Data Modeling Project

Rubric Student Assessment

The Data Modeling project assessment is based on your performance as an individual and as a group member. The Project grade consists of 36 points for
individual work and 8 points for the collective work of the group. The rubric outlines the criteria for assessment.

Student Name

Weight
Points

Score
Points *
Category 4 3 2 1

wt
ER-Model - 90-100% of the entities modeled - 80-89% of the entities modeled - 70-79% of the entities modeled - 0-69% of the entities modeled were
were clearly explained and justified in were clearly explained and were clearly explained and justified clearly explained and justified in
Entities
both the presentation and justified in both the presentation in both the presentation and the both the presentation and the
documentation. and documentation. documentation. documentation.
- 90-100% of the identified entities - 80-89% of the identified entities - 70-79% of the identified entities - 0-69% of the identified entities 1
used correct naming used correct naming conventions. used correct naming conventions. used correct naming conventions.
conventions. - There was no confusion between - There was no confusion between - There was confusion between
- There was no confusion between attributes and entities. attributes and entities. attributes and entities.
attributes and entities.
ER-Model - 90-100% of the entities
modeled, contained the
- 80-89% of the entities modeled
contained the appropriate
- 70-79% of the entities modeled
contained the appropriate
- 0-69% of the entities modeled
contained the appropriate
1
Attributes appropriate attributes. attributes. attributes. attributes.
- 90-100% of the attributes listed - 80-89% of the attributes listed - 70-79% of the attributes listed used - 0-69% of the attributes listed used
used the correct naming used the correct naming the correct naming conventions. the correct naming conventions.
conventions. conventions. - The Unique Identifier where - The Unique Identifier where
- The Unique Identifier where - The Unique Identifier where indicated was clearly labeled. indicated was not clearly labeled.
indicated was clearly labeled. indicated was clearly labeled.
ER-Model - 90-100% of the relationships have
the appropriate name, direction,
- 80-89% of the relationships have the
appropriate name, direction,
- 70-79% of the relationships have
the appropriate name, direction,
- 0-69% of relationships have the
appropriate name, direction,
1
Relationships
optionality and degree/cardinality. optionality and degree/cardinality. optionality and degree/cardinality. optionality and/or
degree/cardinality.

Copyright © 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
 ER-Model - 90-100% of the entity positions and
relationship directions are logical
- 80-89% of the entity positions and
relationship directions are logical
- 70-79% of the entity positions and
relationship directions are logical
- 0-69% of the entity positions and
relationship directions are logical
1
Layout
and clear from the client's and clear from the client's and clear from the client's sequence and clear from the
perspective. perspective. perspective. client's perspective.
- 90-100% of the assumptions made - 80-89% of the assumptions made in - 70-79% of the assumptions made - 0-69% of the assumptions made in
in creating the ERD were clearly creating the ERD were clearly in creating the ERD were clearly creating the ERD were clearly
explained and supported by the case explained and supported by the explained, and supported by the explained and supported by the
study. case study. case study. case study.
- The ERD was in 3rd Normal form - The ERD was in 3rd Normal form. - The ERD was in 2nd Normal form. - The ERD was not normalized.

Presentation - Images, fonts, colors and text size

enhanced the presentation. There
- Images, fonts, colors and text size
enhanced the presentation. There
- Images, fonts, colors and text size
enhanced the presentation. There
- Images, fonts, colors and text size
did not enhance the presentation. 3
Materials and was a consistent theme throughout was a consistent theme throughout There was a consistent theme
was a consistent theme throughout
Written 90-100% of the materials. 80-89% of the materials. 70-79% of the materials. throughout 0-69% of the materials.
Documentati - The written documentation includes - The written documentation is - The written documentation is - The written documentation is
on all requirements noted below: missing one of the requirements missing two requirements noted missing three or more
o Introduction: noted below: below: requirements noted below:
o Overview: o Introduction: o Introduction: o Introduction:
o ERD Diagram o Overview: o Overview: o Overview:
o Tables: o ERD Diagram o ERD Diagram o ERD Diagram
o Conclusion o Tables: o Tables: o Tables:
o Recommendations o Conclusion o Conclusion o Conclusion
- Correct grammar and spelling used o Recommendations o Recommendations o Recommendations
throughout 90-100% of materials - Correct grammar and spelling - Correct grammar and spelling used - Correct grammar and spelling used
and documentation. used throughout 80-89% of throughout 70-79% of materials throughout 0-69% of materials and
materials and documentation. and documentation. documentation.

Individual - Individual presented a portion of each - Individual presented a portion of 3 of - Individual presented a portion of 2
of the following: the following: of the following:
- Individual presented a portion of 1
of the following:
2
Presentation
o entities o entities o entities o entities
- o attributes o attributes o attributes o attributes
Effectiveness o relationships o relationships o relationships o relationships
o tables o tables o tables o tables
- Individual used eye contact, upright - Individual's eye contact, upright - Individual's eye contact, upright - Individual’s eye contact, upright
posture, gestures and other posture, gestures and other posture, gestures and other posture, gestures and other
nonverbal communication to nonverbal communication did not nonverbal communication were nonverbal communication were
persuade the client of the superiority contribute to the persuasive quality distracting to the overall quality of distracting to the overall quality of
of their ERD. of the presentation. the presentation. the presentation.
- Individual answered 90-100% of the - Individual answered 80-89% of the - Individual answered 70-79% of the - Individual answered 0-69% of the
questions using clear, concise questions using clear, concise questions using clear, concise questions using clear, concise
rationale. rationale rationale rationale
Group - The group presentation has a - The group presentation has a - The group presentation has a - The group presentation lacks a
central message. 90-100% of the central message. 80-89% of the central message. 70-79% of the central message and 0-69% of the
Presentation
supporting arguments are supporting arguments are supporting arguments are supporting arguments are
-
Effectiveness
persuasive.
- 90-100% of the analysis of the
persuasive.
- 80-89% of the analysis of the
persuasive.
- 70-79% of the analysis of the
persuasive.
- 0-69% of the analysis of the client’s
2
client’s business rules, operations, client’s business rules, client’s business rules, operations, business rules, operations, and
and processes is accurate, logical, operations, and processes is and processes is accurate, logical, processes is accurate, logical, and
and clear. accurate, logical, and clear. and clear. clear.
40 - 44 is equivalent to 90-100%
36 - 39 is equivalent to 80-89%
32 - 35 is equivalent to 70-79%
28 - 31 is equivalent to 60-69%
TOTAL POINTS

Copyright © 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.