Unit Deficit Financing: 14.0 Objectives
Unit Deficit Financing: 14.0 Objectives
Unit Deficit Financing: 14.0 Objectives
Structure
14.0 Objectives
14.1 Introduction '
14.2 Deficit Financing - Concept and Meaning
14.3 Role of Deficit Financing as an Aid t o Financing Economic Development
14.4 Deficit Financing and Inflation
14.5 Deficit Financing and Price Behaviour in India
14.6 Advantages of Deficit Financing
14.7 Limitations of Deficit Financing
14.8 Measures/Alternatives t o Control Deficit Financing
14.9 Let Us Sum U p
14.10 Key Words
14.11 References
14.12 Answers t o Check Your Progress Exercises
14.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit you should b e able t o :
explain the meaning of deficit financing
discuss the role of deficit financing as an aid t o financing economic development
describe the relationship between deficit financing and inflation
state the impact of deficit financing on price behaviour in India
point out the advantages and limitations of deficit financing; and
suggest measures to control deficit financing.
14.1 INTRODUCTION
The government is committed t o socio-economic responsibilities for breaking the
vicious circle of poverty and uplifting the economic conditions of the masses and
developing the economy into a self-reliant one. In 1950, it was thought that these
objectives could be achieved through the process of planned economic development.
Throughout the period of planned economic development in the country one basic
problem has been that of mobilisation of resources.
Sources of financing economic development are broadly divided into domestic and
foreign sources. Domestic sources of finance at the disposal of the government consist
of taxation, public borrowing, government savings which include surpluses of public
enterprises and deficit financing. The foreign finances consist of loans, grants and
private investments. All these sources of finance have their social costs and benefits
o n the basis of which an upper limit can be determined for the use of any one method
of financing development. Since the financial requirements of development are
enormous and all various sources have their own limitations, it becomes almost
essential t o make use of all the sources as far as possible. The choice is not between
which one is t o be used but between the various combinations of using all of them.
Thus both the domestic and foreign sources of finance have their own place and
importance in a developing country. It is essential to formulate appropriate policies
for different sources of finance and successful implementation of these policies is
required for achieving the desired objectives of rapid economic development.
Taxation is an old source of government revenue. Not only that, it is also regarded
as the most desirable method of financing public investment in developing countries.
But it is a well known fact that taxation has a narrow coverage in developing countries
and the tax revenuetnational income ratio isnot only low but the increase in this ratio
is also very slow during the process of development.
Public borrowing is considered a better method of collecting public revenue than
taxation (on the one hand government will get sources for development programmes Deficla Financing
and, on the other, conspicuous consumption will be reduced). But it cannot substitute
taxation completely because there are certain limitations to the use of this source of
financing development. Firstly public borrowing depends on the credit worthiness of
the government. Secondly, people do not want to lend to the government because
the rates of interest offered by the government are lower than those offered by the
borrowers in the private sector. And thirdly, if the prices are rising, people will not
be interested in saving and lending because of depreciation in the value of money.
We shall be discussing about public borrowing as a source of resource mobilisation
in detail in the next Unit i.e. 15.
Domestic sources of financing economic development are sure to fall short of the
huge financial requirements for rapid economic development in developing
economies. So external sources of finance have become almost essential for the
developing economy. In spite of the necessity of foreign assistance, it remains only a
subordinate source of financing development in a developing economy. In the early
stages of development a substantial foreign assistance may be needed but gradually
foreign assistance as a percentage of development expenditure goes on diminishing
as the developing nations must learn gradually to become self reliant.
Hence various conventional sources of finance, such as taxation. public borrowing,
having been found to be inadequate, deficit financing has been resorted to for
meeting the resource gap. The idea of resorting to deficit financing for economic
development, which is of relatively recent origin, has remained very controversial.
But there are no two opinions regarding the evil consequences of deficit financing,
when adopted carelessely for capital formation and economic development. But the
problem before the country is to choose between the two evils i.e. to adopt deficit
financing for capital formation and face inflation or to go without development
programmes due to paucity of funds.
In this unit we will discuss the meaning of deficit financing and its role as an aid to
financing ec'onomic development. We shall also highlight the relationship between
deficit financing and inflation and its impact on price behaviour in India. The
advantages and limitations of deficit financing are also dealt with.
There were many other factors like mismanagement of the war economy. excessive
dependence on monsoon, power shortagz, labour strikes, increase in the rates of
commodity taxation, rise in wage rates, black money, rise in the international price
of petroleum products which have been responsible for price rise in India. However,
experience shows that the increase in money supply has led to a rise in prices. There
has been a close relationship between the rate of increase in prices and the rate of
growth in money supply and prices have a tendency to rise to new heights at every
successive increase in money supply resulting from deficit financing.
When deficit financing is inflationary, i t will go against the very purpose for which it
is used because it will simply lead to continuous inflation and no development.
Inflation creates uncertainty, labour unrest, work stoppages and decline in
production because of the demand for higher wages and salarieh to compensate for
higher cost of living. Inflation reduces the real income and the real consumption of
all classes of people in the society except the rich. This is objectionable on grounds
of economic efficiency, labour productivity and social justice. Moreover, there is no
certainty that higher levels of income accruing to profit earners will be invested in1
productive enterprises, for the rich may waste windfall gains in con'spicuous
consumption or indulge in speculative activities. Besides, inflation is a sort of invisible
tax on all incomes and cash balances. Their value is automatically reduced with every
rise in prices. Inflation leads to balance of payments difficulties because due to rising
prices the country loses export market and people prefer imported goods. which
appear cheaper as compared to domestic goods.
Inflation is charged with distorting the pattern of investment and production in the
economy. Inflation is beset with the danger of channelising economic resources into
less urgent and speculative fields where the scope for profits to private enterprises is
Illore and such fields are generally of little importance to the nation. Inflationary
deficit financing increases the administrative expenditure of the government because
whenever government resorts to large doses of deficit financing, it has to neutralise
its effects by sanctioning new dearness allowances, revision of controlled prices.
distribution of essentials through fair price shops, compulsory requisition of
foodstuffs etc. All these measures lead to an increase in the administrative burden of
the government in order to ward off inflation caused by the use of deficit financing.
ii) Safe limit of deficit financing also depends on the nature of government
expenditure for which new money is created, i.e., the purpose of deficit
financing. If the newly created money is used for unproductive purposes, the use
of deficit financing will be inflationary and the safe limit of deficit financing will
be lower than if the newly created money is to be used for industrial development
or for intensive farming.
iii) If the foreign exchange reserves are increasing the scope of using deficit financing
will increase because that way the country will be able to import more goods
which will have deflationary effect.
iv) Time lag between the initial investment and the flow of final products also
determines the safe limit of deficit financing. If this time lag is long, then inflation
will set in from the very initial stage of investment and it will not be possible to
control the rapidly rising prices.
v) Low safe limit of deficit financing is required if the economy consists of large
speculative business community.
vi) If government is not in position to implement successfully its economic policies
accompanying the policy of deficit financing, low safe limit of deficit financing is
prescribed.
vii) If a country is already passing through inflationary phase, low deficit financing is
advised.
viii) If the rate of growth of population is high then low deficit financing is good and
vice versa.
ix) Safe limit deficit financing also depends on a country's tax structure and the
borrowing schemes through which the government can take away at least a
portion of additional incomes thereby reducing the purchasing power with the
public. But all this is not easy in a developing economy where there are rigidities
in the tax system. There is large scale tax evasion so that government is not able
to take away any substantial part of additionalincomes. The country is,
therefore, more prone to inflation and the safe limit of deficit financing is low
In a developing economy, all the aforesaid factors exert their influence
simultaneously. The effect of each factor may be favourable or unfavourable for the
use of deficit financing and sometimes the effects of some factors may counter effect
each other and, thus, be cancelled out. This safe limit of deficit financing will be
different for different countries because conditions vary from country to country. The
safe limit of deficit financing also depends on the measure of popular cooperation
which the government gets and the willingness of the people to submit to austerity.
Even if this limit is calculated, it will go on changing with every change in the
economic conditions of the country. With efforts in the right direction this limit can
be shifted upwards so that a larger amount of deficit financing\ can be resorted to by
a government which is conducive to economic development and not inflation.
2) What do you understand by safe limit of deficit financing? List atleast three
factors affecting safe limit.
3) Discuss a few alternatives to control deficit financing. Deficit Financing
14.11 REFERENCES
Bandhopadhyay Asis, 1978, 'Deficit Financing as a Strategy for Economic
Development', in Commerce Guide.
Chelliah R.J.,1973. 'Significance of Alternative Concepts of Budget Deficit', I . M.F.
Staff Papers.
Jain Inu, 1991. 'Deficit Financing, Money Supply and Price Behaviour in Ivdia',
Finance India, Vol. V. No. 3.
Karadia, V.C., 1979. 'Deficit Financing, Money Supply and Price Behaviour ifiladia',
Indian Journal of Economics.
Tripathy , R.N. & M. Tripathy , 1985. Public Finance and Economic Development in
India, Mittal Publications : Delhi.