Ganjam
Ganjam
Ganjam
OF
CONSERVATION SCIENCE
ISSN: 2067-533X Volume 8, Issue 1, January-March 2017: 145-156 www.ijcs.uaic.ro
Department of Geology, MPC Autonomous College, Baripada, Mayurbhanj District, Odisha, India
Abstract
Introduction
Groundwater is one of the most important natural resources required for human
consumption, domestic purposes, irrigation, industrialization, urbanization etc. The demand for
groundwater is increasing every year due to growing population, recurring drought and
increased agricultural and industrial activities. To meet this increasing demand, proper
understanding of the groundwater condition in terms of availability and distribution very
important. Groundwater condition in hard rock terrain is multivariate because of heterogeneous
nature of aquifer due to varying composition, degree of weathering and density of fracturing.
Remote sensing has become an indispensable tool for groundwater exploration in hard rock
areas because the topographic expression and terrain characteristics have a direct relation to the
geological characteristics of the rocks and their structural set up.
Located on the east coast of India, Digapahandi block of Ganjam district, Orissa is
bounded by 1911’30” to 1924’0” N Latitude and 8419’50” to 8441’24” E longitude falling
in the Survey of India Topo Sheet Nos.74 A/7,74 A/8, 74 A/11 (Fig.1).
*
Corresponding author: pcsahugeol@gmail.com
P.C. SAHU
It has a geographical area of 422.18sq.km. As per 2011 census, the total population of
the block is 136618. The area enjoys a humid and sub-tropical climate characterized by cold
winter and hot summer. The annual average rainfall is 1296mm. The most common soil types
in the block are red sandy soils, red loamy soils and alluvial soils. The soils are mainly neutral
to mildly acidic in nature. Digapahandi block shows wide variation in the pattern of land
utilization. Nearly 75% to 80% of the geographical area is available for cultivation. The
drainage pattern is dendritic (Fig. 2).
should be adopted for targeting potential ground water zones in hard rock areas. Authors [7-15]
have emphasized the need to adopt modern know-how i.e. Remote Sensing and GIS to evaluate
the ground water potential in hard rock provinces. Authors[16-18] in their studies on ground
water development and management has remarked that artificial recharge structures/rain water
harvesting structures play a key role in sustainable development of ground water resources.
Methodology
The present study was carried out by interpretation of the Satellite Imageries of IRS- IC
LISS III in the scale of 1:50000. Thematic maps on hydro geomorphology and lithology have
been prepared. Reconnaissance survey with special reference to lithology, structure, topography
and weathering characteristics was made during field visits. Resistivity Survey has been
conducted to understand the sub-surface condition. Systematic collection of hydro geological
data for both pre and post monsoon period during well inventory studies and interpretation of
data was carried out. Collection of secondary data like population, rainfall, ground water
abstraction structures and irrigation potential was made. Data generated have been analyzed,
synthesized and interpreted. Suitable sites for specific water harvesting structures/artificial
recharge structures have been demarcated in the map of the study area.
Geological Aspect
The study area is underlain by the Eastern Ghats Group of rocks of Pre-Cambrian age,
which includes granitic gneisses, khondalite and charnockite suite of rocks. Alluvium of Recent
age occurs as the discontinuous patches in the close vicinity of river channels. Granitic gneiss is
the dominant lithology of the study area. The lithology map prepared from satellite data,
ancillary data and field checks is shown in the (Fig. 3).
The rocks have undergone intense structural and metamorphic deformation as revealed
by features like foliation, lineation, shearing, joints, folds etc. Tectonic foliation is well
developed in granitic gneiss and khondalite. The khondalitic suite of rocks are highly foliated,
jointed and folded. Charnockites are usually compact and massive. Examination of sections of
dug wells excavated in granitic gneiss at Bhismagiri, Jakarpali, Padmanavpur, Digapahandi,
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 147
P.C. SAHU
Ramachandrapur and Bomkei villages and analysis of litholog data revealed that the depth of
weathering extends down to a depth of about 5m to 15m below ground level.
Geomorphology
Geomorphology exercises a significant control over groundwater regime. The relief,
slope, depth and type of weathered materials and the overall disposition of different land forms
play an important role in defining the groundwater regime, more particularly in hard rock areas.
Through remote sensing technique, various hydro geomorphic units within the block have been
identified (Table 1). The different hydro-geomorphic units are shown in (Fig. 4).
Lineament
Study of lineaments, which act as conduits of groundwater can help in identifying
potential sites for groundwater recharging. The lineament and intersection of lineaments is
favourable indicator for groundwater recharging sites. In hard rock terrain, lineaments are the
most sought after features for groundwater development. Lineaments mapped from satellite data
are natural linear or curvilinear features that can be correlated to faults, fractures, joints,
bedding trace, lithological contact etc. The study area is characterized by NE-SW, NNE-SSW,
NW-SE and N-S trending lineaments. The trends of dominant lineaments are NE-SW and NNE-
SSW characteristics of granitic gneisses. The lineament density is high in North-Western part of
the area and some scattered pockets in eastern and southern part of the area.
Hydrogeology
The contrasting water bearing properties of different geological formations usually play
an important role in the occurrence and movement of ground water. The crystalline rocks of
Achaean age occupy about 95% of the total geographical area. The narrow discontinuous
patches of recent to sub-recent alluvium along the river courses occupy small area in the block.
Depending on the water yielding properties of various formations, the block can be broadly
grouped into two distinct hydro geological units.
Consolidated formation
These include granite and granite gneisses, khondalite and charnockites of Eastern Ghats
Group of rocks. These rocks are devoid of primary porosity and are usually very hard and
compact in nature. The secondary porosity in the consolidated formation developed as a result
of weathering and fracturing due to major and minor tectonic movements, form the conduits for
movement of ground water as also act as reservoir of ground water. This fractured and jointed
rocks when interconnected form potential aquifers, which sustain limited to moderate yield.
Ground water occurs under water table condition in the weathered residuum while it occurs
under semi-confined to confined conditions in the fractures and jointed rocks.
Unconsolidated formations
Alluvium of Recent to Sub-recent age constitutes the unconsolidated formations. The
alluvium deposits along the bank of river course form the most potential aquifer due to high
degree of porosity and permeability. The alluvium comprises an admixture of gravel, sand and
clay derived from eroded and weathered country rocks. The thickness of the alluvium in flood
plain vary from 10m to 30m.
Water bearing properties of major lithounits
Most prevalent rock types occurring in the block are granites and granite-gneisses. These
are reduced to loose kaolinised granular materials on weathering. The thickness of the
weathered mantle ranges from 5m to 15m and some times up to 20m. The weathered, fractured
and fissured granites, granite gneisses occurring on topographic low form potential aquifers.
The water yielding fracture zones are generally restricted within a depth of 100m bgl. However,
some water yielding fractures have been encountered even at a depth of 160m to 180m bgl. In
most of the bore holes two or three water bearing fractures zones have been encountered within
100m depth. Bore wells up to a depth of 100m are the typical ground water structures for
fractured rocks. The yield of the well depends upon the thickness of the water saturated zones
as also numbers of intersecting fractures tapped.
Nature of aquifer
Groundwater in the study area occurs mainly in (i) weathered mantle (ii) fractured zone
of hard rocks and (iii) narrow zone of unconsolidated sediments consisting of younger alluvium
along river valleys. Groundwater occurs under water table condition mainly in the weathered
mantle and narrow zones of unconsolidated sediments along river valley. The weathered zone
(saprolite) is of importance as storage zone of groundwater. The yield of individual well is
dependent largely on the saprolite and for the deeper rocks well yield is dependent upon
intensity of spatial extent of interconnected fractures. Large diameter dug wells of depth up to
15m are the typical groundwater extraction structures for weathered rocks. The open wells may
sustain yield of 3 to 18 LPS. The average thickness of weathered zone ranges from 5m to 15m.
The more productive wells are generally limited to highly weathered, jointed and fractured
rocks. In less productive wells, saprolite is generally underlain by massive rocks or bedrocks
with meager fractures. Groundwater occurs under semi-confined to confined condition in the
fractured rocks depending on the depth. The water yielding fracture zones are generally
restricted within a depth of 100m bgl. However, some water yielding fractures have been
encountered even at a depth of 160-180m bgl. In most of the boreholes two or three water
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 149
P.C. SAHU
bearing fractures zones have been encountered within 100m depth. Bore wells up to a depth of
100m are the typical groundwater structures for fractured rocks. The discharge varies from 2 to
27 LPS.
Status of water table
The depth to water table during pre and post monsoon period varies form 2.75m to 9.6m
bgl and 0.33 to 2.45m bgl respectively. Seasonal fluctuation in the wells located in upland areas
in higher than that in the low laying areas. The value of seasonal fluctuation of water table
varies from 2.1m to 7.5m. Most of the areas show fluctuation between 3 to 6m. The water
table contours are generally in conformity with the topography. The water table gradient varies
from 1.9m/km to 2.85m/km. The groundwater flow direction do not show any definite trend but
is highly influenced by topographic and geologic setting. In general, the groundwater flow
direction is towards SE.
Groundwater Potential Zones
Integrating all the above mentioned information such as geology, geomorphology,
drainage, lineament, and aquifer system, Digapahandi block has been classified into different
groundwater potential zones viz. “High”, “Moderate” and “Low” (Table 2).
A perusal of the map showing groundwater potential zones indicates that the potentiality
of aquifer system for groundwater development is moderate to good in 60% of the study area
(Fig. 5).
High potential areas are scattered throughout the area in pockets. In areas of high and
moderate potential, groundwater can be exploited with suitable abstraction structures like dug
wells, dug-cum-bore wells and bore wells. Where the groundwater potential is low, water table
is more than 7-8m bgl and dug wells go dry during summer, the existing dug wells can either be
deepened or bore well can be drilled to meet the water requirement. Further, rainwater
harvesting and artificial recharge techniques should be implemented effectively to augment the
groundwater resources. The groundwater potential zones map can form the base map for the
concerned authorities to take necessary action in planning of land use and to identity sites for
groundwater exploitation in future.
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 151
P.C. SAHU
Zone 1. The fracture controlled small valleys filled with unconsolidated sediments, buried
pediments with thick weathered zones and areas with good vegetative covers in the
foothill regions are the zones of good recharge. These areas are very gently sloping
and are mostly cultivated land, which help in the retention of surface water.
Zone 2. This zone occupies the shallow weathered pediplains adjacent to the zone 1, with good
concentration of lineaments. The recharge rate is good to moderate.
Zone 3. This zone represents the higher slope area of buried pediments with scanty vegetation
and structural hills traversed by fractures and fissures. The groundwater recharge rate
is moderate to low.
Zone 4.The denudational and residual hills of the study area which have only open and
degraded forest cover with steep slope are runoff zones and categorized as zone 4,
where the minor fractures are the only linear area through which percolation may take
place.
Artificial Recharge
Considering the hydro geological set-up, natural recharge conditions, groundwater
potential, future optimal use of groundwater, soil and slope of the area, prevailing land use and
cropping pattern in the study area, suitable sites for specific water harvesting structures/
artificial recharge structures such as percolation tank, check dam, gully plugs have been
demarcated. Besides these, sites for agriculture- related measures which will aid artificial
recharge have also been shown in the map. The construction of artificial recharge structures will
not only augment groundwater resources, but also will help in solving geo-environmental
problems like land degradation by soil erosion and loss of soil moisture (Fig. 7).
Percolation Tank
Percolation tanks are shallow tanks constructed at appropriate places in natural or
diverted stream courses and provided with a waste weir to allow excess water to continue its
course. The ideal site for construction of percolation tanks are gently slope, terrain of light
soils, weathered materials of moderate thickness and fractures zones. However, these tanks
need scraping of bottoms once in a year or two depending on the rate of accumulation of fine
sediments at the bottom of the tank. Percolation tank is the most suitable structure for
recharging groundwater in the hard rock areas, because in addition to artificial recharge it
contributes directly to irrigation from the stored water. Percolation tanks in the study area may
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 153
P.C. SAHU
Hydro-fracturing
The unconventional technique of hydro-fracturing may be undertaken for improving the
yields of bore wells in hard rock areas. This technique has the following advantages.
1. Widening of existing fractures
2. Removal of clogging in the fracture connectivity.
3. Creation of interconnection of fractures
4. Extending the length of the old fractures
5. Creation of new fractures in the aquifers.
Conclusions
Since the block is drought prone, there is an urgent need of ground water exploitation to
save the crops and provide safe drinking water. The ground water abstraction through open
wells restricted up to the weathered mantle can not meet the requirements of the inhabitants
throughout the year. Most of the wells go dry during summer. The only alternative is to get
water from fracture zones through suitable ground water structures, which may be helpful for
the development of the agrarian based poor socio-economic conditions of the people in the
study area, because till now mostly dug/ open wells are being utilized for domestic and
agricultural purpose. The present study emphasizes on the need and scope for artificial recharge
to augment groundwater, scientific well siting on the basis of the result of the present hydro
geological studies aided by remote sensing and GIS techniques. Optimal and judicious
utilization of ground water through properly designed abstraction structures constructed at
suitable locale with accompanying protection, augmentation and conservation measures can
being about laurels to the agrarian economy of the area and can mitigate the problems of
drinking water scarcity faced during summer.
Acknowledgements
The author is thankful to UGC, Government of India for providing financial assistance to
carry out the works. Thanks are due to my colleague, friends and Sri D. Nandi for helping me in
preparing this manuscript.
References
[4] G.P. Reddy Obi, A.K. Maji, Delineation and characterization of geomorphological
features in a part of Lower Maharastra Metamorphic Plateau using IRS-ID LISS-III Data,
Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 31(4), 2003, pp. 241-250.
[5] P.C. Sahu, H.K. Sahoo, Targetting ground water in tribal dominated Bonai area of
drought prone Sundergarh disrict, Orissa India - A combined geophysical and Remote
Sensing approach, Journal of Human Ecology, 20(2), 2006, pp. 109-115.
[6] P.C. Sahu, Geomorphological and lineament studies for targeting ground water in
Digapahandi block, Ganjam disrict, Orissa, Vistas in Geological Research, 7, 2008, pp.
193-200.
[7] P.R. Reddy, Remote Sensing in ground water studies, Remote Sensing for Earth
Resources (2nd Edn.), Publication of Association of Exploration Geophysists, Hyderabad,
India, 1999, pp. 183-203.
[8] D. Nandi, J. Kant, C.K. Sahu, Integrated approach using Remote Sensing and GIS for
hydrogeology of Moroda Block in Mayurbhanj District, Odisha, India, International
Journal of Conservation Science, 6(3), 2015, pp. 383-390.
[9] N.S. Magesh, N. Chandrasekar, J.P. Soundranayagam, Delineation of groundwater
potential zones in Theni district, Tamilnadu, using Remote Sensing, GIS and MIF,
Geosciences Frontiers, 3(2), 2012, pp. 189-196.
[10] D. Nandi, S.R. Mishra, Groundwater quality mapping by using geographic information
system (GIS): A case study of Baripada city, Odisha, India, International Journal of
Conservation Science, 5(1), 2014, pp. 79-84.
[11] P.K. Dinesh Kumar, G. Gopinath, P. Serelathan, Application of Remote Sensing and GIS
for the demarcation of groundwater potentials zones of a river basin in Kerala, southwest
coast of India, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(24), 2007, pp. 5583-5601.
[12] R.K. Jaiswal, S. Mukherjee, J. Krishnamurthy, R. Saxena, Role of Remote Sensing and
GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural development
– an approach, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 2003, pp. 993-1008.
[13] M.Al. Saud, Mapping potential areas for groundwater storage in Wadi Aurnah Basin,
western Arabian Peninsula, using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System
techniques, Hydrogeology Journal, 18, 2010, pp. 1481-1495.
[14] I.M. Bahuguna, S. Nayak, V. Tamilarasan, V.J. Moses, Ground water prospective zones in
basaltic terrain using Remote Sensing, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote
Sensing, 31, 2003, pp. 101-105.
[15] R.S. Suja Rose, N. Krishnan, Spatial analysis of groundwater potential using Remote
Sensing and GIS in the Kanyakumari and Nambiyar Basins, India, Journal of the Indian
Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 2009, pp. 681-692.
[16] B.M. Jha, Sustainability of water resources in Orissa, Proceeding of Seminar on
“Groundwater Resources of Orissa for 2020”, Central Ground Water Board,
Bhubaneswar, Orissa, 2000, pp. 13-22.
[17] K. Pradhan, Artificial recharge to Ground water. The need and scope in Hill region of
Orissa, Proceeding of National Seminar on “Ground water management in Orissa its
Prospects and Challenges“, Central Ground Water Board, Bhubaneswar, 2003, pp. 50-
54.
[18] D.K. Chadha, Groundwater resource potential and scope for development in Orissa,
Proceeding of Seminar on “Prospect of Groundwater Development and Management
in Orissa”, Central Ground Water Board, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, 2000, pp. 1-9.
http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 155
P.C. SAHU
[19] B.N. Umrikar, Artificial recharge and water conservation techniques in Deccan Trap
Aquifers of Maharastra, Journal of Applied Hydrology, 15(1), 2002, pp. 23-30.
[20] A. Shaban, M. Khawlie, C. Abdallah, Use of Remote Sensing and GIS to determine
recharge potential zone: The case of Occidental Lebanon, Hydrogeology Journal, 14,
2006, pp. 433-443.
[21] N.C. Nayak, S.C. Behera, K.C. Naik, Augmentation of ground water resources through
construction of artificial recharge structures in part of Ghodahada basin in Sanakhemundi
block of Ganjam dist, Orissa, Proceeding of National Seminar “Ground Water
Management in Orissa - The Prospects and Challenges. Central Ground Water Board,
Bhubaneswar. 2003, pp. 64-76.
[22] A. Chowdhury, M.K. Jha, V.M. Chowdhury, Delineation of groundwater recharge zones
and identification of artificial sites in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, using RS, GIS
and MCDM techniques, Environmental Earth Science, 59, 2010, pp. 1209-1222.
[23] R.K. Samadder, S. Kumar, R.P. Gupta, Paleochannels and their potential for artificial
groundwater recharge in the western Ganga plains, Journal of Hydrology, 400, 2011,
pp. 154-164.
[24] H.M. Raghunath, Ground Water, (Second Edition) Willey Eastern India Ltd, New Delhi,
India, 1987, p. 563.
[25] K.R. Karanth, Ground Water Assessment, Development and Management, Tata Mc
Graw-Hill Publ. Co. Ltd, New Delhi, India. 1987, p.720.
[26] S.O. Tweed, M. Leblanc, J.A. Webb, M.W. Lubczynski, Remote Sensing and GIS for
mapping recharge and discharge areas in salinity prone catchments, Southeastern
Australia, Hydrogeology Journal, 15, 2007, pp. 75-96.