Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 49 views

    Office of The College of Education: Jose Rizal Memorial State University

    Uploaded by

    Eljean Laclac
    This document contains a form for evaluating a pre-service teacher's off-campus performance from Jose Rizal Memorial State University. The form rates the teacher on indicators of personality, instructional competence, lesson planning, content delivery, questioning skills, teaching methods, and classroom management using a scale of 1 to 5. The form collects information on the mentee and mentor, subject taught, school, semester, and year. Space is provided for remarks on the trainee's professional development and scores are totaled with a descriptive rating.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Office of The College of Education: Jose Rizal Memorial State University

    Uploaded by

    Eljean Laclac
    49 views2 pages
    This document contains a form for evaluating a pre-service teacher's off-campus performance from Jose Rizal Memorial State University. The form rates the teacher on indicators of personality, instructional competence, lesson planning, content delivery, questioning skills, teaching methods, and classroom management using a scale of 1 to 5. The form collects information on the mentee and mentor, subject taught, school, semester, and year. Space is provided for remarks on the trainee's professional development and scores are totaled with a descriptive rating.

    Original Title

    FINAL-PRE_SERVICE-OFF-CAMPUS-EVALUATION-TOOL

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a form for evaluating a pre-service teacher's off-campus performance from Jose Rizal Memorial State University. The form rates the teacher on indicators of personality, instructional competence, lesson planning, content delivery, questioning skills, teaching methods, and classroom management using a scale of 1 to 5. The form collects information on the mentee and mentor, subject taught, school, semester, and year. Space is provided for remarks on the trainee's professional development and scores are totaled with a descriptive rating.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    49 views2 pages

    Office of The College of Education: Jose Rizal Memorial State University

    Uploaded by

    Eljean Laclac
    This document contains a form for evaluating a pre-service teacher's off-campus performance from Jose Rizal Memorial State University. The form rates the teacher on indicators of personality, instructional competence, lesson planning, content delivery, questioning skills, teaching methods, and classroom management using a scale of 1 to 5. The form collects information on the mentee and mentor, subject taught, school, semester, and year. Space is provided for remarks on the trainee's professional development and scores are totaled with a descriptive rating.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    JOSE RIZAL MEMORIAL STATE UNIVERSITY


    The Premier University in the Province of Zamboanga del Norte
    Main Campus,Dapitan City

    Gov. Guading Adaza St., Sta. Cruz, Dapitan City


    JRMSU CED 008
    Province of Zamboanga del Norte
    (065) 213-6444
    (065) 213-6707
    jrmsu_vpred2009@yahoo.
    com OFFICE OF THE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    0917-9022-738

    PRE-SERVICE TEACHER’S OFF CAMPUS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION


    (Reference: Experiential Learning Courses Handbook, A Project of Teacher Education Council TEC, Dep ED,CHED)

    Name of Mentee: ________________________ Name of Mentor: ___________________________

    Subject Taught: ________________________ Cooperating School: _______________________

    Semester: ________________________ Academic Year: _______________

    Directions: Kindly rate the Pe- service Teacher of his/her overall performance during the off campus training using the rating scale
    expressed below:

    5 = Excellent 4 = Very Good 3 = Good 2=Poor 1 = Failure

    PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1 2 3 4 5
    TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
    The teacher…
    A. came to school neat, well-groomed, prepared and showed enthusiastic attitude at all
    times.
    B. exhibited willingness to participate and offer support in school activities.
    C. demonstrated strong personality enough to command respect and attention.
    D. demonstrated punctuality and promptly attends classes as scheduled.
    E. established rapport; showed respect, courtesy, obedience and a strong sense of
    responsibility.
    INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
    I. LESSON PLANNING
    A. lesson plans were well prepared and were submitted on time. (as practice teachers at least they B.
    are given 2 days before actual teaching)
    C. congruency was observed between objective and subject matter; objective and teaching
    procedure; and objective and formative test.
    II. DELIVERY
    A. CONTENT
    The teacher…
    1. demonstrated in depth knowledge of the subject matter and provided new ideas and solid
    understanding in the field.
    2. provided sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful learning experiences by 3.
    relating lessons to real life situations common in the locality.
    B. QUESTIONING SKILLS
    The teacher’s questioning skill stimulates discussion in different ways such as:
    1. probing for learner’s understanding and facilitating factual recall. a.
    2. prompting students to articulate their ideas encouraging convergent and divergent
    thinking.
    3. prompting risk-taking and problem solving techniques with the aim of achieving
    contextualized learning.
    4. stimulating curiosity to further understanding and simplifying issues.

    C. TEACHING METHODS
    The teacher…
    1. used differentiated activities and approaches suited to the needs and capabilities of the
    students.
    2. demonstrated creativity and proper utilization of instructional materials/technology
    which effectively helped illustrate the lessons presented.
    3. evaluated student’s learning using varied assessment techniques.
    D. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
    The teacher had a systematic way of:
    1. checking attendance; independent study; practice exercises and group work/projects.
    2. implementing classroom rules.
    3. correcting, distributing, and collecting outputs.
    4. implementing order and discipline in the classroom.

    TOTAL

    TOTAL SCORE : __________

    Descriptive Rating : ___________________

    95-100 = Excellent 90-94 = Very Good 85-89 = Good 80-84 = Poor 79 & below = Failure

    Descriptive Equivalent: (Reference: JRMSU Grading System and CED Guidelines implementing 80% as a passing rate for Professional Education and other Major
    subjects)

    Remarks: (The critic teacher may make comments on the student trainee’s professional development and improvement of his/her teaching performance during
    his/her off-campus training.)

    Evaluated by: Conforme:

    ________________________________________ ________________________________________
    Signature over printed name of Cooperating Teacher Signature over printed name of Pre-service Teacher

    Approved:

    ___________________________________________
    Signature over printed name of School Principal

    Prepared:

    JOJI T. RECAMARA, EMD


    Associate Dean, College of Education
    Main Campus

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy