Study On Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT)
Study On Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT)
Study On Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT)
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.45327
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
Abstract: This study examines the risk and return characteristics of the NFT-based startups listed on the cryptocurrency
exchange. Our investigation is motivated by the recent surge in the NFT activity on the part of creators, investors, and
traders. We begin by proposing novel classification of the existing NFTs that range from NFT blockchains through NFT
metaverse to NFT DeFi. Next, we establish that NFTs: 1) earn 130% on the first-listing-day; 2) yield an average
investment multiple of 40 (roughly 4,000%) over long-term, which is four times higher than bitcoin during the same
period; 3) deliver positive and significant alpha and exhibit above-average beta. We also show that the NFT segment of the
cryptocurrency market leads market recovery following the mid-2021 crash and generate a return of close to 350%.
I. INTRODUCTION
A non-fungible token (NFT) is a a security consisting of digital data stored in a blockchain, a form of distributed ledger. The
ownership of an NFT is recorded in the blockchain, and can be transferred by the owner, allowing NFTs to be sold and traded.
NFTs can be created by anybody, and require few or no coding skills to create. NFTs typically contain references to digital files
such as photos, videos, and audio. Because NFTs are uniquely identifiable, they differ from cryptocurrencies, which are fungible.
The market value of an NFT is associated with the digital file it references.
Proponents of NFTs claim that NFTs provide a public certificate of authenticity or proof of ownership, but the legal rights conveyed
by an NFT can be uncertain. The ownership of an NFT as defined by the blockchain has no inherent legal meaning, and does not
necessarily grant copyright, intellectual property rights, or other legal rights over its associated digital file. An NFT does not restrict
the sharing or copying of its associated digital file, and does not prevent the creation of NFTs that reference identical files.
The NFT market grew dramatically from 2020–2021: the trading of NFTs in 2021 increased to more than $17 billion,up by 21,000%
over 2020's total of $82 million.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 558
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
B. Evaluation Challenges
The main challenge faced in the NFT market is the uncertainty in determining the price of the NFT. Now, the price of any NFT will
depend on the creativity, uniqueness, scarcity of the buyers and owners, and a lot more. There are considerable fluctuations in the
prices of NFT because thereis no fixed standard for any particular type of NFT.
People can’t determine the factors that might drive the price of NFT. Due to this, the fluctuations in prices remain constant, and
evaluation of NFT becomes a big challenge.
C. Legal Challenges
There is no legal definition of NFT known in the entire world. Different countries such as UK, Japan, and the EU are moving ahead
with different approaches for classifying NFT. This makes it necessary to come up with an international body of Non-fungible
tokens for setting regulations and legalization inthe entire world.
There is a considerable rise seen in the NFT market, and this is why it’s essential to have a regulatory body. There is a vastincrement
visible in the use cases of NFTs. Now, this demands a regulatory body to adapt to the rules and regulations of NFTs.
The current laws related to NFT are still stuck with finding the correct definition for it. As the market and variety of NFT are
constantly growing, it is becoming difficult to come to a solid ground for compliance in NFTs.
Even tweets count. Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey sold hisfirst ever tweet as an NFT for more than $2.9 million.
Essentially, NFTs are like physical collector’s items, only digital. So instead of getting an actual oil painting to hang on the wall, the buyer gets a
digital file instead.
They also get exclusive ownership rights. That’s right: NFTs canhave only one owner at a time. NFTs’ unique data makes it easyto verify their
ownership and transfer tokens between owners.
The owner or creator can also store specific information insidethem. For instance, artists can sign their artwork by including their signature in an
NFT’s metadata.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 559
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
V. RESULTS
In this section we report the results of our main analyses. We begin by presenting NFT initial- listing-day characteristics. Then,
we move to estimating NFT volatilities, raw-returns, Sharpe ratios, and returns on themarket-adjusted basis. In the next step,
we analyze NFT alphas and betas. Subsequently, we construct NFT price index that tracks NFT price movement over the
long-run. We conclude by carrying out an event study to measureNFT-induced blockchain valuation effects.
A. Value Growth
As with any other investment, there’s always the potentialfor growth in the value of your investment when you buy these tokens.
For example, CryptoPunk #3100 first sold for $2,127 on July 6, 2017. The collector who owned the artwork refused to sell until
March 2021, although whoever it was received plenty of offers. Nonetheless, that collector is probably doing backflips considering
the more than $7.5 million return on investmentthey earned when they sold.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 560
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com
C. Excitement
There’s a ton of excitement centered around blockchain technology at the moment. Some believe the technology could lead to as
significant a shift in consumer behavior asthe invention of the Internet did.
That’s an exciting notion, and by purchasing an NFT, you’reactively taking part in that technological evolution.
D. Data Record
Records of authenticity and chain-of-ownership for valuableartwork is sometimes tough to maintain. This is where NFTsshine.
Existing on the blockchain allows clear ownership records of all NFTs, meaning your digital artwork should theoretically never be
subject to theft or having its authenticity questioned.
Some believe the technology will not only shine as a way to manage digital collectibles, but eventually could evolve as a better way
to manage and control sensitive data and records.
B. Environmental Cost
The environment is a hot topic of debate as of late. Any record entered into the Ethereum blockchain takes significant computing,
which requires the use of significantamounts of energy.
So, widespread trading in NFTs and other blockchain-basedassets isn’t necessarily an environmentally friendly process.
In fact, a recent Cambridge University study suggests just about everything having to do with the blockchain is highly unsustainable
from an environmental standpoint because ofthe amount of energy used.
VIII. CONCLUSION
This study examines the risk and return characteristics of the NFT-based startups whose valuations are determined on a
cryptocurrency exchange. Recent months have seen a surge in the use of NFTs, including primary NFT offerings and
feverish NFT trading on the secondary markets. The NFT industry represents another important use case for blockchains,
in addition to fundraising, remittance, store ofvalue, borrowing, and lending.
A number of interesting results emerge from our dataset along the NFT risk and return attributes. First, we find that
NFTs earn large first-day returns of 130% on average.
This is an order of magnitude higher than returns on IPOs -startup firms going public on a traditional stock exchange.
A natural extension of our study would be to look into the on-chain activity of the NFT startups as potential predictors of their
market performance. We leave this challenging question forfuture research.
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 561