Partido College: Module No.5 Learning/Thinking Style and Multiple Intellegences
Partido College: Module No.5 Learning/Thinking Style and Multiple Intellegences
Partido College: Module No.5 Learning/Thinking Style and Multiple Intellegences
PARTIDO COLLEGE
Goa Camarines Sur
2nd Semester
School Year- 202
Learners are expected to discuss the different learning challenge, and how to plan
learning activities that match learner’s learning/thinking styles and multiple intelligences.
II- LEARNING OBJECTIVE:
In this module, you are to challenge yourself to attain the following learning outcomes:
Describe the different learning/thinking styles and multiple intelligences
Pinpoint your own learning/thinking styles and multiple intelligences
III- INTRODUCTION:
One factor that brings about student diversity is thinking/learning styles. Individuals think
and learn in distinct ways. In any group of learners there will always be different learning
characteristics, particularly in the learners’ manner of processing information. Some would
absorb the lesson better when they work with their hands than when they just listen. Others
would prefer to watch a video about a topic. Students, likewise, have preferred ways of
expressing their thoughts, feelings and ideas. Some would prefer to write, others would draw
or even dance and sing. These preferences involve thinking/learning styles and multiple
intelligences.
IV- DISCUSSION AND PRESENTATION:
Learning/Thinking styles
Learning/thinking styles refer to the preferred way an individual processes information.
They describe a person’s typical mode of thinking, remembering or problem solving.
Furthermore, styles are usually considered to be bipolar dimensions. For instance, your
particular learning/thinking style simply denotes a tendency to behave in a certain manner.
Your style is usually described as a personality dimension which influences your attitude
values and social interaction.
There are several perspectives about learning/thinking styles. We shall focus on sensory
preferences and the global-analytic continuum.
Sensory Preferences. Individuals tend to gravitate toward one or two types of sensory input
and maintain a dominance in one of the following types:
Visual Learners. These learners must see their teacher’s actions and facial expressions to
fully understand the content of a lesson. They tend to prefer sitting in front so no one
would block their view. They may think in pictures and learn best from visual aids
including; diagrams, illustrated text books, overhead transparencies, videos, flipcharts
Prof. Ed 4 Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching
and hand-outs. During a lecture or classroom discussion, visual learners often prefer to
take detailed notes to absorb information.
Visual-iconic. Those who prefer this form of input are more interested in visual
imagery such as film, graphic displays, or pictures in order to solidify learning.
They usually have good “picture memory" a.k.a. iconic imagery and attend to
pictorial detail. They would like to read a map better than to read a book.
Visual symbolic. Those who prefer this form of input feel comfortable with
abstract symbolism such as mathematical formulae or the written word. They
would prefer to read a book than a map and would like to read about things than
hear about them. They tend to be good abstract thinkers who do not require
practical means for learning.
Auditory Learners. They learn best through verbal lectures, discussions, talking things
through and listening to what others have to say. Auditory learners interpret the
underlying meanings of speech through listening to tone voice, pitch, speed and other
nuances. Written information may have little meaning until it is heard. These learners
often benefit from reading text aloud and using a tape recorder. They can attend aurally
to details, translate the spoken word easily into the written word, and are not easily
distracted in their listening ability.
TALKERS- They are the ones who prefer to talk and discuss. They often find
themselves talking to those around them. In a class setting when the instructor is
not asking questions, auditory-verbal processors (talkers) tend to whisper
comments to themselves. They are not trying to be disruptive and may not even
realize that they need to talk.
Global. Global thinkers lean towards non-linear thought and tend to see the whole
pattern rather than particle elements. They are the “forest seers” who give attention only
to the overall structure and sometimes ignore details.
Multiple Intelligences
The theory of multiple intelligences (MI) was first described by Howard Gardner in Frames
of Mind (1983). Gardner defines intelligence as “an ability or set of abilities that allows a person
to solve a problem or fashion a product that is valued in one or more cultures”. Gardner believes
that different intelligences may be independent abilities—a person can be low in one domain area
but high in another. All of us possess the intelligences but in varying degrees of strength.
His most current research indicates that there are nine distinct forms of intelligences. In
order to facilitate learning effectively, teachers should use strategies that match these kinds of
intelligences. The nine kinds are:
Visual/ Spatial Intelligence (Picture Smart)
Prof. Ed 4 Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching
Learning visually and organizing ideas spatially. Seeing concepts in action in order to
understand them. The ability to "see" things in one's mind in planning to create a product or
solve a problem.
Verbal/Linguistic Intelligence (Word Smart)
Learning through the spoken and written word. This intelligence is always valued in the
traditional classroom and in traditional assessments of intelligence and achievement.
Mathematical/Logical Intelligence (Number Smart/Logic Smart)
Learning through reasoning and problem solving. Also highly valued in the traditional
classroom where students are asked to adapt to logically sequenced delivery of instruction.
Bodily/Kinesthetic Intelligence (Body Smart)
Learning through interaction with one's environment. This intelligence is the domain of
"overly active” learners. It promotes understanding through concrete experience.
Musical (Music Smart)
Learning through patterns, rhythms and music. This includes not only auditory learning
but also the identification patterns through all the senses.
Intrapersonal (Self Smart)
Learning through feelings, values and attitudes. This is a decidedly affective component
of learning through which students place value on what they learn and take ownership for their
learning.
Interpersonal (People Smart)
Learning through interaction with others. Not the domain of children who are simply
"talkative" or "overly social." this intelligence promotes collaboration and working cooperatively
with others.
Naturalist (Nature Smart)
Learning through classification, categories and hierarchies. The naturalist intelligence
picks up on subtle differences in meaning. It is not simply the study of nature; it can be used in
all areas of study.
Existential (Spirit Smart)
Learning by seeing the “big picture”: "Why are we here?” “What is my role in the world?”
“What is my place in my family, school and community?” This intelligence seeks connections
to real world understanding and application of new learning.
It is important for teachers to use their knowledge about thinking/ learning style and
multiple intelligences in planning activities to help their students learn effectively.
Prof. Ed 4 Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching
While researches on these typologies continue, it is clear that the teachers can no
longer just teach the text book. It is a sensible practice to teach each child according to his/her
thinking/learning styles and multiple intelligence.
Teaching Strategies Guided by Thinking/Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences
1. Use questions of all types to stimulate various levels of thinking from recalling factual
information to drawing implications and making value judgments.
2. Provide a general overview of material to be learned, i.e., structured overviews, advance
organizers, etc., so that students' past experiences will be associated with the new ideas.
3. Allow sufficient time for information to be processed and then integrate using both the
right-and left-brain hemispheres.
4. Set clear purposes before any listening, viewing or reading experience.
5. Warm up before the lesson development by using brainstorming, set induction, etc.
6. Use multisensory means for both processing and retrieving information. (Write directions
on the board and give them orally.)
7. Use a variety of review and reflection strategies to bring closure to learning (writing
summaries, creating opinion surveys, etc.).
8. Use descriptive feedback rather than simply praising (“The example you've provided is an
excellent one to point to the concept of ...”).
ACTIVITY - 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Prof. Ed 4 Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching
9.
10.
V- Assessment
1. In your own words, describe the different learning/thinking styles and multiple
intelligences.
2. What is/are your learning/thinking styles? What are your dominant multiple
intelligences?
3. Choose a particular learning style and intelligence of students. Plan learning activities
that match with the particular learning styles and multiple intelligences of students.
VI- Assignment:
1. Find the following terms:
a. Exceptional Learners b. Learning Disabilities c. Mental retardation d. autism
e. Physical Disabilities f. Emotional Behavioral Disorder g. Health Impairment
2. What are the basics categories of exceptional learners?
VII-Reference:
Lucas, M.R. D., PhD & Corpuz, B., PhD. Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching. LORIMAR
Publishing Inc. ISBN 978-621-8035-97-3, 5th Edition.
Prepared by:
NATIVIDAD S. ALEJANDRO, MAEd.
Instructress
Prof. Ed 4 Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching