Arch

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Breaking down the connection between Religion and Arcuated

Construction in India
By Diya Banerjee

Methodology: Comparison between historic fact and commonly believed narrative which is
contradictory to the former and coming up with a narrative establishing the chronological
continuity.

As we all know, Arch, as a construction technique was not known to Indians in its true form till early
medieval period. The technique of constructing a true arch came to India with Islamic invasion in 10-
11th Century and eventually it flourished into a much decorative form. This historical fact, however,
is being challenged in recent years, mostly in Social media, by people with less knowledge and more
religious zeal. The argument, however, is old. We had Chaitya ‘Arches’, which resembles Horse-shoe
shaped arch, in our country long before the Islamic invasion. So, the knowledge of ‘Arch’ building
must have been existed since then.

The reason for choosing a narrative about a structural system instead of one isolated building for
this paper is, an incident in which I was questioned and countered to ‘prove’ that Arch was really a
contribution of Islamic world. At that point, I truly had felt the need of a narrative which will be
easily understood by layman and students alike. So here it goes, it is a narrative regarding Arcuated
construction system in India, before and after Islamic invasion.

First, let us understand what an Arch is and what are the different types.

Arch. Noun\ ˈärch \

Definition of arch:

1. a typically curved structural member spanning an opening and serving as a support (as for
the wall or other weight above the opening)

(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arch)

Let us also understand how Arch functions as a structural system and why it is unique.
Fundamentally, in an Arcuated construction the structure's entire tensile stress caused by the
weight of the superstructure are transformed into compressive stress.

Why was this system developed? As all of us are aware of,


the simplest and the commonest construction system
across the ancient world was ‘Post and Lintel’ or
trabeated system. But the major downside that it had
was, larger the span, thicker became the lintel. And it
reached its breaking point soon because of its sheer dead
weight. Therefore, to achieve a longer span, another
system was needed. Since lintels broke down under

Page | 1
Diya Banerjee
tensile stress, the new system countered it with total compression.

Predecessor of the true arcuated system: In ancient world, almost all the civilizations had
discovered a system which was more efficient in taking the load in longer span than the post and
lintel system. This method is known as Corbelling. Indus-Saraswati Civilisation, Ancient Mayans,
Etruscans all were aware of this technique. But this was not a ‘True’ arch, since it didn’t comply with
the structural definition of an Arch.

Example of Arches in India before the introduction of


[Image courtesy : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbel_arch]
Figure 1: A Corebelled Arch
True Arch :

1. Corbelled Arches in Harappa : Many large covered drains


were constructed with corbelled arches. These drains ran
beneath streets and lanes and were large enough for
workmen to enter and clear any obstruction.
2. Barrel Vaulted Wooden roofs in Vedic villages and towns :
As per the eminent Architectural historian Percy Brown, Vedic
residential units initially were circular in plan. The roofs were
thatched with leaves. But it was difficult to bunch them in a
group to form a multi-roomed house, so the plan got
modified to an oval and then eventually became a rectangle
with a barrel-vaulted roof. Structural component of this roof
was made of bent bamboo or timber. Both ends of the ‘Arch’ was tied by a chord, much like
a bow. So the member which looks like an ‘Arch’, is actually under tensile stress. So
categorically, though it might appear to look like an arch, it is not one. This kind of vaulted
structure then had liner cross members tied with them and then thatched. As all of them
were constructed with perishable materials, none of these examples survive today. But we
still have the evidence of their existence by two means A. The reliefs on contemporary stone
structures, . Eg. the reliefs on the Toranas of Sanchi Stupa B. The stone Constructions of
that era which imitated the wooden prototypes. Eg. the rock-cut Chaityagrihas like Karle and
Bhaja.

Bent Bamboo/ timber member

Tensile stress

Figure 2: Structural system of rectangular vedic huts

Image source: Indian architecture: (Buddhist and Hindu


periods) by Brown, Percy,1959

Page | 2
Diya Banerjee
Image 2 : Karla Caves, Imitation of wooden barrel vault
Image 1 : Vedic townscape on Sanchi Stupa Torana
3. The Kala-Makara Torana of Hindu temples and the Bell-and-Garland motif of Jain Temple
entrances :
Since Hindu/ Jain construction techniques followed the trabeated method, it was imperative
that to reduce the span they needed brackets. These brackets took different decorative
forms in different temples. Hindu temples almost always had two ‘Makaras’ or Mythical
beings from whose mouth the brackets appeared and Jain temples usually followed an
alternate course of temple bell and garland.

Image 3 & 4 : Bell and garland brackets

Image 5 & 6 : Ornate brackets coming out of mouth of Makara

4. Corbelled arches which looked like a true arch : In the early days of Islamic invasion, Arches
were made to look like a true arch to fulfill the design requirement. We see this in all the
early Islamic constructions like – Adhai-din-ka jhopda, Qwuaat-ul-Islam mosque, Iltutmish
Tomb etc. True arch was constructed for the first time in 1287 in the tomb of Ghiyasuddin
Balban, a ruler of the slave dynasty.

Page | 3
Diya Banerjee
Figure 3: Corbelled Arch vs. True Arch [Image courtesy : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbel_arch]

Image 7: Corbelled arch at Sultan Garhi, with the Image 8: 1st true arch construction at Balban’s tomb, Circa 1287
inside chiselled out to give an impression of true arch
As a researcher, this exploration has helped myself
establish a chronological understanding of the arcuated construction system in India. This research
spans over a time period of 3000 years, which, pedagogically, is always divided in multiple semesters
(Harappa – Ancient Civilisations, Chaityagriha : Hindu and Buddhist Architecture and early mosques
in Indo-islamic architecture). The knowledge flow, thus, also becomes fragmented. This narrative
was an initiative to create a continuity in terms of understanding the development of a particular
construction system throughout the history.

Page | 4
Diya Banerjee
References

1. Brown, Percy. 1950. Indian Architecture (Buddhist and Hindu)Volume 1. D.B. Taraporevala,

2. Brown, Percy. 1959. Indian Architecture (Islamic)Volume 2. D.B. Taraporevala,

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbel_arch

4. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arch

Page | 5
Diya Banerjee

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy