Arch
Arch
Arch
Construction in India
By Diya Banerjee
Methodology: Comparison between historic fact and commonly believed narrative which is
contradictory to the former and coming up with a narrative establishing the chronological
continuity.
As we all know, Arch, as a construction technique was not known to Indians in its true form till early
medieval period. The technique of constructing a true arch came to India with Islamic invasion in 10-
11th Century and eventually it flourished into a much decorative form. This historical fact, however,
is being challenged in recent years, mostly in Social media, by people with less knowledge and more
religious zeal. The argument, however, is old. We had Chaitya ‘Arches’, which resembles Horse-shoe
shaped arch, in our country long before the Islamic invasion. So, the knowledge of ‘Arch’ building
must have been existed since then.
The reason for choosing a narrative about a structural system instead of one isolated building for
this paper is, an incident in which I was questioned and countered to ‘prove’ that Arch was really a
contribution of Islamic world. At that point, I truly had felt the need of a narrative which will be
easily understood by layman and students alike. So here it goes, it is a narrative regarding Arcuated
construction system in India, before and after Islamic invasion.
First, let us understand what an Arch is and what are the different types.
Definition of arch:
1. a typically curved structural member spanning an opening and serving as a support (as for
the wall or other weight above the opening)
(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arch)
Let us also understand how Arch functions as a structural system and why it is unique.
Fundamentally, in an Arcuated construction the structure's entire tensile stress caused by the
weight of the superstructure are transformed into compressive stress.
Page | 1
Diya Banerjee
tensile stress, the new system countered it with total compression.
Predecessor of the true arcuated system: In ancient world, almost all the civilizations had
discovered a system which was more efficient in taking the load in longer span than the post and
lintel system. This method is known as Corbelling. Indus-Saraswati Civilisation, Ancient Mayans,
Etruscans all were aware of this technique. But this was not a ‘True’ arch, since it didn’t comply with
the structural definition of an Arch.
Tensile stress
Page | 2
Diya Banerjee
Image 2 : Karla Caves, Imitation of wooden barrel vault
Image 1 : Vedic townscape on Sanchi Stupa Torana
3. The Kala-Makara Torana of Hindu temples and the Bell-and-Garland motif of Jain Temple
entrances :
Since Hindu/ Jain construction techniques followed the trabeated method, it was imperative
that to reduce the span they needed brackets. These brackets took different decorative
forms in different temples. Hindu temples almost always had two ‘Makaras’ or Mythical
beings from whose mouth the brackets appeared and Jain temples usually followed an
alternate course of temple bell and garland.
4. Corbelled arches which looked like a true arch : In the early days of Islamic invasion, Arches
were made to look like a true arch to fulfill the design requirement. We see this in all the
early Islamic constructions like – Adhai-din-ka jhopda, Qwuaat-ul-Islam mosque, Iltutmish
Tomb etc. True arch was constructed for the first time in 1287 in the tomb of Ghiyasuddin
Balban, a ruler of the slave dynasty.
Page | 3
Diya Banerjee
Figure 3: Corbelled Arch vs. True Arch [Image courtesy : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbel_arch]
Image 7: Corbelled arch at Sultan Garhi, with the Image 8: 1st true arch construction at Balban’s tomb, Circa 1287
inside chiselled out to give an impression of true arch
As a researcher, this exploration has helped myself
establish a chronological understanding of the arcuated construction system in India. This research
spans over a time period of 3000 years, which, pedagogically, is always divided in multiple semesters
(Harappa – Ancient Civilisations, Chaityagriha : Hindu and Buddhist Architecture and early mosques
in Indo-islamic architecture). The knowledge flow, thus, also becomes fragmented. This narrative
was an initiative to create a continuity in terms of understanding the development of a particular
construction system throughout the history.
Page | 4
Diya Banerjee
References
1. Brown, Percy. 1950. Indian Architecture (Buddhist and Hindu)Volume 1. D.B. Taraporevala,
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbel_arch
4. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arch
Page | 5
Diya Banerjee