Critical Jurnal Review: Dosenpengampu: Sabda Dian Nurani Siahaan.S.Pd.,M.B.A
Critical Jurnal Review: Dosenpengampu: Sabda Dian Nurani Siahaan.S.Pd.,M.B.A
Critical Jurnal Review: Dosenpengampu: Sabda Dian Nurani Siahaan.S.Pd.,M.B.A
DosenPengampu :
DisusunOleh:
NIM : 7213560015
Class B
Medan, 2021
Author
Daftar Isi
KATA PENGANTAR.............................................................................................................................2
BAB I PENDAHULUAN.......................................................................................................................4
A. Latar Belakang.............................................................................................................................4
B. Tujuan CJR..................................................................................................................................4
C. Manfaat CJR................................................................................................................................5
A. Jurnal Utama................................................................................................................................7
B. Jurnal Pembanding.......................................................................................................................8
A. Kelebihan Jurnal........................................................................................................................12
B. Kekurangan Jurnal.....................................................................................................................12
A. Kesimpulan................................................................................................................................13
B. Saran ..........................................................................................................................................13
PENDAHULUAN
A. Latar Belakang
The development of science is minimal due to the low interest in reading students at this time. Criticizing
journals is one way that can be done to increase the relevance of reading interest. Criticizing Journals (Critical
Journal Review) is an activity to review a journal in order to know and understand what is presented in a
journal. Basically, a journal review focuses on evaluation (explanation, interpretation and analysis) of the
strengths and weaknesses, what is interesting, and how the journal can change perceptions and ways of
thinking as well as a consideration of whether the knowledge gained in a particular field of study. In addition,
criticizing journals can also train our ability to analyze and discuss the discussion presented by the author. So
that it becomes a valuable input for other writing creative processes. Criticizing a journal cannot be done if the
critic does not read the entire journal. By doing this review, readers can find out the quality of the journal with
the work of the same author or other authors and can provide input to journal writers in the form of criticism
and suggestions on the systematics of writing, content, and substance of the journal.
1. Fulfill one of the mandatory tasks given by the lecturer in the Entrepreneurship course
2. Provide an overview to the reader regarding the identity of the journal, the summary of the journal, the
advantages and disadvantages of the journal, both in terms of systematic writing, as well as the overall
cohesiveness of the journal content and its implications from various aspects.
3. Adding insight to the critics because in the journal presented problems and solutions that will increase our
knowledge.
B. Manfaat CJR
The benefits of making a Critical Journal Review, namely: I. As a student engaged in the world of Education.
These journals need to be criticized because they can improve students' skills in making good and correct
research reports.
II. Increase students' knowledge of the theory and application of the results of researchers' ideas so that this
knowledge can be a new inspiration for students as prospective teachers in compiling or designing effective
learning. Improve the results of the analysis in each journal that will be criticized.
IdentitasJurnal
Journal 1
Journal
Volume -
Years 2017
ISSN 2306-8401
Journal Homepage
Journal 2
Volume -
Years 2009
ISSN 1943-6114
Journal Homepage
Review Journal
Journal 2
PENUTUP
A. Kesimpulan
Each written work certainly has characteristics that are different from one another, both in terms of
language, advantages, and disadvantages. Every journal must contain information that has been clearly
explained by the author regardless of the shortcomings contained in each journal, but it is certain that
each journal will bring benefits to readers in terms of getting more information.
This journal contains abundant information that can make readers interested in reading and analyzing
this journal. Above has been presented a summary and also the advantages and disadvantages of each
journal which is expected to be a comparison between the opinions of readers of the journal.
B. Suggestion The advantages of the journal are to be further maintained and strengthened, and the
shortcomings of the journal are to be further researched to achieve maximum results.