Ship Hydrodynamics 1 Part B Lecture 7

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Ship Hydrodynamics 1 MR 331 3rd Marine

Vessel Motions in Irregular Seaway

Though the principal of linear superposition has to be adhered to, it has been found from
experiments that the response of ships in irregular seas indicated that the linear spectral
techniques yielded unexpectedly accurate results in seas as high as seastate 7.

Thus, practically linear theory can be applied for up to moderate sea state cases.

The basic steps in predicting the vessel motions are given as follow:

1. Choose a suitable wave spectrum S()

2. Calculate the encounter frequency E, as a function of the wave frequency w,


vessel speed V, wave speed c, and heading : E = (1 – V.c-1 cos )
[ = o0 for following seas, 180o for head seas]

3. Calculate the encounter spectrum S(E) = S() x d/dE

Vessel response
4. Evaluate R.A.O = [Response Amplitude Operators]
Wave input parameter *

Where it is assumed that;

(a) The response to each component wave is independent of the response to the
other waves.

(b) The response is a linear function of the component wave amplitudes.

[ * a commonly used wave input parameter is the wave amplitude for


translational motions or wave slope for rotational motions ]

5. Plot the response spectrum SR(E) = S(E) x (R.A.O)2 [spectral density function]

Transform spectrum Response spectrum


Wave spectrum

mR = mean square response of vessel


2.5 mR = significant response (amplitude) of vessel

Page 1
Ship Hydrodynamics 1 MR 331 3rd Marine

Example

A sea spectrum is defined by the following table:

 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
S() 0.2 2.0 4.05 4.3 3.4 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.5

d E 2 .
and =1+ V
d g

For 10 knots, E =  (1 + 0.525 )

d
and = (1 + 1.05 ) –1
d E

Assuming the RAO of the vessel is given as in column 6. Therefore, the following
calculations can be conducted to find the response spectrum and the statistical responses of
the vessel.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
 E S() dE S(E) = RAO SR(E) = SM f(SR)
d (3)x(4)-1 (5)x(6)2

0.3 0.347 0.2 1.315 0.15 0.8 0.098 1 0.098


0.4 0.484 2.0 1.420 1.41 0.6 0.508 4 2.032
0.5 0.632 1.05 1.525 2.65 0.69 1.262 2 2.524
0.6 0.789 4.30 1.630 2.64 0.44 0.511 4 2.044
0.7 0.958 3.40 1.735 1.96 0.28 0.153 2 0.306
0.8 1.136 2.30 1.840 1.25 0.18 0.041 4 0.164
0.9 1.326 1.50 1.945 0.77 0.12 0.011 2 0.022
1.0 1.525 1.00 2.050 0.49 0.10 0.005 4 0.020
1.1 1.736 0.70 2.155 0.32 0.08 - 1 0
1.2 1.956 0.50 2.260 0.22 0.07 -
f(SR) = 7.21

The heave spectrum can be plotted and the area under the curve will give mo.

Page 2
Ship Hydrodynamics 1 MR 331 3rd Marine

Remember:
The average heave amplitude
H1  2.50 mo1 / 2
H1 / 3  4.00 mo1 / 2
H1 / 10  5.10 mo1 / 2
Heave Amplitude
RAO 
Wave Amplitude

1
mo = x C.I. x f(SR(E))
3

= 1 x 0.1 x 7.21
3

= 0.2403


 H1 = 2.50 0.2403 = 1.226 m


H1 / 3 = 4.00 0.2403 = 1.961 m

H 1 / 10 = 5.10 0.2403 = 2.5 m

Page 3
Ship Hydrodynamics 1 MR 331 3rd Marine

TUTORIAL 4

Question 1

(a) Outline the basic steps in predicting the vessel motions in an irregular seaway.
(10 marks)

(b) A full scale motion trial was carried out in a long-crested irregular wave system.

The spectrum of an irregular long-crested wave-system, as measured at a fixed


point is given as follows:

fw(Hertz) 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11


S(fw)m2s 0.0003 0.460 7.393 21.25 29.51 29.43 25.09

(i) The vessel heads into the wave-system at an angle of 60 degrees with a
speed of 10 knots. Calculate and plot the wave spectrum as it would be
measures by a probe moving forward with the speed of the vessel.

(8 marks)

(ii) The roll energy spectrum obtained from a gyroscope reading onboard the
vessel is given as follows :

fw(Hertz) 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11


S(fE)m2s 0.0 0.001 0.008 0.033 0.042 0.021 0.004

Roll Amp.
Derive and plot the RAO curve in the form of for the vessel at
Wave Amp.
the speed and heading as indicated in (i).

(7 marks)

Page 4
Ship Hydrodynamics 1 MR 331 3rd Marine

Question 2

Compare the generated ordinates of the following series of wave spectra:

(i) JONSWAP
(ii) PERSON-MOSKOWITZ
(iii) DARBYSHIRE
(iv) BRITISH TOWING TANK PANEL
(v) BRETSCHNEIDER

Give comments on the differences observed.

Note : A FORTRAN Computer code is given to assist in the comparative work.

Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Prof. Adi Maimun for the preparation of this scientific material

Page 5

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy