Lesson 2 Bioethics
Lesson 2 Bioethics
Lesson 2 Bioethics
SCHOOL OF NURSING
NCM 108-BIOETHICS
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
A. Autonomy
B. Informed Consent
2. Consent for the treatment must be voluntary: A person should not be under
any influence or be coerced to provide consent. This means patients should
not be asked to sign a consent form when they are under the influence of
mind-altering medications, such as narcotics.
LEGAL PERSPECTIVE
Assault and battery are two legal terms describing offenses against a person. Both are relevant
to the ethical requirement of informed consent. Assault is the threat of harm; for example,
someone commits assault if he or she acts or talks in a way that causes another person to feel
apprehension about his or her physical safety. Battery consists of one person offensively
touching another person.
C. Intentional Nondisclosure
-In the past, medical and nursing patient-care errors were something to be
swept under the rug, and care was taken to avoid patient discovery of these
errors. However, when healthcare leaders realized that huge numbers of
patients, as many as 98,000 per year, were dying from medical errors, the
Institute of Medicine (IOM) began a project to analyze medical errors and try
to reduce them. One outcome of the project is the book To Err Is Human:
Building a Safer Health Care System (IOM, 2000). The IOM project
committee determined that to err really is human, and good people working
within unsafe systems make the most errors.
-It is now expected that errors involving serious, preventable adverse events
be reported to patients and other organizational reporting systems on a
mandatory basis (IOM, 2000). Reporting near misses (i.e., errors that cause
no harm to patients) are more controversial (Lo, 2009). Some professionals
tend to avoid telling patients about near-miss errors since no harm was done
to the patient, but ethicists recommend disclosure of these events.
D. Nonmaleficence
- Nonmaleficence is the maxim or norm that “one ought not to inflict evil or
harm” whereas beneficence includes the following three norms: “one ought
to prevent evil or harm, one ought to remove evil or harm, one ought to do or
promote good”
1. Upholding standards of due care means abiding by the standards that are specific to one’s
profession; the acceptable and expected care a reasonable person in a profession would
render.
2. Negligence is “the absence of due care” and imposing a risk of harm; imposing an
unintended careless risk of harm or imposing an intentional reckless risk of harm.
3. Making distinctions of and rules governing nontreatment and end-of-life decisions
a. Withholding and withdrawing life sustaining treatment
b. Extraordinary (or heroic) and ordinary treatment
c. Sustenance technologies and medical treatments
d. Intended effects and merely foreseen effects (rule of double effect)
Rules of Beneficence
1. Protect and defend the rights of others.
2. Prevent harm from occurring to others.
3. Remove conditions that will cause harm to others.
4. Help persons with disabilities.
5. Rescue persons in danger.
F. JUSTICE
Justice, as a principle in healthcare ethics, refers to fairness, treating people
equally and without prejudice, and the equitable distribution of benefits and
burdens, including assuring fairness in biomedical research.
Distributive justice refers to the fair allocation of resources, whereas social justice
represents the position that benefits and burdens should be distributed fairly
among members of a society, or ideally that all people in a society should have
the same rights, benefits, and opportunities. The mission to define and attain
some measure of social justice is an ongoing and difficult activity for the world
community.
PROFESSIONAL–PATIENT RELATIONSHIPS
The quality of patient care rendered by healthcare professionals and patients’
satisfaction with health care often depend on harmonious relationships between
professionals and patients and among the members of professions themselves. If
healthcare professionals view life as a web of interrelationships, all their
relationships potentially can affect the well-being of patients.
- Unavoidable Trust
When patients enter the healthcare system, they usually are entering a foreign
and frightening environment. Intimate conversations and activities, such as
being touched and probed, that normally do not occur between strangers are
commonplace between healthcare professionals and patients. Patients
frequently are stripped of their clothes, subjected to sitting alone in cold and
barren rooms, and made to wait anxiously for frightening news regarding the
5|P age KIMGMACALINAORNRMNHRARNMANC
LUNA GOCO COLLEGES
SCHOOL OF NURSING
NCM 108-BIOETHICS
continuation of their very being. When patients need help from healthcare
professionals, they frequently feel a sense of vulnerability and uncertainty.
The tension patients feel when accessing health care is heightened by the need
is called unavoidable trust.
-Patient Advocacy
Nurses acting from a point of patient advocacy try to identify unmet patient
needs and then follow up to address the needs appropriately Advocacy, as
opposed to advice, involves the nurse’s moving from the patient to the
healthcare system rather than moving from the nurse’s values to the patient.
Pondering the questions, “What is the right thing to do?” and “What ought I
do in this circumstance?” are ever-present normative considerations in
nursing.
The concept of critical thinking is used quite liberally today in nursing. Many
nurses probably have a general idea about the meaning of the concept, but
they may not be able to clearly articulate answers to questions about its
meaning.
MORAL IMAGINATION
Dewey (1934) stated imagination “is a way of seeing and feeling things as they
compose an integral whole”. Moral imagination is moral decision making through
reflection involving “empathetic projection” and “creatively tapping a situation’s
An important role for nurses is to provide leadership and help create healthy
communities through individual-, family-, and population-based assessments;
program planning; program implementation; and program evaluation. When
assuming this key leadership role, nurses continually make choices and decisions
that may affect the well-being of both individuals and populations.
REFLECTIVE PRACTICE
Jonsen and colleagues’ (2010) Four Topics Method for ethical analysis is a practical
approach for nurses and other healthcare professionals. The nurse or team begins
with relevant facts about a particular case and moves toward a resolution through a
structured analysis.
Medical Indications
The Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence
1. What is the patient’s medical problem? Is the problem acute? Chronic? Critical?
Reversible? Emergent? Terminal?
2. What are the goals of treatment?
3. In what circumstances are medical treatments not indicated?
4. What are the probabilities of success of various treatment options?
5. In sum, how can this patient be benefited by medical and nursing care, and how
can harm be avoided?
B. Patient Preferences
The Principle of Respect for Autonomy
C. Quality of Life
The Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence and Respect for Autonomy
1. What are the prospects, with or without treatment, for a return to normal life, and
what physical, mental, and social deficits might the patient experience even if
treatment succeeds?
2. On what grounds can anyone judge that some quality of life would be undesirable
for a patient who cannot make or express such a judgment?
3. Are there biases that might prejudice the provider’s evaluation of the patient’s
quality of life?
4. What ethical issues arise concerning improving or enhancing a patient’s quality
of life?
5. Do quality-of-life assessments raise any questions regarding changes in treatment
plans, such as forgoing life-sustaining treatment?
6. What are plans and rationale to forgo life-sustaining treatment?
7. What is the legal and ethical status of suicide?
D. Contextual Features
The Principles of Justice and Fairness
1. Are there professional, interprofessional, or business interests that might create
conflicts of interest in the clinical treatment of patients?
2. Are there parties other than clinicians and patients, such as family members, who
have an interest in clinical decisions?
3. What are the limits imposed on patient confidentiality by the legitimate interests
of third parties?
4. Are there financial factors that create conflicts of interest in clinical decisions?
5. Are there problems of allocation of scarce health resources that might affect
clinical decisions?
6. Are there religious issues that might influence clinical decisions?
7. What are the legal issues that might affect clinical decisions?
When patients and families are experiencing distress and suffering, it often is during
times when decisions need to be made about risky procedures or end-of-life care.
Family members may want medical treatment for their loved one, while physicians
and nurses may be explaining to the family that to continue treatment most likely
would be nonbeneficial or futile for the patient.
In caring for particular patients and interacting with their families, nurses sometimes
find themselves caught in the middle of conflicts. Though nurses frequently make
ethical decisions independently, they also act as an integral part of the larger team
of decision makers. Many problematic bioethical decisions will not be made
unilaterally—not by physicians, nurses, or any other single person.
####### FIN######
EXERCISE:
During the late 1920s in the United States, syphilis rates were extremely high
in some areas. The private Rosenwald Foundation teamed with the United
States Public Health Service (USPHS) to begin efforts to control the disease
using the drug NEOSALVARSAN, an arsenic compound. Macon County,
Alabama, particularly the town of Tuskegee, was targeted because of its high
rate of syphilis, as identified through a survey. However, the Great Depression
derailed the plans, and the private foundation withdrew from the work. The
USPHS repeated the Rosenwald survey in Macon County and identified a
syphilis rate of 22% among African American men in the county and a 62%
rate of congenital syphilis cases. The natural history (progression) of syphilis
had not been studied yet in the United States, and the surgeon general
suggested that 399 African American men with syphilis in Tuskegee should
be observed, rather than treated, and compared with a group of 200 African
American men who were uninfected. The men were not told about the
particular details of their disease. They underwent painful, nontherapeutic
spinal taps to provide data about the natural history of syphilis and were told
these procedures were treatments for “bad blood.” The men were given free
meals, medical treatment for diseases other than their syphilis, and free
burials. Even after penicillin was discovered in the 1940s, the men were not
offered treatment. In fact, the USPHS researchers arranged to keep the
uninformed study participants out of World War II because the men would be
tested for syphilis, treated with penicillin, and lost from the study. The
unethical research continued for 40 years, from 1932 to 1972. During the 40
years of research, an astonishing number of articles about the study was
published in medical journals and no attempt was made to hide the
11 | P a g e
KIMGMACALINAORNRMNHRARNMANC
LUNA GOCO COLLEGES
SCHOOL OF NURSING
NCM 108-BIOETHICS
surreptitious terms of the research. No one intervened to stop the travesty.
Finally, a medical reporter learned of the study and the ethical issues were
exposed. ###
After reading this chapter and researching more information on the Internet about
the Tuskegee research, answer the following questions:
1. What were the main social issues with ethical implications involved in this study?
2. Which bioethical principles were violated by the Tuskegee study? Explain.
3. How do various ethical approaches or ethical concerns or dilemma relate to the
Tuskegee study?
12 | P a g e
KIMGMACALINAORNRMNHRARNMANC