel with competence, knowledge, skills and passion
for the translation of education and other services through application of different
academic, research, extension and training programs of the College.
3. Empower students and personnel by leading in the provision of education and
enhancement of technologies in its distinctive learning environment and extend
such environment beyond the boundaries of the College.
4. Advance the general welfare of its students and personnel at best.
5. Further expand networks and pursue partnerships and collaborations with
stakeholders and organizations especially the local and national government for
enhancement of resources.
6. Preserve a scholarly community conducive to learning by providing quality
laboratories; adequate classrooms; state-of-the-art e-learning systems; modern
libraries, buildings and ICT equipment; and clean and green surroundings.
7. Implement more vigorous resource generation projects and consequently boost
and constantly increase the income of the College towards self-sufficiency.
8. Implement and maintain administrative efficiency and a transparent financial
management system.
65