Chapter 14 - Work Sampling
Chapter 14 - Work Sampling
Work Sampling 1
Work Sampling
Introduction
• Applications
(1) Determining machine utilization
(2) Determining allowances
(3) Establishing standard times
Pros Cons
• Reduce tension caused by • Decrease the accuracy of
constant observation of performance rating (difficult to do
workers. a performance rating at each short
• Establish an average standard instant).
time over varying work • Require a relatively large number
conditions. of random observations for high
• Permit simultaneous accuracy.
development of standards for
various operations.
• Procedure
1. Estimation of Percentage
ni
pˆ =
n
where: n = total number of observations
ni = number of observations for activity i
pq p(1 − p)
pˆ ~ N p, = N p, if np > 5 and nq = n(1 − p) > 5
n n
pˆ (1 − pˆ ) pˆ (1 − pˆ )
P pˆ − z α ≤ p ≤ pˆ + z α = 1− α
2
n 2
n
pˆ (1 − pˆ )
L = zα
2
n
z α2 / 2 pˆ (1 − pˆ )
N=
L2
• There is a direct trade-off between the accuracy of the study and the
number of observations needed. Thus, we need to check if the extra
sample size is worth for the extra accuracy.
Chapter 14. Work Sampling 4
(2) Analyst’s Bias: There is a natural tendency for the observer to record
what has just happened or what will be happening, rather than what is
actually happening at the exact moment of observation.
• The longer period of time the time study, the better the chance of
observing average conditions.
• Make a mark on the floor to show where the analyst should stand before
making an observation.
• Take a visual observation, and then make a written entry after leaving the
work area to minimize the workers’ feelings of being watched and to allow
them to perform in their accustomed manner.
(Note) A video camera can be used to save the travel time of the analyst
and reduce bias in the study.
• If the operator or machine under study is idle, the analyst must determine
the reason for the idleness, and confirm the reason with the line
supervisor before recording the data.
2. Recording Form
• A standard form does not exist because each work sampling study is
unique.
(e.g.)
Random Material Unavoidable Performance
No Machine Drilling Set-up
Time Handling Delay Rating
1 8:07 3 v 125
2 8:08 4 v 110
3 8:16 2 v 110
4 9:17 3 v 105
5 10:56 1 v 110
6 11:16 1 v 105
7 11:52 5 v 110
8 13:00 3 v 105
9 13:18 2 v 110
10 13:20 3 v 120
11 13:22 2 v 125
12 13:28 4 v 105
13 13:30 3 v 110
14 13:38 1 v
15 13:48 5 v 100
16 13:57 3 v 105
17 14:10 2 v 110
18 15:11 2 v 105
19 15:18 5 v 110
20 15:45 4 v 110
Total 12 3 4 1 2090
% 60.0% 15.0% 20.0% 5.0% 110
Chapter 14. Work Sampling 6
3. Plotting Percentages
• Plot p values for each day on a control chart (used in statistical quality
control) using ±3σ limits (99.73%) as the control limits.
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Day
• Points beyond the control limits of p are considered as being out of control.
(1) If the case occurred due to rare reasons (e.g., complete failure of
machine, strike), eliminate the outliers.
(2) If the case occurred due to change of the work methods, modify the
control chart and recalculate the sample size requirement.
Chapter 14. Work Sampling 7
Material Unavoidable
Machine Drilling Set-up Total
Handling Delay
1 101 26 44 3 174
2 102 34 35 6 177
3 119 34 25 5 183
4 109 24 33 8 174
5 127 30 29 6 192
Total 558 148 166 28 900
% 62.0% 16.4% 18.4% 3.1% 100.0%
1. Machine Utilization
z 0.05 = 1.96
2
pˆ (1 − pˆ ) pˆ (1 − pˆ )
pˆ − z α ≤ p ≤ pˆ + z α
2
n 2
n
2. Allowance
3. Standard Time
• Determine the observed time (OT) of each work element for a piece:
T × pˆ i
OTi =
P
where: T = total time of the study period,
p̂i = % element i , and
P = total production volume during the study period
Exercise: OT
T × pˆ drilling
OTdrilling =
P
T × pˆ set −up
OTset −up =
P
T × pˆ material _ handling
OTmaterial _ handling =
P
• Determine the normal time (NT) of the work process for a piece:
NT = ∑ OT × R , where
i
i R = average rating of performance
Exercise: NT
• Determine the standard time (NT) of the work process for a piece:
Exercise: ST