Criteria of Compounds
Criteria of Compounds
Criteria of Compounds
65-67 (Nikolenko)
SLIDE 1. Today I would like to tell you about the criteria of compounds or in
other words to give you some pieces of advice about how to distinguish between a
compound and a word-combination. This question has a direct bearing on the
specific feature of the structure of most English compounds – with the exception of
the rare morphological type, they originate directly from word-combinations and
are often homonymous to them.
SLIDE 2. For example, a tall boy (a boy who is tall) and a tallboy (a piece of
furniture, a chest of drawers supported by a low stand). Of course, it is not easy to
distinguish whether we are talking about a compound or just a word phrase.
SLIDE 3. In this case 6 criteria of distinguishing between a word and a word-
group seem to be sufficiently convincing. These are graphic criterion, semantic
criterion, phonetic criterion, morphological criterion, syntactic criterion and
finally transformational criterion.
SLIDE 4. To start with, the graphic criterion is really helpful when we deal
with compounds and word combinations, yet in many cases it cannot wholly be
relied on as there is a consistency in English spelling in this respect. With different
dictionaries and different authors and sometimes even with the same author the
spelling varies, so that the same unit may exist in a solid spelling: headmaster,
loudspeaker, or with a hyphen: head-master, loud-speaker, and with a break
between the components: head master, loud speaker. Moreover, compounds that
appear to be constructed on the same pattern and have similar semantic relations
between the constituents may be spelt differently – textbook, phrase-book,
reference book. These three types of spelling need not indicate different degrees of
semantic fusion. Sometimes hyphen may serve aestheStic purposes, helping to
avoid words that will look too long, or purposes of convenience, making syntactic
components clearer to the eye.