Obrien Julien 1988
Obrien Julien 1988
Obrien Julien 1988
INTRODUCTION
RHEOLOGICAL MODELS
can be used:
880
90
W 80
6
o
•N.
70
0>
c
-S- 60
w
M 50
w
10
2
4—
40
CO
•- 7,0
o
<u
JC
CO 20
10
nl i i i i i i—i i—i—i—i—i—i—i—I
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Shear Rate du/dr (s~ )
FIG. 1. Aspen Natural Soil Rheogram (C„ = 34.2%; Silts and Clays)
and
jy = a 2 e ^ ... (4)
ar
The values of the four empirical coefficients a, , a 2 > Pi » >d P2 obtained by
regression analysis for each mudflow sample are presented in Table 2; the
results are in reasonable agreement with those found in the literature.
Particularly, the experimental values of the yield stress fall within the
range of values defined by Fei (1981). The dispersion of the points at a
given concentration certainly calls for more fundamental research to
examine possible effects of thixotropy and clay mineralogy. Nevertheless,
the open points (Glenwood) indicating lower percentages of clay in Fig. 2
have lower values of yield stress when compared with the samples with
larger clay contents (Aspen). This trend is not quite apparent when
88t
«2 <*i
Source (dynes/cm2) (poises) Pi
d) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(a) Relationships Found in Field
Aspen pit 1 1.81 x 10"' 25.7 3.60 X 10-2 22.1
Aspen pit 4 2.72 10.4 5.38 X 10" 2 14.5
Aspen natural soil 1.52 X 10-' 18.7 1.36 X 10~ 3 28.4
Aspen mine fill 4.73 X 10" 2 21.1 1.28 X 10"' 12.0
Aspen natural soil 3.83 x 10" 2 19.6 4.95 x 10^ 4 27.1
source
Aspen mine fill 2.91 x 10"' 14.3 2.01 x 10~ 4 33.1
source
2 3
Glenwood 1 3.45 x 10~ 20.1 2.83 x 10~ 23.0
Glenwood 2 7.65 x 10" 2 16.9 6.48 x KT" 6.2
Glenwood 3 7.07 x 10" 4 29.8 6.32 x 10~ 3 19.9
Glenwood 4 1.72 x 10" 3 29.5 6.02 x 10" 4 33.1
(b) Relationships Found in Literature
Iida (1938) — — 3.73 x 10^ 5 36.6
Dai et al. (1980) 2.60 17.48 7.5 x 10~ 3 14.39
Kang and Zhang 1.75 7.82 4.05 x 10" 2 8.29
(1980)
Qian et al. (1980) 1.36 X 10" 3 21.2 — —
- 5 . 0 X 10" 2 -15.48 — —
Chien and Ma 5.88 x 10~2 19.1-32.7 — —
(1958)
Fei (1981) 1.66 X 1 0 - ' 25.6 — —
- 4 . 7 x 10~ 3 -22.2
882
Aspen -
Pit I
Pit 2
Natural Soil
Nat. Soil Source Area
10 Mine Fill
Mine Fill Source Area
Glenwood - 0.01
# I
#2
#3
#4
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
C„ Concentration by Volume of the Fluid Matrix
1
' ' Vcb 1 1
100
i\uny Qfiu £.nung \iaouj » /
Dai et al. (1980) °/
Iida (1938) ? /Sb ";0.1
v„ '
O » / 4> B a
0
z
• ' °m a -
10 / vV^ -
& «, wf B»4) -
- 0.01
AA
a
° O 91 o / Aspen
* ID ^P/ / & Pit 1
v Pit 2
'_
ra O © / 9 Natural Soil
-
1 e Nat. Soil Source Area -
/ / / CD Mine Fill
SI Mine Fill Source Area
Glenwood - 0 . 0 0 1 >•
o #1
—
•fy
D #2
"
.// -
./ & #3
V # 4
-
n i i i i i -
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
C v Concentration by Volume of the. Fluid Matrix
FIG. 4. Rheogram for Aspen Natural Soil (C„ = 30% Silts and Clays) with Added
Sand Concentration C„ = 14%; C tolal = 44%)
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02 >
0.01
FIG. 5. Dynamic Viscosity of Mixtures with Added Sand Particles versus Total
Volumetric Concentration
884
mudflow matrix. The viscosity of the fluid matrix increases very rapidly at
volumetric concentrations of sand in excess of 20%. Further investigation
is needed with coarser grained slurries.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
APPENDIX I. REFERENCES
886
887