VIRO Analysis
VIRO Analysis
PepsiCo can imitate easily. However, no rival apart from PepsiCo deals in such a large product range.
Were the resources, that is, application, restaurant network and delivery execution, valuable?
Yes, because they allowed Foodpanda to grow and compete in the business. A customer had the
ease of access to a variety of restaurants and enjoyed the convenience of getting their food
delivered through the application.
Through this analysis, it becomes clear that FoodPanda did not have a sustainable competitive
advantage with regard to the three most important resources in the food delivery industry, that is,
application, restaurant network and delivery execution. It had competitive parity.
ITC distribution network helps it in reaching out to more and more customers. This ensures greater
revenues for ITC Limited India. It also ensures that promotion activities translate into sales as the
products are easily available pan India. This is a valuable resource.
The competitors would require a lot of investment and time to come up with a better distribution
network than that of ITC. Such a large distribution network is possessed by very few firms in the
industry. Thus, it is a rare resource.
The distribution network of ITC is very costly and hard to imitate. Since it has been developed over
the years gradually.
The organisation is structured to leverage its distribution network. ITC has the largest market share,
and due to this, it is often able to leverage shelf space in most shops. It began its shift from tobacco
to FMCG by using its existing distribution network, as most shops that stored their tobacco products
were now storing their matchsticks, chips and biscuits as well.
Keeping these in mind, ITC’s distribution network is definitely a source of sustainable competitive
advantage for the firm.