Chapter 10 - Conflict and Negotiations 1
Chapter 10 - Conflict and Negotiations 1
Chapter 10 - Conflict and Negotiations 1
CONFLICT &
NEGOTIATIONS
Managing conflict and engaging
in effective negotiation are both
key for effective organizational
behavior.
How will we manage conflict?
When can we say there is a conflict?
DEFINITION
INTRAPERSONAL CONFLICT
01 - arises within a person e.g. Role conflict
INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT
02 - conflict between two person
e.g. competition, personality values differences.
INTERGROUP CONFLICT
03 - takes place among different groups
TRANSITION IN CONFLICT
THOUGHT
TRADITIONAL
CONFLICT INTERACTIONIST
- assumed all conflict was
CONFLICT
bad and to be avoided. - a belief that conflict is not only
early a positive force in a group but
• Poor communication current also an absolute necessity for a
• Lack of openness and group to perform effectively.
trust between people
• Failure to respond to
employees needs
FORMS OF
INTERACTIONIST
CONFLICT
FUNCTIONAL CONFLICT
- Conflict that supports the goals of the
group and improves its performance.
DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT
- Conflict that hinders group
performance.
TYPES OF INTERACTIONIST
CONFLICT
TASK CONFLICT
- conflict over content and goals of
work.
RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT
- conflict based on interpersonal
relationship.
PROCESS CONFLICT
- conflict over how work gets
done
The impact of too much or too little conflict can disrupt performance.
If conflict is too low, then performance is low. If conflict is too high,
then performance also tends to be low. The goal is to hold conflict
read the message
levels in the middle of this range.
note: a medium level of task-related conflict is often viewed as optimal, because it represents a situation in which a healthy debate of ideas takes place.
POTENTIAL CAUSES
OF CONFLICT
Collaboration
CONFLICT HANDLING STYLES High on both
Competition cooperative &
Compromise assertive
Middle ground
Accommodation
Cooperative &
unassertive
Avoidance
Uncooperative &
unassertive
NEGOTIATIONS
NEGOTIATIONS
- is a process whereby
two or more parties
work toward
an agreement.
The Five Phases of Negotiation
5 Closure
4 Bargaining
3 Presentation
2 Determine your BATNA
1 Investigation
Phase 1:
Investigation
▪ The first step in negotiation is the investigation, or in
formation gathering stage.
▪ This is a key stage that is often ignored.
▪ The first place to begin is with yourself.
▪ “You need the clearest possible view of your goals.
And you need to be brutally honest with yourself
about your priorities.”
Phase 2:
Determine your BATNA
▪ BATNA is an acronym that stands for the “best
alternative to a negotiated agreement.”
▪ Thinking through your BATNA is important to helping you
decide whether to accept an offer you receive during the
negotiation.
▪ Accept any set of terms that are better than the BATNA,
reject anything worse.
▪ The party with the best BATNA has the best negotiating position, so
try to improve your BATNA whenever possible by exploring
possible alternatives.
Phase 3:
Presentation
▪ In this phase, you assemble the
information you’ve gathered in a way
that supports your position.
Phase 4:
Bargaining
▪ Each party discusses their goals and seeks to get an
agreement.
▪ A natural part of this process is making concessions,
namely, giving up one thing to get something else in
return.
▪ Concessions are often in the areas of money, time, resources,
responsibilities, or autonomy.
▪ One key to the bargaining phase is to ask questions.
Don’t simply take a statement such as “we can’t do
that” at face value. Rather, try to find out why the
party has that constraint.
Phase 5:
Closure
▪ At the close of a negotiation, you and the other
party have either come to an agreement on the terms,
or one party has decided that the final offer is
unacceptable and therefore must be walked away from.
▪ The savviest of negotiators, however, see the rejection
as an opportunity to learn.
Distributive Approach Integrative Approach
▪ The distributive view of negotiation ▪ A newer, more creative approach to
is the traditional fixed-pie approach. negotiation is called the integrative
▪ That is, negotiators see the situation approach.
as a pie that they have to divide ▪ In this approach, both parties look
between them. for ways to integrate their goals
▪ Each tries to get more of the pie and under a larger umbrella.
“win.” ▪ That is, they look for ways to
expand the pie, so that each party
gets more.
▪ This is also called a win–win
approach.
SHOULD YOU
NEGOTIATE FOR A
HIGHER SALARY?
Listen more
than talk.
Don’t make 7
the first offer.
6
Begin assertively.
5
Know what you want.
4
Build your case.
Get the facts. 3
2
Overcome your fear.
1
Failing to Negotiate
Letting Your Ego
/Accepting the First
Get in the Way
Offer
AVOIDING
COMMON Having Unrealistic
MISTAKES IN Expectations
NEGOTIATIONS
Be patient.
Whose reality?
Deadlines.