1. The petitioners argue that Section 44 of Republic Act No. 8189 undermines the constitutional independence of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and COMELEC's authority to appoint and transfer its own officials and employees.
2. For a law to validly classify individuals, the classification must be germane to the purpose of the law, not be limited to existing conditions only, and apply equally to all members of the same class.
3. The petitioners seek a writ of preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order to prevent the implementation of Section 44 of RA 8189, which they argue is unconstitutional.
1. The petitioners argue that Section 44 of Republic Act No. 8189 undermines the constitutional independence of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and COMELEC's authority to appoint and transfer its own officials and employees.
2. For a law to validly classify individuals, the classification must be germane to the purpose of the law, not be limited to existing conditions only, and apply equally to all members of the same class.
3. The petitioners seek a writ of preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order to prevent the implementation of Section 44 of RA 8189, which they argue is unconstitutional.
1. The petitioners argue that Section 44 of Republic Act No. 8189 undermines the constitutional independence of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and COMELEC's authority to appoint and transfer its own officials and employees.
2. For a law to validly classify individuals, the classification must be germane to the purpose of the law, not be limited to existing conditions only, and apply equally to all members of the same class.
3. The petitioners seek a writ of preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order to prevent the implementation of Section 44 of RA 8189, which they argue is unconstitutional.
1. The petitioners argue that Section 44 of Republic Act No. 8189 undermines the constitutional independence of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and COMELEC's authority to appoint and transfer its own officials and employees.
2. For a law to validly classify individuals, the classification must be germane to the purpose of the law, not be limited to existing conditions only, and apply equally to all members of the same class.
3. The petitioners seek a writ of preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order to prevent the implementation of Section 44 of RA 8189, which they argue is unconstitutional.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
REMEDIOS R. QUIZON, LORETA E. ATILANO L. ISAAC, CORAZON L. J.
EN BANC VERGARA, MELECIA M. ASTRERA, PEPITO, LUCILA S. PINEDA, ROCHE B.
VICENTA R. SAMANTE, HELEN M. CERRO, JOCELYN KL. LIBUT, REMBERTO CUENTO-BUENDICHO, ANICIA V. L. GUTIERREZ, NAZARIO A. TRASMONTE, G.R. No. 129118 July 19, 2000 MORALES, RISALINA C. GONZALES, REYNALDO O. MACARAT, FLORENCIA M. ROSARIO CHARITO R. PABELLON, MALIBAGO, IMELDA G. TUYAY, JUAN A. AGRIPINO A. DE GUZMAN, JR., NARCISO LOLITA L. MALADAGA, MAXIMO A. GIBA, JR., JOSE M. CAPACITE, ARCITA M. M. ARABE, LETICIA T. ENDOMA, GLINDO, WILFREDO A. RODELAS, CELSO GARCIA, ANGEL G. DACUNO, RITA M. ARISTIDES A. RAMOS, PANCHO M. O. ROGO, RAMON C. VALENCIA, FELIPE BEDIANG, RENATO L. CANDIDO, RIVERA, TERESITA A. DE CASTRO, R. FRANDO, ADEN B. DUNGO, OFELIA N. NESTORIO B. BOCO, JONATHAN C. CANDIDA C. HABANA, AZUCENA C. QUIBEN, LIGAYA S. VALENZUELA, AMBIDA, MONICA MACABARE, BENITO A. FALCON, MARIA LUZ P. CAEDO, EUNICE S. FAMILARIN, MARCELA DE MONTALLANA, CLOTILDE C. APURA- YOLANDA V. RIO, RUBEN S. ANIEVAS, LEON, ADELA M. JAMILLA, RENY ABLES, VALDEMORO, CIRIACO J. ARCENO, LELISA L. SANCHEZ, VILLARDO A. ADELA E. FABERES, ALICIA P. PABLO L. FORMARAN, JR., PROSPERO S. TRINIDAD, ENRIQUE CH. ZUNIGA, BALDOMAR, EDNA C. GARCIA, ANGELINA OLMEDO, IGNACIO V. CASCANO, ROMEO A. GONZALES, CASIANO G. V. GARRIDO, ELOISA P. TORRENO, SERAFIN L. CLUTARIO, ARTURO L. DIN, ATUEL, JR., GEMMA L. BANARES, CHARITO M. LACAMENTO, CLARENCIA M. JUCHITA C. SY, RODOLFO L. ASUERO, PERFECTO T. CAMPOS, ARNULFO A. AQUINO, HILDA DIMALANTA, ELSIE PIO T. PORTES, MARILOU F. TAMAYO, AGUILAR, RUDOLPH R. MELON, SIBAL, PURIFICACION TANGONAN, MILAGROS P. LAMBINO, ESTANISLAO A. MAGDALENA M. LAO, MARINA GERONA, AMELITA FERNANDEZ, TEDDY C. ESPINA, RENERIO D. ENGO, FERNANDO FLORIANA O. DE GUIA, EMETERIO B. MARIANO, LORETO SANGGALANG, A. MOSCARE, CONCHITA A. PICARDAL, BRUCAL, NILDA C. CONCHA, YOLANDA P. GERARDO GONZALES, FEDERICO ELIAS T. TURLA, BONIFACIO T. LIM, FERMA, TEOTISTA C. ANGKIKO, ONATE, JR., ARTURO BALIGNASAY, JOSEFINA A. AGUILAR, ANTONIO O. FRANCISCO V. TRIAS, JENELYN E. FELIX M. CABARIOS, JR., NORBERTO TEPACE, GAVINO S. ASOTES, RENE P. ESTERNON, MILAGROS M. ABELLAR, PUNZALAN, JAIME G. ALCANTARA, MAGBUTAY, NICOLAS C. UY, JR., JESUS ALICIA T. MOJICA, ELVIRA E. BAYBAY, ERNESTO VILLANUEVA, ESTANISLAO B. LAVA, SENORA C. CALAGOS, RAFAEL PRICILLA P. GOLFO, ELISEA M. HIERCO, SANCHEZ, ADORACION L. PINEDA, A. PAYOD, MACARIO L. CIEGO, TERESITA L. DIMACUHA, MYRNA LUCILA S. DUNGCA, ADELAIDA B. SALVADOR T. CRUZ, VIRGINIA V. BESAS, GUILLERMO, GRACIANO R. SAMELA, JR., LAOIJINDANUM, ROLANDO A. BALUYUT, RAUL S. FIGUERDA, EDGAR R. DELOS NIMFA M. LAGASCA, JOSEFINA P. FRANCISCO M. DAVID, LEONELLE S. REYES, TERESO R. ROSEL, JOSE J. JARENO, NORMA V. ORDENES, MENDOZA, MA. LUZ A. BASILIO, NESTOR MABANGUE, PRIMO D. PALOMO, JOHN C. FRANCISCO T. SERVANDO, VIOLETA M. J. TIMBANG, HILDA P. DIZON, EMMANUEL YANGZON, ROMULO D. JABON, FIDENCIO ANONUEVO, ALFREDO O. BAYANI, MARIO E. IGNACIO, RAMON S. ABELLA, Z. LA TORRE, JR., LETICIA R. J. RAMOS, EME FEROLINO, LEONIDES P. JOSELITO MATIAS, HEZEQUIAS B. MACARIOLA, CARLOS P. VARELA, JR., COMIA, MILAGROS E. GENEBLAZO, GALANG, ERLINDA C. ZAPATA, IMELDA R. ANTONIO L. PEDRAZA, SALVACION A. LORNA L. MENORCA, REYNALDO DE LA MANALASTAS, PEDRO L. PALO, AURECIO LAMBAN, LINO L. JAPSON, EUNIA H. CRUZ, ROMULO A. FAZ, LIMUEL G. GADO, C. TRASPE, JOSEPHINE GALANG, VACAL, ANTONIO F. VALDEZ, NATIVIDAD REY G. FABELLA, DOMINGUITO G. FLORINDA R. MADULID, MAGDALENA W. E. PRADO, LORENZO C. MERKA, TACASA, IMELDA R.B. ROTONI, TITA SADI, NYDIA V.A. BOLISAY, GAUDIOSO A. RUEGO, ETERIO Z. FOJA, NOEMI F. CASTRO, LILIA B. PRESENTACION A. PALOM, ANTONIO B. ABOCEJO, DEMETRIA O. COROLLO, CAWALING, ROBERT A. REYES, ANCHETA, MACARIO L. SADI, PACIFICO MARIA S. OBEN, ARTHUR V. LEYSON, CONCEPCION H. PARRENO, SERAFIN L. E. GISAPON, FELICIANO C. CRUZ, PEDRO L. AVILA, DOMINADOR S. OLMEDO, ADOLFO L. ALLAN, PROSPERO IMELDA A. QUIMEL, LINDA D. SANDOVAL, RODILLA, MARCIAL MAGPATOC, D. CASTRO, ROSELLER C. GAPULAO, MARILOU R. ORTIZ, NORMA F. SANTOS, FEDERICO D. BARCELON, EVANGELINE GLICERIO B. LAURENTE, BERNICE E. MAGPAYO V. ABESAMIS, BONIFACIO B. DELA ROSA, ELENO GIL, ARSENIA BERNABE, ADINA L. FERNANDEZ, ANITA VILLAFLOR, DANIEL O. TABIOS, GARCIA, HUMILDA ALICUM, DIOSDADO M. PAALAN, ROSA P. PINOON, CONSTANTE T. CATRIZ, JESUS E. CAS, ABRAHAM MASAOY, SAMUEL INOCENCIA P. DANGUE, JULITA E. ALICANTE, FEDERICO SACLAYAN, JR., ORALLO, AMELIA OLORES, CANDIDO MENDOZA, ELENA O. RAMOS, GENE BE NOLY G. UMINGA, FE FRAELI L. DE URBANO, LOURDES FRIAS, ROEL BARTE, FLORENCIA Z. MAGANITO, GUZMAN, RODRIGO S. WYCOCO, JOVEN SORIANO, EMELDA AGUSTIN, PAQUITO PABLO A. ARGA, PEDRO S. LUNA, HERMOGENES, RODOLFO D. BANAWA, SORIANO, GERMAN BALOLONG, CARMELITA P. LAUREL, VICTORINO I. ABELARDO O. CAPANZANA, ERNESTO Q. BENJAMIN C. ROSARIO, EFREN BUYA, MARASIGAN, ROMEO M. MENDOZA, TIONGSON, ROSANNA CRUZ, OSCAR C. LEONIDA LEGASPI, TOMAS ABELLA, JR., JUAN C. MALABANAN, MANUEL B. ONGOCO, CONSUELO A. KABIGTING, JOVENCIA CANTO, JUAN DACONO, ABRELI, JOSEPH T. MACAHIYA, LEONOR JULITA V. PASTELERO, ARSENIA V. MIGUEL BAUTISTA, LORNA PASCUAL, P. ARADA, JULIA G. PEREZ, MODESTO M. BONDOC, ISIDRO A. TOMAS, ANGELINA FERDINAND BRAGANZA, PRISCILLA VILLADELREY, ARNULFO Y. FAJILAN, V. GARRIDO, CONSOLACION N. LABOG, PEREZ, ALMA LUZ SORIANO, JUAN MARLON P. HERRERA, JAIME A. ELENITA A. RIVERA, SOCORRO NOCES, VALENCIA, JR., JULIAN APOSTOL, BISCOCHO, MICHAEL D. CASTILLO, RODOLFO GALLARDO, CARMENCITA M. ROSARIO GUICO, BONITA VIDAL, GUIA MILAGROS H. BAYLOSIS, ARSENIO T. ONGEO, CAMILO L. SEDURIFA, ARLEEN GARCIA, LEOCADIO GINEZ, CATALINA GUSTE, ALFREDO V. ORAYANI, DANTE A. VIC B. OCHANDRA, EDGARDO E. BANEZ, VERONICA TABILIN, ELVIRA PENAMANTE, ROMEO A. DE CHAVEZ, APOSTOL, CLOTILDE C. CANETE, CALSADO, ALIPIO LOPEZ, JOSEPHINE MANUEL M. ILAGAN, ALFREDO O. ALEJANDRO B. DEL AGUA, PILAR R. MALANA, PIO ANONUEVO, ELMA DEL MANZA, JR., DOMINGO B. GUNIO, FIDEL BUENO, TEODOICO C. MAGALLANES, ROSARIO, RUFINO FLORES, ANTONIO V. PALERACIO, VICENTE V. DEL MORO, PETRONIO N. PIANGCO, JR., JOSE M. ORDONEZ, CARMEN CLAVERIA, JUSTINO R. DEQUILLA, ERNESTO A. FLORENDO, BIBIANO A. CAGNAN, ALICIA ESTRELLA RAMOS, petitioners, RUZOL, ROMEO D. DELGADO, ERLINDA A. TUBI, RODOLFO C. NATAN, JAIME B. vs. P. MAGSINO, VERONICA R. MENDONEZ, EDILBERTO EDANG, COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, CAMBRONERO, NORMA A. DEQUINA, ROSENDA T. JENOVEVA, VEDASTO B. respondent. WELLIE R. RAVINA, CORAZON T. LOPEZ, ELIZAN, JR., MILAGROS P. DE LUNA, DECISION IV 2. The classification must be germane to the purpose of the law; PURISIMA, J.: SECTION 44 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8189 UNDERMINES THE CONSTITUTIONAL INDEPENDENCE OF COMELEC AND 3. The classification must not be At bar is a petition for certiorari and COMELEC’S CONSTITUTIONAL limited to existing conditions prohibition with urgent prayer for the AUTHORITY TO NAME, DESIGNATE AND only; and issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction APPOINT AND THEN REASSIGN AND and temporary restraining order, assailing TRANSFER ITS VERY OWN OFFICIALS the validity of Section 44 of Republic Act No. 4. The classification must apply AND EMPLOYEES; 8189 (RA 8189) otherwise known as "The equally to all members of the Voter’s Registration Act of 1996". same class.4 V RA 8189 was enacted on June 10, 1996 and After a careful study, the ineluctable approved by President Fidel V. Ramos on SECTION 44 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8189 conclusion is that the classification under June 11, 1996. Section 44 thereof provides: CONTRAVENES THE BASIC Section 44 of RA 8189 satisfies the CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEPT [Article VI, aforestated requirements. SECTION 26(1), Phil. Constitution] THAT "SEC. 44. Reassignment of Election Officers . EVERY BILL PASSED BY CONGRESS - No Election Officer shall hold office in a The singling out of election officers in order SHALL EMBRACE ONLY ONE SUBJECT particular city or municipality for more than to "ensure the impartiality of election officials WHICH MUST BE EXPRESSED IN THE four (4) years. Any election officer who, by preventing them from developing TITLE THEREOF; and either at the time of the approval of this Act familiarity with the people of their place of or subsequent thereto, has served for at assignment" does not violate the equal least four (4) years in a particular city or VI protection clause of the Constitution. municipality shall automatically be reassigned by the Commission to a new SECTION 44 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8189 In Lutz vs. Araneta,5 it was held that "the station outside the original congressional IS VOID FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH legislature is not required by the Constitution district." THE CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT to adhere to a policy of ‘all or none’". This is [ARTICLE VI, SECTION 26 (2)] OF THREE so for underinclusiveness is not an argument By virtue of the aforequoted provision of law, READINGS ON SEPARATE DAYS AND against a valid classification. It may be true the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED COPIES IN that all the other officers of COMELEC promulgated Resolution Nos. 97-00021 and ITS FINAL FORM THREE DAYS BEFORE referred to by petitioners are exposed to the 97-06102 for the implementation thereof. ITS PASSAGE. same evils sought to be addressed by the Thereafter, the COMELEC issued several statute. However, in this case, it can be directives3 reassigning the petitioners, who discerned that the legislature thought the Petitioners’ contentions revolve on the pivotal are either City or Municipal Election Officers, noble purpose of the law would be issue, whether Section 44 of RA 8189 is valid to different stations. sufficiently served by breaking an important and constitutional. link in the chain of corruption than by breaking up each and every link thereof. Aggrieved by the issuance of the aforesaid The petition is barren of merit. Section 44 of Verily, under Section 3(n) of RA 8189, directives and resolutions, petitioners found RA 8189 enjoys the presumption of validity, election officers are the highest officials or their way to this Court via the present petition and the Court discerns no ground to authorized representatives of the COMELEC assailing the validity of Section 44 of RA invalidate it. in a city or municipality. It is safe to say that 8189, contending that: without the complicity of such officials, large scale anomalies in the registration of voters Petitioners theorize that Section 44 of RA I can hardly be carried out. 8189 is violative of the "equal protection clause" of the 1987 Constitution because it SECTION 44 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8189 singles out the City and Municipal Election Moreover, to require the COMELEC to VIOLATES THE ‘EQUAL PROTECTION Officers of the COMELEC as prohibited from reassign all employees (connected with the CLAUSE’ ENSHRINED IN THE holding office in the same city or municipality registration of voters) who have served at CONSTITUTION; for more than four (4) years. They maintain least four years in a given city or municipality that there is no substantial distinction would entail a lot of administrative burden on between them and other COMELEC officials, the part of the COMELEC. II and therefore, there is no valid classification to justify the objective of the provision of law Neither does Section 44 of RA 8189 infringe SECTION 44 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8189 under attack. the security of tenure of petitioners nor VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTIONAL unduly deprive them of due process of law. GUARANTEE ON SECURITY OF TENURE The Court is not persuaded by petitioners’ As held in Sta. Maria vs. Lopez.6 OF CIVIL SERVANTS; arguments. The "equal protection clause" of the 1987 Constitution permits a valid "xxx the rule that outlaws unconsented III classification under the following conditions: transfers as anathema to security of tenure applies only to an officer who is appointed - SECTION 44 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8189 1. The classification must rest on not merely assigned - to a particular station. CONSTITUTES A DEPRIVATION OF substantial distinctions; Such a rule does not pr[o]scribe a transfer PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF carried out under a specific statute that LAW; empowers the head of an agency to periodically reassign the employees and officers in order to improve the service of the titles gave no information, and In determining the constitutionality of a agency. xxx" (italics supplied) which might therefore be statute dubbed as defectively titled, the overlooked and carelessly and presumption is in favor of its validity.10 unintentionally adopted; and The guarantee of security of tenure under the Constitution is not a guarantee of perpetual As regards the issue raised by petitioners - employment.1âwphi1 It only means that an 3. To fairly apprise the people, whether Section 44 of RA 8189 was enacted employee cannot be dismissed (or through such publication of in accordance with Section 26 (2), Article VI transferred) from the service for causes other legislative proceedings as is of the 1987 Constitution, petitioners have not than those provided by law and after due usually made, of the subjects of convincingly shown grave abuse of discretion process is accorded the employee. What it legislation that are being on the part of Congress. Respect due to co- seeks to prevent is capricious exercise of the considered, in order that they equal departments of the government in power to dismiss. But, where it is the law- may have opportunity of being matters entrusted to them by the making authority itself which furnishes the heard thereon by petition or Constitution, and the absence of a clear ground for the transfer of a class of otherwise if they shall so desire.7 showing of grave abuse of discretion suffice employees, no such capriciousness can be to stay the judicial hand.11 raised for so long as the remedy proposed to Section 26(1) of Article VI of the cure a perceived evil is germane to the 1987 Constitution is sufficiently WHEREFORE, the petition is DISMISSED; purposes of the law. complied with where, as in this and the constitutionality and validity of case, the title is comprehensive Section 44 of RA 8189 UPHELD. No Untenable is petitioners’ contention that enough to /embrace the general pronouncement as to costs. Section 44 of RA 8189 undermines the objective it seeks to achieve, authority of COMELEC to appoint its own and if all the parts of the statute SO ORDERED. officials and employees. As stressed upon by are related and germane to the the Solicitor General, Section 44 establishes subject matter embodied in the a guideline for the COMELEC to follow. Said title or so long as the same are Davide, Jr., C.J., (Chairman), Bellosillo, section provides the criterion or basis for the not inconsistent with or foreign to Melo, Puno, Vitug, Kapunan, Mendoza, reassignment or transfer of an election officer the general subject and title.8 Panganiban, Quisumbing, Buena, Gonzaga- and does not deprive the COMELEC of its Section 44 of RA 8189 is not Reyes, Ynares-Santiago, and De Leon, Jr., power to appoint, and maintain its authority isolated considering that it is JJ., concur. over its officials and employees. As a matter related and germane to the Pardo, J., no part. of fact, the questioned COMELEC subject matter stated in the title resolutions and directives illustrate that it is of the law. The title of RA 8189 still the COMELEC which has the power to is "The Voter’s Registration Act reassign and transfer its officials and of 1996" with a subject matter employees. But as a government agency enunciated in the explanatory tasked with the implementation and note as "AN ACT PROVIDING enforcement of election laws, the COMELEC FOR A GENERAL is duty bound to comply with the laws passed REGISTRATION OF VOTERS, by Congress. ADOPTING A SYSTEM OF CONTINUING REGISTRATION, PRESCRIBING THE The independence of the COMELEC is not at PROCEDURES THEREOF AND issue here. There is no impairment or AUTHORIZING THE emasculation of its power to appoint its own APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS officials and employees. In fact, Section 44 THEREFOR." Section 44, which even strengthens the COMELEC’s power of provides for the reassignment of appointment, as the power to reassign or election officers, is relevant to transfer is within its exclusive jurisdiction and the subject matter of registration domain. as it seeks to ensure the integrity of the registration process by Petitioners’ contention that Section 44 has an providing a guideline for the isolated and different subject from that of RA COMELEC to follow in the 8189 and that the same is not expressed in reassignment of election officers. the title of the law, is equally untenable. It is not an alien provision but one which is related to the conduct and procedure of The objectives of Section 26(1), Article VI of continuing registration of voters. the 1987 Constitution, that "[e]very bill In this regard, it bears stressing passed by the Congress shall embrace only that the Constitution does not one subject which shall be expressed in the require Congress to employ in title thereof", are: the title of an enactment, language of such precision as to 1. To prevent hodge-podge or mirror, fully index or catalogue, log-rolling legislation; all the contents and the minute details therein.9 2. To prevent surprise or fraud upon the legislature by means of provisions in bills of which the
History of Gage County, Nebraska: A Narrative of the Past, With Special Emphasis Upon the Pioneer Period of the County's History, Its Social, Commercial, Educational, Religious, and Civic Development From the Early Days to the Present Time