Kamle 2013
Kamle 2013
Kamle 2013
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Anthracnose is recognized as the most important disease of field and post-harvest disease of mango
Received 26 March 2013 worldwide. It has affected the fruit production in all countries where mangoes are grown, particularly
Received in revised form where high humidity prevails during the cropping session. Severe lesions along with black spots on
6 April 2013
leaves, inflorescence and fruits on mango (Magnifera indica L.) were observed during routine survey at
Accepted 9 April 2013
Available online 29 April 2013
several sites with mango trees in Eastern Uttar Pradesh indicating the occurrence of anthracnose disease.
The pathogen was isolated from several infected samples and matched characteristics of Colletotrichum
Keywords: gloeosporioides Penz. and Sacc. by microscopic, cultural studies and on the basis of spore formation. Pure
Mangifera indica L. cultures of C. gloeosporioides were maintained and further identification of this pathogen was conducted
Anthracnose
using the internal transcribed spacer region of the known C. gloeosporioides rDNA region 5.8S. Sequence
C. gloeosporioides
similarity of the collected isolates was 100% with some C. gloeosporioides isolates and phylogenetic
rDNA Phylogenetic
analysis also showed the close relationship. Although there are many prior reports on anthracnose
disease on mango in India, confirmation of this disease on mango from isolates in India is confirmed by
sequence analysis for the first time.
& 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1878-8181/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2013.04.001
286 M. Kamle et al. / Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2 (2013) 285–287
(Talhinhas et al., 2011). This study identified the fungus responsible reference id no.—HM102505 for C. gloeosporioides from mango
for fruit anthracnose in mango and its sequence homology with the anthracnose.
other countries' isolates of anthracnose based phylogenetic analysis In agarose gel 560 bp amplicons were observed in all the eleven
by using multiple sequence alignments tools. isolates of C. gloeosporioides cultures from the leaves samples
During a routine survey of mango growing areas of Eastern while no amplicon was visualized in control (Fig. 2). The amplicon
Uttar Pradesh symptoms of anthracnose disease were observed. (560 bp) obtained from the symptomatic samples, from one of the
The incidence of the disease within crops was significant (30–50%) isolate bands showing the highest pathogenicity, was gel purified
and symptoms consisted of lesion and black spots on leaf, and complete sequencing using ITS1 and ITS4 primers from both
inflorescence, apical tip and fruits (Fig. 1). The characteristic the direction for accuracy is performed.
symptoms of the diseased plants indicate the possibility of BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) analysis was performed
anthracnose disease. Microscopic study was performed by the for HM102505, which shows 100% identity with the C. gloeosporioides
isolated pure pathogen culture and on the basis of the spore affecting other subtropical fruits. The sequence HM102505 is highly
identification it was confirmed that the isolated pathogen from identical to other C. gloeosporioides which were reported from USA,
mango leaf, fruit or stem is C. gloeosporioides (Mullar, 1940). Later, China and Thailand to cause anthracnose disease on different fruits as
genomic DNA from the isolated plant pathogen is isolated using hosts. During sequence similarity of HM102505 for C. gloeosporioides
the Fast DNA Extraction Kit (MP Bio, Inc.) following the manufac- isolates from mango in India through Genomatix dialing programme
turer's instructions. Genomic DNA is visualized under UV light on with the selected identical isolate from the GenBank, 100% similarity
0.8% (w/v) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and stored was recorded with AY266390 isolate of C. gloeosporioides reported
at –20 1C. The ITS rDNA region includes ITS1, 5.8S and ITS4 primers from Thailand on Herbaceous plants. Lower similarities of selected
which were used to amplify 11 isolates of C. gloeosporioides sequence were found with HM146134, DQ062671, HM53032,
selected from different places using the universal primers ITS1/ HM575231, HM575260, AY266379, AY266373, EF423519 and AY2
ITS4 (White et al., 1990). Each PCR reaction contained 1 PCR 66389 i.e. 89%. Phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequence of
buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 mM of each primer, HM102505 for C. gloeosporioides isolate with selected isolates from
0.7U of Taq DNA polymerase (Biochem) and 1 ml (30 ng) of Genbank which were all at least 90% identical, was performed using
template DNA. The PCR reaction mix was adjusted to a final the molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) version 4.0 soft-
volume of 25 ml with nuclease free water. PCR amplifications were ware (Tamura et al., 2007). The analysis revealed 100% homology to
performed on a Thermal Cycler (Eppendorf, India Limited). The the C. gloeosporioides mango isolate (AY266390) from Thailand and
program consisted of an initial step of 1 min at 94 1C for 1 min,
followed by 30 cycles of 60 s at 94 1C, 2 min at 58 1C, and 60 s at
72 1C; and a final extension step of 5 min at 72 1C. PCR products
were analyzed in 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide
and visualized under UV light. 100-bp DNA ladder was used as
a molecular weight marker (Biochem). The sequencing reactions
were performed in an ABI prism sequencer (ABI Advanced
Biotechnological Institute, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Foster City,
USA). 602 bp consensus sequences without ambiguities were
obtained from the sequence of isolates of C. gloeosporioides from Fig. 2. Amplification of PCR products in maintained cultures from mango leaves.
mango which are deposited at NCBI GenBank under Accession (M—ladder, 01–11: C. gloeosporioides and lane N: Negative control).
Fig. 1. (a) Black spot on leaf of mango, (b) on apical tip of mango, (c) symptoms of anthracnose on mango fruits, (d) pure culture of C. gloeosporioides and (e) spores of
C. gloeosporioides.
M. Kamle et al. / Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2 (2013) 285–287 287
29 60 DQ062671_Glomerella_USA
HM146134_C.g._China
25 AY266389_C.g._Thailand
75 EF423519_Glomerella_USA
HM102505 _Present study isolate
100 AY266390 _C. gloeosporioides
0.002
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree constructed by using Clustal W algorithm and MEGA 4.2 version with ITS region sequences retrieved randomly from the Genbank along with the
present study isolate.
high homology with the other reported isolates of C. gloeosporioides Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. By random amplified polymorphic DNA
(Fig. 3). Thus, on the basis of the sequence similarity and phylogenetic analysis. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9, 4009–4013.
Kumar, P., Misra, A.K., Modi, D.R., 2011. Current status of mango malformation in
analysis it was confirmed that mango anthracnose disease in India is India. Asian J. Plant Sci. 10, 01–23.
caused by C. gloeosporioides. From India, the existence of anthracnose Leu, L.S., Chang, C.W., 1985. Histological study of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on
disease of mango has been confirmed by serological and RAPD grape fruit. Plant Prot. Bull. (Taiwan) 27, 11–18.
Mullar, H.R.A., 1940. Survey of the most important mango disease in Dutch East
analyses (Gupta et al., 2010) but to the best of our knowledge no Indies. Meded Alg. Proefstt. Linab. Bataivia 40, 9.
prior information is available at sequence level phylogenetic analysis Pandey, A., Yadava, L.P., Misra, R.K., Pandey, B.K., Muthukumar, M., Chauhan, U.K.,
of C. gloeosporioides from India. 2012a. Studies on the incident and pathogenesis of Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides penz. causes anthracnose of mango. Int. J. Sci. Nat. 3, 220–232.
Pandey, A., Pandey, B.K., Muthukumar, M., Yadava, L.P., Chauhan, U.K., 2012b.
Histopathological study of infection process of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Acknowledgments Penz and Sacc. on Mangifera indica L. Plant Pathol. J. 11, 18–24.
Ploetz, R., 1999. Anthracnose: the most important disease in much of the mango
producing world. News Lett. Plant Pathol. 3, 1–6.
The authors are thankful to Director, Central Institute for Prakash, O., 1996. Prescribed diseases of mango causes and control, Advances in
Subtropical Horticulture (ICAR), Rehmankhera, Lucknow, India, Diseases of Crops in India. Kalyani Publisher, Ludhiana191–256.
for providing necessary research facilities and fund during the Talhinhas, P., Mota-Capitao, C., Martins, S., Ramos, A.P., Neves-Martins, J., Guerra-
Guimara~es, L., Va´rzea, V., Silva, M.C., Sreenivasaprasad, S., Oliveira, H., 2011.
course of investigations. Epidemiology histopathology and aetiology of olive anthracnose caused by
Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides in Portugal. Plant Pathol. 60,
References 483–495.
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., Kumar, S., 2007. MEGA 4: Molecular Evolutionary
Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Bio. Evol. 24, 1596–1599.
Charles, A.O., Osunlaja, S.O., Owuru, O.O., Sosanya, O.S., 2012. Mango fruit anthrac- White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., Taylor, J.W., 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing
nose and the effects on mango yield and market values in Southwestern of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H.,
Nigeria. Asian J. Agric. Res. 6, 171–179. Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J. (Eds.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and
Coates, L.M., Muirhead, L.F., Irwin, J.A.G., Gowanlock, D.H., 1993. Initial infection Applications. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp. 315–322.
processes by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on avocado fruit. Mycol. Res. 97, Xiao, C.L., MacKenzie, S.J., Legard, D.E., 2004. Genetic and pathogenic analyses of
1363–1370. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides from strawberry and noncultivated hosts.
Dodd, J.C., Prusky, D., Jeffries, P., 1997. Fruit diseases. In: Litz, R.E. (Ed.), The Mango: Phytopath 94, 446–453.
Botany, Production and Uses. CAB International, UK, pp. 257–280.
Gupta, V.K., Pandey, A., Kumar, P., Pandey, B.K., Gaur, R.K., Bajpai, V., Sharma, N.,
Sharma, S., 2010. Genetic characterization of mango anthracnose pathogen