Time Management Practices in Large Construction Projects
Time Management Practices in Large Construction Projects
Time Management Practices in Large Construction Projects
uk
2014 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER 2014) brought to you by CORE
provided by UTHM Institutional Repository
Aftab Hameed Memon1, Ismail Abdul Rahman2, Ismaaini Ismail3, Noor Yasmin Zainun4
1,2
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Malaysia
86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
1
aftabm78@hotmail.com, 2ismailar@uthm.edu.my, 3is_mujahidah@yahoo.com, 4nryasmin@uthm.edu.my
Abstract— Challenge of completing construction projects time management techniques and software packages in
within estimated time frame is biggest concern amongst the construction projects and determine the level of effectiveness
practitioners. Several approaches and tools have been introduced both of them.
over the past years to enhance the management of the
construction projects. This paper has identified commonly used II. RELATED WORKS
techniques and software packages of time management together
with their effectiveness level in large construction projects of In the pursuit of efficient project performance, time control
Malaysia. Data was gathered through survey technique amongst is one of the most important functions. It is more crucial in
the practitioners involved in handling large construction large scale and megaprojects; where various risk variables
projects. Relative Importance Index calculation was employed to cause schedule delays. Hence, there are numerous time
assess the level of effectiveness for time management techniques management techniques and software packages used for project
and software packages adopted in the construction project. The planning and scheduling worldwide. Each of the techniques has
results highlighted that most common and effective time different functions and process in providing a list of dates on
management technique and software Package are CPM and
which certain items are to be completed. Following sections
Microsoft Project respectively. Although, this technique and
software package in almost every project is applied, but still the explain all the related techniques/methods and available
industry practitioners fail in achieving effective time software packages used for time management.
management. Hence, this study recommends the further A. Time Management Techniques/Methods
investigation be carried out in uncovering the related issue which
hindrance in achieving the benefits of these in construction Time management is one of the keys to effective project
projects. management as weaknesses in the time management will cause
delays in project completion [10]. Hence, time in construction
Index Terms— Time management, Large Construction, Time projects need to be controlled from the beginning of the
management techniques, Time control Software construction process until the project is totally completed.
There are several techniques or methods commonly used for
I. INTRODUCTION managing time in construction projects as discussed below:
Time management is important in any construction project. 1) Gantt Bar Chart
Without proper time management, many problems will occur Gantt charts are simple and easy to construct and hence are
such as extension of time or time overrun. Some of the the most commonly used method of scheduling and controlling
researchers describe time overrun as delay and some of them in construction industry [11-12]. Besides that, Gantt charts help
describe that the time overrun is an effect from the construction in managing the dependencies between tasks and determining
delay, no matter what it was described, time overrun become the resources required for each activity. These are used in
the most general problem in construction industry worldwide monitoring progress of the project. The main advantages of
[1]-[8]. Time overrun occur when the actual progress of a Gantt charts are as follows:
construction project is slower than the planned schedule [9]. a) Gantt charts are useful tools for planning and
Delay or time overrun will affect all parties involved in the scheduling projects.
project. It will affect the profits which would be obtained if the b) Gantt charts allow assessment on how long a project
project can be completed on the schedule. But due to the time should take.
overrun, contractors had to spend more money on labor, plant c) Gantt charts determine the resources needed.
and may lose the opportunity to get the next project. Hence, 2) Critical Path Networks/Method
effective time management is very important and crucial to Critical path method has been widely used for network
achieve successful completion of construction projects. The analysis and project planning industry [13] and as a project
aim of the study is to investigate the common application of management tool to improve scheduling and project
62
analysis with large data sets. Excel's statistical formulas and TABLE I. RESPONDENTS’ DEMOGRAPHY
graphing help researchers to perform various types of analysis. Demography Frequency %
5) Project Commandar Type of Organization
Project Commander is an extremely cost-effective planning Consultant 30 23.6
Contractor 79 62.6
tool written by experts in project management and Client 18 14.2
enthusiastically endorsed by satisfied customers worldwide. It Type of Projects
covers all aspects of project management from producing Building 49 38.6
simple plans through to fully customizable professional output. Infrastructure 41 32.3
Building & Infrastructure 31 24.4
This software is ideal for all those involved in project and
Size of Projects
resource planning, job scheduling or departmental. Besides 6-10 million 25 19.7
that, Project Commander is one of the easiest software to use 11-50 million 48 37.8
and also the most cost effective planning solution. It has the >50 million 38 29.9
Qualification
capability to exchange information with Microsoft Project, Diploma 19 15.0
Power Project and Primavera. Degree 65 51.2
6) Deltek Open Plan Master 24 18.9
Deltek open plan is also well known software for project PhD 1 0.8
Experience
planning and scheduling. This software also offers the power 0-10 years 112 88.2
and flexibility to serve the differing needs of business, resource 11-20 years 9 7.1
and project managers. It is because, Deltek Open Plan provides 21-30 years 5 3.9
multi-project analysis, critical path planning, and sophisticated >31 years 1 0.8
resource management. There are several advantages by using Table I indicates that the majority of the respondents were
Deltek Open Plan in project planning and scheduling such as it working with contractor organizations which represent 62.6%
support enterprise-level program management, improves of respondents followed by consultants and clients with %age
project planning, leverage system and processes, and able to of 23.6 and 14.2 respectively. The respondents were involved
manage resources. in handling both type of project i.e. building and infrastructure.
Majority of the respondents i.e. 37.8% involved in projects cost
III. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 11-50 million. Most of the respondents involved in the survey
This study involved quantitative mode of research using were holding bachelor degree in term of education qualification
structured questionnaire survey. The respondents were asked to with the highest percentage 51.2% compare to others. Survey
specify the method and software they practice in their project statistics showed that 88.2% of the respondents have
and their relative effectiveness using 3-likert scales. Data experience below 10 years, 7.1% of respondents with 11 to 20
collection was carried out amongst clients, consultants and years’ experience, 3.9% with 21 to 30 years of experience and
contractors involved in construction projects who are registered only 0.8% of respondents with above 31 years’ experience.
under CIDB and PKK. More than 300 sets of survey A. Time Management Techniques
questionnaires were distributed to respondents. As a result,
Figure 1 shows %age of respondents having practices
only 127 completed questionnaires could be collected which
various techniques in their project. The level of effectiveness
were analysed statistically with statistical software package
for the techniques is ranked by using the Relative Important
SPSS. Relative importance index (RII) method was used to
Index (RII) for overall analysis as shown in table II.
assess the effectiveness of time management methods and
software packages. RII value was calculated with following
formula:
Where;
w = weighting given to each factor by respondents and it
ranges from 1 to 3
x = frequency of ith response given for each cause
A = highest weight (i.e. 3 in this case)
N = total number of participants
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Fig. 1. Technique/Methods for Time Management
The demography of respondents is presented in Table 1.
From Figure 1, it can be perceived that the three most
commonly used techniques as agreed by all respondents are
Critical Path Method (CPM) technique with highest percentage
63
of 97.6% of respondents, followed by Gantt Bar Chart with From table III, the software packages are listed in rank
92.1% of respondents and Milestone technique with 81.9% of based on the RII value. Microsoft Project is placed at first rank
respondents. with RII=0.73, second ranked software is Microsoft Excel with
Table II shows the ranking of techniques of time control RII=0.61, and Primavera Project Planner is third ranked
analysed based on RII values. Results show that CPM is the software package with RII= 0.50. It is followed by Project
most effective method of time management paced at first Commandar, Asta Power Project and the lowest rank is Deltek
ranked (with RII=0.73.) With RII value of 0.64, Gantt Bar Open Plan software.
Chart was ranked at second place while third ranked was found
as Milestone with RII=0.61. LOB and Precedence Network TABLE III. EFFECTIVENESS OF TIME MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Diagram were at same rank as 4th ranked, followed by PERT Software Packages RII Rank
and Simulation.
Primavera Project Planner 0.50 3
TABLE II. EFFECTIVENESS OF TIME MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES Microsoft Project 0.73 1
Asta Power Project 0.28 5
Technique / Method RII Rank
Microsoft Excel 0.61 2
Gantt Bar Chart 0.64 2 Project Commandar 0.29 4
CPM 0.73 1 Deltek Open Plan 0.26 6
Milestone 0.61 3
PERT 0.49 5
V. CONCLUSION
LOB 0.51 4 Through questionnaire survey, frequency and effectiveness
of various techniques and software packages of time
Precedence Network Diagram 0.51 4
management was assessed. The finding of the study indicated
Simulation 0.44 6 that most common and effective method of time management
as perceived by the respondents was Critical Path Method
B. Software Packages (CPM). The respondent recorded that most commonly adopted
There are many scheduling and management software software package is Microsoft Project and also this software
packages to help in achieving effective scheduling and time was ranked as most effective package.
management in the construction industry. Figure 2 shows the
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
result of software packages commonly applied in construction
projects. Data gathered was also analysed to show the level of The authors would like to thank Centre of Research and
effectiveness for each software packages as presented in table Innovations, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, for
III. encouragement and support in carrying out this research work.
Also, we are thankful to construction practitioners for
providing comprehensive & important information; a lot of
cooperation which made data collection easier. The authors
also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers of the paper for
their constructive comments, valuable guidance and advice.
Finally, Aftab Hameed Memon is grateful to Quaid-e-Awam
University of Engineering, Science and Technology also for
granting permission to carryout research work at Universiti
Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
REFERENCES
[1] Hussin, J. Md, I. A. Rahman, and A. H. Memon, “The way
forward in sustainable construction: issues and challenges,”
International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, vol 2(1),
Fig. 2. Software Packages for time control 2012.
Figure 2 shows that most of the organization with 96.1% of [2] A. H. Memon, I. A. Rahman, M. R. Abdullah, and A. A. Abdul
Azis, “Time overrun in Malaysian construction projects:
respondents used Microsoft Project software to control perspective of project management consultant,” Journal of
construction time in the projects. This might be because of it is Surveying, Construction and Property, vol. 2 (1), pp. 54-66,
easy to operate and obtain progress directly. The second 2011.
commonly used software is Microsoft Excel with 88.2% of [3] F. D. K. Fugar and A. B. Agyakwah-Baah, “Delays in building
respondents applies this software. While, Primavera Project construction projects in Ghana,” Australasian Journal of
Planner is the third software that applied by respondents with Construction Economics and Building, vol. 10 (1), 2010.
64.6%. [4] Endut, I. Rohani, A. Akintoye, and J. Kelly, “Cost and time
overruns of projects in Malaysia,” Proceedings of the 2nd
64
Scottish Conference for Postgraduate Researchers of the Built Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 121(4), pp.
and Natural Environment (PRoBE), Glasgow Caledonian 388-396, 1995.
University. Rotterdam (Netherlands), pp. 243-252, 2009. [22] J. Y. Ruwanpura, S. M. Abourizk, K. C. Er and S. Fernando,
[5] A. Enshassi, J. Al-Najjar and M. Kumaraswamy, “Delays and “Special purpose simulation templates for tunnel construction
cost overruns in the construction projects in the Gaza Strip,” operations”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 28(2),
Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, pp. 222-237, 2001.
vol. 14 (2), pp.126-151, 2009. [23] J. Shi, and S. M. AbouRizk, “Resource-based modeling for
[6] L. Le-Hoai, Y. D. Lee and J. Y. Lee, “Delay and cost overruns construction simulation.” J. Constr. Engrg. & Mgmt, ASCE.,
in Vietnam large construction projects: a comparison with other vol. 123(1), pp. 26-33, 1997.
selected countries,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol.
12(6), pp. 367-377, 2008.
[7] M. Sambasivan, Y. W. Soon, “Causes and effects of delays in
Malaysian construction industry,” International Journal of
Project Management, vol. 25, pp. 517–526, 2007.
[8] Y. A. Olawale and M. Sun, “Cost and time control of
construction projects: inhibiting factors and mitigating measures
in practice,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 28,
pp. 509-526, 2010.
[9] M. Ibrahim, “Risk matrix for factors affecting time delay in road
construction projects: owners’ perspective,” Engineering,
Construction and Architectural Management, Emerald Group
Publishing Limited, pp. 609-617, 2011.
[10] K. Harold, “Project management (a systems approach to
planning, scheduling, and controlling)”, Ninth Edition. New
Jersey. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[11] W. C. Chi, P. H. Liu, and Y. C. Tsai, “Resource-constrained
project management using enhanced theory of constraint,”
International Journal of Project Management vol. 20,(7), pp.
561-567, 2002.
[12] D. Arditi, P. Sikangwan, and O. B. Tokdemir, “Scheduling
system for high rise building construction,” Construction
Management & Economics vol. 20(4), pp.353-364, 2002.
[13] L. Ming and S. M. AbouRizk, “Simplified CPM/PERT
simulation model,” Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, vol. 126(3), pp. 219-226, 2000.
[14] K. Kyunghwan and J. M. Garza, “Phantom float,” Journal of
construction Engineering and Management, vol. 129(5), pp.
507-517, 2003.
[15] N. N. Chehayeb and S. M. AbouRizk, “Simulation-based
scheduling with continuous activity relationships,” Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 124(2), pp.
107-115, 1998.
[16] S. S. Leu and C. H. Yang, “A genetic-algorithm-based resource-
constrained construction scheduling system,” Construction
Management & Economics, vol. 17(6), pp. 767-776, 1999.
[17] W. D. Cottrell, “Simplified program evaluation and review
technique (PERT),” Journal of construction Engineering and
Management, vol. 125(1), pp. 16-22, 1999.
[18] M. T. Callahan, D. G. Quackenbush and J. E. Rowings,
“Construction project scheduling,” New York: McGraw Hill,
Inc., 1992.
[19] R. Jongeling and T. Olofsson, “A method for planning of work-
flow by combined use of location-based scheduling and 4D
CAD,” Elsevier Science Direct, November 15, 2007.
[20] D. Hajjar and S. M. AbouRizk, “Unified modeling methodology
for construction simulation”, Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, vol. 128(2), pp. 174-185, 2002.
[21] S. D. Smith, J. R. Osborne and M. C. Forde, “Analysis of earth
moving systems using discrete-event simulation,” Journal of
65