Risk Assessment: Corresponding Permit To Work No

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

G

Corresponding Permit to Work No. P289-00-3957161


Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment of: Welding of Lifting Eyes on SKP-06 Rev: 00


Assessor(s): Sagar Sharma, Sheeraz Ahmed, Mirza Muhammad Anwar Date of Assessment:
23/05/2022
Responsible Supervisor: Sheeraz Ahmed, Mirza Anwar Signature Date:
Description of activity:
1. Mobilization of Material ,Equipment and manpower on site
2. Visual Inspection of internal side from main hole and gas testing before stating hot work
3. Extend scaffolding platform for welding of eyes on roof for access and anchor point reference permit number (P289-00-3945560)
4. Welding of Lifting Eyes on SKP-06 top side
5. Perform DPT.
6. Housekeeping
Description of equipment and Tools:
Welding Plant, DPT Set(Cleaner, Penetrate & Developer), Full body Harness, and other general hand tools

Overall Assessment of Risk (using Shell Risk Assessment Matrix): High Medium Low

Action needed: (inc responsible party and close out target)

Comment (if any):


Hazard Analysis Worksheet (For Assessment ref :)

Form G – Risk Assessment Distribution Permit to Work System Reviewed by: March 2006

Document Prepared by: (Sagar Sharma) Custodian: Approved by: Page 1 of 4


Form G – Risk Assessment Distribution Permit to Work System Reviewed by: March 2006

Document Prepared by: (Sagar Sharma) Custodian: Approved by: Page 2 of 4


Risk
Those
Activity Hazards & Risks Those at Risk Controls in place RA Recommendations
Responsible
M
What hazards and risks Who will be
Who is
are associated with the affected by the
What measures are required to responsible to
What activity is task? These must be hazards?
eliminate or control the hazards to an ensure that
being planned? identified before the job isEmployees and
acceptable level? these measures
carried out. any others in
are put in place?
the area.
1. Mobilization  Use of non- Project  Only certified, Tested and pre-
on Site: recommended, self- workers / Other inspected Equipment to be
(Tool / Plant & fabricated and banned contractor / used.
Equipment to site) tools / plant / equipment Terminal Assets  Ensure that no safety guard is
may lead to personal removed from tools.
injury and damage to  No homemade hand tool is
terminal assets. allowed at site. Project Engineer  Ensure availability
 Provide red tag and remove 2C Safety of industrial grade
any hand tool if it gets Supervisor hand tools.
damaged during work at site.
 Access the load before
handling to ensure safe grip.
 Wear adequate PPEs and
additional PPEs where
required.

2.Visual Inspection  Flammable material Project  Ensure Visual inspection of 2B Project Engineer Inspection should be
of internal side  Hydrocarbons workers / Other internal side from top side Safety done before starting
from main hole  Slug contractor / main hole Supervisor work
 Toxic gases Terminal Assets  Ensure gas testing by
and gas testing
authorized gas tester
before stating hot  Ensure no flammable material
work inside tank or near hot work
activity
3.Extend  Fall from height Project  Ensure double Layard harness 3C Project Engineer Ensure Pre
scaffolding  Slip & trip workers / Other belt during working at height Safety Inspection of
platform for contractor /  Ensure 100% tie off Supervisor Harness before Each
Terminal Assets  During erection and use
welding of Form
eyesGon– Risk Assessment Distribution Permit to Work System Reviewed by: March 2006
dismantling only scaffolders
roof for access and are allowed
anchor point  Ensure housekeepingApproved by:
Document Prepared by: (Sagar Sharma) Custodian: Page 3 of 4
reference permit  Ensure no slip and trip material
number (P289-00- before starting work
3945560)
4. Welding of  Hot work Project  Ensure gas testing 3C Project Engineer
Non exhaustive list of hazard categories

When conducting a risk assessment:


 The assessment should be carried out in good time prior to the relevant decision being made
 When a specific assessment is needed then such an assessment, rather than a generic assessment should be made
 The risk from each activity should be considered
 A team of people or employees with practical knowledge of the process/activity being assessed should be used as appropriate
 Consultants should be used where necessary
 All the hazards associated with a particular activity should be considered
 Hazards and risk controls should be linked
 The results of the assessment should be properly used.
 Assessment should be revised when change in condition, tool, task or methodology or when new technology is introduced.

Form G – Risk Assessment Distribution Permit to Work System Reviewed by: March 2006

Document Prepared by: (Sagar Sharma) Custodian: Approved by: Page 4 of 4

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy