Spirometer Handbook Naca
Spirometer Handbook Naca
Spirometer Handbook Naca
Copyright Rob Pierce and David P. Johns, 1995, 2004, 2008. First published 1995. Revised by David P. Johns July 2004 and March 2008. This handbook is not intended to be a comprehensive guide to spirometry. Those seeking detailed information should refer to the recommended text below. Recommended Text Book Pocket Guide to Spirometry, 2nd edition David P. Johns & Rob Pierce McGraw-Hill Australia, 2007
Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Measurement of Ventilatory Function ....................................................................................................................... 4 Measurement Devices .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Volume-Displacement Spirometers ....................................................................................................................... 5 Flow-Sensing Spirometers .................................................................................................................................... 5 Monitoring Devices................................................................................................................................................ 6 Factors to Consider when Choosing a Spirometer ................................................................................................ 6 The Technique - How to Do it and Common Pitfalls and Problems........................................................................... 7 How to Do It .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Acceptability Criteria .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Repeatability Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Results to Report ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Patient-Related Problems ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Instrument-Related Problems................................................................................................................................ 9 Predicted Normal Values ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Interpretation of Ventilatory Function Tests............................................................................................................. 10 Classifying Abnormal Ventilatory Function .......................................................................................................... 10 Measuring Reversibility of Airflow Obstruction..................................................................................................... 12 Peak Flow Monitoring.......................................................................................................................................... 13 Choosing an Appropriate Test............................................................................................................................. 13 Infection Control Measures ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Appendix A - Calibration Checks ............................................................................................................................ 15 Appendix B - Predicted Normal Values ................................................................................................................... 16 Respiratory function tables .................................................................................................................................. 16 FEV1 (L) Male .................................................................................................................................................. 17 FVC (L) Male ................................................................................................................................................... 17 FEV1/FVC (%) Male ......................................................................................................................................... 17 FEV1 (L) Female .............................................................................................................................................. 18 FVC (L) Female ............................................................................................................................................... 18 FEV1/FVC (%) Female..................................................................................................................................... 18 FEV1 (L) Male children (<20 years).................................................................................................................. 19 FVC (L) Male children (<20 years) ................................................................................................................... 19 FEV1/FVC (%) Male Children (<20 years)........................................................................................................ 19 PEF (L/min) Male children (<20 years) ............................................................................................................ 20 FEV1 (L) Female Children (<18 years)............................................................................................................. 21 FVC (L) Female Children (<18 years) .............................................................................................................. 21 FEV1/FVC (%) Female Children (<18 years).................................................................................................... 21 PEF (L/min) Female Children (<18 years) ....................................................................................................... 22 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................................................ 23 References.......................................................................................................................................................... 23 Further Reading .................................................................................................................................................. 23 Acknowledgements................................................................................................................................................. 23 Copyright & Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................... 24
Page 2
Introduction
A great deal can be learned about the mechanical properties of the lungs from measurements of forced maximal expiration and inspiration. Since Hutchinson first developed the spirometer in 1846, measurements of the so-called dynamic lung volumes and of maximal flow rates have been used in the detection and quantification of diseases affecting the respiratory system. Over the years it has become obvious that the spirometer and peak flow meter used to measure ventilatory function are as deserving of a place in the family practitioner's surgery as the sphygmomanometer. After all, who would dream of managing hypertension without measurement of blood pressure? It is important to appreciate that the clinical value of spirometric measurements is critically dependent on the correct operation and accuracy of the spirometer, performance of the correct breathing manoeuvre and use of relevant predicted normal values. Staff performing spirometry should first attend a comprehensive training course. This is important because inadequate training will result in poor quality spirometry that is of little clinical value. This handbook was written as a guide for those involved in the performance and interpretation of spirometry in clinical practice, i.e. medical practitioners and assisting nursing staff, and as an introduction to the topic for scientists and technicians. It is not intended to be an exhaustive review but rather a guide aiming to help improve the knowledge and techniques of those already doing and interpreting spirometry, and to introduce spirometry to those learning how to do it for the first time. The important facts about types of spirometers, how the test is actually performed and interpreted, and some common pitfalls and problems are covered in the main text. Those seeking more detailed information, including case histories, are referred to our other publications: 1. Johns DP, Pierce R. Pocket Guide to Spirometry, 2nd edition. Sydney: McGraw-Hill Australia, 2007. 2. Burton D, Johns DP, Swanney M. Spirometer Users and Buyers Guide. Melbourne: Department of Health and Ageing, 2005. 3. Johns DP, Pierce R. How to Perform and Interpret Spirometry [CD ROM]. Melbourne: Medi+World International, 2004.
Page 3
4.
Figure 1 Normal spirogram showing the measurements of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow over the middle half of the FVC (FEF25-75%). The left panel is a typical recording from a water-sealed (or rolling seal) spirometer with inspired volume upward; the right panel is a spirogram from a dry wedge-bellows spirometer with expired volume upward.
Page 4
Measurement Devices
Commonly used devices include volume-displacement and flow-sensing spirometers for use in the office or laboratory and portable devices suitable for personal use. Volume-Displacement Spirometers Conventional spirometers provide a direct measure of respired volume from the: displacement of a bell (water sealed); piston (rolling seal); or bellows (e.g. wedge bellows).
The results are normally presented as a graphic display of expired volume against time (a spirogram). The indices FEV1, FVC and VC are generally manually calculated (including correction to BTPS) from the spirogram by the operator and for this reason volume-type spirometers are considered time consuming and less convenient for routine use in the doctor's surgery. Generally, volume spirometers are simple to use, accurate, reliable, easy to maintain and provide a clear and permanent record of the test. They are, however, less portable than flow spirometers, and more difficult to clean and disinfect. Flow-Sensing Spirometers Over recent years advances in electronics and microprocessor technology have led to the development of a new range of portable spirometers. Flow spirometers generally utilise a sensor that measures flow as the primary signal and calculate volume by electronic (analog) or numerical (digital) integration of the flow signal. The most commonly used flow sensors detect and measure flow from: the pressure drop across a resistance (e.g. pneumotach or orifice); the cooling of a heated wire (anemometer); electronically counting the rotation of a turbine blade; or the time of flight of an ultrasonic sound pulse directed across the expired gas flow (ultrasonic sensor).
For the general practitioner these devices have largely replaced the volume spirometer because they are usually portable and they automatically calculate a large range of ventilatory indices, provide immediate feedback on the quality of each blow, select the best result, store patient results, calculate reference values for the patient being tested and provide a print-out of the results including the spirogram and flow-volume loop. These features, together with their portability, ease of use and maintenance (e.g. cleaning and disinfection) have resulted in the increasing popularity of flow-based spirometers. Some flow spirometers have single patient use disposable sensors, effectively eliminating the need for cleaning and disinfection. However, the accuracy of each new sensor may need to be established. Accuracy and reproducibility depend on the stability and calibration of the electronic circuitry and appropriate correction of flow and volume to BTPS conditions. Spirometers need to be calibrated (or their accuracy validated) regularly (see Appendix A).
SPIROMETRY: The Measurement and Interpretation of Ventilatory Function in Clinical Practice Page 5
Monitoring Devices Mechanical devices for personal use by patients, such as the peak flow meter, have been available for several decades for serial monitoring of lung function and have proven useful in the management of asthma. Most peak flow meters are robust and provide reproducible results essential for serial monitoring. However, they often have limited accuracy and, because they provide only a single effort-dependent index of ventilatory function, they have limited application in the initial assessment of respiratory diseases. Measurements of PEF are reduced in diseases causing airways obstruction. Peak flow monitoring is particularly useful for following trends in lung function, quantifying response to treatment and identifying trigger factors in asthma. Portable peak flow meters are a reasonably reliable tool for patients to monitor their own airway function. Recently several small, inexpensive yet accurate battery-powered devices for measuring ventilatory function (including FEV1) have been developed, some of which can store the test data which can be downloaded onto a computer for review and statistical analysis.
Factors to Consider when Choosing a Spirometer Ease of use Provision of easy to read real-time graphic display of the manoeuvre Provision of immediate quality feedback concerning the acceptability of blows, including reproducibility Provision to interface with clinical software packages Provision of customisable final spirometry report Provision to print the final report Price and running costs Reliability and ease of maintenance Training, servicing and repair of the spirometer provided by supplier Ability to trial the spirometer in your setting before purchase Provision of a disposable sensor or a breathing circuit that can be easily cleaned and disinfected Provision of appropriate normal reference values with lower limits of normal Robustness Provision of a comprehensive manual describing the spirometers operation, maintenance and calibration Calibration requirements Conformance with accepted spirometry performance standards Compliance with electrical safety standards
A summary of the specifications and features of spirometers currently available in Australia and New Zealand is provided in the Spirometer Users and Buyers Guide, which is published on the National Asthma Council Australia website (http://nationalasthma.org.au). Faced with such a large variety of spirometers, general practitioners have to choose an instrument suitable for use in their own surgery. Readers are advised to contact their State Asthma Foundation for further information and advice on peak flow meters, and local respiratory laboratories regarding spirometers.
Page 6
breathe in again as forcibly and fully as possible (if inspiratory curve is required and the spirometer is able to measure inspiration). If only peak expiratory flow is being measured then the patient need only exhale for a couple of seconds. Essentials are: to breathe in fully (must be absolutely full) a good seal on the mouthpiece very vigorous effort right from the start of the manoeuvre and continuing until absolutely no more air can be exhaled no leaning forward during the test obtain at least 3 acceptable tests that meet repeatability criteria (see below)
Remember, particularly in patients with airflow obstruction, that it may take many seconds to fully exhale. It is also important to recognise those patients whose efforts are reduced by chest pain or abdominal problems, or by fear of incontinence, or even just by lack of confidence. There is no substitute for careful explanation and demonstration demonstrating the manoeuvre to the patient will overcome 90% of problems encountered and is critical in achieving satisfactory results. Observation and encouragement of the patient's performance are also crucial. At least three technically acceptable manoeuvres should be obtained, ideally with less than 0.15 L variability for FEV1 (and FVC) between the highest and second highest result. Each individual test is acceptable if it meets the following acceptability and repeatability criteria. Acceptability Criteria The patient followed instructions A continuous maximal expiratory manoeuvre throughout the test (i.e. no stops and starts) was achieved and was initiated from full inspiration There was no evidence of hesitation during the test The test was performed with a rapid start The PEF has a sharp rise (flow-volume) No premature termination, i.e. expiration continued until there was no change in volume and the patient had blown for 3 seconds (children aged <10 years) or for 6 seconds (patients aged 10 years). However, the patient or practitioner can terminate the blow if the patient cannot or should not continue There were no leaks No cough (note FEV1 may be valid if cough occurs after the first second) No glottis closure (Valsalva) No obstruction of the mouthpiece (e.g. by the tongue or teeth) No evidence that the patient took an additional breath during the expiratory manoeuvre
Page 7
Repeatability Criteria Obtain 3 acceptable tests, i.e. each test should meet the stated acceptability criteria The two largest values for FVC should agree to within 0.15L
The two largest values for FEV1 should agree to within 0.15L Obtain additional tests if these repeatability criteria are not met. Results to Report FEV1 - report the largest value FVC - report the largest value PEF - report the largest value FEF25-75% - report the value from the test with the highest sum of FEV1 + FVC
It is important that the acceptability criteria be applied and unacceptable tests discarded before assessing repeatability, as the latter is used to determine whether additional tests from the three acceptable ones already obtained are required. These criteria (together with a properly maintained and calibrated spirometer) help to ensure the quality of your results. Tests that do not fully meet the acceptability criteria may still be useful. For example, FEV1 may still be valid if cough or premature termination of the blow occurs after the first second. The report should state when the results are obtained from manoeuvres that do not meet acceptability and repeatability criteria. Figures 3 (a) and 3 (b) show some problematic examples compared with well-performed manoeuvres.
Fig 3 (a)
Page 8
Fig 3 (b)
Patient-Related Problems The most common patient-related problems when performing the FVC manoeuvre are: 1. Submaximal effort 2. Leaks between the lips and mouthpiece 3. Incomplete inspiration or expiration (prior to or during the forced manoeuvre) 4. Hesitation at the start of the expiration 5. Cough (particularly within the first second of expiration) 6. Glottic closure 7. Obstruction of the mouthpiece by the tongue 8. Vocalisation during the forced manoeuvre 9. Poor posture. Once again, demonstration of the procedure will prevent many of these problems, remembering that all effortdependent measurements will be variable in patients who are uncooperative or trying to produce low values. Glottis closure should be suspected if flow ceases abruptly during the test rather than being a continuous smooth curve. Recordings with cough, particularly if this occurs within the first second, or hesitation at the start should be rejected. Vocalisation during the test will reduce flows and must be discouraged - performing the manoeuvre with the neck extended often helps. The vigorous effort required for spirometry is often facilitated by demonstrating the test yourself.
Instrument-Related Problems These depend largely on the type of spirometer being used. On volume-displacement spirometers look for leaks in the hose connections; on flow-sensing spirometers look for rips and tears in the flowhead connector tube; on electronic spirometers be particularly careful about calibration, accuracy and linearity. Standards recommend checking the calibration at least daily and a simple self-test of the spirometer is an additional, useful daily check that the instrument is functioning correctly.
Page 9
3. 4.
There is a vast literature of normal population studies, many of which have deficiencies in sample size, definition of normality, inclusion of smokers and choice of equipment. Appendix B provides tables of mean predicted values from a well-conducted study on a US Caucasian population2.
2.
3.
Page 10
Figure 4 Schematic diagram illustrating idealised shapes of flow-volume curves and spirograms for obstructing, restrictive and mixed ventilatory defects. Classification Of Ventilatory Abnormalities by Spirometry OBSTRUCTIVE RESTRICTIVE MIXED
FEV1
or Normal
FVC
or Normal
Normal or FEV1/FVC
The shape of the expiratory flow-volume curve varies between obstructive ventilatory defects where maximal flow rates are diminished and the expiratory curve is scooped out or concave to the x-axis, and restrictive diseases where flows may be increased in relation to lung volume (convex). A "tail" on the expiratory curve as residual volume is approached is suggestive of obstruction in the small peripheral airways. Examination of the shape of the flow-volume curve can help to distinguish different disease states, but note that the inspiratory curve is effort-dependent. For example, a plateau of inspiratory flow may result from a floppy extra-thoracic airway, whereas both inspiratory and expiratory flow are truncated for fixed lesions. Expiratory flows alone are reduced for intra-thoracic obstruction (Figure 5).
Page 11
Figure 5
Maximum expiratory and inspiratory flow volume curves with examples of how respiratory disease can alter its shape
Measuring Reversibility of Airflow Obstruction To measure the degree of reversibility (typically increased in asthma) of airflow obstruction, perform spirometry before and 10 to 15 minutes after administering a bronchodilator by metered dose inhaler or jet nebuliser. Beta2 agonists (e.g. salbutamol, terbutaline, etc.) are generally considered the benchmark bronchodilator. To express the degree of improvement, calculate the absolute change in FEV1 (i.e. post-bronchodilator FEV1 minus baseline FEV1) and calculate the percentage improvement from the baseline FEV1. % Improvement =100 X FEV1 (post-bronchodilator) - FEV1 (baseline) FEV1 (baseline) There is presently no universal agreement on the definition of significant bronchodilator reversibility. According to the ATS/ERS the criteria for a significant response in adults is: >12% improvement in FEV1 (or FVC) and an absolute improvement of >0.2 L Normal subjects generally exhibit a smaller degree of reversibility (up to 8% in most studies). The absence of reversibility does not exclude asthma because an asthmatic persons response can vary from time to time and at times airway calibre in asthmatic subjects is clearly normal and incapable of dramatic improvement.
Page 12
Peak Flow Monitoring When peak expiratory flow is measured repeatedly over a period and plotted against time (e.g. by patients with asthma), the pattern of the graph can be helpful in identifying particular aspects of the patient's disease. Typical patterns are the fall in PEF during the week with improvement on weekends and holidays which occurs in occupational asthma; and
the morning dipper pattern of some patients with asthma due to a fall in PEF in the early morning hours. Isolated falls in PEF in relation to specific allergens or trigger factors can help to identify and quantify these for the doctor and patient. A downward trend in PEF and an increase in its variability can identify worsening asthma and can be used by the doctor or patient to modify therapy. PEF monitoring is particularly useful for people with poor perception of their own airway calibre. Response to asthma treatment is usually accompanied by an increase in PEF and a decrease in its variability. Further practical information about measuring peak flow is given in the National Asthma Councils Asthma Management Handbook. PEF self-monitoring can be useful in asthma management, particularly in those with poor perception of their own airway calibre.
Choosing an Appropriate Test It is worth trying to recognise clinical situations and choosing the appropriate test for each. For example, If upper airway obstruction is suspected, flow-volume curve with particular emphasis on inspiration is the best test. For the diagnosis of asthma, spirometry before and after the administration of a bronchodilator, looking for an obstructive pattern with significant improvement, would apply. It is usually necessary to repeat spirometric assessment of airway function at follow-up visits in asthma and other lung conditions where change can occur over short periods of time.
In patients suspected of having asthma but in whom baseline spirometry is normal, it may be appropriate to try bronchial challenge testing with measurement of spirometry before and after provocation by exercise or by inhalation of histamine, methacholine or hypertonic saline. To identify asthma triggers or treatment responses over long periods of time, regular PEF monitoring by the patient can be helpful. Spirometry is most useful for: Detection of disease and its severity Identification of asthma triggers Progress/natural history monitoring Treatment response assessment Preoperative assessment
Page 13
Summary
Measurements of ventilatory function should be part of the routine assessment of patients with respiratory disease. Spirometry measurements can detect respiratory abnormalities and help to differentiate the various disease processes which result in ventilatory impairment. They also have an important role in following the natural history of respiratory disease and its treatment.
Page 14
Page 15
Respiratory function tables From the National Asthma Council Australia. Asthma Management Handbook 2006. Melbourne: National Asthma Council Australia, 2006. Used with permission. Table
FEV1 (L) Male FVC (L) Male FEV1/FVC (%) Male FEV1 (L) Female FVC (L) Female FEV1/FVC (%) Female FEV1 (L) Male children (<20 years) FVC (L) Male children (<20 years) FEV1/FVC (%) Male Children (<20 years) PEF (L/min) Male children (<20 years) FEV1 (L) Female Children (<18 years) FVC (L) Female Children (<18 years) FEV1/FVC (%) Female Children (<18 years) PEF (L/min) Female Children (<18 years)
Page
19 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 21 22 23 23 23 24
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Bibliography
References 1. Miller MR, Hankinson JL, Brusasco V et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 31938 2. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general US population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 17987 3. Hankinson JL, Crapo RO, Jensen RL. Spirometric reference values for the 6-s FVC manoeuvre. Chest 2003; 124: 180511.
Further Reading a. Burton D, Johns DP, Swanney M. Spirometer Users and Buyers Guide. Melbourne: Department of Health and Ageing, 2005. (http://www.nationalasthma.org.au/html/management/spiro_guide/index.asp) b. Johns DP, Pierce R. Pocket Guide to Spirometry, 2nd edition. Sydney: McGraw-Hill Australia, 2007 c. Johns DP, Pierce R. How to Perform and Interpret Spirometry [CD ROM]. Melbourne: Medi+World International, 2004. d. Kendrick AH, Johns DP, Leeming JP. Infection control of lung function equipment: a practical approach. Respir Med 2003; 97: 116379. e. McKenzie, DK, Abramson M, Crockett AJ et al. The COPD-X Plan: Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Brisbane: Australian Lung Foundation, 2007. f. National Asthma Council Australia. Asthma Management Handbook 2006. Melbourne: National Asthma Council Australia, 2006. (http://www.nationalasthma.org.au/cms/index.php)
Acknowledgements
This handbook was commissioned by The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. It carries the endorsement of: The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand The Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science The National Asthma Council Australia The Australian Lung Foundation
Comments to: Associate Professor David P. Johns Menzies Research Institute and School of Medicine University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia Email: david.johns@utas.edu.au
Page 23
Page 24