NEAP QAME Analysis Forms 1 2 3 2 1

Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES

2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
QAME Analysis Form I: Analysis of the Monitoring/Evaluation Results
ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS
(to be accomplished by Individual Monitors)
Title of the Training Program: _____________________________________________ Inclusive Dates:_________________________

Learning Service Provider (Division/HEI):_______________________________ Class Section: __________________________
Venue: _____________________________________ Proponent: ________________________________
NAME OF MONITOR: ________________________________ Date Monitored: ___________________________ Mobile number of Monitor: _____________________________
PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site
monitors, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
SESSION TITLE Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Factors that may Recommended Steps
(This may be done Improvement have contributed to Address the
through a Focus-Group to the areas for Issue/s. (Indicate
Discussion) improvement whether action can be
(This may be done immediate or long-
through a Focus- term)
Group Discussion)
Session1:___________________
Average Session Rating:
Facilitator :
______________________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
Session2:___________________
Facilitator :
______________________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
Session3:___________________
Facilitator :
______________________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
Session4:___________________
Facilitator :
______________________________
Average Facilitator
Rating:
2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of Action to Address
Standard/s the Deviation
PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training Management

Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
DAY Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
1
4
5
AVERAGE RATING
FOR OPERATIONS
2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the
Standard/s Deviation
IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate action
PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)
AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0” )

Identify Class Section/s and Program Attainment Delivery of Provision of Program Training Accommodations
batches Management of Objectives Content Support Management Venue
Materials Team
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:

SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
FURTHER LEARNING
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

Submitted by: ____________________________________________ Copy Given to: On-Site QAME Team Leader
QAME ANALYSIS FORM 2
SUMMARY OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
(to be accomplished by On-Site Team Leader)
Title of Training Program:
Learning Service Provider/Division:
Region of Program:
Division of Program:
Venue:
Inclusive Dates:
Learning Area/s:
Participants: (No. of Participants and General Description):
Name of On-Site Team Leader:
Mobile Number of On-Site Team Leader:
1. What is the daily overall rating of the sessions and facilitators?

Day Overall Session-Facilitator Rating General General Summary of Comments and Suggestions
(Average of General Rating for Sessions Rating for Rating for
and Facilitators) Sessions Facilitators
1
4
SITE AVERAGE FOR SESSIONS AND

FACILITATORS:
Major Observations/ Findings:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. What is the overall rating of the daily operations of the training program?
Day Overall Summary of Significant Comments and Suggestions
Rating
1
4
AVERAGE
FOR
OPERATIONS
Major Observations/ Findings:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Are there critical incidents that should be addressed by the Training Program Provider/Management?
CRITICAL INCIDENT/S BASED ON Training Region of Action Taken by the Program Status
STAR Provider Training Management
(Division/TEI) Provider
Major Observations/Findings:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)
AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0” )

Training Site/Venue Program Attainment Delivery of Provision of Program Training Accommodations
Management of Objectives Content Support Management Venue
Materials Team
SITE AVERAGE:
*Average of ALL 7 criteria within a training site/venue
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:

SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
FURTHER LEARNING
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

5. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS:
6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:
Submitted by: ____________________________________ Recommending Approval: ________________________________ Approved by: ______________________________

Copy Given to: Regional QAME Team Leader

NEAP QAME Analysis Forms 1 2 3 2 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NEAP QAME Analysis Forms 1 2 3 2 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NEAP QAME Analysis Forms 1 2 3 2 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Department of Education

NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES

Title of the Training Program: _____________________ Inclusive Dates:_

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training Management

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0” )

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

1. What is the daily overall rating of the sessions and facilitators?

SITE AVERAGE FOR SESSIONS AND

Major Observations/ Findings:

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0” )

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

5. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS:

6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:

Submitted by: ______ Recommending Approval: Approved by:

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.