Scribd
Upload
870 views1 page

2022-2023 Rubric Mini-Dbq or Short Response

This rubric evaluates mini DBQ or short response assessments on five criteria: 1. Background/context: Students should provide relevant information about the topic before stating their claim. 2. Claim/thesis: The claim should answer the prompt, demonstrate understanding, and restate the prompt. 3. Evidence: Students should cite at least two pieces of evidence from sources and provide accurate sourcing. 4. Analysis: Students should accurately explain how the evidence relates to and supports the claim/thesis. 5. Grammar/structure: Responses should use academic language and have few errors.

Uploaded by

api-290708886
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
870 views1 page

2022-2023 Rubric Mini-Dbq or Short Response

This rubric evaluates mini DBQ or short response assessments on five criteria: 1. Background/context: Students should provide relevant information about the topic before stating their claim. 2. Claim/thesis: The claim should answer the prompt, demonstrate understanding, and restate the prompt. 3. Evidence: Students should cite at least two pieces of evidence from sources and provide accurate sourcing. 4. Analysis: Students should accurately explain how the evidence relates to and supports the claim/thesis. 5. Grammar/structure: Responses should use academic language and have few errors.

Uploaded by

api-290708886
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Mini DBQ or Short Response Rubric

These types of assessments are expected to be two large paragraphs with evidence and analysis that support your claim/thesis.

Fully Meets Expectations Partially Meets Expectations Needs Improvement

Background/ 2 points 1 points 0 points


Context Student response: Student response: Student response:
❖ provides insightful and relevant information ❖ provides basic information about topic of the ❖ provides no information about topic of the
about topic of the prompt before stating the prompt before stating the claim/thesis prompt before stating the claim/thesis
claim/thesis

Claim/ 3 points 2 points 1 point


Thesis Student response: Student response: Student response has:
❖ has restated the prompt ❖ has restated the prompt ❖ has restated the prompt
❖ has a relevant and provable claim that ❖ has a provable claim that answers the prompt ❖ has a claim that somewhat answers the
answers the prompt and demonstrates an and demonstrates some understanding of the prompt but displays a very limited
understanding of the topic topic understanding of the topic

Evidence 5 points 3-4 points 1-2 points


Student response: Student response: Student response:
❖ has two or more pieces of evidence (either a ❖ has two pieces of evidence (either a quote, ❖ has one piece of evidence (either a quote,
quote, paraphrase or description) from the paraphrase or description) from either a paraphrase or description) from either a
primary or secondary source primary or secondary source primary or secondary source
❖ provides an accurate source of the the ❖ provides an accurate source of the the ❖ provides an accurate source of the the
evidence (author name, document name, evidence (author name, document name, date evidence (author name, document name, date
date or any other information provided) or any other information provided) or any other information provided)

Analysis 5 points 3-4 points 1-2 points


Student response: Student response: Student response:
❖ has insightful explanation of the ❖ has an accurate explanation of the ❖ has an accurate, but incomplete explanation
significance and/or meaning of the evidence significance and/or meaning of the evidence of the significance and/or meaning of the
❖ explains the relationship between the ❖ explains the relationship between the evidence
evidence and the claim/thesis and topic in evidence and the claim/thesis in a clear and ❖ explains the relationship between the
an insightful and accurate way accurate way evidence and the claim/thesis in a way that is
unclear, but somewhat accurate

Grammar/ 5 points 3-4 points 1-2 points


Structure Student response: Student response: Student response:
❖ meets all grade level expectations for use of ❖ meets most grade level expectations for use ❖ does not meet grade level expectations for
academic language (no use of ‘I’ or ‘me’ of academic language (no use of ‘I’ or ‘me’ use of academic language (use of ‘I’ or ‘me’
statements, proper framing of quotes and statements, proper framing of quotes and statements, no framing of quotes and
analysis) analysis) analysis)
❖ has very few spelling or grammatical errors ❖ has some spelling or grammatical errors ❖ has significant spelling or grammatical
errors

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy