Scribd
Upload
49 views2 pages

Date: - Lab Manual Chemical Process Optimization (Ch-404) Lab No: - Roll No

This document contains a rubric for assessing student performance in a chemical process optimization lab (CH-404). It evaluates students on 5 criteria: presence in lab, program standards, program execution, design and correct output, and documentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale of excellent to poor, with defined requirements for each level. For example, for presence in lab, an excellent score requires being present and actively participating, while a poor score is for failing to show up or being in lab but not participating. The rubric provides a total possible score of 20 points.

Uploaded by

Aisha Ellaf
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
49 views2 pages

Date: - Lab Manual Chemical Process Optimization (Ch-404) Lab No: - Roll No

This document contains a rubric for assessing student performance in a chemical process optimization lab (CH-404). It evaluates students on 5 criteria: presence in lab, program standards, program execution, design and correct output, and documentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale of excellent to poor, with defined requirements for each level. For example, for presence in lab, an excellent score requires being present and actively participating, while a poor score is for failing to show up or being in lab but not participating. The rubric provides a total possible score of 20 points.

Uploaded by

Aisha Ellaf
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Date: _________

LAB MANUAL
CHEMICAL PROCESS OPTIMIZATION (CH-404)
Lab No: ____ Roll No: __________
LAB ASSESSMENT RUBRICS

Student Name: ________________________

Program (Excellent) (Good) (Average) (Fair) (Poor)


(20 pts) (20~18) (17-14) (13-10) (09-05) (04-00)
Programmer
Programmer Programmer Programmer
Programmer failed to show
was few was late by was late by
Presence in was present up at all or
minutes late half but half and did
Lab and actively was in lab but
but actively actively not actively
20% participated failed
participated participated participated
during Lab participate in
during Lab during Lab during Lab
activities
Few Several
inappropriate inappropriate
Program is design design
Standards stylistically choices (i.e. choices (i.e. Program is Failed to write
20% well poor variable poor variable poorly written Program
designed names, names,
improper improper
indentation) indentation)
Program
Program Program
executes
Program executes executes Program does
correctly Program does
execution with a minor with a minor not execute at
with no not execute
30% (easily fixed (not easily all
error’s
errors) fixed error)
messages
Program
Design and displays Output has Output is
Output has Output is
correct output correct multiple completely
minor errors incorrect
20% output with errors incorrect
no errors
Missing two
Program is Missing one Most All
Documentation or more
well required documentation documentation
10% required
documented comment missing missing
comments

Total Score = /20

Remarks if any:

Signature with date: __________________________

1
Date: _________
LAB MANUAL
CHEMICAL PROCESS OPTIMIZATION (CH-404)
Lab No: ____ Roll No: __________

TITLE:

DESCRIPTION:

CODES:
1. m. file:

2. command window:

RESULT & DISCUSSION:

CASE STUDY:

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy