Systems Thinking Mod1
Systems Thinking Mod1
Learning Outcomes
Intended Students should be able to meet the following intended learning outcomes:
Learning Recognize the concepts of systems thinking.
Outcomes
Targets/ At the end of the lesson, students should be able to:
Objectives analyze the given problem/issue through causal loop diagram and feedback loops
(For further instructions, refer to your Google Classroom and see the
schedule of activities for this module)
Lecture Guide
Systems Thinking is the art and science of making reliable inferences about
behavior by developing an increasingly deep understanding of underlying structure.
Cultivating this "art and science" leads to routine use of correct mental models
that see the world as a complex system whose behavior is controlled by its dynamic
structure, which is the way its feedback loops interact to drive the system's behavior. The
term systems thinking is preferred to holistic or whole systems, which have looser and
more intuitive meanings, and emphasize understanding the whole rather than the
dynamic structure of the system.
Systems thinking is not stepping back to look at the whole, the big picture, or a
higher level. Nor is it realizing that when a butterfly flaps its wings in one place, that could
cause a hurricane far away. This helps, but does not lead to the major insights that emerge
when the feedback loop structure of the system becomes visible. When this happens night
becomes day. Systems thinking is the first step to an even higher level: system dynamics,
where instead of just thinking in terms of system structure you model it (Barry Richmond,
1987).
Systems thinking is a way of thinking about, and a language for describing and
Offline Activities understanding, the forces and interrelationships that shape the behavior of systems. This
(e-Learning/Self- discipline helps us to see how to change systems more effectively, and to act more in tune
Paced) with the natural processes of the natural and economic world (Peter Senge's The Fifth
Discipline Fieldbook).
2 kinds of thinkers
• Everyone in the world can also be divided into two groups based on how they see
the world around them: event oriented thinkers and system thinkers.
They see the world as a rag tag collection of parts and events. Each event
has a cause and if you want to solve a problem, find the cause and fix
that. Applying this mind set to the global environmental sustainability problem,
they see people’s misbehavior as the cause of the problem. The solution, then, is
to get them to stop behaving so irresponsibly. This can be done with laws stating
what to do and not to do, plus emotional appeals to be nice to the environment.
When that solution fails, as it has for over 40 years, they just throw up their hands
and call it a hard problem. This mindset is also known as Classic Activism.
Systems thinking revolves around a handful of concepts that anyone who is determined
to learn can master, with study and practice. The key concepts are:
behavior is emergent.
Engaging Activities
L/M
+
OFFICIAL BRIBERY
bureaucracy
M/L
gov’t. policy
L/M
+
OFFICIAL BRIBERY
L/M
suffering
Performance Tasks
PT 1
Directions: Make a reinforcing loop and a balancing loop with 5 variables each considering “health
pandemic” as the issue.
2 / NEEDS
5 / EXCELLENT 4 / VERY GOOD 3 / AVERAGE 1 / UNACCEPTABLE
IMPROVEMENT
This paper is clear and This paper is mostly The writer is beginning to Topic is not well-defined As yet, the paper has no
focused. It holds the focused, and has some define the topic, even and/or there are too clear sense of purpose or
reader's attention. good details. though development is many topics. central theme. To extract
Ideas Relevant details enrich still basic or general. meaning from the text,
the central theme. the reader must make
inferences based on
sketchy or missing details.
The organization Paper (and paragraphs) The organizational Sentences within The writing lacks a clear
enhances and showcases are mostly organized, in structure is strong paragraphs make sense, sense of direction. Ideas,
the central idea or order, and makes sense enough to move the but the order of details, or events seem
theme. The order, to the reader. reader through the text paragraphs does not. strung together in a loose
Organization
structure of information without too much or random fashion; there
is compelling and moves confusion. is no identifiable internal
the reader through the structure.
text.
The writing has an easy The writing mostly flows, The text hums along with The text seems choppy The reader has to
flow, rhythm, and and usually invites oral a steady beat, but tends and is not easy to read practice quite a bit in
cadence. Sentences are reading. to be more businesslike orally. order to give this paper a
Sentence
well built, with strong than musical, more fair interpretive reading.
Fluency
and varied structure that mechanical than fluid.
invites expressive oral
reading.
The form and The format only has a The writer's message is The writer's message is The reader receives a
presentation of the text few mistakes and is understandable in this only understandable garbled message due to
enhances the ability for generally easy to read format. occasionally, and paper is problems relating to the
Presentation the reader to understand and pleasing to the eye. messily written. presentation of the text,
and connect with the and is not typed.
message. It is pleasing to
the eye.
Adopted from:https://www.coursehero.com/file/41388589/EDRD-430-COOPER-Rubricdocx/
Learning Resources